The Role of Authority Power in Explaining Procedural Fairness Effects

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 488-502

  van Dijke, Marius ^a   De Cremer, David ^b   Mayer, David M ^c  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Charisma; OCB; Power; Procedural fairness; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; MALE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TRUST;

ADULT; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PROFESSIONAL ROLE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TRUST;

EID: 77954772408     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018921     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aguinis H., Beaty J.C., Boik R.J., Pierce C.A. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:94-107.
2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
3. Aquino K., Tripp T.M., Bies R.J. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:653-668.
4. Aryee S., Budhwar P.S., Chen Z.X. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2002, 23:267-286.
5. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
6. Begley T.M., Lee C., Hui C. Organizational level as a moderator of the relationship between justice perceptions and work-related reactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2006, 27:705-721.
7. Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 1995, 10:122-142.
8. Bies R.J., Tripp T.M. The use and abuse of power: Justice as social control. Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace 1995, 131-146. Quorum Books, Westport, CT. R.S. Cropanzano, K.M. Kacmar (Eds.).
9. Bollen K.A. Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychological Methods 2007, 12:219-228.
10. Brockner J., Ackerman G., Fairchild G. When do elements of procedural fairness make a difference? A classification of moderating influences. Advances in organizational justice 2001, 179-212. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (Eds.).
11. Choi Y., Mai-Dalton R.R. The model of followers' responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test. Leadership Quarterly 1999, 10:397-421.
12. Cohen-Charash Y., Spector P.E. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2001, 86:278-321.
13. Colquitt J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:386-400.
14. Colquitt J.A., Conlon D.E., Wesson M.J., Porter C.O.L.H., Yee K.Y. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:425-445.
15. Colquitt J.A., Greenberg J., Scott B.A. Organizational justice: Where do we stand?. Handbook of organizational justice 2005, 589-619. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Greenberg, J.A. Colquitt (Eds.).
16. Colquitt J.A., Scott B.A., LePine J.A. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92:909-927.
17. Conger J.A., Kanungo R.N. Charismatic leadership in organizations 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Crampton S.M., Wagner J.A. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology 1994, 79:67-76.
19. De Cremer D. Charismatic leadership and cooperation in social dilemmas: A matter of transforming motives?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002, 32:997-1016.
20. De Cremer D. The influence of accuracy as a function of leader's bias: The role of trustworthiness in the psychology of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:293-304.
21. De Cremer D., van Knippenberg D. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2004, 95:140-156.
22. De Cremer D., van Knippenberg D. Cooperation as a function of leader self-sacrifice, trust, and identification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 2005, 26:355-369.
23. Desmet, P., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2007, October). Can I buy trust again? Trust restoration as a function of violation type and financial compensation size. Paper presented at the 4th Workshop on Trust Within and Between Organizations, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
24. Edwards J.R., Lambert L.S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods 2007, 12:1-22.
25. Emerson R.M. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 1962, 27:31-41.
26. Evans M.G. A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1985, 36:305-323.
27. Fiske S.T. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist 1993, 48:621-628.
28. Folger R., Cropanzano R. Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. Advances in organizational justice 2001, 1-55. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (Eds.).
29. French J.R.P., Raven B. The bases of social power. Studies in social power 1959, 259-269. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI. D. Cartwright (Ed.).
30. Giacobbe-Miller J.K. A test of the group values and control models of procedural justice from the competing perspectives of labor and management. Personnel Psychology 1995, 48:115-142.
31. Goodwin S.A., Gubin A., Fiske S.T., Yzerbyt V.Y. Power can bias impression processes. Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2000, 3:227-256.
32. Grant A.M., Mayer D.M. Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:900-912.
33. Hinkin T.R., Schriesheim C.A. Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:561-567.
34. Howell R.D., Breivik E., Wilcox J.B. Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods 2007, 12:205-218.
35. Johnson J.P., Korsgaard M.A., Sapienza H.J. Perceived fairness, decision control, and commitment in international joint venture management teams. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23:1141-1160.
36. Kelman H.C. Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification and internalization. Perspectives on social power 1974, 125-177. Aldine, Chicago, IL. J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.).
37. Keltner D., Gruenfeld D.H., Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review 2003, 110:265-284.
38. Konovsky M.A., Cropanzano R. Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1991, 76:698-707.
39. Konovsky M.A., Pugh S.D. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal 1994, 37:656-669.
40. Korsgaard M.A., Schweiger D.M., Sapienza H.J. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38:60-84.
41. Kramer R.M. The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motivation and Emotion 1994, 18:199-230.
42. Kramer R.M. Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research 1996, 216-245. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R.M. Kramer, T.R. Tyler (Eds.).
43. Kramer R.M. Rethinking trust. Harvard Business Review 2009, June 1, 87:69-77.
44. Leventhal G.S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. Social exchange: Advances in theory and research 1980, 27-55. Plenum, New York, NY. K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, R.H. Willis (Eds.).
45. Lind E.A. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in organizational justice 2001, 56-88. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (Eds.).
46. MacKinnon D.P., Lockwood C.M., Hoffman J.M., West S.G., Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:83-104.
47. Martijn C., Spears R., Van der Pligt J., Jakobs E. Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality. European Journal of Social Psychology 1992, 22:453-463.
48. Masterson S.S., Lewis K., Goldman B.M., Taylor M.S. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal 2000, 43:738-748.
49. Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20:709-734.
50. McClelland G.H., Judd C.M. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:376-390.
51. McKnight D.H., Cummings L.L., Chervany N.L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23:473-490.
52. Morgeson F.P., Humphrey S.E. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:1321-1339.
53. Mossholder K.W., Bennett N., Kemery E.R., Wesolowski M.A. Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management 1998, 24:533-552.
54. Pearce C.L., Sims H.P. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2002, 6:172-197.
55. Pfeffer J. Managing with power. Politics and influence in organizations 1992, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
56. Preacher K.J., Rucker D.D., Hayes A.F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007, 42:185-227.
57. Raven B.H., Schwarzwald J., Koslowsky M. Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1998, 28:307-332.
58. Rousseau D.M., Sitkin S.B., Burt R.S., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23:393-404.
59. Rusbult C.E., Van Lange P.A.M. Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:351-375.
60. Scott D. Trust differences between men and women in superior-subordinate relationships. Group & Organization Studies 1983, 8:319-336.
61. Skarlicki D.P., Folger R. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:434-443.
62. Skarlicki D.P., Latham G.P. How can training be used to foster organizational justice?. Handbook of organizational justice 2005, 499-522. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Greenberg, J.A. Colquitt (Eds.).
63. Smith C.A., Organ D., Near J. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology 1983, 68:653-663.
64. Thibaut J., Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis 1975, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
65. Tyler T.R. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57:830-838.
66. Tyler T.R. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:375-400.
67. van Dijke M., De Cremer D. Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:85-96.
68. van Dijke M., Poppe M. Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 36:537-556.
69. Vermunt R., Wit A., van den Bos K., Lind E.A. The effects of unfair procedure on negative affect and protest. Social Justice Research 1996, 9:109-119.
70. Weber J.M., Malhotra D., Murnighan J.K. Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Research in organizational behavior 2005, 26:75-101. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. B. Staw, R.M. Kramer (Eds.).
71. Willer D., Lovaglia M.J., Markovsky B. Power and influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces 1997, 76:571-603.