Ethanol production in Brazil: a bridge between science and industry

Brazilian Journal of Microbiology

Volumn 47, Issue , 2016, Pages 64-76

  Lopes, Mario Lucio ^a   Paulillo, Silene Cristina de Lima ^a   Godoy, Alexandre ^a   Cherubin, Rudimar Antonio ^a   Lorenzi, Marcel Salmeron ^a   Giometti, Fernando Henrique Carvalho ^a   Bernardino, Claudemir Domingues ^a   de Amorim Neto, Henrique Berbert ^a   de Amorim, Henrique Vianna ^a  

^a FERMENTEC LTDA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Distillery; Ethanol; Fermentation; Yeast

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; BIOFUEL;

BRAZIL; FERMENTATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; YEAST;

BIOFUELS; BRAZIL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HUMANS; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; YEASTS;

EID: 85004045060     PISSN: 15178382     EISSN: 16784405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.003     Document Type: Review

References (136)

1. 1 Amorim, H.V., Lopes, M.L., Ethanol production in a petroleum dependent world. Sugar J 67 (2005), 11–14.
2. 2 Potter, N.I., How Brazil achieved energy independence and the lessons the United States should learn from Brazil's experience. Wash U Glob Stud Law Rev 7:2 (2008), 331–351 Available from: http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol7/iss2/7.
3. 3 Olympio, K.P.K., Gonçalves, C., Günther, W.M.R., Bechara, E.J.H., Neurotoxicity and aggressiveness triggered by low-level lead in children: a review. Pan Am J Public Health 26:3 (2009), 266–275.
4. 4 Goldemberg, J., The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnol Biofuels, 1, 2008, 6.
5. 5 Anfavea, Brazilian automotive industry yearbook. 2016, Brazilian Automotive Indus-try Association Available from: http://www.anfavea.com.br/anuario2016/anuario2016.zip.
6. 6 Macedo, I.C., Seabra, J.E.A., Silva, J.E., Greenhouse gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass Bioenergy, 32, 2008, 4.
7. 7 Pasha, C., Rao, L.V., Thermotolerant yeasts for bioethanol production using lignocellulosic substrates. Satyanarayana, T., Kunze, G., (eds.) Yeast biotechnology: diversity, 2009, Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 551–558.
8. 8 Goldemberg, J., Sugarcane ethanol: strategies to a successful program in Brazil. Lee, J.W., (eds.) Advanced biofuels and bioproducts, 2013, Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 13–20.
9. 9 Hidzir, N.S., Som, A.S., Abdullah, Z., Ethanol production via direct hydration of ethylene: a review. International conference on global sustainability and chemical engineering (ICGSE), 2014 Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277957681_Ethanol_Production_via_Direct_Hydration_of_Ethylene_A_review.
10. 10 Radecka, D., Mukherjee, V., Mateo, R.Q., Stojiljkovic, M., Foulquie-Moreno, M.R., Thevelein, J.M., Looking beyond Saccharomyces: the potential of non-conventional yeast species for desirable traits in bioethanol fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res, 15, 2015, 10.1093/femsyr/fov053.
11. 11 Rokem, J.S., Greenblatt, C.L., Making biofuels competitive: the limitations of biology for fuel production. JSM Microbiol, 3(2), 2015, 1023.
12. 12 Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Lindén, T., Senac, T., Skoog, K., Ethanolic fermentation of pentoses in lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28–29 (1991), 131–144.
13. 13 Jones, A.M., Thomas, K.C., Ingledew, W.M., Ethanolic fermentation of blackstrap molasses and sugarcane juice using very high gravity technology. J Agric Food Chem 42:5 (1994), 1242–1246.
14. 14 Silva, G.P., Araújo, E.F., Silva, D.O., Guimarães, W.V., Ethanolic fermentation of sucrose, sugarcane juice and molasses by Escherichia coli strain ko11 and Klebsiella oxytoca strain P2. Braz J Microbiol 36:4 (2005), 395–404.
15. 15 Madaleno, L.L., Minari, G.D., Annunzio, F.R., et al. Use of antimicrobials for contamination control during ethanolic fermentation. Científica 44:2 (2016), 226–234.
16. 16 Monceaux, D.A., Alternative feedstocks for fuel ethanol production. Ingledew, W.M., Kelsall, D.R., Austin, G.D., Kluhspies, C., (eds.) The alcohol textbook. A reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, 5th ed., 2009, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 47–57.
17. 17 Wang, F., Jiang, Y., Guo, W., et al. An environmentally friendly and productive process for bioethanol production from potato waste. Biotechnol Biofuels, 9, 2016, 50.
18. 18 Amorim, H.V., Lopes, M.L., Tecnologia sobre processamento de leveduras vivas, inativas e seus derivados: conceitos básicos. Congresso Internacional Sobre uso da Levedura na Alimentação Animal, 2009, CBNA, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, 5–20 [in Portuguese].
19. 4 plant biology. 1999, Elsevier, San Diego.
20. 20 Wang, M., Han, J., Dunn, J.B., Cai, H., Elgowainy, A., Well-to wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environ Res Lett, 7, 2012, 045905.
21. 21 Wheals, A.E., Basso, L.C., Alves, D.M.G., Amorim, H.V., Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biotechnol 17 (1999), 482–487.
22. 22 Amorim, H.V., Lopes, M.L., Oliveira, J.V.C., Buckeridge, M., Goldman, G.H., Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:5 (2011), 1267–1275.
23. 23 Bhatia, S.C., Ethanol. Bhatia, S.C., (eds.) Advanced renewable energy systems. Part I, 2014, Woodhead Publishing India PVT LTD, New Delhi, 523–572.
24. 24 Larson, E.D., A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuels systems for the transport sector. Energy Sustain Dev 10:2 (2006), 109–126.
25. 25 Coelho, S.T., Goldemberg, J., Lucon, O., Guardabassi, P., Brazilian sugarcane ethanol: lessons learned. Energy Sustain Dev 10:2 (2006), 26–39.
26. 26 Basso, L.C., Amorim, H.V., Oliveira, A.J., Lopes, M.L., Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 8 (2008), 1155–1163.
27. 27 Amorim, H.V., Gryschek, M., Lopes, M.L., The success and sustainability of the Brazilian sugarcane–fuel ethanol industry. Eggleston, G., (eds.) Sustainability of the sugar and sugar ethanol industries ACS symposium series; vol. 1058, 2010, American Chemical Society, Washington, 73–82.
28. 28 Della-Bianca, B.E., Basso, T.O., Stambuk, B.U., Basso, L.C., Gombert, A.K., What do we know about the yeast strains from the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry?. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97 (2013), 979–991.
29. 29 Borges, E.P., Lopes, M.L., Bernardino, C., et al. The benefits of applied research: 37 years of discoveries, adaptations and solutions. Sugar Ind 140:4 (2015), 209–216.
30. 30 Bertrand, E., Vandenberghe, L.P.S., Soccol, C.R., Sigoillot, J.C., Faulds, C., First generation bioethanol. Soccol, C.R., Brar, S.K., Faulds, C., Ramos, L.P., (eds.) Green fuels technology, 2016, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 175–212.
31. 31 Boinot F. Process for carrying out industrial alcoholic fermentations. United States Patent Office PI 2,230,318; 1941. Available from: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US2230318.pdf.
32. 32 Ingledew, W.M., Austin, G.D., Kelsall, D.R., Kluhspies, C., The alcohol industry: how has it changed and matured?. Ingledew, W.M., Austin, G.D., Kelsall, D.R., Kluhspies, C, (eds.) The alcohol textbook. A reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, 2009, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 1–6.
33. 33 Lima, U.A., Basso, L.C., Amorim, H.V., Produção de etanol. Aquarone, U.A., Borzani, E., Schmidell, W., (eds.) Biotecnologia Industrial: processos fermentativos e enzimáticos, 2001, Editora Edgard Blucher, São Paulo, 1–43 [chapter 3].
34. 34 Martinez-Amezcua, C., Parsons, C.M., Singh, V., Srinivasan, R., Murthy, G.S., Nutritional characteristics of corn distillers dried grains with solubles as affected by the amounts of grains versus solubles and different processing techniques. Poult Sci 86:12 (2007), 2624–2630.
35. 35 Prado, R.M., Caione, G., Campos, C.N.S., Filter cake and vinasse as fertilizers contributing to conservation agriculture. Appl Environ Soil Sci, 2013, 581984, 10.1155/2013/581984.
36. 36 Amorim, H.V., Basso, L.C., Lopes, M.L., Sugar cane juice and molasses, beet molasses and sweet sorghum: composition and usage. Ingledew, W.M., Austin, G.D., Kelsall, D.R., Kluhspies, C, (eds.) The alcohol textbook: a reference for the beverage, fuel, and industrial alcohol industries, 2009, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 39–46.
37. 37 Godoy, A., Amorim, H.V., Lopes, M.L., Oliveira, A.J., Continuous and batch fermentation processes: advantages and disadvantages of these processes in the Brazilian ethanol production. Int Sugar J 110:1311 (2008), 175–181.
38. 38 Andrietta, M.G.S., Andrietta, S.R., Steckelberg, C., Stupiello, E.N.A., Bioethanol – 30 years of Proálcool. Int Sugar J 109 (2007), 195–200.
39. 39 Barnett, J.A., Lichtenthaler, F.W., A history of research on yeasts 3: Emil Fischer, Eduard Buchner and their contemporaries, 1880–1900. Yeast 18 (2001), 363–388.
40. 40 Laluce, C., Palmieri, M.C., Cruz, C.L., Growth and fermentation characteristics of new selected strains of Saccharomyces at high temperatures and high cell densities. Biotechnol Bioeng 37:6 (1990), 528–536.
41. 41 Dorta, C., Oliva-Neto, P., de-Abreu-Neto, M.S., Nicolau-Junior, N., Nagashima, A.I., Synergism among lactic acid, sulfite, pH and ethanol in alcoholic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PE-2 and M-26). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:2 (2006), 177–182.
42. 42 Brown, N.A., Castro, P.A., Figueiredo, B.C.P., et al. Transcriptional profiling of Brazilian Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains selected for semi-continuous fermentation of sugarcane must. FEMS Yeast Res 13:3 (2013), 277–290.
43. 43 Reis, V.R., Bassi, A.P.G., da Silva, J.C.G., Ceccato-Antonini, S.R., Characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts exhibiting rough colonies and pseudohyphal morphology with respect to alcoholic fermentation. Braz J Microbiol 44:4 (2013), 1121–1131.
44. 44 Ferreira, L.V., Amorim, H.V., Basso, L.C., Fermentação de trealose e glicogênio endógenos em Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ciênc Tecnol Alim 19:10 (1999), 29–32 [in Portuguese].
45. 45 Paulillo, S.C.L., Yokoya, F., Basso, L.C., Mobilization of endogenous glycogen and trehalose of industrial yeasts. Braz J Microbiol 34:3 (2003), 249–254.
46. 46 Panek, A.C., Mansure, J.J.A., Paschoalin, M.F., Panek, D., Regulation of trehalose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants during temperature shifts. Biochemie 72 (1990), 77–79.
47. 47 D'Amore, T., Crumplen, R., Stewart, G.G., The involvement of trehalose in yeast stress tolerance. J Ind Microbiol 7:3 (1991), 191–195.
48. 48 Basso, L.C., Alves, D.M.G., Amorim, H.V., The antibacterial action of succinic acid produced by yeast during fermentation. Rev Microbiol 28:suppl 1 (1997), 77–82.
49. 49 Alves, D.M.G., Respostas fisiológicas de duas linhagens de Saccharomyces cerevisiae frente ao potássio durante a fermentação alcoólica. [PhD thesis], 2000, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita”, Rio Claro 118 pp. [in Portuguese].
50. 50 Walker, G.M., Yeast physiology and biotechnology. 1998, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
51. 51 Watrud, L.S., Martin, K., Donegan, K.K., Stone, J.K., Coleman, C.G., Comparison of taxonomic, colony morphotype and PCR-RFLP methods to characterize microfungal diversity. Mycologia 98:3 (2006), 384–392.
52. 52 Gimeno, C.J., Fink, G.R., Induction of pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of PHD1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene related to transcriptional regulators of fungal development. Mol Cell Biol 14:3 (1994), 2100–2112.
53. 53 Ceccato-Antonini, S.R., Sudbery, P.E., Filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Braz J Microbiol 35:3 (2004), 173–181.
54. 54 Lopes, M.L., Paulillo, S.C.L., Cherubin, R.A., Godoy, A., Amorim Neto, H.B., Amorim, H.V., Tailored-yeast strains for ethanol production: process-driven selection. 2015 Available from: http://fermentec.com.br/downloads/eBook_-_Tailored_yeast_strains_selected_for_ethanol_production_-_Fermentec.pdf.
55. 55 Vezinhet, F., Blondin, B., Hallet, J.N., Chromosomal DNA patterns and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism as tools for identification of enological strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 32:5 (1990), 568–571.
56. 56 Vezinhet, F., Hallet, J.N., Valade, M., Poulard, A., Ecological survey of wine yeast strains by molecular methods of identification. Am J Enol Viticult 43:1 (1992), 83–86.
57. 57 Basso, L.C., Oliveira, A.J., Orelli, V.F.M., Campos, A.A., Gallo, C.R., Amorim, H.V., Dominância das leveduras contaminantes sobre as cepas industriais avaliada pela técnica da cariotipagem. V Congr Nac STAB 5 (1993), 246–250 [in Portuguese].
58. 58 Zolan, M.E., Chromosome-length polymorphism in fungi. Microbiol Rev 59:4 (1995), 686–698.
59. 59 Codón, A.C., Benítez, T., Korhola, M., Chromosomal reorganization during meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Baker's yeasts. Curr Genet 32:4 (1997), 247–259.
60. 60 Codón, A.C., Benítez, T., Korhola, M., Chromosomal polymorphism and adaptation to specific industrial environments of Saccharomyces strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:2 (1998), 154–163.
61. 61 Amorim, H.V., Lopes, M.L., Ciência e tecnologia na seleção de leveduras para produção de etanol. Almeida, J.R., (eds.) Microrganismos em Agroenergia: da Prospecção aos Bioprocessos, 2013, Embrapa Agroenergia, Brasília, 42–59 Available from: http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/95339/1/DOC15-19-12-2013.pdf [in Portuguese].
62. 62 Benítez, T., Martínez, P., Codón, A.C., Genetic constitution of industrial yeast. Microbiologia 12:3 (1996), 371–384.
63. 63 Lopes, M.L., Estudo do polimorfismo cromossômico em Saccharomyces cerevisiae (linhagem PE-2) utilizada no processo industrial de produção de etanol. [PhD thesis], 2000, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” UNESP, Rio Claro, 118 [in Portuguese].
64. 64 López, V., Querol, A., Ramo, D., Fernandez-Espinar, M.T., A simplified procedure to analyse mitochondrial DNA from industrial yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 68 (2001), 75–81.
65. 65 Birky, W.C. Jr., The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: laws, mechanisms, and models. Annu Rev Genet 35 (2001), 125–148 http://www.math.uci.edu/∼brusso/Birky[35].pdf.
66. 66 Argueso, J.L., Carazzolle, M.F., Mieczkowski, P.A., Duarte, F.M., Netto, O.V.C., Missawa, S.K., Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res 19 (2009), 2258–2270.
67. 67 Stambuk, B.U., Dunn, B., Alves Junior, S.L., Duval, E.H., Sherlock, G., Industrial fuel ethanol yeasts contain adaptive copy number changes in genes involved in vitamin B1 and B6 biosynthesis. Genome Res 19 (2009), 2271–2278.
68. 68 Babrzadeh, F., Jalili, R., Wang, C., et al. Whole-genome sequencing of the efficient industrial fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CAT-1. Mol Genet Genomics 6 (2012), 485–494.
69. 69 Lachance, M.A., Yeast biodiversity: how many and how much?. Rosa, C.A., Gabor, P., (eds.) Biodiversity and ecophysiology of yeasts, 2006, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg [chapter 1].
70. 70 Ramos, C.L., Duarte, W.F., Freire, A.L., Dias, D.R., Eleutherio, E.C.A., Schwan, R.F., Evaluation of stress tolerance and fermentative behavior of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Braz J Microbiol 44:3 (2013), 935–944.
71. 71 Amorim, H.V., Oliveira, A.J., Infecção na fermentação: como evitá-la. Açúcar Álcool 5 (1982), 12–18 [in Portuguese].
72. 72 Lucena, B.T., dos Santos, B.M., Moreira, J.L., et al. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria of the bioethanol process. BMC Microbiol, 10, 2010, 298.
73. 73 Oliveira, M.C.F.L., Pagnocca, F.C., Aplicabilidade de meios seletivos empregados na indústria cervejeira para detecção de leveduras selvagens em unidades sucroalcooleiras. Simpósio Nacional de Fermentação, VIII, 1988, Sinaferm, São Lourenço, 78–81 [in Portuguese].
74. 74 Stroppa, C.T., Dinâmica Populacional de leveduras caracterizadas por eletro–cariótipo e desempenho fermentativo em processos de fermentação alcoólica. [PhD thesis], 2002, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 133 [in Portuguese].
75. 75 Liberal, A.T.D., Basilio, A.C.M., Resende, A.D., et al. Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. J Appl Microbiol 102:2 (2007), 538–547.
76. 76 Basilio, A.C.M., de Araujo, P.R.L., de Morais, J.O.F., de Silva, E.A., de Morais, M.A., Simoes, D.A., Detection and identification of wild yeast contaminants of the industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process. Curr Microbiol 56:4 (2008), 322–326.
77. 77 Figueiredo, C.M., Análise molecular da floculação e da formação de espuma por leveduras utilizadas na produção industrial de álcool combustível no Brasil. [Master dissertation], 2008, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 82 https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/91054/252707.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [in Portuguese].
78. 78 Shimoi, H., Sakamoto, K., Okuda, M., Atthi, R., Iwashita, K., Ito, K., The AWA1 gene is required for the foam-forming phenotype and cell surface hydrophobicity of sake yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4 (2002), 2018–2025.
79. 79 Costa, O.Y.A., Souto, B.M., Tupinambá, D.D., et al. Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery a culture-independent method. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42:1 (2015), 73–84.
80. 80 Souza, R.S.C., Okura, V.K., Armanhi, J.S.L., et al. Unlocking the bacterial and fungal communities assemblages of sugarcane microbiome. Sci Rep, 6, 2016, 28774, 10.1038/srep28774.
81. 81 Oliva-Neto, P., Yokoya, F., Effects of nutritional factors on growth of Lactobacillus fermentum mixed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in alcoholic fermentation. Rev Microbiol 28:1 (1997), 25–31.
82. 82 Ludwig, K.M., Oliva-Neto, P., Angelis, D.F., Quantificação da floculação de Saccharomyces cerevisiae por bactérias contaminantes da fermentação alcoólica. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment 21:1 (2001), 63–68 [in Portuguese].
83. 83 Lopes, M.L., Amorim, H.V., Godoy, A., Oliveira, A.J., Cherubin, R.A., Basso, L.C., Interaction between yeast and acetic acid bacteria in industrial fermentation for ethanol production: a case study. 11th International Congress on Yeasts; vol. 1, Rio de Janeiro, 2004, 183.
84. 84 Gallo, C.R., Determinação da microbiota bacteriana de mosto e de dornas de fermentação alcoólica. [PhD thesis], 1989, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 387 http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=000038046&fd=y [in Portuguese].
85. 85 Meneghin, S.P., Reis, F.C., Almeida, P.G., Ceccato-Antonini, S.R., Chlorine dioxide against bacteria and yeasts from the alcoholic fermentation. Braz J Microbiol 39:2 (2008), 337–343.
86. 86 Oliva-Neto, P., Yokoya, F., Susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria from the alcohol industry to several antimicrobial compounds. Braz J Microbiol 32:1 (2001), 10–14.
87. 87 Madigan, M.T., Martinko, J.H., Bender, K.S., Buckley, D.H., Stahl, D.A., Brock biology of microorganisms. 2015, Pearson, Boston, 1041.
88. 88 Costa, V.M., Basso, T.O., Angeloni, L.H.P., Oetterer, M., Basso, L.C., Production of acetic acid, ethanol and optical isomers of lactic acid by Lactobacillus strains isolated from industrial ethanol fermentations. Cienc Agrotecnol 32:2 (2008), 503–509.
89. 89 Eggleston, G., Legendre, B., Tew, T., Indicators of freeze-damage sugarcane varieties which can predict processing problems. Food Chem 87 (2004), 119–133.
90. 90 Eggleston, G., Basso, L.C., de Amorim, H.V., Paulillo, S.C.D., Basso, T.O., Mannitol as a sensitive indicator of sugarcane deterioration and bacterial contamination in fuel alcohol production. Zuckerindustrie 132:1 (2007), 33–39.
91. 91 Basso, T.O., Gomes, F.S., Lopes, M.L., Amorim, H.V., Eggleston, G., Basso, L.C., Homo- and heterofermentative lactobacilli differently affect sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 105 (2014), 169–177.
92. 92 Alcarde, V.E., Avaliação de parâmetros que afetam a floculação de leveduras e bactérias isoladas de processos industriais de fermentação alcoólica. [PhD thesis], 2001, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 91 [in Portuguese].
93. 93 Yokoya, F., Oliva-Neto, P., Características da floculação de leveduras por Lactobacillus fermentum. Rev Microbiol 22:1 (1991), 12–16 [in Portuguese].
94. 94 Cherubin, R.A., Efeitos da viabilidade da levedura e da contaminação bacteriana na fermentação alcoólica. [PhD thesis], 2003, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Piracicaba, 137 [in Portuguese].
95. 95 Gans, J., Wolinsky, M., Dunbar, J., Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309:5739 (2005), 1387–1390.
96. 96 Stupiello, J.P., Complexo broca/podridões: avaliação-interpretação da intensidade de dano e efeitos no processamento de álcool. Rev STAB – Açúcar Álcool Subprod, 17(5), 1999 [in Portuguese].
97. 97 Paulillo, S.C.L., Borges, E.P., Costa, V.M., et al. Bactérias malolácticas na fermentação alcoólica. Anais dos Resumos do 25° Congresso Brasileiro de Microbiologia, 2009 ID 63.1 [in Portuguese].
98. 98 Kolb, S., Otte, H., Nagel, B., Schink, B., Energy conservation in malolactic fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus sake. Arch Microbiol 157:5 (1992), 457–463.
99. 99 Gutierrez, L.E., Ferrari, S.E., Orelli, A.A. Jr., Ácidos orgânicos de caldo de três variedades de cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum spp) em quatro estádios de maturidade. An Esc Super Agric Luiz Queiroz 46:1 (1989), 41–52 [in Portuguese].
100. 100 Abreu-Cavalheiro, A., Monteiro, G., Solving ethanol production problems with genetically modified yeast strains. Braz J Microbiol 44:3 (2013), 665–671.
101. 101 Borsatto, J.L. Jr., Souza, R.F., Weiss Lass, Dal Vesco, D.G., Ensaio teórico sobre viabilidade da produção de etanol a partir do milho: uma possibilidade para as usinas sucroalcooleiras e produtores de grãos do estado de Mato Grosso. Annals of IV international symposium on project management, innovation and sustainability, 2015 Available from: http://www.singep.org.br/4singep/resultado/319.pdf.
102. 102 Corrigan, M.E., Mass, R.A., Utilisation of distiller's dried grains with solubles (DGGS) by cattle. Ingledew, W.M., Austin, G.D., Kelsall, D.R., Kluhspies, C, (eds.) The alcohol textbook. A reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, 5th ed., 2009, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 323–335.
103. 103 Fermentec Tecnologias em Açúcar e Álcool Ltda, Processo de reaproveitamento de biomassa de levedo na integração de fermentações alcoólicas de cana e substratos amiláceo. 2015 BR 10 2015 021056 6 [in Portuguese].
104. 104 Milanez, A.Y., Nyko, D., Valente, M.S., et al. A produção de etanol pela integração do milho-safrinha às usinas de cana-de-açúcar: avaliação ambiental, econômica e sugestões de política. Rev BNDES 41 (2014), 147–208 http://www.bndes.gov.br/SiteBNDES/export/sites/default/bndes_pt/Galerias/Arquivos/conhecimento/revista/rev4104.pdf [in Portuguese].
105. 105 Kang, A., Lee, T.S., Converting sugars to biofuels: ethanol and beyond. Bioengineering 2 (2015), 184–203.
106. 106 Pereira, N. Jr., Couto, M.A.P.G., Santa Anna, L.M.M., Pereira, N. Jr., Couto, M.A.P.G., Santa Anna, L.M.M., (eds.) Biomass of lignocellulosic composition for fuel ethanol production within the context of biorefinery, 2008, Rio de Janeiro Available from: http://www.ladebio.org.br/download/series-em-biotecnologia-vol-ii-lignocellulosic-biomass.pdf.
107. 107 Mariano, A.P., Dias, M.O.S., Junqueira, T.L., et al. Utilization of pentoses from sugarcane biomass: techno-economics of biogas vs. butanol production. Bioresour Technol 142 (2013), 390–399.
108. 108 Natalense, J., Désirée, Z., Technology roadmapping for renewable fuels: case of biobutanol in Brazil. J Technol Manag Innov 8:4 (2013), 143–152.
109. 109 Pang, Z.W., Lu, W., Zhang, H., et al. Butanol production employing fed-batch fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum GX01 using alkali-pretreated sugarcane bagasse hydrolysed by enzymes from Thermoascus aurantiacus QS 7-2-4. Bioresour Technol 212 (2016), 82–91.
110. 110 Silva, E.A., Melo, W.F., Antunes, D.F., et al. Isolation by genetic and physiological characteristics of a fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with potential for genetic manipulation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32:10 (2005), 481–486.
111. 111 Basso, T.P., Improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by hybridization for increased tolerance towards inhibitors from second-generation ethanol substrate. [PhD thesis], 2015, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Piracicaba 104 pp.
112. 112 Scully, S.M., Orlygsson, J., Recent advances in second generation ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria. Energies 8 (2015), 1–30.
113. 113 Ramos, J.L., Valdivia, M., Garcia-Lorente, F., Segura, A., Benefits and perspectives on the use of biofuels. Microb Biotechnol 9:4 (2016), 436–440.
114. 114 Silva, R., Lago, E.S., Merheb, C.W., Macchione, M.M., Park, Y.K., Gomes, E., Production of xylanase and cmcase on solid state fermentation in different residues by Thermoascus aurantiacus Miehe. Braz J Microbiol 36 (2005), 235–241.
115. 115 Moretti, M.M.S., Bocchini-Martins, D.A., Silva, R., Rodrigues, A., Sette, L.D., Gomes, E., Selection of thermophilic and thermotolerant fungi for the production of cellulases and xylanases under solid-state fermentation. Braz J Microbiol 43:3 (2012), 1062–1071.
116. 116 Vásquez, M.P., da Silva, J.N., de Souza, M.B. Jr., Pereira, N. Jr., Enzymatic hydrolysis optimization to ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137–140:1–12 (2007), 141–153.
117. 117 Ferreira, V., Faber, M.O., Mesquita, S.S., Pereira, N. Jr., Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process of different cellulosic substrates using a recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring the β-glucosidase gene. Electron J Biotechnol, 13(2), 2010, 10.2225/vol13-issue2-fulltext-1.
118. 118 Benassi, V.M., de Lucas, R.C., Jorge, J.A., Polizeli, M.L.T.M., Screening of thermotolerant and thermophilic fungi aiming β-xylosidase and arabinanase production. Braz J Microbiol 45:4 (2014), 1459–1467.
119. 119 You, Y., Yang, S., Bu, L., Jiang, J., Sun, D., Comparative study of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation byproducts from sugarcane bagasse using steam explosion, alkaline hydrogen peroxide and organosolv pretreatments. RSC Adv 6 (2016), 13723–13729.
120. 120 Wanderley, M.C.A., Martín, C., Rochad, G.J.M., Gouveia, E.R., Increase in ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse based on combined pretreatments and fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 128 (2013), 448–453.
121. 121 Buckeridge, M.S., Santos, W.D., Souza, A.P., Routes for cellulosic ethanol in Brazil. Cortez, L.A.B., (eds.) Sugarcane bioethanol — R&D for productivity and sustainability, 2014, Editora Edgard Blucher, São Paulo, 365–380.
122. 122 Romano, F.P., Benefícios econômicos do aumento do teor alcoólico no vinho de fermentação. [Monography], 2015, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Piracicaba 48 pp. [in Portuguese].
123. 123 Almeida, J.R., Ranzani, G., Valsechi, O., Contribuition à 1’étude de la vinasse dans l'Agriculture. VIII Congr Int Ind Agric 1 (1950), 13–21.
124. 124 Christofoletti, C.A., Escher, J.P., Correia, J.E., Marinho, J.F.U., Fontanetti, C.S., Sugarcane vinasse: environmental implications of its use. Waste Manage 33:12 (2013), 2752–2761.
125. 125 Germek, H.A., Feigl, G.E., Processo de redução de vinhaça. Rev STAB Açúcar Álcool Subprod 2 (1987), 42–50 [in Portuguese].
126. 126 Silva, G.A., Possibilidades tecnológicas para a destinação da vinhaça de cana-de-açúcar quanto ao aspecto de desenvolvimento ambiental e econômico. [PhD thesis], 2012, Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, São Carlos 208 pp. [in Portuguese].
127. 127 Amorim, H.V., Lorenzi, M.S., Boscariol, F.C., Ferreira, G.M., Alto teor alcoólico e concentração de vinhaça: Processos se complementam. Idea News 134 (2012), 26–32 [in Portuguese].
128. 128 Doerfler, J., Amorim, H.V., Applied bioethanol technology in Brazil. Sugar Ind 132:57 (2007), 694–697.
129. 129 Vicente, F.A.F.C., Seleção, avaliação e utilização de uma levedura personalizada para a produção de etanol. [PhD thesis], 2015, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho”, São José do Rio Preto 113 pp. [in Portuguese].
130. 130 Amorim, H.V., Lorenzi, M.S., Boscariol, F.C., Ferreira, G.M., Information on Fermentec/Dedini process. Sugar J 74:1 (2011), 34–35.
131. 131 Winter, E., Lima, A.A., Mendes, C.D.S., Mapeamento tecnológico da cadeia produtiva do etanol proveniente da cana-de-açúcar sob enfoque dos pedidos de patente: cenário brasileiro. Cortez, L.A.B., (eds.) Bioetanol de Cana-de-Açúcar: P&D para produtividade e sustentabilidade, 2010, Editora Edgar Blucher, São Paulo [chapter 10, in Portuguese].
132. 132 Salles-Filho, S., Sicsú, A.B., Bina, A., et al. Futuros do Bioetanol: Brasil na liderança. 1st ed., 2015, Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro [in Portuguese].
133. 133 Furtado, A.T., Scandiffio, M.I.G., Cortez, L.A.B., The Brazilian sugarcane innovation system. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 56–66.
134. 134 Rogers, E.M., Takegami, S., Yin, J., Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation 21:4 (2001), 253–261.
135. 135 Giometti, F.H.C.A, Impacto das tecnologias industriais nos custos de produção. 37ª Reunião Anual Fermentec, 2016 [in Portuguese].
136. 136 Amorim, H.V., Leão, R.M., Fermentação Alcoólica: Ciência e Tecnologia. 1st ed., 2005, Fermentec, Piracicaba [chapter 11, in Portuguese].