Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables

Ecology

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 3078-3089

  Dray, Stéphane ^a   Chessel, Daniel ^a   Thioulouse, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Canonical correlation analysis; Canonical correspondence analysis; Co inertia analysis; Multi table analysis; Ordination; Redundancy analysis; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; ECOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 1342287627     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-0178     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Austin, M. P., J. A. Meyers, L. Belbin, and M. D. Doherty. 1995. Simulated data case study, Sub-project 5, Modelling of landscape patterns and processes using biological data. Available by loan from Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Teritory, Australia.
2. Bayley, P. B., and J. T. Peterson. 2001. An approach to estimate probability of presence and richness of fish species. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:620-633.
3. Ben-Shahar, R. 1987. Grasses and habitat relationships on a sour bushveld nature reserve. Vegetatio 72:45-49.
4. Ben-Shahar, R., and J.-D. Skinner. 1988. Habitat preferences of african ungulates derived by uni-and multivariate analyses. Ecology 69:1479-1485.
5. Birks, H. J. B., S. M. Peglar, and H. A. Austin. 1996. An annotated bibliography of canonical correspondence analysis and related constrained ordination methods 1986-1993. Abstracta Botanica 20:17-36.
6. Cadet, P., and J. Thioulouse. 1998. Identification of soil factors that relate to plant parasitic nematode communities on tomato and yam in the French West Indies. Applied Soil Ecology 8:35-49.
7. Cao, Y., D. P. Larsen, R. M. Hughes, P. L. Angermeier, and T. M. Patton. 2002. Sampling effort affects multivariate comparisons of stream assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21:701-714.
8. Cao, Y., D. P. Larsen, and R. S. J. Thorne. 2001. Rare species in multivariate analysis for bioassessment: some considerations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20:144-153.
9. Cazes, P. 1980. L'analyse de certains tableaux rectangulaires décomposé en blocs: généralisation des propriétés rencontrées dans l'étude des correspondances multiples. Les cahiers de l'analyse des données 5:145-161.
10. Chessel, D., and M. Hanafi. 1996. Analyse de la co-inertie de K nuages de points. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 44: 35-60.
11. Chessel, D., and P. Mercier. 1993. Couplage de triplets statistiques et liaisons espèces - environnement. Pages 15-43 in J. D. Lebreton and B. Asselain, editors. Biométrie et Environnement. Masson, Paris, France.
12. Chevenet, F., S. Dolédec, and D. Chessel. 1994. A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long-term ecological data. Freshwater Biology 31:295-309.
13. Couteron, P., R. Pélissier, D. Mapaga, J.-F. Molino, and L. Teillier. 2003. Drawing ecological insights from a management-oriented forest inventory in French Guiana. Forest Ecology and Management 172:89-108.
14. Del Moral, R. 1982. Control of vegetation on contrasting substrates: herb patterns on serpentinite and sandstone. American Journal of Botany 69:227-238.
15. De Maesschalck, R., D. Jouan-Rimbaud, and D. L. Massart. 2000. The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 50:1-18.
16. Digby, P. G. N., and R. A. Kempton. 1987. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
17. Dolédec, S., and D. Chessel. 1987. Rythmes saisonniers et composantes stationnelles en milieu aquatique. I. Description d'un plan d'observations complet par projection de variables. Acta Oecologica - Oecologia Generalis 8:403-426.
18. Dolédec, S., and D. Chessel. 1994. Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species - environment relationships. Freshwater Biology 31:277-294.
19. Dolédec, S., D. Chessel, and C. Gimaret-Carpentier. 2000. Niche separation in community analysis: a new method. Ecology 81:2914-2927.
20. Dolédec, S., D. Chessel, C. J. F. ter Braak, and S. Champely. 1996. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3:143-166.
21. Dray, S., D. Chessel, and J. Thioulouse. 2003. Procrustean co-inertia analysis for the linking of multivariate data sets. Ecoscience 10:110-119.
22. Dray, S., N. Pettorelli, and D. Chessel. 2002. Matching data sets from two different spatial samplings. Journal of Vegetation Science 13:867-874.
23. Esposito Vinzi, V. 2001. Explanatory methods for comparative analyses. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 58:275-286.
24. Franquet, E., and D. Chessel. 1994. Approche statistique des composantes spatiales et temporelles de la relation faune-milieu. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences Serie III - Sciences de la Vie 317:202-206.
25. Franquet, E., S. Dolédec, and D. Chessel. 1995. Using multivariate analyses for separating spatial and temporal effects within species-environment relationships. Hydrobiologia 300/301:425-431.
26. Gauch, H. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. Gauch, H. G., and T. R. Wentworth. 1976. Canonical correlation analysis as an ordination technique. Vegetatio 33: 17-22.
28. Gimaret-Carpentier, C., D. Chessel, and J.-P. Pascal. 1998a. Non-symmetric correspondence analysis: an alternative for species occurrences data. Plant Ecology 138:97-112.
29. Gimaret-Carpentier, C., D. Chessel, J.-P. Pascal, and B. R. Ramesh. 1998b. Advantages of non-symmetric correspondence analysis in identifying multispecific spatial patterns in the rain forest of the western Ghats. Pages 397-411 in Y. Laumier, B. King, C. Legg, and K. Rennolls, editors. Data management and modelling using remote sensing and GIS for tropical forest land inventory. Rodeo International Publishers, Jakarta, Indonasia.
30. Hill, M. O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Applied Statistics - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C 23:340-354.
31. Hill, M. O., and A. J. E. Smith. 1976. Principal component analysis of taxonomic data with multi-state discrete characters. Taxon 25:249-255.
32. Hotelling, H. 1936. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 28:321-377.
33. Huang, C. L., and R. Del Moral. 1988. Plant-environment relationships on the Montlake wildlife area, Seattle Washington, USA. Vegetatio 75:103-113.
34. Ihaka, R., and R. Gentleman. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5:299-314.
35. Jackson, D. A. 1995. PROTEST: a PROcrustean randomization TEST of community environment concordance. Ecoscience 2:297-303.
36. Jackson, D. A., and K. M. Somers. 1991. Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 137:704-712.
37. Kiers, H. A. L. 1994. Simple structure in component analysis techniques for mixtures of qualitative and quantitative variables. Psychometrika 56:197-212.
38. Kroonenberg, P. M., and R. Lombardo. 1999. Nonsymmetric correspondence analysis: a tool for analysing contingency tables with a dependence structure. Multivariate Behavioral Research 34:367-396.
39. Lafosse, R., and M. Hanafi. 1997. Concordance d'un tableau avec K tableaux: définition de K+1 uples synthétiques. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 45:111-126.
40. Lauro, N., and L. D'ambra. 1984. L'analyse non symétrique des correspondances. Pages 433-446 in E. Diday, M. Jambu, L. Lebart, J. P. Pagès, and R. Tomassone, editors. Data analysis and informatics III. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
41. Legendre, P., and M. J. Anderson. 1999. Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecological Monographs 69:1-24.
42. Legendre, P., and E. D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271-280.
43. Legendre, P., R. Galzin, and M. L. Harmelin-Vivien. 1997. Relating behavior to habitat: solutions to the fourth-corner problem. Ecology 78:547-562.
44. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Second English edition. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
45. Lods-Crozet, B., E. Castella, D. Cambin, C. Ilg, S. Knispel, and H. Mayor-Simeant. 2001. Macroinvertebrate community structure in relation to environmental variables in a Swiss glacial stream. Freshwater Biology 46:1641-1661.
46. McArdle, B. H., and M. J. Anderson. 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290-297.
47. McCune, B. 1997. Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78:2617-2623.
48. Méot, A., P. Legendre, and D. Borcard. 1998. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation: questions and propositions in the linear modelling framework. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5:1-27.
49. Mercier, P., D. Chessel, and S. Dolédec. 1992. Complete correspondence analysis of an ecological profile data table: a central ordination. Acta Oecologica - International Journal of Ecology 13:25-44.
50. Minchin, P. R. 1987. Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Vegetatio 71:145-156.
51. Montana, C., and P. Greig-Smith. 1990. Correspondence analysis of species by environmental variable matrices. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:453-460.
52. Noy-Meir, I. 1973. Data transformation in ecological ordination. I. Some advantages of non-centring. Journal of Ecology 61:329-341.
53. Noy-Meir, I., D. Walker, and W. T. Williams. 1975. Data transformation in ecological ordination. II. On the meaning of data standardization. Journal of Ecology 63:779-800.
54. Ojeda, F., J. Arroyo, and T. Marañon. 1998. The phytogeography of European and Mediterranean heath species (Ericoideae, Ericaceae): a quantitative analysis. Journal of Biogeography 25:165-178.
55. Palmer, M. W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215-2230.
56. Palmer, M. W., and P. S. White. 1994. Scale dependence and the species-area relationship. American Naturalist 144: 717-740.
57. Peet, R. K., R. G. Knox, J. S. Case, and R. B. Allen. 1988. Putting things in order: the advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 131:924-934.
58. Rao, C. R. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya A 26: 329-359.
59. Reynaud, P. A., and J. Thioulouse. 2000. Identification of birds as biological markers along a neotropical urban-rural gradient (Cayenne, French-Guiana), using co-inertia analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 59:121-140.
60. Romane, F. 1972. Utilisation de l'analyse multivariable en phytoécologie. Investigacion Pesquera 36:131-139.
61. Simier, M., L. Blanc, F. Pellegrin, and D. Nandris. 1999. Approche simultanée de K couples de tableaux: application à l'étude des relations pathologie végétale-environment. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 47:31-46.
62. Soberon, J. M., and J. B. Llorente. 1993. The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conservation Biology 7:480-488.
63. Strahler, A. H. 1978. Binary discriminant analysis: a new method for investigating species-environment relationships. Ecology 59:108-116.
64. Tenenhaus, M. 1998. La régression PLS. Théorie et pratique. Editions Technip, Paris, France.
65. Tenenhaus, M., and F. W. Young. 1985. An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data. Psychometrika 50:91-119.
66. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1983. Principal components biplots and alpha and beta diversity. Ecology 64:454-462.
67. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167-1179.
68. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988. Partial canonical correspondence analysis. Pages 551-558 in H. H. Bock, editor. Classification and related methods of data anlysis. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
69. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1990. Interpreting canonical correlation analysis through biplots of structure correlations and weights. Psychometrika 55:519-531.
70. ter Braak, C. J. F., and C. W. N. Looman. 1986. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65:3-11.
71. ter Braak, C. J. F., and C. W. N. Looman. 1994. Biplots in reduced-rank regression. Biometrical Journal 36:983-1003.
72. Thioulouse, J., D. Chessel, S. Dolédec, and J. M. Olivier. 1997. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing 7:75-83.
73. Thioulouse, J., M. Simier, and D. Chessal. 2004. Simultaneous analysis of a sequence of paired ecological tables. Ecology 85, in press.
74. Tucker, L. R. 1958. An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika 23:111-136.
75. Wartenberg, D., S. Ferson, and F. J. Ohlf. 1987. Putting things in order: a critique of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 129:434-448.
76. Willby, N. G., V. J. Abernethy, and B. O. L. Demars. 2000. Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshwater Biology 43:43-74.