Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 145, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 338-344

  Pradíes, Guillermo ^a   Ferreiroa, Alberto ^a   Özcan, Mutlu ^b   Giménez, Beatriz ^a   Martínez Rus, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computer aided design; Computeraided manufacturing; Implant framework; Implant impression technique; Photogrammetry; Stereophotogrammetry

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ADULT; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PROCEDURES; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

EID: 84902210488     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.2013.45     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber HP, Wismeijer D. Computeraided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(suppl):110-117.
2. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac 1996;11(5):620-625. (Pubitemid 126442767)
3. Smedberg JI, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson SA, Glantz SA. On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: a methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7(1):55-63. (Pubitemid 126670567)
4. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures: a pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9(4):272-280. (Pubitemid 128658000)
5. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(suppl 1):156-158.
6. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001;10(2):85-92. (Pubitemid 33699313)
7. Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennani V, Waddell N, Swain M. Fit of screwretained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24(3):207-220.
8. Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):506-515.
9. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50(3):399-410.
10. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(3):270-276.
11. Bartlett DW, Greenwood R, Howe L. The suitability of head-ofimplant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implantretained three unit bridges: an in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10(4):163-166.
12. De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: a comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(3):329-336. (Pubitemid 40433865)
13. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(5):470-476. (Pubitemid 39446460)
14. Akca K, Cehreli MC. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(4):517-523. (Pubitemid 39194176)
15. Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(2):192-198. (Pubitemid 38561055)
16. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(2):186-192. (Pubitemid 37323918)
17. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(1):39-47.
18. Lee Y, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(5):823-830.
19. Browne V, Flewelling M, Wierenga M, et al. Sterilization analysis of contaminated healing abutments and impression copings. J Calif Dent Assoc 2012;40(5):419-421.
20. Raviv E, Hana J, Raviv R, Harel-Raviv M. A clinical report on the use of closed tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings (published online ahead of print April 17, 2012). J Oral Implantol. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11- 00056.1.
21. Tarib NA, Seong TW, Chuen KM, Kun MS, Ahmad M, Kamarudin KH. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012;20(1):35-39.
22. Phillips K, Nicholls J, Ma T, Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: a three-dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(5):533-540.
23. Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(4): 444-447.
24. Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(6):588-593.
25. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(5):503-509.
26. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(6):885-888.
27. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(4):285-291.
28. Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(5):823-830.
29. Howell KJ, McGlumphy EA, Drago C, Knapik G. Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(1):228-240.
30. Gallucci GO, Papaspyridakos P, Ashy LM, Kim GE, Brady NJ, Weber HP. Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24(5):469-472.
31. Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Happe A, Schlee M, Beuer F. Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(8):1929-1935.
32. Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(4):1201-1208.
33. Mormann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F. The Cerec system: computerassisted preparation of direct ceramic inlays in 1 setting (in German). Quintessenz 1987;38(3):457-470.
34. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204(9):505-511.
35. Eliasson A, Ortorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14(suppl 1):e30-e38.
36. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35(12):903-908.
37. Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008;19(1):1-4.
38. Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38(5):323-330.
39. Wiedhahn K. The impression-free Cerec multilayer bridge with the CAD-on method (in English, German). Int J Comput Dent 2011;14(1): 33-45.
40. Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera (in English, German). Int J Comput Dent 2009;12(1):11-28.
41. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38(7):553-559.
42. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24(1):111-115.
43. Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, McGlone JC. Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry. New York: Wiley; 2001:473.
44. Ercoli C, Geminiani A, Feng C, Lee H. The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14(suppl 1):e188-e195.
45. Chan DC, Chung AK, Haines J, Yau EH, Kuo CC. The accuracy of optical scanning: influence of convergence and die preparation. Oper Dent 2011;36(5):486-491.
46. Vlaar ST, van der Zel JM. Accuracy of dental digitizers. Int Dent J 2006;56(5):301-309. (Pubitemid 44599244)
47. Nouri M, Massudi R, Bagheban AA, Azimi S, Fereidooni F. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements. Aust Orthod J 2009;25(1):41-47.
48. Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16(3):851-856.
49. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions - an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14(1):11-21.
50. Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P, Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling (published online ahead of print Oct. 17, 2011). J Dent 2011.
51. Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth (published online ahead of print July 24, 2013). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013. doi:10.1111/cid.12124.
52. Moreno A, Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Pradies G. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology. Implant Dent 2013;22(4):320-325.
53. Lie A, Jemt T. Photogrammetric measurements of implant positions: description of a technique to determine the fit between implants and superstructures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5(1):30-36.
54. Jemt T, Lie A. Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6(3):172-180.
55. Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implantsupported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(2):151-158.
56. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(5):620-625. (Pubitemid 126442767)
57. Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12(3):209-215.
58. Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A. Photogrammetry: an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12(4):363-368.
59. Waters K, Terzopoulos D. The computer synthesis of expressive faces. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992;335(1273):87-93.
60. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T. Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(1):43-50. (Pubitemid 40445862)
61. Mulcahy C, Sherriff M, Walter JD, Fenlon MR. Measurement of misfit at the implant-prosthesis interface: an experimental method using a coordinate measuring machine. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(1):111-118.