Procedural Justice and System-Justifying Motivations

Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Feygina, Irina ^a   Tyler, Tom R ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Authority legitimacy; Conservatism; Justice; Liberalism; Procedural justice; System justification

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958095628     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Allison, S. T., McQueen, L. R., & Schaerfl, L. M. (1992). Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resources. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 23-42.
2. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Hafer, C. L. (2000). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165-173.
4. Haines, E., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219-236.
5. Herlocker, C. E., Allison, S. T., Foubert, J. D., & Beggan, J. K. (1997). Intended and unintended overconsumption of physical, spatial, and temporal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 992-1004.
6. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397-424.
7. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
8. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
9. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
10. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265.
11. Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
13. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 305-358.
14. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim-derogation and victim-enhancement as alternate routes to system-justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246.
15. Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493-520). New York: Guilford Press.
16. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
17. Lau, G. P., Kay, A. C., & Spencer, S. J. (2008). Loving those who justify inequality: The effects of system threat on attraction to women who embody benevolent sexist ideals. Psychological Science, 19, 20-21.
18. Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
19. Lind, E. A., & Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19-29.
20. Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P., & Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why are we fairer than others? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480-500.
21. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1996). The power of the myth of self-interest. In L. Montade & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 25-48). New York: Plenum.
22. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53-62.
23. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
24. Schroth, H. A., & Shah, P. P. (2000). Procedures: Do we really want to know them? An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 462-471.
25. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 555-589.
26. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Governing amid diversity: Can fair decision-making procedures bridge competing public interests and values? Law and Society Review, 28, 701-722.
28. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-344.
29. Tyler, T. R. (2000). Multiculturalism and the willingness of citizens to defer to law and to legal authorities. Law and Social Inquiry, 25(3), 983-1019.
30. Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.
32. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
33. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1996). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
34. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.
35. Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. (2007). Psychology and the law: Reconciling normative and descriptive accounts of social justice and system legitimacy. In T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd ed., pp. 807-825. New York: Guilford.
36. Tyler, T. R., & McGraw, K. (1986). Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 115-128.
37. Tyler, T. R., & Mitchell, G. (1994). Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: The United States Supreme Court and abortion rights. Duke Law Journal, 43, 703-814.
38. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1-60.
39. Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274.
40. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.