Revisiting e-learning effectiveness: proposing a conceptual model

Interactive Technology and Smart Education

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 156-172

  Macgregor, George ^a   Turner, James ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

E learning; Learning methods; Modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992996713     PISSN: 17415659     EISSN: 17588510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17415650911005375     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Abraham, T. (2002), “Evaluating the virtual management information systems (MIS) classroom”, Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 125-134.
2. Abras, C., Ozok, A. and Preece, J. (2005), “Research methods for validating and deriving guidelines for e-learning online communities”, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 207-219.
3. Anakwe, B. (2008), “Comparison of student performance in paper-based versus computer-based testing”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 13-17.
4. Anderson, T. (2004), “Toward a theory of online learning”, in Ed. Anderson, T. and Ed. Elloumi, F. (Eds), Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Athabasca University, Athabasca, pp. 33-60.
5. Andretta, S. (2005), Information Literacy: A Practitioner's Guide, Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
6. Aragon, S.R., Johnson, S.D. and Shaik, N. (2002), “The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments”, American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 227-244.
7. Arbaugh, J.B. (2001), “How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses”, Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 42-54.
8. Baird, D. and Fisher, M. (2007), “Neomillennial user experience design strategies: utilizing social networking media to support ‘always on’ learning styles”, Educational Administration Abstracts, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 5-32.
9. Bangert, A.W. (2004), “The seven principles of good practice: a framework for evaluating on-line teaching”, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 217-232.
10. Bell, J. (2007), “E-learning: your flexible development friend?”, Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 7-9.
11. Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P.A., Fiset, M. and Huang, B. (2004), “How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 74 No. 3, pp. 379-439.
12. Biggs, J. (2007), Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 2nd ed., Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Maidenhead.
13. Blazic, B.J., Law, E.L.-C. and Arh, T. (2007), “An assessment of the usability of an internet-based education system in a cross-cultural environment: the case of the interreg crossborder program in central Europe”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 66-75.
14. Bolman, C., Tattersall, C., Waterink, W., Janssen, J., van den Berg, R. van Es, R. and Koper, R. (2007), “Learners' evaluation of a navigation support tool in distance education”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 384-392.
15. Breslin, C., Nicol, D., Grierson, H., Wodehouse, A., Juster, N. and Ion, W. (2007), “Embedding an integrated learning environment and digital repository in design engineering education: lessons learned for sustainability”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 805-816.
16. Catherall, P. (2005), Delivering eLearning for Information Services in Higher Education, Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
17. Challis, D. (2005), “Committing to quality learning through adaptive online assessment”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 519-527.
18. Chiu, H.Y., Sheng, C.C. and Chen, A.P. (2008), “Modeling agent-based performance evaluation for e-learning systems”, Electronic Library, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 345-362.
19. Clark, R.E. (1983), “Reconsidering research on learning from media”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 445-459.
20. Clarke, A. (2004), E-learning Skills, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
21. Connor, C. (2003), “Virtual learning and inter-professional education: developing computer-mediated communication for learning about collaboration”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 341-347.
22. Cooper, M., Colwell, C. and Jelfs, A. (2007), “Embedding accessibility and usability: considerations for e-learning research and development projects”, ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 231-245.
23. Dalsgaard, C. (2008), Social networking sites: transparency in online education, 14th Congress of the European University Information Systems Organisation (EUNIS), Aarhus University, Aarhus, available at: http://eunis.dk/papers/p41.pdf (accessed 31 August 2009).
24. Dewey, J. (1938), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, Allen & Unwin, London.
25. Dutton, J., Dutton, M. and Perry, J. (2002), “How do online students differ from lecture students?”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 169-190.
26. Eisenberg, M., Lowe, C.A. and Spitzer, K.L. (2004), Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age, Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT.
27. Englebart, D.C. (1962), Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework, Bootstrap Alliance, Fremont, CA, available at: www.bootstrap.org/augdocs/friedewald030402/augmentinghumanintellect/ahi62index.html (accessed 19 April 2009).
28. Fallah, M.H. and Ubell, R. (2000), “Blind scores in a graduate test: conventional compared with web-based outcomes”, Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALN) Magazine, Vol. 4 No. 2, available at: www.aln.org/publications/magazine/v4n2/fallah.asp (accessed 19 April 2009).
29. Frederickson, N., Reed, P. and Clifford, V. (2005), “Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: quantitative and qualitative perspectives”, Higher Education, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 645-664.
30. Hall, R. (2009), “Towards a fusion of formal and informal learning environments: the impact of the read/write web”, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 29-40.
31. Hassanien, A. (2007), “A qualitative student evaluation of group learning in higher education”, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 135-150.
32. Hui, W., Hu, P.J., Clark, T.H., Tam, K.Y. and Milton, J. (2008), “Technology-assisted learning: a longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 245-259.
33. Jiang, M., Parent, S. and Eastmond, D. (2006), “Effectiveness of web-based learning opportunities in a competency-based program”, International Journal on E-learning, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 353-360.
34. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, F.P. (1991), Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, Prentice-Hall International, London.
35. Johnson, R.D., Hornik, S. and Salas, E. (2008), “An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments”, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 66 No. 5, pp. 356-369.
36. Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., Shaik, N. and Palma-Rivas, N. (2000), “Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments”, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 29-50.
37. Kaplan, A. (2002), The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science, Transaction, London (Orig. pub. 1964).
38. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S. and Beauchamp, G. (2008), “Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 61-73.
39. Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
40. Laurillard, D. (2003), Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies, 2nd ed., Routledge Falmer, London.
41. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (2003), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Leung, H.K. (2003), “Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning”, Computer Science Education, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 123-136.
43. Liaw, S.S. (2008), “Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case study of the blackboard system”, Computers and Education, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 864-873.
44. Liaw, S.S., Huang, H.M. and Chen, G.D. (2007), “Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning”, Computer and Education, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 1066-1080.
45. Littlejohn, A., Falconer, I. and McGill, L. (2008), “Characterising effective e-learning resources”, Computers and Education, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 757-771.
46. Liu, C.-H., Chiang, T.-C. and Huang, Y.-M. (2007), “Assessment of effectiveness of web-based training on demand”, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 217-235.
47. MacDonald, J. (2004), “Developing competent e-learners: the role of assessment”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 215-226.
48. Macgregor, G. and McGill, L. (2005), “Digital libraries and information literacy issues within virtual learning environments: an e-learning impasse?”, paper presented at the Librarians' Annual Information Literacy Conference (LILAC), April 4-6, Imperial College, London, available at: http://eprints.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/2334/01/MacgregorMcGill_LILAC2005.pdf (accessed 19 April 2009).
49. McConnell, D. (2002), “The experience of collaborative assessment in e-learning”, Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 73-92.
50. McDonald, J. (2006), “The role of e-teaching in e-learning. Who's learning? Whose technology?”, in Ed. Markauskaite, L., Ed. Goodyear, P. and Ed. Reimann, P. (Eds), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 3-6 December, University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney University Press, Sydney, pp. 529-533.
51. McGill, L., Nicol, D., Littlejohn, A., Grierson, H., Juster, N. and Ion, W.J. (2005), “Creating an information-rich learning environment to enhance design student learning: challenges and approaches”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 629-642.
52. McPherson, M.A. and Nunes, J.B. (2008), “Critical issues for e-learning delivery: what may seem obvious is not always put into practice”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 1-13.
53. Maki, R.H., Maki, W.S., Patterson, M. and Whittaker, P.D. (2000), “Evalution of a web-based introductory psychology course: I. learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 230-239.
54. Mason, R. (2002), “E-learning: what have we learnt?”, in Ed. Rust, C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium of Improving Student Learning: Improving Student Learning Using Learning Technology, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, pp. 27-34.
55. Mason, R. and Rennie, F. (2006), Elearning: The Key Concepts, Routledge, London.
56. Moller, L., Foshay, W.R. and Huett, J. (2008), “The evolution of distance education: implications for instructional design on the potential of the web”, TechTrends, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 70-75.
57. Morville, P. (2005), Ambient Findability, O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA.
58. Nielsen, J. (2000), Designing Web Usability, New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
59. Oliver, R. (2002), “Winning the toss and electing to bat: maximising the opportunities of online learning”, in Ed. Rust, C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium of Improving Student Learning: Improving Student Learning Using Learning Technology, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, pp. 35-44.
60. Paas, F. and Firssova, E. (2004), “Usability evaluation of integrated e-learning”, in Ed. Jochem, W., Ed. Merrinboer, J.J.G.V. and Ed. Koper, R. (Eds), Integrated E-learning Implications for Pedagogy, Technology and Organization, Routledge Falmer, London, pp. 112-125.
61. Phipps, L. and Kelly, B. (2006), “Holistic approaches to e-learning accessibility”, ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 69-78.
62. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R. and Ives, B. (2001), “Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training”, Management Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 401-426.
63. Pilkington, R.M. and Walker, S.A. (2004), “Facilitating debate in networked learning: reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education”, in Ed. Goodyear, P., Ed. Banks, S., Ed. Hodgson, V. and Ed. McConnell, C. (Eds), Advances in Research on Networked Learning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 67-90.
64. Pituch, K.A. and Lee, Y.-K. (2006), “The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use”, Computers & Education, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 222-244.
65. Rhee, C., Moon, J. and Choe, Y. (2006), “Web interface consistency in e-learning”, Online Information Review, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 53-69.
66. Rosenberg, M.J. (2001), E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, NY.
67. Ruiz, J.G., Mintzer, M.J. and Leipzig, R.M. (2006), “The impact of e-learning in medical education”, Academic Medicine, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 207-212.
68. Russell, T.L. (2009), No Significant Difference Phenomenon, available at: http://nosignificantdifference.wcet.info/ (accessed 19 April).
69. Scalise, K., Bernbaum, D., Timms, M., Harrell, S.V., Burmester, K., Kennedy, C.A. and Wilson, M. (2007), “Adaptive technology for e-learning: principles and case studies of an emerging field”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58 No. 14, pp. 2295-2309.
70. Schneiderman, B. (1999), Supporting Creativity with Advanced Information-Abundant User Interface, Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, available at: www.lib.umd.edu/drum/bitstream/1903/6037/1/TR_99-73.pdf (accessed 31 August 2009).
71. Sclater, M. and Bolander, K. (2004), “Factors influencing students' orientation to collaboration in networked learning”, in Ed. Goodyear, P., Ed. Banks, S., Ed. Hodgson, V. and McConnell, C. (Eds), Advances in Research on Networked Learning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 175-203.
72. Secker, J. (2004), “E-learning and information literacy”, in Ed. Secker, J. (Ed.), Electronic Resources in the Virtual Learning Environment: A Guide for Librarians, Chandos Publishers, Oxford, available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/4884/1/E-learning_and_information_literacy_(LSERO).pdf (accessed 19 April 2009).
73. Segers, M., Jan, N. and Gijselaers, W. (2006), “Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: the influence on students' perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 223-242.
74. Shields, P.M. and Tajalli, H. (2006), “Intermediate theory: the missing link to successful student scholarship”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 313-334.
75. Stewart, T.M., MacIntyre, W.R., Galea, V.J. and Steel, C.H. (2007), “Enhancing problem-based learning designs with a single e-learning scaffolding tool: two case studies using challenge FRAP”, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 77-92.
76. Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M.E., Nölting, K., Röser, M. and Voigt, D. (2004), “Is e-learning the solution for individual learning?”, Electronic Journal of E-learning, Vol. 2 No. 2, available at: www.ejel.org/volume-2/vol2-issue2/v2-i2-art4-tavangarian.pdf (accessed 19 April 2009)
77. Thorpe, M. and Godwin, S. (2006), “Interaction and e-learning: the student experience”, Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 203-221.
78. Twigg, C.A. (1999), Improving Learning & Reducing Costs: Redesigning Large-enrolment Courses, National Center for Academic Transformation, Saratoga Springs, NY, available at: www.thencat.org/Monographs/mono1.pdf (accessed 19 April 2009).
79. Twigg, C.A. (2001), Innovations in Online Learning: Moving Beyond No Significant Difference, National Center for Academic Transformation, Saratoga Springs, NY, available at: www.center.rpi.edu/Monographs/Mono4.pdf (accessed 19 April 2009).
80. Wagner, D.G. and Berger, J. (1985), “Do sociological theories grow?”, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 90 No. 4, pp. 697-728.
81. Wang, K.H., Wang, T.H., Wang, W.L. and Huang, S.C. (2006), “Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in web-based learning”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 207-217.
82. Wang, Y.-M. (2007), “Riding to the future – an investigation of information literacy skills of students at an urban university as applied to the web environment”, International Journal of E-learning, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 593-603.
83. Waterhouse, S. (2005), The Power of eLearning: the Essential Guide for Teaching in the Digital Age, Pearson Education, Boston, MA.
84. Webb, E., Jones, A., Barker, P. and Schaik, P. van (2004), “Using e-learning dialogues in higher education”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 93-104.
85. Wenger, S.B., Holloway, K.C. and Garton, E.M. (1999), “The effects of internet-base instruction on student learning”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 1-9 available at: www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v3n2/pdf/v3n2_wegner.pdf (accessed 19 April 2009).
86. Zhang, D. (2005), “Interactive multimedia-based e-learning: a study of effectiveness”, The American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 149-162.
87. Bates, T. and Bates, T. (2005), Technology, E-learning and Distance Education, (Routledge Falmer Studies in Distance Education), Routledge, London.
88. Trasler, J. (2002), “Effective learning depends on the blend”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 191-195.