Dimension reduction techniques for the integrative analysis of multi-omics data

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 628-641

  Meng, Chen ^a   Zeleznik, Oana A ^b   Thallinger, Gerhard G ^b   Kuster, Bernhard ^a   Gholami, Amin M ^c   Culhane, Aedín C ^d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY   (United States)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dimension reduction; Exploratory data analysis; Integrative genomics; Multi assay; Multi omics data integration; Multivariate analysis

Indexed keywords

GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING;

GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING;

EID: 84991380039     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv108     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Brazma A, Culhane AC. Algorithms for gene expression analysis. In: Jorde LB, Little PFR, Dunn MJ, Subramaniam S (eds). Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics. London: John Wiley & Sons, 2005, 3148-59.
2. Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HC, et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:733-9.
3. Legendre P, Legendre LFJ. Numerical Ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 3rd edition. 2012.
4. Biton A, Bernard-Pierrot I, Lou Y, et al. Independent component analysis uncovers the landscape of the bladder tumor transcriptome and reveals insights into luminal and basal subtypes. Cell Rep 2014, 9:1235-45.
5. Hoadley KA, Yau C, Wolf DM, et al. Multiplatform analysis of 12 cancer types reveals molecular classification within and across tissues of origin. Cell 2014;158:929-44.
6. Verhaak RG, Tamayo P, Yang JY, et al. Prognostically relevant gene signatures of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Invest 2013;123:517-25.
7. Senbabaoglu Y, Michailidis G, Li JZ. Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery. Sci Rep 2014;4:6207.
8. Gusenleitner D, Howe EA, Bentink S, et al. iBBiG: iterative binary bi-clustering of gene sets. Bioinformatics 2012;28: 2484-92.
9. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Magazine Series 1901;6(2):559-72.
10. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 1933;24:417.
11. Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. 3rd edn. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. xvi, 405.
12. Warner RM. Applied Statistics: From Bivariate through Multivariate Techniques. London: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2nd Edition. 2012, 1004.
13. Dray S, Chessel D, Thioulouse J. Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables. Ecology 2003;84:3078-89.
14. Golub GH, Loan CF. Matrix Computations. Baltimore: JHU Press, 2012.
15. Anthony M, Harvey M. Linear Algebra: Concepts and Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1st edition. 2012, 149-60.
16. McShane LM, Cavenagh MM, Lively TG, et al. Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials: explanation and elaboration. BMC Med 2013;11:220.
17. Guyon I, Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 2003;3:1157-82.
18. Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company 1977.
19. Hogben L. Handbook of Linear Algebra, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 1st edition. 2007, 20.
20. Ringner M. What is principal component analysis? Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:303-4.
21. Wall ME, Rechtsteiner A, Rocha LM. (2003) Singular value decomposition and principal component analysis. In: A Practical Approach to Microarray. Data Analysis. Berrar, D.P., Dubitzky, W., Granzow, M. (eds) Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 2003, 91-109.
22. terBraak CJF, Prentice IC. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1988;18:271-313.
23. terBraak CJF, Smilauer P. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power (Ithaca, NY USA) http://www.microcomputerpower.com/1998;352.
24. Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal Component Analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & SonsInterdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2010;2(4):433-59.
25. Dray S. On the number of principal components: a test of dimensionality based on measurements of similarity between matrices. Comput Stat Data Anal 2008;52:2228-37.
26. Wouters L, Gohlmann HW, Bijnens L, et al. Graphical exploration of gene expression data: a comparative study of three multivariate methods. Biometrics 2003;59:1131-9.
27. Greenacre M. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2 edition. 2007, 201-11.
28. Goodrich JK, Rienzi DSC, Poole AC, et al. Conducting a microbiome study. Cell 2014;158:250-62.
29. Fasham MJR. A comparison of nonmetric multidimensional scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines, and coenoplanes. Ecology 1977;58:551-61.
30. Beh EJ, Lombardo R. Correspondence Analysis: Theory, Practice and New Strategies, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 1st edition. 2014, 120-76.
31. Greenacre MJ. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. Waltham, MA: Academic Press; 3rd Edition. 1993, 83-125.
32. Fagan A, Culhane AC, Higgins DG. A multivariate analysis approach to the integration of proteomic and gene expression data. Proteomics 2007;7:2162-71.
33. Fellenberg K, Hauser NC, Brors B, et al. Correspondence analysis applied to microarray data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10781-6.
34. Lee DD, Seung HS. Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative matrix factorization. Nature 1999;401:788-91.
35. Comon P. Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Processing 1994;36:287-314.
36. Witten DM, Tibshirani R, Hastie T. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 2009;10:515-34.
37. Shen H, Huang JZ. Sparse principal component analysis via regularized low rank matrix approximation. J Multivar Anal 2008;99:1015-34.
38. Lee S, Epstein MP, Duncan R, et al. Sparse principal component analysis for identifying ancestry-informative markers in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 2012;36:293-302.
39. Sill M, Saadati M, Benner A. Applying stability selection to consistently estimate sparse principal components in highdimensional molecular data. Bioinformatics 2015;31:2683-90.
40. Zhao J. Efficient model selection for mixtures of probabilistic PCA via hierarchical BIC. IEEE Trans Cybern 2014;44:1871-83.
41. Zhao Q, Shi X, Huang J, et al. Integrative analysis of '-omics' data using penalty functions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 2015;7:10.
42. Alter O, Brown PO, Botstein D. Generalized singular value decomposition for comparative analysis of genome-scale expression data sets of two different organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:3351-6.
43. Culhane AC, Perriere G, Higgins DG. Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using coinertia analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2003;4:59.
44. Dray S. Analysing a pair of tables: coinertia analysis and duality diagrams. In: Blasius J, Greenacre M (eds). Visualization and verbalization of data, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014; 289-300.
45. Le Cao KA, Martin PG, Robert-Granie C, et al. Sparse canonical methods for biological data integration: application to a cross-platform study. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:34.
46. Braak CJF. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 1986;67:1167-79.
47. Hotelling H. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 1936;28:321-77.
48. McGarigal K, Landguth E, Stafford S. Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research, New York: Springer, 2002.
49. Thioulouse J. Simultaneous analysis of a sequence of paired ecological tables: a comparison of several methods. Ann Appl Stat 2011;5:2300-25.
50. Hong S, Chen X, Jin L, et al. Canonical correlation analysis for RNA-seq co-expression networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:e95.
51. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate Analysis. London, New York, NY, Toronto, Sydney, San Francisco, CA: Academic Press, 1979.
52. Waaijenborg S, Zwinderman AH. Sparse canonical correlation analysis for identifying, connecting and completing gene-expression networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:315.
53. Parkhomenko E, Tritchler D, Beyene J. Sparse canonical correlation analysis with application to genomic data integration. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2009;8:article 1.
54. Witten DM, Tibshirani RJ. Extensions of sparse canonical correlation analysis with applications to genomic data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2009;8:article 28.
55. Lin D, Zhang J, Li J, et al. Group sparse canonical correlation analysis for genomic data integration. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14:245.
56. Le Cao KA, Boitard S, Besse P. Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for multiclass problems. BMC Bioinform 2011; 12:253.
57. Boulesteix AL, Strimmer K. Partial least squares: a versatile tool for the analysis of high-dimensional genomic data. Brief Bioinform 2007;8:32-44.
58. Dolédec S, Chessel D. Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwater Biol 1994;31:277-94.
59. Ponnapalli SP, Saunders MA, Van Loan CF, et al. A higherorder generalized singular value decomposition for comparison of global mRNA expression from multiple organisms. PLoS One 2011;6:e28072.
60. Meng C, Kuster B, Culhane AC, et al. A multivariate approach to the integration of multi-omics datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 2014;15:162.
61. de Tayrac M, Le S, Aubry M, et al. Simultaneous analysis of distinct Omics data sets with integration of biological knowledge: multiple factor analysis approach. BMC Genomics 2009;10:32.
62. Abdi H, Williams LJ, Valentin D. Statis and Distatis: Optimum Multitable Principal Component Analysis and Three Way Metric Multidimensional Scaling. Wiley Interdisciplinary, 2012;4: 124-67.
63. De Jong S, Kiers HAL. Principal covariates regression: Part I Theory. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1992;14:155-64.
64. Bénasséni J, Dosse MB. Analyzing multiset data by the power STATIS-ACT method. Adv Data Anal Classification 2012;6: 49-65.
65. Escoufier Y. The duality diagram: a means for better practical applications. Devel Num Ecol 1987;14:139-56.
66. Giordani P, Kiers HAL, Ferraro DMA. Three-way component analysis using the R package threeway. J Stat Software 2014;57:7.
67. Leibovici DG. Spatio-temporal multiway decompositions using principal tensor analysis on k-modes: the R package PTAk. J Stat Software 2010;34(10):1-34
68. Kolda TG, Bader BW. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Rev 2009;51:455-500.
69. Tenenhaus A, Tenenhaus M. Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis for multiblock or multigroup data analysis. Eur J Oper Res 2014;238:391-403.
70. Chessel D, Hanafi M. Analyses de la co-inertie de K nuages de points. Rev Stat Appl 1996;44:35-60.
71. Hanafi M, Kohler A, Qannari EM. Connections between multiple co-inertia analysis and consensus principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory, 2011;106(1):37-40.
72. Carroll JD. Generalization of canonical correlation analysis to three or more sets of variables. Proc. 76th Convent. Am. Psych. Assoc. 1968;3:227-8.
73. Takane Y, Hwang H, Abdi H. Regularized multiple-set canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 2008;73:753-75.
74. Tenenhaus A, Tenenhaus M. Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 2011;76:257-84.
75. van de Velden M. On generalized canonical correlation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 58th World Statistical Congress, Dublin, 2011.
76. Tenenhaus A, Philippe C, Guillemot V, et al. Variable selection for generalized canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 2014;15:569-83.
77. Zhao Q, Caiafa CF, Mandic DP, et al. Higher order partial least squares (HOPLS): a generalized multilinear regression method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2013;35:1660-73.
78. Kim H, Park H, Eldén L. Non-negative tensor factorization based on alternating large-scale non-negativity-constrained least squares, In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE); Dublin 2007: 1147-51.
79. MorupM, Hansen LK, Arnfred SM. Algorithms for sparse nonnegative Tucker decompositions. Neural Comput 2008;20:2112-31.
80. Wang HQ, Zheng CH, Zhao XM. jNMFMA: a joint non-negative matrix factorization meta-analysis of transcriptomics data. Bioinformatics 2015;31:572-80.
81. Zhang S, Liu CC, Li W, et al. Discovery of multi-dimensional modules by integrative analysis of cancer genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:9379-91.
82. Lv M, Zhang X, Jia H, et al. An oncogenic role of miR-142-3p in human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) by targeting glucocorticoid receptor-alpha and cAMP/PKA pathways. Leukemia 2012;26:769-77.
83. Pulikkan JA, Dengler V, Peramangalam PS, et al. Cell-cycle regulator E2F1 and microRNA-223 comprise an autoregulatory negative feedback loop in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2010;115:1768-78.
84. Smilde AK, Kiers HA, Bijlsma S, et al. Matrix correlations for high-dimensional data: the modified RV-coefficient. Bioinformatics 2009;25:401-5.
85. Streicher KL, Zhu W, Lehmann KP, et al. A novel oncogenic role for the miRNA-506-514 cluster in initiating melanocyte transformation and promoting melanoma growth. Oncogene 2012;31:1558-70.
86. Chiaretti S, Messina M, Tavolaro S, et al. Gene expression profiling identifies a subset of adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with myeloid-like gene features and overexpression of miR-223. Haematologica 2010;95:1114-21.
87. Dahlhaus M, Roolf C, Ruck S, et al. Expression and prognostic significance of hsa-miR-142-3p in acute leukemias. Neoplasma 2013;60:432-8.
88. Eyholzer M, Schmid S, Schardt JA, et al. Complexity of miR-223 regulation by CEBPA in human AML. Leuk Res 2010;34:672-6.
89. Kumar V, Palermo R, Talora C, et al. Notch and NF-kB signaling pathways regulate miR-223/FBXW7 axis in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2014;28:2324-35.
90. Josson S, Gururajan M, Hu P, et al. miR-409-3p/-5p promotes tumorigenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and bone metastasis of human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:4636-46.
91. Alizadeh AA, Aranda V, Bardelli A, et al. Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity. Nat Med 2015;21: 846-53.
92. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Weinstein JN, Collisson EA, Mills GB, et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet 2013;45:1113-20.
93. Gholami AM, Fellenberg K. Cross-species common regulatory network inference without requirement for prior gene affiliation. Bioinformatics 2010;26(8):1082-90.
94. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:559.