Adaptive technology for E-learning: Principles and case studies of an emerging field

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 2295-2309

  Scalise, Kathleen ^a   Bernbaum, Diana J ^b   Timms, Mike ^c   Harrell, S Veeragoudar ^b   Burmester, Kristen ^b   Kennedy, Cathleen A ^b   Wilson, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c WestEd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE TECHNOLOGY; COGNITIVE DIAGNOSIS; COURSE PLACEMENT; DYNAMIC FEEDBACK; LEARNING MATERIALS;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; EDUCATION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 38049127204     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20701     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., & Wang., W. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(1), 1-23.
2. Anderson, J.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, J.R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Behrens, J., Mislevy, R., Bauer, M., Williamson, D., & Levy, R. (2004). Introduction to evidence centered design and lessons learned from its application in a global e-learning program. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 295-301.
5. Clark, D., & Hooley, A. (2003). Epic Survey 2003: The future of e-learning. Brighton, England: Epic Group PLC.
6. DfES (2004). Five Year Strategy for Children and Learners. London: Crown, Department for Education and Skills.
7. Flynn, L.J. (2006, January 23). "Like this? You'll hate that (Not all Web recommendations are welcome.) New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/ 2006/01/23/technology/23recommend.html?ex=1295672400&en= b663a18edbb93830&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
8. Gifford, B.R. (1999). Computer-mediated instruction and learning in higher education: Bridging the gap between promise and practice. Paper presented at the 104th annual meeting of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, April 10-13, 1999. Commission on Institutions of Higher Education, Chicago.
9. Gifford, B.R. (2001). Transformational instructional materials, settings and economics. In the case for the distributed learning workshop. Minneapolis, MN: The Distributed Learning Workshop.
10. Hopkins, D. (2004,). Assessment for personalised learning: The quiet revolution. In General Teaching Council for England, Perspecives on pupil assessment, London: GTC.
11. Mueller, S. (2006). Overview of the OSI Seven-Layer Networking Reference Model. In Upgrading and Repairing Networks (5th ed.), Indianapolis: Que Publishing.
12. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. National Research Council. (Ed.). (2002). Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead-Proceedings from a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Osterlind, S.J. (1998). Constructing test items: Multiple-choice, constructedresponse, performance, and other formats. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
16. Parshall, C.G., Davey, T., & Pashley, P.J. (2000). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In W. Van der Linden & C.A.W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 129-148). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
17. Resnick, L.B., & Resnick, D.P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B.R. Gifford & M.C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 37-76). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
18. Scalise, K., Bernbaum, D.J., Timms, M.J., Harrell, S.V., Burmester. K., Kennedy, C.A., et al. (2006). Assessment for e-learning: Case studies of an emerging field [Online]. 13th International Objective Measurement Workshop. Berkeley, CA. Retrieved April 5, 2007, from http://bearcenter.berkeley.edu/ publications/Scalise_eLearning.pdf
19. Timms, M.J. (2000). Measurement issues in student modeling for intelligent tutoring systems. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley POME Position Paper.
20. Tomlinson, C.A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction + understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21. Turker, A., Görgün, I., & Conlan, O. (2006). The challenge of content creation to facilitate personalized e-learning experiences. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(1), 11-17.
22. Williamson, D., Bauer, M., Steinberg, L., Mislevy, R., Behrens, J., & DeMark, S. (2004). Design rationale for a complex performance assessment. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 303-330.
23. Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Wilson, M., & Scalise, K. (2003). Reporting progress to parents and others: Beyond grades. In J.M. Atkin & J.E. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 89-108). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
25. Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181-208.
26. Wu, M., Adams, R.J., & Wilson, M. (1998). The generalised Rasch model. In ACER ConQuest. Hawthorn, Australia: ACER.