Cross-species common regulatory network inference without requirement for prior gene affiliation

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1082-1090

  Gholami, Amin Moghaddas ^a,b   Fellenberg, Kurt ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC DATABASE; METHODOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 77951942959     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq096     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adie,E.A. et al. (2006) SUSPECTS: enabling fast and effective prioritization of positional candidates. Bioinformatics, 22, 773-774.
2. Alon,U. (2007) Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet., 8, 450-461.
3. Bansal,M. et al. (2006) Inference of gene regulatory networks and compound mode of action from time course gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics, 22, 815-822.
4. Basso,K. et al. (2005) Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nat. Genet., 37, 382-390.
5. Ben-Shahar,T.R. et al. (2008) Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science, 321, 563-566.
6. Bourgeois,F. and Lassalle,J.-C. (1971) An extension of the Munkres algorithm for the assignment problem to rectangular matrices. Commun. ACM, 14, 802-804.
7. Brunner,H.G. and van Driel,M.A. (2004) From syndrome families to functional genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 545-551.
8. Choi,J.K. et al. (2003) Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation. Bioinformatics, 19 (Suppl. 1), i84-i90.
9. Conlon,E.M. et al. (2007) Bayesian meta-analysis models for microarray data: a comparative study. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 80.
10. Culhane,A.C. et al. (2003) Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 59.
11. Dolédec,S. and Chessel,D. (1994) Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwater Biol., 31, 277-294.
12. Dray,S. et al. (2003) Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables. Ecology, 84, 3078-3089.
13. Dray,S. and Dufour,A.-B. (2007) The ade4 Package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Soft., 22, 1-20.
14. Fellenberg,K. et al. (2001) Correspondence analysis applied to microarray data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10781-10786.
15. Fierro,A.C. et al. (2008) Meta analysis of gene expression data within and across species. Curr. Genomics, 9, 525-534.
16. Franke,L. et al. (2006) Reconstruction of a functional human gene network, with an application for prioritizing positional candidate genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 78, 1011-1025.
17. Friedman,N. et al. (2000) Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J. Comput. Biol., 7, 601-620.
18. Garrett-Mayer,E. et al. (2008) Cross-study validation and combined analysis of gene expression microarray data. Biostatistics, 9, 333-354.
19. Gilks,W.R. et al. (2005) Fusing microarray experiments with multivariate regression. Bioinformatics, 21 (Suppl. 2), ii137-ii143.
20. Hartemink,A. et al. (2002a) Bayesian methods for elucidating genetic regulatory networks. IEEE Intel. Systems, 17, 37-43.
21. Hartemink,A. et al. (2002b) Combining location and expression data for principled discovery of genetic regulatory networks. In Altman,R. and Dunker,A.K. (eds), Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2002 (PSB02). World Scientific: New Jersey, 437-449.
22. Huang da,W. et al. (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protocols, 4, 44-57.
23. Kanehisa,M. et al. (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D480-D484.
24. Kuhn,H.W. (1955) The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart., 2, 83-87.
25. Lage,K. et al. (2007) A human phenome-interactome network of protein complexes implicated in genetic disorders. Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 309-316.
26. Ma,S. and Huang,J. (2009) Regularized gene selection in cancer microarray metaanalysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 1.
27. Marot,G. et al. (2009) Moderated effect size and p-value combinations for microarray meta-analyses. Bioinformatics, 25, 2692-2699.
28. Milo,R. et al. (2002) Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298, 824-827.
29. Quackenbush,J. (2006) Microarray analysis and tumor classification. N. Engl. J. Med., 354, 2463-2472.
30. Ramasamy,A. et al. (2008) Key issues in conducting a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray datasets. PLoS Med., 5, e184.
31. Rhodes,D.R. et al. (2002) Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 62, 4427-4433.
32. Rhodes,D.R. et al. (2004) Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 9309-9314.
33. Robert,P. and Escoufier,Y. (1976) A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: the RV-coefficient. Appl. Statist., 25, 257-265.
34. Rousseeuw, P. (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53-65.
35. Rowland,B.D. et al. (2009) Building sister chromatid cohesion: smc3 acetylation counteracts an antiestablishment activity. Mol. Cell, 33, 763-774.
36. Rustici,G. et al. (2004) Periodic gene expression program of the fission yeast cell cycle. Nat. Genet., 36, 809-817.
37. Santisteban,M.S. et al. (1997) Histone octamer function in vivo: mutations in the dimer-tetramer interfaces disrupt both gene activation and repression. EMBO J., 16, 2493-2506.
38. Smid,M. et al. (2003) Venn Mapping: clustering of heterologous microarray data based on the number of co-occurring differentially expressed genes. Bioinformatics, 19, 2065-2071.
39. Smith,V.A. et al. (2002) Evaluating functional network inference using simulations of complex biological systems. Bioinformatics, 18 (Suppl. 1), S216-S224.
40. Smith,V.A. et al. (2003) Influence of network topology and data collection on network inference. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 8, 164-175.
41. Spellman,P.T. et al. (1998) Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell, 9, 3273-3297.
42. Stevens,J.R. and Doerge,R.W. (2005) Combining Affymetrix microarray results. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 57.
43. Tsiporkova,E. and Boeva,V. (2008) Fusing time series expression data through hybrid aggregation and hierarchical merge. Bioinformatics, 24, i63-i69.
44. Unal,E. et al. (2008) Amolecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science, 321, 566-569.
45. Wang,J. et al. (2004) Differences in gene expression between B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and normal B cells: a meta-analysis of three microarray studies. Bioinformatics, 20, 3166-3178.
46. Wernicke,S. (2006) Efficient detection of network motifs. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 3, 347-359.
47. Yang,X. and Sun,X. (2007) Meta-analysis of several gene lists for distinct types of cancer: a simple way to reveal common prognostic markers. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 118.
48. Yu,J. et al. (2004) Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data. Bioinformatics, 20, 3594-3603.