Unlocking the bacterial and fungal communities assemblages of sugarcane microbiome

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  De Souza, Rafael Soares Correa ^a   Okura, Vagner Katsumi ^a   Armanhi, Jaderson Silveira Leite ^a   Jorrín, Beatriz ^b   Lozano, Núria ^b   Da Silva, Márcio José ^a   González Guerrero, Manuel ^b   De Araújo, Laura Migliorini ^a   Verza, Natália Cristina ^a   Bagheri, Homayoun Chaichian ^c   Imperial, Juan ^b,d   Arruda, Paulo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c REPSOL YPF   (Spain)

^d CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRIVER; FAMILY; FUNGAL COMMUNITY; HUMAN; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIOME; ORGAN CULTURE; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; SHOOT; SOIL; SUGARCANE; YEAST; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FUNGUS; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RHIZOSPHERE;

RNA 16S;

BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BIODIVERSITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FUNGI; MICROBIOTA; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RHIZOSPHERE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SACCHARUM; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84976875307     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep28774     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Mendes, R. et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332, 1097-1100 (2011).
2. Lugtenberg, B. & Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 541-556 (2009).
3. Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S. & Elsas, J. D. Van. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 16, 463-471 (2008).
4. Bulgarelli, D. et al. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe 17, 392-403 (2015).
5. Lebeis, S. L. et al. Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa. Science 349, 860-864 (2015).
6. Peiffer, J. A. et al. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6548-6553 (2013).
7. Lundberg, D. S. et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86-90 (2012).
8. Berg, G., Zachow, C., Müller, H., Philipps, J. & Tilcher, R. Next-generation bio-products sowing the seeds of success for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy 3, 648-656 (2013).
9. Coleman-Derr, D. & Tringe, S. G. Building the crops of tomorrow: advantages of symbiont-based approaches to improving abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Microbiol. 5, 1-6 (2014).
10. Compant, S., Clément, C. & Sessitsch, A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants: Their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 669-678 (2010).
11. Baldani, J. I., Reis, V. M., Baldani, V. L. D. & Döbereiner, J. Review: A brief story of nitrogen fixation in sugarcane - reasons for success in Brazil. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 417-423 (2002).
12. Arruda, P. Genetically modified sugarcane for bioenergy generation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23, 315-322 (2012).
13. Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R. & Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671-677 (2002).
14. de Santi Ferrara, F. I., Oliveira, Z. M., Gonzales, H. H. S., Floh, E. I. S. & Barbosa, H. R. Endophytic and rhizospheric enterobacteria isolated from sugar cane have different potentials for producing plant growth-promoting substances. Plant Soil 353, 409-417 (2012).
15. Döbereiner, J., Day, J. M. & Dart, P. J. Nitrogenase activity in the rhizosphere of sugarcane and some other tropical grasses. Plant Soil 196, 191-196 (1972).
16. Urquiaga, S., Cruz, K. H. S. & Boddey, R. M. Contribution of nitrogen fixation to sugar cane: nitrogen-15 and nitrogen-balance estimates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 105-114 (1992).
17. Boddey, R. M., Polidoro, J. C., Resende, A. S., Alves, B. J. R. & Urquiaga, S. Use of the 15N natural abundance technique for the quantification of the contribution of N2 fixation to sugar cane and other grasses. Funct. Plant Biol. 28, 889 (2001).
18. Urquiaga, S. et al. Evidence from field nitrogen balance and 15N natural abundance data for the contribution of biological N2 fixation to Brazilian sugarcane varieties. Plant Soil 356, 5-21 (2012).
19. Döbereiner, J. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria of the genus Beijerinckia Derx in the rhizosphere of sugar cane. Plant Soil 15, 211-216 (1961).
20. Cavalcante, V. A. & Döbereiner, J. A new acid-tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugarcane. Plant Soil 108, 23-31 (1988).
21. Magalhaes, F. M., Baldani, J. I., Souto, S. M. & Kuykendall, J. R. A new acid tolerant Azospirillum species. Anais. Acad. bras. Cienc 55, 417-430 (1983).
22. Olivares, F. L., Baldani, V. L. D., Reis, V. M., Baldani, J. I. & Döbereiner, J. Occurrence of the endophytic diazotrophs Herbaspirillum spp. in roots, stems, and leaves, predominantly of Gramineae. Biol. Fertil. Soils 21, 197-200 (1996).
23. Pisa, G. et al. Diversity of 16S rRNA genes from bacteria of sugarcane rhizosphere soil. Brazilian J. Med. Biol. Res. 44, 1215-1221 (2011).
24. Fischer, D. et al. Molecular characterisation of the diazotrophic bacterial community in uninoculated and inoculated field-grown sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Plant Soil 356, 83-99 (2012).
25. Rouws, L. F. M. et al. In Biological Nitrogen Fixation (ed. de Brujin, F. J.) Ch. 94, 955-965 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015).
26. Yeoh, Y. K. et al. The core root microbiome of sugarcanes cultivated under varying nitrogen fertilizer application. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1338-1351 (2016).
27. Paungfoo-Lonhienne, C. et al. A new species of Burkholderia isolated from sugarcane roots promotes plant growth. Microb. Biotechnol. 7, 142-154 (2014).
28. Basso, L. C., De Amorim, H. V., De Oliveira, A. J. & Lopes, M. L. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res. 8, 1155-1163 (2008).
29. Lucena, B. T. et al. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria of the bioethanol process. BMC Microbiol. 10, 298 (2010).
30. da Silva-Filho, E. A. et al. Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel-ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 88, 13-23 (2005).
31. Basílio, A. C. M. et al. Detection and identification of wild yeast contaminants of the industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process. Curr. Microbiol. 56, 322-326 (2008).
32. Lundberg, D. S., Yourstone, S., Mieczkowski, P., Jones, C. D. & Dangl, J. L. Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 999-1002 (2013).
33. Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996-998 (2013).
34. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods 7, 335-336 (2010).
35. Van Overbeek, L. & Van Elsas, J. D. Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the structure of bacterial communities associated with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64, 283-296 (2008).
36. Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 807-838 (2013).
37. Zarraonaindia, I. et al. The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. 6, 1-10 (2015).
38. Cheavegatti-Gianotto, A. et al. Sugarcane (Saccharum X officinarum): a reference study for the regulation of genetically modified cultivars in Brazil. Trop. Plant Biol. 4, 62-89 (2011).
39. Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. The Human Microbiome Project. Nature 449, 804-810 (2007).
40. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207-214 (2013).
41. Sevilla, M., Burris, R. H., Gunapala, N. & Kennedy, C. Comparison of benefit to sugarcane plant growth and 15N2 incorporation following inoculation of sterile plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus wild-type and Nif-mutant strains. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 14, 358-366 (2001).
42. Azevedo, L. C. B. de, Stürmer, S. L. & Lambais, M. R. Early changes in arbuscular mycorrhiza development in sugarcane under two harvest management systems. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 45, 995-1005 (2014).
43. Costa, O. Y. A. et al. Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery using a culture-independent method. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 42, 73-84 (2015).
44. Methé, B. A. et al. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486, 215-221 (2012).
45. Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4516-4522 (2011).
46. Blaalid, R. et al. ITS1 versus ITS2 as DNA metabarcodes for fungi. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 218-224 (2013).
47. DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069-5072 (2006).
48. Abarenkov, K. et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi-recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol. 186, 281-285 (2010).
49. Caporaso, J. G. et al. Moving pictures of the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 12, R50 (2011).
50. Loudon, A. H. et al. Microbial community dynamics and effect of environmental microbial reservoirs on red-backed salamanders (Plethodon cinereus). ISME J. 8, 807-838 (2014).
51. Huse, S. M., Ye, Y., Zhou, Y. & Fodor, A. A. A core human microbiome as viewed through 16S rRNA sequence clusters. PLoS One 7, e34242 (2012).