Analyzing multiset data by the Power STATIS-ACT method

Advances in Data Analysis and Classification

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 49-65

  Bénasséni, Jacques ^a   Dosse, Mohammed Bennani ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

Author keywords

Multiset data; Power based criterion; RV coefficient; STATIS ACT method; Three way data

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

MULTISET; POWER BASED CRITERION; RV-COEFFICIENT; STATIS-ACT METHOD; THREE WAY DATA;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

EID: 84857793609     PISSN: 18625347     EISSN: 18625355     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11634-011-0085-8     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arnold GM, Collins AJ (1993) Interpretation of transformed axes in multivariate analysis. Appl Stat 42: 381-400.
2. Carroll JD (1968) Generalization of canonical correlation analysis in three or more sets of variables. In: Proceedings of the 76th convention of the American Psychology Association, vol 3, pp 227-228.
3. Carroll JD, Chang JJ (1970) Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika 35: 283-319.
4. Casin P (2001) A generalization of principal component analysis of K sets of variables. Comput Stat Data Anal 35: 417-428.
5. Chaya C, Perez-Hugalde C, Judez L, Wee CS, Guinard JX (2003) Use of the STATIS method to analyze time-intensity profiling data. Food Qual Preference 15: 3-12.
6. Chessel D, Doledec S (1995) ADE software hypercard stacks and quick-basic microsoft program library for the analysis of environmental data, Version 4 Documentation ESA. CNRS 5023, Université Lyon 1.
7. Coquet R, Troxler L, Wipff G (1996) The STATIS method: characterization of conformational states of flexible molecules from molecular dynamics simulation in solution. J Mol Graph 14: 206-212.
8. Derks E, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AG, King BM (2003) An introduction to multi-block component analysis by means of flavour language case study. Food Qual Preference 14: 497-506.
9. Dijksterhuis GB, Punter PH (1990) Interpreting generalized procrustes analysis. 'Analysis of variance' tables. Food Qual Preference 2: 255-265.
10. Dijksterhuis GB, Gower JC (1991) The interpretation of generalized procrustes analysis and allied methods. Food Qual Preference 3: 67-87.
11. Escofier B, Pagès J (1994) Multiple factor analysis: afmult package. Comput Stat Data Anal 18: 121-140.
12. Escofier B, Pagès J (1998) Analyses factorielles simples et multiples: objectifs, méthodes et interprétation. Dunod, Paris.
13. Escoufier Y (1987) The duality diagram: a means for better practical applications. Developments in numerical ecology (Roscoff, 1986). NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. G. Ecolog. Sci., 14. Springer, Berlin, pp 139-156.
14. Gourvénec S, Stanimirova I, Saby CA, Airiau CY, Massart DL (2005) Monitoring batch processes with the STATIS approach. J Chemom 19: 288-300.
15. Gower JC (1975) Generalised procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33-51.
16. Gower JC (1984) Procrustes analysis. In: Llyod EH (ed) Handbook of applicable mathematics, vol 6. Wiley, Chichester, pp 397-405.
17. Gower JC, Dijksterhuis GB (2004) Procrustes problems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Groenen PJF (1993) The majorization approach to multidimensional scaling. DSWO Press, Leiden.
19. Hanafi M, Kiers HAL (2006) Analysis of K sets of data, with differential emphasis on agreement between and within sets. Comput Stat Data Anal 51: 1491-1508.
20. Harshman RA (1970) Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an explanatory multimodal factor analysis. UCLA Work Pap Phonetics 16: 1-84.
21. Healy MJR, Goldstein H (1976) An approach to the scaling of categorized attributes. Biometrika 63: 219-229.
22. Horst P (1961) Relations among m sets of measures. Psychometrika 26: 129-149.
23. Kherif F, Poline JP, Mériaux S, Benali H, Flandin G, Brett M (2003) Group analysis in functional neuroimaging: selecting subjects using similarity measures. NeuroImage 20: 2197-2208.
24. Kiers HAL (1990) Majorization as a tool for optimizing a class of matrix trace function. Psychometrika 55: 417-428.
25. Lavit C (1985) Application de la méthode STATIS. Statistique et Analyse des données 10: 103-116.
26. Lavit C (1988) Analyse conjointe de tableaux quantitatifs. Collection Méthodes Programmes. Masson, Paris.
27. Lavit C, Escoufier Y, Sabatier R, Traissac P (1994) The ACT (STATIS method). Comput Stat Data Anal 18: 97-117.
28. Lazraq A, Hanafi M, Cléroux R, Allaire J, Lepage Y (2008) Une approche inférentielle pour la validation du compromis de la méthode STATIS. Journal de la Société Française de statistique 149: 97-109.
29. L'Hermier des Plantes H, Thiébaut B (1977) Étude de la pluviosité au moyen de la méthode STATIS. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 25: 57-81.
30. Lütkepohl J (1996) Handbook of matrices. Wiley, New York.
31. Meyer R (1991) Canonical correlation analysis as starting point for extensions of correspondence analysis. Statistique et Analyse des Données 16: 55-77.
32. Meyners M, Kunert J, Qannari EM (2000) Comparing generalized procrustes analysis and STATIS. Food Qual Preference 11: 77-83.
33. Oliveira MM, Mexia JT (2007) Modelling series of studies with a common structure. Comput Stat Data Anal 51: 5876-5885.
34. Pagès J (2005) Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Qual Preference 16: 642-649.
35. Qannari EM, Courcoux P, Lejeune M, Maystre (1997) Comparaison de trois stratégies de détermination d'un compromis en évaluation sensorielle. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 45: 61-74.
36. Qannari EM, Wakeling I, Courcoux P, MacFie HJH (2000) Defining the underlying sensory dimensions. Food Qual Preferences 11: 151-154.
37. Robert P, Escoufier Y (1976) A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: the RV-coefficient. Appl Stat 25: 257-265.
38. Schlich P (1996) Defining and validating assessor compromises about product distances and attribute correlations. In: Naes T, Risvik E (eds) Multivariate analysis of data in sensory sciences. Elsevier, New York, pp 229-306.
39. Smilde AG, Westerhuis JA, de Jong S (2003) A framework for sequential multiblock component methods. J Chemom 17: 323-337.
40. Stanimirova I, Walczack B, Massart DL, Simeonov V, Saby CA, Di Crescenzo E (2004) STATIS, a three-way method for data analysis. Application to environmental data. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 73: 219-233.
41. Thioulouse J, Simier M, Chessel D (2004) Simultaneous analysis of a sequence of paired ecological tables. Ecology 85: 272-283.
42. Tucker LR (1966) Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 42: 593-600.
43. Verneaux J (1973) Cours d'eau de Franche comté (Massif du Jura). Recherches écologiques sur le réseau hydrographique du Doubs. Essai de biotypologie. PhD Thesis. University of Besançon.
44. Vivien M, Sabatier R (2004) A generalization of STATIS-ACT strategy: DO-ACT for two multiblocks tables. Comput Stat Data Anal 46: 155-171.
45. Williams A, Langron SP (1984) The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports. J Sci Food Agric 35: 558-568.