Mapping the Moral Domain

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 366-385

  Graham, Jesse ^a   Nosek, Brian A ^b   Haidt, Jonathan ^b   Iyer, Ravi ^a   Koleva, Spassena ^c   Ditto, Peter H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Culture; Moral foundations; Morality; Scale validation; Values

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTUITION; MALE; MORALITY; PILOT STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUITION; JUDGMENT; MALE; MORALS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 79960801653     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021847     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Appiah K.A. Experiments in ethics 2008, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Aquino K., Reed A. The self importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:1423-1440. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423.
3. Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 350 BCE).
4. Arts W., Gelissen J. Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?. Acta Sociologica 2001, 44:283-299. doi: 10.1080/00016990152696385.
5. Barriga A.Q., Morrison E.M., Liau A.K., Gibbs J.C. Moral cognition: Explaining the gender difference in antisocial behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2001, 47:532-562. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2001.0020.
6. Burke E. Reflections on the revolution in France 1790/2003, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
7. Cialdini R.B. Influence: Science and practice 2001, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA. 4th ed.
8. Costello A.B., Osborne J.W. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 2005, 10:1-9.
9. Cushman F.A., Young L., Hauser M.D. The role of reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1082-1089.
10. Davis M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 44:113-126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
11. Dawkins R. The selfish gene 1976, Oxford University Press, London, England.
12. Douglas M. Purity and danger 1966, Routledge, London, England, doi: 10.4324/9780203361832.
13. Druschel B.A., Sherman M.F. Disgust sensitivity as a function of the Big Five and gender. Personality and Individual Differences 1999, 26:739-748. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00196-2.
14. Emler N., Renwick S., Malone B. The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45:1073-1080. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1073.
15. Fabrigar L.R., Wegener D.T., MacCallum R.C., Strahan E.J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods 1999, 4:272-299. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.
16. Fehr E., Gachter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 2002, January 10, 415:137-140. doi: 10.1038/415137a.
17. Feldman S. Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. Oxford handbook of political psychology 2003, 477-508. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. D.O. Sears, L. Huddy, R. Jervis (Eds.).
18. Fiske A.P. Four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 1992, 99:689-723. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689.
19. Gert, B. (2010). The definition of morality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/.
20. Gilligan C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development 1982, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Gough H.G. A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:1398-1405. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1398.
22. Gough H.G. A managerial potential scale for the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology 1984, 69:233-240. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.233.
23. Graham, J., Cox, K., & Casablanca, S. (2010). Moral concerns among sex workers, rural poor, urban poor, university students, and municipal dump inhabitants in Nicaragua. Manuscript in preparation.
24. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (in press). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. New York, NY: APA Books.
25. Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B.A. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:1029-1046.
26. Graham J., Haidt J., Rimm-Kaufman S.E. Ideology and intuition in moral education. European Journal of Developmental Science 2008, 2:269-286.
27. Greene J.D., Cushman F.A., Stewart L.E., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L.E., Cohen J.D. Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition 2009, 111:364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.001.
28. Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001, September 14, 293:2105-2108. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872.
29. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 2001, 108:814-834. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.
30. Haidt J. Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2008, 3:65-72.
31. Haidt, J., Darley, J., & Gromet, D. (2009). The Progressive and Traditional Justice Scale. Manuscript in preparation.
32. Haidt J., Graham J. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research 2007, 20:98-116. doi: 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z.
33. Haidt J., Hersh M. Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2001, 31:191-221. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02489.x.
34. Haidt J., Joseph C. Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues [Special issue]. Daedalus 2004, 133:55-66. doi: 10.1162/0011526042365555.
35. Haidt J., Joseph C. The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The innate mind 2007, 3:367-391. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, S. Stich (Eds.).
36. Haidt J., Kesebir S. Morality. Handbook of social psychology 2010, 797-832. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. 5th ed. S.T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
37. Haidt J., Koller S., Dias M. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:613-628. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613.
38. Haidt J., McCauley C., Rozin P. Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences 1994, 16:701-713. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7.
39. Hauser M. Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong 2006, HarperCollins, New York, NY.
40. Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations 2001, Sage, New York, NY.
41. Hogan R., Johnson J.A., Emler N.P. A socioanalytic theory of moral development. New directions for child development: Moral development 1978, 2:1-18. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. W. Damon (Ed.).
42. Hogan R., Nicholson R.A. The meaning of personality test scores. American Psychologist 1988, 43:621-626. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.621.
43. Hollos M., Leis P., Turiel E. Social reasoning in Ijo children and adolescents in Nigerian communities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1986, 17:352-374. doi: 10.1177/0022002186017003007.
44. Iyer R. Robustness of liberal-conservative Moral Foundations Questionnaire differences 2009, Retrieved from http://www.polipsych.com/2009/09/18/robustness-of-liberal-conservative-moral-foundations-questionnaire-differences/.
45. James W. The meaning of truth: A sequel to pragmatism 1998, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, (Original work published 1907).
46. Jensen L.A. Moral divisions within countries between orthodoxy and progressivism: India and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1998, 37:90-107. doi: 10.2307/1388031.
47. John O.P., Soto C.J. The importance of being valid: Reliability and the process of construct validation. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology 2007, 461-494. Guilford Press, New York, NY. R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, R.F. Krueger (Eds.).
48. John O.P., Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 1999, 102-138. Guilford Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. L.A. Pervin, O.P. John (Eds.).
49. Jost J.T. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist 2006, 61:651-670. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651.
50. Joyce R. The evolution of morality 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
51. Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1797).
52. Kohlberg L. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. Handbook of socialization theory and research 1969, 347-480. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL. D.A. Goslin (Ed.).
53. Kohlberg L. From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. Cognitive development and epistemology 1971, 151-235. Academic Press, New York, NY. T. Mischel (Ed.).
54. Koleva, S., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2010). The ties that bind: How five moral intuitions (especially about purity) organize culture war attitudes. Manuscript under review.
55. Lakoff G. Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think 1996, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
56. Larue G.A. Ancient ethics. A companion to ethics 1991, 29-40. Blackwell, Malden, MA. P. Singer (Ed.).
57. Levenson M.R., Kiehl K.A., Fitzpatrick C.M. Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:151-158. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.151.
58. Marcus G. The birth of the mind 2004, Basic, New York, NY.
59. Mauss M. The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies 1990, Routledge, London, England, (Original work published 1924).
60. Mill J.S. On liberty 2003, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, (Original work published 1859).
61. Moll J., Krueger F., Zahn R., Pardini M., de Oliveira-Souza R., Grafman J. Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2006, 103:15623-15628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604475103.
62. Muller J.Z. What is conservative social and political thought?. Conservatism: An anthology of social and political thought from David Hume to the present 1997, 3-31. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. J.Z. Muller (Ed.).
63. Nisbett R.E., Wilson T.D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 1977, 84:231-259. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.
64. Olatunji B.O., Haidt J., McKay D., David B. Core, animal reminder, and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioral, physiological, and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality 2008, 42:1243-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.009.
65. Pincoffs E.L. Quandaries and virtues: Against reductivism in ethics 1986, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
66. Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:741-763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
67. Puka B. The great justice debate: Kohlberg criticism. Moral development: A compendium 1994, 4. Routledge, New York, NY.
68. Rest J., Narvaez D., Thoma S.J., Bebeau M.J. DIT2: Devising and testing a new instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, 91:644-659. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.644.
69. Rohan M.J. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2000, 4:255-277. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4.
70. Rokeach M. The nature of human values 1973, Free Press, New York, NY.
71. Rozin P. Domain denigration and process preference in academic psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2006, 1:365-376.
72. Rozin P., Haidt J., McCauley C.R. Disgust. Handbook of emotions 2000, 637-653. Guilford Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. M. Lewis, J. Haviland (Eds.).
73. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values. Advances in experimental social psychology 1992, 25:1-65. Academic Press, New York, NY. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
74. Schwartz S.H. Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2007, 38:711-728. doi: 10.1177/0022022107308992.
75. Sears D.O. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow database on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:515-530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515.
76. Shweder R.A. Liberalism as destiny. Contemporary Psychology 1982, 27:421-424.
77. Shweder R.A., Mahapatra M., Miller J. Culture and moral development. The emergence of morality in young children 1987, 1-83. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. J. Kagan, S. Lamb (Eds.).
78. Shweder R.A., Much N.C., Mahapatra M., Park L. The " big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the " big three" explanations of suffering. Morality and health 1997, 119-169. Routledge, New York, NY. A. Brandt, P. Rozin (Eds.).
79. Singer P. Practical ethics 1979, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
80. Smith, C., & Vaisey, S. (2010). Charitable giving and moral foundations in a nationally-representative sample. Manuscript in preparation, University of North Carolina.
81. Sowell T. A conflict of visions: The ideological origins of political struggles 2002, Basic, New York, NY.
82. Sullivan E.V. A study of Kohlberg's structural theory of moral development: A critique of liberal social science ideology. Human Development 1977, 20:352-376. doi: 10.1159/000271568.
83. Tetlock P.E., Kristel O., Elson B., Green M., Lerner J. The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:853-870. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853.
84. Triandis H.C. Individualism and collectivism 1995, Westview, Boulder, CO.
85. Trivers R.L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 1971, 46:35-57. doi: 10.1086/406755.
86. Turiel E. The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
87. Turiel E., Hildebrandt C., Wainryb C. Judging social issues: Difficulties, inconsistencies, and consistencies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1991, 56:1-116. doi: 10.2307/1166056.
88. Wilson T.D. Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious 2002, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
89. Zakrisson I. Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences 2005, 39:863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026.