Interaction and e-learning: The student experience

Studies in Continuing Education

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 203-221

  Thorpe, Mary ^a   Godwin, Steve ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750145730     PISSN: 0158037X     EISSN: 1470126X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01580370600947330     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson, B. (2004) Dimensions of learning and support in an online community Open Learning, 19(2), pp. 183-190.
2. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2002) Computer-mediated communication, e-learning and interactivity: A review of the research Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 161-179.
3. Baym, N.(1998) The emergence of online community, CyberSociety 2.0. In Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. (pp. 35-68). Thousand Oaks CA and London: Sage.
4. Berge, Z. L. (1999) Interaction in post-secondary Web-based learning Educational Technology, 39(1), pp. 5-11.
5. Berge, Z. L. (2002) Active, interactive, and reflective e-learning Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 181-190.
6. Biggs, J.(2003) Teaching for quality learning at university 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Borsook, T. K. and Higginbotham-Wheat, N. (1991) Interactivity: What is it and what can it do for computer-based instruction? Educational Technology, 10, pp. 11-17.
8. Chyung, S. Y. and Stepich, D. (2003) Applying the 'congruence' principle of Bloom's taxonomy to designing online instruction Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), pp. 317-330.
9. Dillenbourg, P.(Ed.) (1999) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (Amsterdam, Pergamon).
10. Dillon, P. (2004) Trajectories and tensions in the theory of information and communication technology in education British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(2), pp. 138-150.
11. ESRC (2002) Working towards e-quality in networked e-learning in higher education: A manifesto statement for debate. Report of UK Economic and Social Research Council seminar series. Available online at:hTtp:// csalt.lancs.ac.uk/esrc/manifesto.pdf(accessed 13 February 2003).
12. Flavell, J. H. (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry American Psychologist, 34(1), pp. 906-911.
13. Goodyear, P.(2002) Psychological foundations for networked learning. In Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer.
14. Hirumi, A. (2002) A framework for analyzing, designing and sequencing planned e-learning interactions Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 141-160.
15. Hodgson, V. and Reynolds, M. (2005) Consensus, difference and 'multiple communities' in networked learning Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), pp. 11-24.
16. Kear, K. (2004) Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education Open Learning, 19(2), pp. 151-164.
17. Kirkwood, A. and Price, L. (2005) Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students' attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), pp. 257-274.
18. Kress, G.(2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Laurillard, D.(2002) Rethinking university teaching 2nd edn. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
20. Mayes, T.(2001) Learning technology and learning relationships. In Teaching and learning online: Pedagogies for new technologies. London: Kogan Page.
21. McConnell, D.(2006) Sustaining networked e-learning through collaborative pedagogies. In Changing higher education: The development of learning and teaching. (pp. 85-96). London: Routledge.
22. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M.(1984) Qualitative data 2nd edn. London: Sage.
23. Moore, M. J. (1989) Editorial: Three types of interaction American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 1-6.
24. Moore, M. J.(1993) Three types of interaction. In Distance education: new perspectives. (pp. 19-24). London: Routledge.
25. Northrup, P. T. (2002) Online learners' preferences for interaction Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 219-226.
26. Ploetzner, R. and Dillenbourg, P. and Preier, M. and Traum, D.(1999) Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. (pp. 103-121). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
27. Ravenscroft, A. (2001) Designing e-learning interactions in the 21st century: Revisiting and rethinking the role of theory European Journal of Education, 2, pp. 133-156.
28. Rheingold, H.(1993) The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley.
29. Salomon, G. (2000) It's not just the tool, but the educational rationale that counts: Invited keynote address at the 2000 Ed-Media Meeting, Montreal, June2000.
30. Strauss, A. L.(1987) Qualitative analysis for social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Wagner, E. D. (1994) In support of a functional definition of interaction American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), pp. 6-29.