Examination of the position accuracy of implant abutments reproduced by intra-oral optical impression

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Ajioka, Hitoshi ^a   Kihara, Hidemichi ^a   Odaira, Chikayuki ^a   Kobayashi, Takuya ^a   Kondo, Hisatomo ^a  

^a IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL CASTING; DENTAL DEVICE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; ELECTRONIC DEVICE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAORAL SCANNER; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; OPTICAL IMPRESSION; SOFTWARE; VIRTUAL REALITY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DEVICES; HUMAN; TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS;

EID: 84991245570     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164048     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008; 204: 505-511. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350 PMID: 18469768
2. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res. 2014; 58: 208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003 PMID: 25172234
3. Kattadiyil MT, Mursic Z, AlRumaih H, Goodacre CJ. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 444-448. doi: 10.1016/j. prosdent.2014.03.022 PMID: 24882595
4. Takuma Y, Yasuda H, Sato T, Hisanaga R. Examination of the fitting precision of all-ceramic bridges manufactured by intraoral digital impression. J Esthet Dent. 2013; 26: 1-7.
5. Nayyar N, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E. Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 210-215. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)00073-5 PMID: 23566600
6. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 111-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x PMID: 22353208
7. Mormann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137 Suppl: 7S-13S. PMID: 16950932
8. Posselt A, Kerschbaum T. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Int J Comput Dent. 2003; 6: 231-248. PMID: 14601187
9. Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 241-246. PMID: 15119879
10. Zimmer S, Gohlich O, Ruttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH, Barthel CR. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Oper Dent. 2008; 33: 484-487. doi: 10.2341/07-142 PMID: 18833853
11. Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57: 236-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001 PMID: 24140561
12. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007; 28: 422-424, 426-428, 430-431. PMID: 18578100
13. Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1425-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.012 PMID: 24993373
14. Mehl A. A new concept for the integration of dynamic occlusion in the digital construction process. Int J Comput Dent. 2012; 15: 109-123. PMID: 22891415
15. Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Bronkhorst EM, Breuning KH, Schols JG, Bergé SJ, et al. Accuracy and reliability of a novel method for fusion of digital dental casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e59130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059130 PMID: 23527111
16. Odaira C, Itoh S, Ishibashi K. Clinical evaluation of a dental color analysis system: the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer1. J Prosthodont Res. 2011; 55: 199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.12.005 PMID: 21296639
17. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111: 186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010 PMID: 24210732
18. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010; 31 Spec No 4: 2-11. PMID: 21049823
19. Johnson GH, Craig RG. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 484-490. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85) 90630-4 PMID: 3889281
20. Millstein PL. Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil. 1992; 19: 239-243. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01098.x PMID: 1500967
21. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2011; 14: 11-21. PMID: 21657122
22. Souza RO, Ozcan M, Pavanelli CA, Buso L, Lombardo GH, Michida SM, et al. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21: 94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00793.x PMID: 22050205
23. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142: 308-313. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031 PMID: 22920696
24. Pradies G, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Gimenez B, Martinez-Rus F. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145: 338-344. doi: 10.14219/jada.2013.45 PMID: 24686966
25. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2010; 38: 553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015 PMID: 20381576
26. Grossmann Y, Pasciuta M, Finger IM. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 258-261. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.013 PMID: 16543025
27. Vafiadis DC. Computer-generated abutments using a coded healing abutment: a two year preliminary report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2007; 19: 443-448. PMID: 17929687
28. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e43312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043312 PMID: 22937030
29. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 121-128. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1 PMID: 23395338
30. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18: 1687-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y PMID: 24240949
31. Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1461-1471. doi: 10.1016/j. prosdent.2014.05.027 PMID: 25134995
32. Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P, Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2011:doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.005 PMID: 22027653
33. Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, Eliasson A, Karlsson S,Örtorp A. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int J Dent. 2014; 2014: 534382. doi: 10.1155/2014/534382 PMID: 24723954
34. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100: 285-291. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5 PMID: 18922257
35. Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent. 2004; 13: 358-366. PMID: 15591998
36. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 448-455. PMID: 1820314
37. Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 635-641. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01543.x PMID: 18492075