The experience of collaborative assessment in e-Learning

Studies in Continuing Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 73-92

  McConnell, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644238899     PISSN: 0158037X     EISSN: 1470126X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01580370220130459     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ALAVI, M., WHEELER, B.C., and VALACICH, J.S., 1995. Using technology to reengineer business education: an exploratory investigation of collaborative learning. MIS Quarterly, 19(3): 292–312.
2. ASENSIO, M., HODGSON, V., and TREHAN, K., 2000. “ Is there a difference?: Contrasting experiences of face-to-face and online learning ”. In Networked learning 2000: Innovative approaches to lifelong learning and higher education through the Internet, Edited by: ASENSIO, M., FOSTER, J., HODGSON, V., and MCCONNELL, D., Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
3. AXELROD, R., 1990. The evolution of cooperation, London: Penguin Books.
4. BECKER, H.S., GEER, B., 1968. Making the grade: The academic side of academic life, New York: John Wiley.
5. BOUD, D., 1995. Enhancing learning through self assessment, London: Kogan Page.
6. BOUD, D., 2000. Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for a learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2): 151–167.
7. BOYD, H., and COWAN, J., 1985. A case for self-assessment based on recent studies of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 10(3): 225–235.
8. BROADFOOT, P.M., 1996. Education, assessment and society: A sociological analysis, Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. FALCHKOV, N., and GOLDFINCH, J., 2000. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3): 287–322.
10. GLASER, B., and STRAUSS, A., 1968. The discovery of grounded theory, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
11. GOLDFINCH, J., 1994. Further developments in peer assessment of groups. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1): 29–35.
12. HERON, J., 1981. “ Self and peer assessment ”. In Management self-development, Edited by: BOYDELL, T., and PEDLER, M., Gower.
13. JONES, C.R., 1998. Context, content and cooperation: An ethnographic study of collaborative learning online, Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University. PhD thesis
14. JONES, C.R., 2000. “ Understanding students' experiences of collaborative networked learning ”. In Networked learning 2000: Innovative approaches to lifelong learning and higher education through the Internet, Edited by: ASENSIO, M., FOSTER, J., HODGSON, V., and MCCONNELL, D., Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
15. KEISLER, S., 1992. “ Talking, teaching and learning in network groups ”. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing, NATO ASI Series Edited by: KAYE, A.R., 147–166. Berlin: Springer.
16. LAVE, J., and WENGER, E., 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. MCCOMB, M., 1994. Benefits of computer mediated communications in college courses. Communication Education, 43: 159–170.
18. MCCONNELL, D., 1999. Examining a collaborative assessment process in networked lifelong learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15 September: 232–243.
19. MCCONNELL, D., 2000. Implementing computer supported cooperative learning, (2nd ed.), London: Kogan Page.
20. MCCONNELL, D., Complexity, harmony and diversity of learning in collaborative e-learning continuing professional development groups. Paper submitted to CSCL 2002 Conference.
21. MCCONNELL, D., 2002. Action research and distributed problem based learning in continuing professional education. Distance Education, 23(1): 59–83.
22. MCDOWELL, L., and SAMBELL, K., Students' experience of self evaluation in higher education: Preparation for lifelong learning?. Paper presented at the bi-annual conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). August24-281999, Gothenburg.
23. MCGRATH, J., 1990. “ Time matters in groups ”. In Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work, Edited by: GALEGHER, J., KRAUT, R., and EGIDO, C., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. MCKENDREE, J., STENNING, K., MAYES, T., LEE, J., and COX, R., 1998. Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(2): 110–119.
25. MICHAELSEN, L.K., WATSON, W.E., CRAIGIN, J.P., and FINK, L.D., 1982. Team learning: A potential solution to the problems of large classes. The Organisational Behaviour Teaching Journal, 7(1): 13–22.
26. MILLER, C.M.L., and PARLETT, M., 1974. Up to the mark: A study of the examination game, London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
27. OLANIRAN, B.A., SAVAGE, G.T., and SORENSON, R.L., 1996. Experimental and experiential approaches to teaching face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Communication Education, 45(3): 244–259.
28. PATTON, M.Q., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. PEDLER, M., 1981. “ Developing the learning community ”. In Management self-development: Concepts and practices, Edited by: BOYDELL, T., and PEDLER, M., London: Gower.
30. RAGOONADEN, K., and BORDELEAU, P., 2000. Collaborative learning via the Internet. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3)
31. RAMSDEN, P., 1988. “ Context and strategy: Situational influences on learning ”. In Learning strategies and learning styles, Edited by: SCHMECK, R.R., New York: Plenum Press.
32. RICHARDSON, J.E.T., 1999. The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1): 53–82.
33. SHAFRIRI, N., Learning as a reflective activity: Linkage between the concept of learning and the concept of alternative assessment. Paper presented at the bi-annual conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). August24-281999, Gothenburg.
34. SOMERVILLE, H., 1993. Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(3): 221–233.
35. STEFANI, L., 1998. Assessment in partnership with learners. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23: 339–350.
36. STEPHENSON, J., and WEIL, S., eds. 1992. Quality in learning: A capability approach to higher education, London: Kogan Page.
37. STRAUSS, A., and CORBIN, J., 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, London: Sage.
38. TANSLEY, C., and BRYSON, C., 2000. Virtual seminars--A viable substitute for traditional approaches?. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4): 335–345.
39. VEEN, W., LAM, I., and TACONIS, R., 1998. A virtual workshop as a tool for collaboration: Towards a model of telematics learning environments. Computers and Education, 30(1-2): 31–39.
40. WEGERIF, R., 1998. The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1): 34–49.
41. WENGER, E., 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.