From Ethical Review to Responsible Research and Innovation

From Ethical Review to Responsible Research and Innovation

Volumn 3, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-184

  Pellé, Sophie ^a   Reber, Bernard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983426640     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781119318422     Document Type: Book

References (192)

1. ADAM B., GROVES C., "Futures tended: care and future-oriented responsibility", Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 31, pp. 17-27, 2011.
2. ANDERSEN V., HANSEN K., "How deliberation makes better citizens: the Danish deliberative poll on the euro", European Journal of Political Research, vol. 46, pp. 531-556, 2007.
3. ARENDT H., Responsabilité et jugement, Payot, Paris, 2003.
4. BASU S., "Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humour", Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 7, pp. 378-403, 1999.
5. BEAMING PROJECT, Deliverable D7.1: assessment of ethical and legal issues of component technologies, available at http://beamingeu.org/sites/beamingeu.org/files/BEAMING_Deliverable_D7_1.pdf, 2010.
6. BEAMING PROJECT, Deliverable D. 7.2: scoping report on the legal impacts of BEAMING technologies, available at http://beaming-eu.org/sites/beamingeu.org/files/D%207.2BEAMING%20Deliverable%207.2-FINAL.pdf, 2011.
7. BECK U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage Publications, London, 1992.
8. BERTRAND A., JOLY P.-B., MARRIS C., "L'expérience française de l'évaluation technologique interactive des recherche sur les vignes transgéniques", Ethique Publique, vol. 7, pp. 186-194, 2005.
9. BERTHELOT J-M., L'emprise du vrai. Connaissance scientifique et modernité, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2007.
10. BIRD K., SHERWIN M. J., American Prometheus, the Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2006.
11. BLANCHON D., MOREAU S., VEYRET Y. "Comprendre et construire la justice environnementale", Annales de Géographie, vol. 665-666, pp. 35-60, 2009.
12. BLOK V., "Look who's talking: responsible innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes", Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 2, pp. 171-190, 2014.
13. BLOK V., LEMMENS P., "The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation", in VAN DEN HOVEN J., KOOPS E. J., ROMIJN H. A., et al. (eds), Responsible Innovation: Issues in Conceptualization, Governance and Implementation, Springer, Dordrecht, vol. 2, pp. 19-35, 2015.
14. BOHMAN J. "Survey article: the coming of age of deliberative democracy", The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 6, pp. 400-425, 1998.
15. BOVENS M., The Quest for Responsibility. Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
16. BOVENS, M., "Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism", West European Politics, vol. 33, pp. 946-967, 2010.
17. CALLON M., LASCOUMES P., BARTHES Y., Acting in an Uncertain World. An essay on Technical Democracy (trans. BURCHELL G.), MIT Press, Cambridge, 2009.
18. CANE P., Responsibility in Law and Morality, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2002.
19. CHAMBERS S., "Deliberative Democracy Theory", Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 6, pp. 307-326, 2003.
20. COHEN J., "Deliberation and democratic legitimacy", in HAMLIN A., PETTIT P. (eds), The Good Polity, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 17-34, 1989.
21. COHEN J., "Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy", in BOHMAN J., REHG W. (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, MIT Press Cambridge, MA, pp. 407-437, 1996.
22. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Call for Tender, No. RTD-B6-PP-00964-2013. Study on monitoring the evolution and benefits of responsible research and innovation, Brussels, 2013.
23. COOKE M., "Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy", Political Studies, vol. 48, pp. 947-969, 2000.
24. CORLETT J.A., "Collective moral responsibility", Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 32, pp. 573-584, 2001.
25. DARWAL J., GIBBARD A., RAILTON P., "Toward 'Fin de Siècle' Ethics. Some Trends", The Philosophical Review, vol. 101, pp. 115-189, 1992.
26. DECKER M., LADIKAS M. (eds), Bridges between Science, Society and Policy; Technology Assessment-Methods and Impacts, Springer, Berlin, New York, 2004.
27. DEMORTAIN D., "L'étude Séralini et ce qu'elle nous apprend sur la toxicologie réglementaire", EDP Sciences, Natures Sciences Sociétés, vol. 21, pp. 84-87, 2013.
28. DOUGLAS, H. E., "The moral responsibilities of scientists", American Philosophical Quarterly, no. 40, pp. 59-68, 2003.
29. DRYZEK J.S., Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
30. DUFF A., Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2007.
31. DWORKIN R., Justice for Hedgehogs, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2011.
32. ELSTER J., "Introduction", in ELSTER J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
33. ENGELHARDT JR H.T., CAPLAN A. L. (eds), Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution of Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
34. EU COMMISSION, Options for strengthening RRI. Report of the expert group on the state of art in Europe on responsible research and innovation, EU Commission, 2013.
35. EXPERT GROUP ON POLICY INDICATORS FOR RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (chair, Stand R., rapporteur Spaapen J., members: Bauer M.W., Hogan E., Revuelta G., Stagl S., Contributors: Paula L, Guimaraes Pereira A.), "Indicators for promoting and monitoring responsible research and innovation", Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Science with and for Society, Bruxelles, available at https://infoeuropa.eurocid.pt/files/database/000056001-000057000/000056403_2.pdf, June 2015.
36. EWALD F., L'Etat providence, Grasset et Fasquelle, Paris, 1986.
37. FERRY J. M., Les puissances de l'expérience, vol. 2, éd., Editions du Cerf, Paris, 1991.
38. FERRY J. M., Valeures et normes, Université Libre Bruxelles, Bruxelles, 2002.
39. FISHKIN, J. S., LUSKIN R.C., "Experimenting with a democratic ideal: deliberative polling and public opinion", Acta Politica, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 284-298, 2005.
40. FISHER E., MAHAJAN R. L., MITCHAM C., "Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within", Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 485-496, 2006.
41. FISHER E., RIP A., "Responsible innovation: multi-level dynamics and soft interventions", in OWEN R., HEINTZ M., BESSANT J. (eds), Responsible Innovation, Wiley, Chichester (UK), pp. 165-184, 2013.
42. FOGELBERG H., SANDEN B., "Understanding reflexive systems of innovation: an analysis of Swedish nanotechnology discourse and organization", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65-81, 2008.
43. FUNTOWICZ S. O., RAVETZ J. R., "Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post normal science", in KRIMSKY S., GOLDING D., Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, New York, pp. 251-273, 1992.
44. FUNTOWICZ S. O., RAVETZ J. R., "Science for the post-normal age", Futures, vol. 25, pp. 739-755, 1993.
45. GIANNI R., Responsibility and Freedom: The Ethical Realm of RRI, ISTE, London, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2016.
46. GIBBONS M., LIMOGES C., NOWOTNY H. et al., The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage Publications, London, 1994.
47. GILLIGAN C., In a Different Voice-Psychological Theory & Women's Development, Harvard University Press, 1982.
48. GOODIN R. E. Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985.
49. GOODIN, R. E., "Responsibilities", Philosophical Quaterly, vol. 36, pp. 50-56. 1986.
50. GRACCI, F., "Quelle expertise scientifique après le verdict du procès de L'Aquila?", La Recherche, vol. 140, pp 8, 2012.
51. GREAT. Del 2.2 Theoretical landscape, available at http://www.greatproject.eu/deliverables_files/deliverables03, 2013.
52. GREAT. Del 2.3. Analytical grid, available at http://www.greatproject.eu/deliverables_files/deliverables02, 2013.
53. GRINBAUM A., GROVES C., "What is 'responsible' about responsible innovation? Understanding the ethical issues", in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M., (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
54. GROVES, C., "Future ethics: risk, care and non-reciprocal responsibility", Journal of Global Ethics, vol. 5, pp. 17-31, 2009
55. GRöNLUND K., SETäLä M., HERNE K., "Deliberation and civic virtue: lessons from a citizen deliberation experiment", European Political Science Review, vol. 2, pp. 95-117, 2010.
56. GROVES, C. Care, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2014.
57. GROTHENDIECK A., Récoltes et semailles. Réflexions et témoignage sur un passé de mathématicien, available at http://lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~duchamp/Books&more/Grothendieck/RS/pdf/RetS.pdf, 1986.
58. GRUNWALD A., "From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology", NanoEthics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 91-101, 2010.
59. GRUNWALD A., "Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research", Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, vol. 7, pp. 9-31, 2011.
60. GRUNWALD A., Responsible Nanobiotechnology, Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2012.
61. GUSTON D., "Understanding 'anticipatory Governance'", Social Studies of Science, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 218-242, 2014.
62. HABERMAS J., Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, Beacon Press, Boston, MA, 1981.
63. HALL S., "Scientists on trial: at fault?" Nature, vol. 477, pp. 264-269, 2011.
64. HART H.L.A., Punishment and Responsibility: Essay in the Philosophy of Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968
65. HARTZ-KARP J., "How and why deliberative democracy enables cointelligence and brings wisdom to governance", Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2007.
66. HAUPTMANN E., "Can less be more? leftist deliberative democrats' critique of participatory democracy?", Polity, vol. 33, pp. 397-421, 2001.
67. HELLSTRöM T., "Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation", Technology in Society, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 369-384, 2003.
68. HUMABIO PROJECT, HUMABIO ethical manual, del. 1.1., 2006.
69. HUMABIO PROJECT, HUMABIO deliverable 1.2.doc, 2006.
70. HUMABIO PROJECT, HUMABIO deliverable 1.3.doc, 2006.
71. INRA, Co-construction d'un programme de recherche: une expérience pilote sur les vignes transgéniques, Rapport final du groupe de travail, 2002. Available at http://inra-dam-front-resources-cdn.brainsonic.com/ressources/afile/236123-0d0cb-resource-rapport-final-du-groupe-de-travail-pdf-.html
72. JASANOFF S., "Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science", Minerva, vol. 41, pp. 223-244, 2003.
73. JOLY P.-B., MARRIS C., BERTRAND A., "Mettre les choix scientifiques et techniques en débat", in LOLIVE J., SOUBEYRAN O., (eds), L'émergence des cosmopolitiques, La Découverte, Paris, pp. 115-124, 2007.
74. JONAS H., The Imperative of Responsibility; In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984.
75. JOSS S., BROWNLEA A., "Considering the concept of procedural justice for public policy-and decision-making in science and technology dossier, Special Issue on Public Participation in Science and Technology", Science and Public Policy, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 321-330, 1999.
76. KAHANE D., "Délibération démocratique et ontologie sociale", in LEYDET D. (ed), La démocratie délibérative, Philosophique, vol. 29, pp. 251-286 2002.
77. KELTY C. M., "Beyond implications and applications: the story of 'safety by design'", NanoEthics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79-96, 2009.
78. KEMP P., RENDTORFF J., MATTSON JOHANSEN N., (eds.), Bioethics and Biolaw, deux volumes, vol. 1; Judgement of Life, vol. 2; Four ethical Principles, Rhodos International Science and Art Publisher & Centre for Ethics and Law, Copenhague, 2000.
79. KERMISCH C. "Risk and responsibility: a complex and evolving relationship", Science and Engineering Ethics, no. 18, pp. 91-102, 2012.
80. KJØLBERG K., DELAGDO-RAMOS G.C., WICKSON F., et al., "Models of governance for converging technologies", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 83-97, 2008.
81. KLüVER L., "Project management. A matter of ethics and robust decision", in KLüVER L., Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making (EUROPTA), pp. 87-111, 2000. Available at http://www.tekno.dk/pdf/projekter/europta_Report.pdf.
82. LATOUR B., Nous n'avons jamais été Modernes. Essai d'anthropologie symétrique, La Découverte, Paris, 1991.
83. LEE R. G., PETTS J., "Adaptive governance for responsible innovation", in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M., (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 143-164, 2013.
84. LENOBLE J., MAESSCHALCK M., Toward a Theory of Governance: The Action of Norms, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London/New York, 2003.
85. LENOBLE J., MAESSCHALCK M., Democracy, Law and Governance, ASHGATE Farnham, Farnham, Burlington, 2010.
86. LINDELL M., "Same but different-similarities and differences in the implementation of deliberative mini-publics", ECPR General Conference, Section "Democratic Innovations in Europe-a comparative perspective", August 24-27, University of Reykjavik, Iceland, 2011.
87. MAESSCHALCK, M., Normes et Contextes, Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, Zurich, New York, 2001.
88. MANSBRIDGE J., Beyond Adversary Democracy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1983.
89. MANSBRIDGE J., "Everyday talk in the deliberative system", in MACEDO S. (ed), Deliberative Politics: Essays on 'Democracy and Disagreement', Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 211-239, 1999.
90. MANSBRIDGE J., BOHMAN J., CHAMBERS S., et al., "The place of self - interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy", The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 64-100, 2010.
91. MARRIS C., JOLY P.-B., RIP A., "Interactive technology assessment in the real world: Dual dynamics in an iTA exercise on genetically modified vines", Science Technology Human Values, vol. 33, pp. 77-100, 2008.
92. MIAUCE PROJECT, Deliverable 5.1.1. Ethical, legal and social issues From analysis to methodology, 2007.
93. MIAUCE PROJECT, D5.1.2: ethical, legal and social issues, 2008.
94. MIAUCE PROJECT, D5.1.3: ethical, legal and social issues, 2009.
95. MITCHAM C., "Co-responsibility for research integrity", Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 273-290, 2003.
96. MONNIER S., Les comités d'éthique et le droit. Eléments d'analyse sur le système normatif de la bioéthique, L'Harmattan, Paris, 2005.
97. MOUFFE C., "Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?", Social Research, vol. 3, pp. 745-758, 1999.
98. NORDMANN A., MACNAGHTEN P., "Engaging narratives and the limits of lay ethics: introduction", Nanoethics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 133-140, 2010.
99. NORDMANN A., "Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation", Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 87-98, 2014.
100. NOWOTNY H., SCOTT P., GIBBONS M., Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2001.
101. OWEN R., MACNAGHTEN P., STILGOE J., "Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society", Science and Public Policy, vol. 39, pp. 751-760, 2012.
102. OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M., (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
103. OWEN R., MACNAGHTEN P., STILGOE J., et al., "A framework for responsible innovation", in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M., (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 27-50, 2013.
104. PARKINSON J., MANSBRIDGE J. (eds), Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012.
105. PAVIE, X., SCHOLTEN V., CARTHY D., Responsible Innovation: From Concept to Practice, World Scientific, Singapore, 2014.
106. PHARO P., "Ethique et sociologie. Perspectives actuelles de la sociologie morale", L'Année sociologique, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 321-606, 2004.
107. PHARO P., Morale et sociologie. Le sens et les valeurs entre nature et culture, Gallimard, Paris 2004.
108. PHARO P., "Perspectives de la sociologie de l'éthique", in BATEMANNOVAES S., OGIEN R., PHARO P. (eds), Raison pratique et sociologie de l'éthique. Autour des travaux de Paul Ladrière, Editions du CNRS, Paris, pp. 207-221, 2000.
109. PHARO P., "Les conditions de légitimité des actions publiques", Revue Française de Sociologie, vol. XXXI, pp. 389-420, 1990.
110. PHARO P. "Problèmes empiriques de la sociologie compréhensive", Revue Française de Sociologie, vol. XXV, pp. 120-149, 1985.
111. PIDGEAON N., ROGERS-HAYDEN T., "Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or 'upstream engagement'?", Health, Risk & Society, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 191-210, 2007.
112. PISANO U. Resilience and sustainable development: theory of resilience, systems thinking and adaptive governance, ESDN Quarterly Report No.26, 2012
113. PELLé S., NUROCK V., "Of nanochips and persons: toward an ethics of diagnostic technology in personalized medicine", Nanoethics, vol. 6, pp. 155-165, 2012.
114. PELLé S., REBER B., "Responsible innovation in the light of moral responsibility", Journal on Chain and Network Science, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107-117, 2015.
115. PELLé S., "Responsibility as care for research and innovation", Proceedings from the Pacita 2015 Conference in Berlin, 2016.
116. PELLIZZONI L., "Responsibility and environmental governance", Environmental Politics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 541-565, 2004.
117. PELLé S., De la Responsabilité sociale des entreprises à l'Innovation et à la recherche responsables, ISTE Editions, Paris, 2016, forthcoming.
118. QUINCHE F., La délibération éthique. Contribution du dialogisme et de la logique des questions, Kimé, Paris, 2005.
119. QUINCHE F., "Analyse d'un conflit en éthique clinique à partir du schéma de l'argument de S. Toulmin", Ethique & Santé, vol. 2, pp. 186-190, 2005.
120. RAYNAUD D., Sociologie des controverses scientifiques, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2003.
121. RAWLS J., A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971.
122. RAWLS J., Political Liberalism, The John Dewey Essays in Philosophy, (4th ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, 1993.
123. REBER B., Precautionary Principle, Pluralism and Deliberation, ISTE, London and John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2016, forthcoming.
124. REBER B., "Taking moral responsibility seriously to foster responsible research and innovation", in GIANNI R., PEARSON J., REBER B., Responsible Innovation and Research:. Concepts and Practises, forthcoming, Oxford, Rutledge, 2016.
125. REBER B., Analysis of governance theory and practice of responsible innovation, DEL 5.2. Projet GREAT, 2015.
126. REBER B., PELLé S. "Innovation responsable", in CASILLO I., AVEC BARBIER R., BLONDIAUX L., et al. (eds), Dictionnaire critique et interdisciplinaire de la participation, GIS Démocratie et Participation, Paris, available at http://www.dicopart.fr/it/dico/innovation-responsable, 2013.
127. REBER B., "Argumenter et délibérer entre éthique et politique", in REBER B. (ed), Vertus et limites de la démocratie délibérative, Archives de Philosophie, vol. 74, pp. 289-303, 2012.
128. REBER B. (ed), "Vertus et limites de la démocratie délibérative", Archives de philosophie, vol. 74/1, pp. 219-303, 2012.
129. REBER B., La démocratie génétiquement modifiée. Sociologies éthiques de l'évaluation des technologies controversées, collection Bioéthique critique, Presses de l'Université de Laval, Québec, 2011.
130. REBER B., "Un long chemin pour des méthodes robustes d'évaluation de la participation et de la délibération dans des débats réels", in CARDOSO ROSAS, J. (ed) Etica, technologia è Democracia, A avaliação de tecnologias controversas em conferências de cidadãos, Humus, Lisbon, pp. 25-32, 2011.
131. REBER B., "La bioéthique en conférences élargies. Quelle qualité dans l'évaluation?", La Bioéthique en débat, Archives de philosophie du droit, Tome 53, pp. 333-366, 2010.
132. REBER B. (ed), "La Bioéthique en débat", Archives de philosophie du droit, vol. 53, 2010.
133. REBER B., "La Valutazione partecipata della technologia. Una promessa troppo difficile da mantenere?", in ARNALDI S., LORENZET A. (eds), Innovazioni in corso. Il dibattito sulle nanotecnologie fra diritto, etica e società, Il Mulino, Rome, pp. 325-349, 2010.
134. REBER B., "Entre participation et délibération, le débat public et ses analyses sont-ils hybrides du point de vue des théories politiques?", Klesis. Revue philosophique, Philosophie et sociologie, available at http://revueklesis,org/index,php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45&Itemid=63, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 46-78, 2007.
135. REBER B., "Pluralisme moral: les valeurs, les croyances et les théories morales", Archives de philosophie du droit, vol. 49, pp. 21-46, 2006.
136. REBER B., "The ethics of participatory technology assessment", Technikfolgenabschätzung, Theorie und Praxis, available at http://www.itas.fzk.de/tatup/062/rebe06a.html, vol. 2, no. 15, pp. 73-81, 2006.
137. REBER B., "Democracy and technologies: goals of technology assessment", in TERSMAN F. (ed.), Democracy unbound. Basic Explorations, Stockholm Studies in democratic Theory 2, Stockholm University Press, pp. 98-106 2006.
138. REBER B., "Technology Assessment as Policy Analysis: From Expert Advice to Participatory Approaches", in FISCHER F., MILLER G., and SIDNEY M. (éd.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Theory, Politics and Methods, New York, Public Administration and Public Policy Series, Rutgers University/CRC Press, New-York, 125, p. 493-512, 2006d.
139. REBER B., "Technologies et débat démocratique en Europe. De la participation à l'évaluation pluraliste", Revue Française de Science Politique, vol. 55, nos. 5-6, pp. 811-833, 2005.
140. REBER B., "Public evaluation and new rules for the 'Human Park'", in LATOUR B., WEIBEL P., Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 314-319, 2005.
141. RENN O., WEBLER T., WIEDERMANN P., (eds), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1995.
142. RENDTORFF J., KEMP P. (eds), Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw, Vol. 1 Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability, Parners research, Institut Borgia de Bioetica, Guissona (Catalogne), vol. 2, 2000.
143. RHODES R., The Making of the Atomic Bomb, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1986.
144. RICOEUR P., Le Juste, Edition Esprit, Paris, 1995.
145. RICHARDSON H. S., "Institutionally divided moral responsibility", in PAUL E. F., MILLER, F. D., PAUL, J. (eds.) Responsibility, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 218-249, 1999.
146. RIP A., "A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance-and its ironies", in VOSS J.-P., BAUKNECHT D., KEMP R. (eds.), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK pp. 82-100, 2006.
147. RITTEL H. W. J., WEBBER, M. M., "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning", Policy Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 155-169, 1973.
148. RIVAL M., Robert Oppenheimer, Edition du Seuil, Paris, 2002.
149. ROBINSON D. K. R., HUANG L., GUO Y. et al., "Forecasting innovation pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 267-285, 2013.
150. ROWE G., FREWER J. L., "Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation", Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3-29, 2000.
151. SANDERS L. M., "Against deliberation", Political Theory, vol. 25, pp. 347-375, 1997.
152. SARTRE, J.-P., L'être et le Néant, Gallimard, Paris, 1943.
153. SELIN C., "Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology", Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 196-220, 2007.
154. SERRES M., Statues. Le second livre des fondations, François Bourin, Paris, 1987.
155. SéRALINI G.-E., CLAIR E., MESNAGE R., et al., "Long term toxicity of a roundup herbicide and a roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize", Food And Chemical Toxicology, vol. 50, pp. 4221-4231, 2012.
156. SéRALINI G.-E., CLAIR E., MESNAGE R., et al., "Long term toxicity of a roundup herbicide and a roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize", Environmental Science Europe, vol. 26, pp. 1-17, 2014.
157. SETäLä M., GRöNLUND K., HERNE K., "Citizen deliberation on nuclear power: a comparison of two decision-making methods", Political Studies, vol. 58, pp. 1-27, 2010.
158. SHAPIRO I., "Enough of deliberation. Politics is about interests and power", in MACEDO S. (ed), Deliberative Politics. Essays on 'Democracy and Disagreement', Oxford University Press, 1999.
159. SHIEBINGER L., "Gendered innovations. How gender analysis contributes to research", Report of the Expert Group "Innovation Through Gender", European Commission, Brussels, 2013
160. SLOCUM N., Participatory Methods Toolkit. A practionners's Manual, United Nations University, Bruges, 2003.
161. SMITH G., WALES C. "Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy", Political Studies, vol. 48, pp. 51-63, 2000.
162. SMITH G., Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from around the World, POWER Inquiry, available at http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/34527/1/Beyond_the_Ballot.pdf (lien consulté le 10.12.2015), 2005.
163. STAHL C. B., EDEN G., JIROTKA M., "Responsible research and innovation in information and communication technology: identifying and engaging with the ethical implications of ICTs", in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M., (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
164. STERN P.C., FINEBERG H. (ed), Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1996.
165. STEINER J., BäCHTIGER A., SPöRNDLI M., et al., Deliberative Politics in Action. Analysing Parliamentary Discourse, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
166. STEINER J., The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy. Empirical Research and Normative Implications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012.
167. STIRLING A., "Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology", in LEACH M., SCOONES I., WYNNE B., Science, Citizens: Globalisation and the Challenge of engagement, Zed, London, pp. 218-231, 2005.
168. STIRLING A., "'Opening up' and 'closing down': power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology", Science Technology and Human Values, vol. 33, pp. 262-294, 2008.
169. STILGOE J., OWEN R., MACNAGHTEN P., "Developing a framework for responsible innovation", Research Policy, vol. 42, pp. 1568-1580, 2013.
170. SUNSTEIN C.R., "The law of group polarization", Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 10, pp. 175-195, 2002.
171. SUNSTEIN C. R., "Deliberation, democracy, disagreement", in BONTEKOE R., STEPANIANTS M. (eds), Justice and Democracy: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, University of Hawaï Press, 1997.
172. SUTCLIFFE H., A report on Responsible Research & Innovation, DG for Research and Innovation, European Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilarysutcliffe_en.pdf, 2011.
173. SUTOUR S., LORRAIN J-L., Rapport d'information fait au nom de la commission des affaires européennes sur la prise en compte des questions éthiques à l'échelon européen, no. 67, Sénat, Paris, 2013.
174. SWIERSTRA T., JELSMA J., "Responsibility without moralims in techno scientific design practices", Science, Technology and Human Value, no. 31, pp. 309-32, 2006.
175. SYKES K., MACNAGHTEN P., "Responsible innovation-opening up dialogue and debate 85", in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds.), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
176. THOMPSON, D. F., "Moral responsibility and public officials: the problem of many hands", American Political Science Review, vol. 74, pp. 905-916, 1980.
177. THOMPSON, DENNIS F., "Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science", Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 11, pp. 497-520, 2008.
178. TRONTO J., Moral Boundaries: a Political Argument for an Ethics of Care, Routledge, New York, 1993.
179. VAN DE POEL I., "The relation between forward-looking and backward looking responsibility", in VINCENT N., VAN DE POEL I., VAN DEN HOVEN J. (eds.), Moral Responsibility, Beyond Free Will & Determinism, Springer, Dordrecht, 2011.
180. VAN DEN HOVEN J., "Value sensitive design and responsible innovation", in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 75-84, 2013.
181. VAN OUDHEUSDEN M., "Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond", Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67-86, 2014.
182. VINCENT, N. "Responsibility: distinguishing virtue from capacity", Polish Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, pp. 111-126, 2011.
183. VON SCHOMBERG R., "Introduction" in VON SCHOMBERG R. (ed), Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Field, European Commission, Brussels, 2011.
184. VON SCHOMBERG, "Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation", in DUSSELDORP M., BEECROFT R. (eds), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, Vs Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 39-61, 2012.
185. VON SCHOMBERG R., "Vision of responsible research and innovation", in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
186. VOSS D., KEMP K., "Introduction", in VOSS J.-P., BAUKNECHT D., KEMP R. (eds), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 3-28, 2006.
187. WEBLER T., KASTENHOLZ H., RENN O., "Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 443-464, 1995.
188. WILLIAMS G., "Responsibility as a virtue" Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 11, pp. 455-470, 2008.
189. WYNNE B., "Knowledges in context", Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 111-121, 1991.
190. WYNNE B., "Public understanding of science research: new horizons or hall of mirrors?", Public Understanding of Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37-43, 1992.
191. WYNNE B., "Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity", Public Understanding of Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 321-337, 1993.
192. YOUNG I. M., "Activist challenges to deliberative democracy", Political Theory, vol. 29, pp. 670-690, 2001.