Intermediate Theory: The Missing Link in Successful Student Scholarship

Journal of Public Affairs Education

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 313-334

  Shields, Patricia M ^a   Tajalli, Hassan ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050834082     PISSN: 15236803     EISSN: 23289643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2006.12001438     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anderson, Rebecca. 2003. “A Description of Domestic Partner Benefits Policies of State, County and City Governments.” Applied Research Project, Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/43/.
2. Babbie, Earl. 2004. The Practice of Social Research, 10th ed. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
3. Bard, Mary, and Elaine, Moore. 2000. “Mentoring and Self-managed Learning: Professional Development for the Market Industry.” International Journal of Market Research, 42(4):255–275.
4. Barker, Richard A., 1997. How Can We Train Leaders If We Do Not Know What Leadership Is? Human Relations, 50(4):343–363.
5. Baum, Kevin. 1997. “Group Dynamics and Power Structures: Toward a Greater Understanding of the Line-Staff Relationship within the Austin Fire Department.” Applied Research Project, Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/96/.
6. Behn, Robert. 2003. “Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures.” Public Administration Review, 63(5):586–606.
7. Bouckaert, Geert. 1993. “Measurement and Meaningful Management.” Public Productivity and Management, 17(1):31–43.
8. Caiden, Namoi. 2000. “Public Service Professionalism for Performance Measurement Evaluation.” Public Budgeting and Finance, 18(2):3–17.
9. Delahoussaye, Martin. 2001. “Leadership in the 21st Century.” Training, 38(8):50–60.
10. Dewey, John. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11. Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan Co.
12. Di Mattia, Susan. 2000. “Louisville Begins Staff Program.” Library Journal, September: 22.
13. Flower, Elizabeth, and M. G., Murphy. 1977. A History of Philosophy in America. New York: Capricorn Books.
14. Foster, Rick. 2000. “Leadership in the 21st Century: Working to Build Civil Society.” National Civic Review, 89(1):87–94.
15. Francois, Valerie. 2004. “An Assessment of Grievance Procedures in Austin and Large Texas City Governments.” Applied Research Project. Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/17/
16. Getty, Cheryl. 1993. “Planning Successfully for Succession Planning.” Training and Development, Nov.: 31–34.
17. Gratton, Lynda, and Michael, Syrett. 1990. “Heirs Apparent: Succession Strategies for the Future.” Personnel Management, January:35–38.
18. Grizzle, Gloria A., and Carole D., Pettijohn. 2002. “Implementing Performance-Based Program Budgeting: A System Perspective.” Public Administration Review, 62(1):51–62.
19. Hickman, Larry J., 1990. Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
20. Holton, Elwood F., Reid A., Bates, and Sharon, Naquin. 2000. “Large-Scale Performance Driven Training Needs Assessment: A Case Study.” Public Personnel Management, 29(2):349–267.
21. Jeffers, Rachael. 2003. “Development Sprawl in Texas.” Applied Research Project, Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/46/.
22. Julnes, Patria De Lancer, and Marc, Holzer. 2001. “Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation.” Public Administration Review, 61(6):693–708.
23. Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. Scranton, PA: Chandler Publishing Co.
24. Kravchuk, Robert S., and Ronald W., Schack. 1996. “Designing Effective Performance Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.” Public Administration Review, 56(4):348–358.
25. Ley, Sharon. 2002. “An Assessment of Succession Planning at the State Bar of Texas.” Applied Research Project. Texas State University. Available at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/53/.
26. Limbach, Barbara, and Wendy, Waugh. 2005. “Questioning the Lecture Format.” Thought and Action, Fall:47–56.
27. Long, Edward, and Aimee L., Franklin. 2004. “The Paradox of Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act: Top-Down Direction for Bottom-Up Implementation.” Public Administration Review, 64(3):309–319.
28. McKinnerney, Erin. 2004. “Reality Bytes: A Formative Technology Implementation Plan for Public Schools.” Applied Research Project. Texas State University. Available at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/25/.
29. Melkers, Julia, and Katherine, Willoughby. 1998. “The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 of 50 States.” Public Administration Review, 58(1):66–73.
30. Moore, George C., and Philip M., Henegan. 1996. “Defining and Prioritizing Public Performance Requirements.” Public Productivity & Management Review, 20(2):158–173.
31. Nowack, Kenneth M., 1994. “The Secrets of Succession.” Training and Development, 48(11):49–55.
32. Pearson, David. 2002. “An Exploratory Study of Rural Hospital Closures and Their Links to the Economic Health of Local Communities.” Applied Research Project. Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/55/.
33. Perez, Shivaun. 2000. “Assessing Service Learning Using Pragmatic Principles of Education.” A Texas Charter School Case Study. Pi Alpha Alpha Journal and Applied Research Project, Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/76/.
34. Radin, Beryl. 1998. “The Government Performance and Results Act (GRPA): Hydra-Head Monster or Flexible Management Tool?” Public Administration Review, 58(4):307–316.
35. Romero, Michelle. 2004. “A Utilization Assessment of the Texas Performance Measurement System.” Applied Research Project. Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/26/.
36. Rothwell, William J., 2001. Effective Succession Planning. New York: American Management Association.
37. Schall, Ellen. 1997. “Public Sector Succession: A Strategic Approach to Sustaining Innovation.” Public Administration Review, Jan./Feb.:4–10.
38. st Century.” SAM Advanced Management Journal, Spring 22–28.
39. Shields, Patricia M., 1998. “Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Science: A Tool for Public Administration.” In Jay, White, ed., Research in Public Administration, Vol. 4. JAI Press: Stamford, CT, 195–225.
40. Shields, Patricia M., 1999. “Getting Organized: A Pragmatic Tool for Writing Graduate Papers.” Journal of Graduate Assistant Development. 7(1):5–17.
41. Shields, Patricia M., 2003. “A Pragmatic Teaching Philosophy.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(1): 7–12.
42. Shields, Patricia M., 2003.a. “The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration.” Administration & Society, 35(5):510–538.
43. rd ed. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
44. Shirota, Keeiji. 2003. “Government Accounting Standards Board Statement 34: Perceptions of Texas Finance Officers.” Applied Research Project. Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/47/.
45. Sogunro, Olusegun. 1997. “Impact of Training on Leadership Development.” Evaluation Review, 21(6): 713–738.
46. Walker, James. 1998. “Do We Need Succession Planning Any More?” Human Resource Planning, September 9-12.
47. Wilson, Timothy. 2001. “Pragmatism and Performance Measurement: An Exploration of Pragmatic Principles in Texas State Government.” Applied Research Project, Texas State University. Available online at http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/71/.