JNMFMA: A joint non-negative matrix factorization meta-analysis of transcriptomics data

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 572-580

  Wang, Hong Qiang ^a   Zheng, Chun Hou ^b   Zhao, Xing Ming ^c  

^a HEFEI INSTITUTES OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE   (China)

^b ANHUI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA METHYLATION; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; HUMAN; LUNG TUMOR; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA METHYLATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84928981583     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu679     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akavia, U.D. et al. (2010) An integrated approach to uncover drivers of cancer. Cell, 143, 1005-1017.
2. Bock, C. and Lengauer, T. (2008) Computational epigenetics. Bioinformatics, 24, 1-10.
3. Breitling, R. and Herzyk, P. (2005) Rank-based methods as a non-parametric alternative of the T-statistic for the analysis of biological microarray data. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 3, 1171-1189.
4. Brunet, J.-P. et al. (2004) Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 4164-4169.
5. Cappello, P. et al. (2014) Role of Nek2 on centrosome duplication and aneuploidy in breast cancer cells. Oncogene, 33, 2375-2384.
6. Chang, L.-C. et al. (2013) Meta-analysis methods for combining multiple expression profiles: comparisons, statistical characterization and an application guideline. BMC Bioinformatics, 14, 368.
7. Choi, J. et al. (2003) Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling inter-study variation. Bioinformatics, 19, i84-90.
8. D'Antonio, M. and Ciccarelli, F. (2013) Integrated analysis of recurrent properties of cancer genes to identify novel drivers. Genome Biol., 14, R52.
9. Das, P.M. and Singal, R. (2004) DNA methylation and cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 22, 4632-4642.
10. Das, T.K. et al. (2013) Centrosomal kinase Nek2 cooperates with oncogenic pathways to promote metastasis. Oncogenesis, 2, e69.
11. Fagan, A. et al. (2007) A multivariate analysis approach to the integration of prote-omic and gene expression data. Proteomics, 7, 2162-2171.
12. Forde, P.M. et al. (2014) New strategies in lung cancer: epigenetic therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 20, 2244-2248.
13. Gan, B. et al. (2014) Sparse representation for tumor classification based on feature extraction using latent low-rank representation. BioMed Res. Int., 2014, 7.
14. Gaujoux, R. and Seoighe, C. (2012) Semi-supervised nonnegative matrix factorization for gene expression deconvolution: a case study. Infection Genet. Evol., 12, 913-921.
15. Hong, F. and Breitling, R. (2008) A comparison of meta-analysis methods for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 24, 374-382.
16. Hong, F. et al. (2006) RankProd: a bioconductor package for detecting differentially expressed genes in meta-analysis. Bioinformatics, 22, 2825-2827.
17. Hoyer, P.O. (2004) Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 5, 1457-1469.
18. Irizarry, R.A. et al. (2005) Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms. Nat. Methods, 2, 345-350.
19. Jeffery, I.B. et al. (2007) Integrating transcription factor binding site information with gene expression datasets. Bioinformatics, 23, 298-305.
20. Jiao, Y. et al. (2014) A systems-level integrative framework for genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data identifies differential gene expression modules under epigenetic control. Bioinformatics, 30, 2360-2366.
21. Kim, H. and Park, H. (2007) Sparse non-negative matrix factorizations via alternating non-negativity-constrained least squares for microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics, 23, 1495-1502.
22. Landi, M.T. et al. (2008) Gene expression signature of cigarette smoking and its role in lung adenocarcinoma development and survival. PLoS One, 3, e1651.
23. Le Cao, K.-A. et al. (2009) integrOmics: an R package to unravel relationships between two omics datasets. Bioinformatics, 25, 2855-2856.
24. Lee, D.D. and Seung, H.S. (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401, 788-791.
25. Li, J. and Tseng, G.C. (2011) An adaptively weighted statistic for detecting differential gene expression when combining multiple transcriptomic studies. Ann. Appl. Stat., 5, 994-1019.
26. Li, S. and Li, D. (2008) DNA Microarray Technology and Data Analysis in Dancer Research. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
27. Natrajan, R. and Wilkerson, P. (2013) From integrative genomics to therapeutic targets. Cancer Res., 73, 3483-3488.
28. Novakovic, B. et al. (2011) Evidence for widespread changes in promoter methyla-tion profile in human placenta in response to increasing gestational age and environmental/stochastic factors. BMC Genomics, 12, 529.
29. Richards, K.L. et al. (2010) Methylation of the candidate biomarker TCF21 is very frequent across a spectrum of early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancers. Cancer, 117, 606-617.
30. Rung, J. and Brazma, A. (2013) Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data. Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 89-99.
31. Selamat, S.A. et al. (2012) Genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in lung adenocarcinoma and integration with mRNA expression. Genome Res., 22, 1197-1211.
32. Shivapurkar, N. et al. (2008) Differential methylation of a short CpG-rich sequence within exon 1 of TCF21 gene: a promising cancer biomarker assay. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 17, 995-1000.
33. Smith, L.T. et al. (2006) Epigenetic regulation of the tumor suppressor gene TCF21 on 6q23-q24 in lung and head and neck cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 982-987.
34. Song, C. and Tseng, G.C. (2014) Hypothesis setting and Order statistics for robust genomic meta-analysis. Ann. Appl. Stat, 8, 777-800.
35. Su, L.-J. et al. (2007) Selection of DDX5 as a novel internal control for Q-RT-PCR from microarray data using a block bootstrap re-sampling scheme. BMC Genomics, 8, 140.
36. TCGA. (2012) Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature, 487, 330-337.
37. Tseng, G. et al. (2012) Comprehensive literature review and statistical considerations for microarray meta-analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, 3785-3799.
38. Wang, H.-Q. and Huang, D.-S. (2006) Regulation probability method for gene selection, Patt. Recogn. Lett., 27, 116-122.
39. Wang, H.-Q. et al. (2011) SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures. Bioinformatics, 27, 225-231.
40. Xia, J. et al. (2013) INMEX: A web-based tool for integrative meta-analysis of expression data. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, W63-W70.
41. Zeng, X.-Q. et al. (2008) Dimension reduction with redundant gene elimination for tumor classification. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, S8.
42. Zhang, S. et al. (2012) Discovery of multi-dimensional modules by integrative analysis of cancer genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, 9379-9391.
43. Zhang, W. et al. (2013) Integrating genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic features reveals modular signatures underlying poor prognosis in ovarian cancer. Cell Reports, 4, 542-553.
44. Zheng, C.-H. et al. (2011) Tumor classification based on non-negative matrix factorization using gene expression data. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci., 10, 86-93.
45. Zhong, X. et al. (2014) Examining Nek2 as a better proliferation marker in non-small cell lung cancer prognosis. Tumor Biol., 35, 7155-7162.