Adaptive Governance for Responsible Innovation

Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 143-164

  Lee, Robert G ^a   Petts, Judith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accountability; Governance framework; Product safety; Responsibility; Responsible innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886353073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118551424.ch8     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Arnall, H.W. (2003) Future Technologies, Today's Choices. Nanotechnology. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. A Technical, Political and Institutional Map of Emerging Technologies, Greenpeace Environmental Trust, London.
2. Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Baldwin, R. (2004) The new punitive regulation. The Modern Law Review, 67, 351-383.
4. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Theory, Culture and Society Series, Vol. 17, Sage Publications, London.
5. Bhattachary, D., Pascall Calitz, J, and Hunter, A. (2010) Synthetic Biology Dialogue, TNS-BMRB, UK, http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Reviews/1006-synthetic-biology-dialogue.pdf (accessed 19 December 2012).
6. Carter, C.A. and Gruère, G.P. (2003) International approaches to the labelling of genetically modified foods. Choices, 18(2), 1-4.
7. Collingridge, D. (1980) The Social Control of Technology, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
8. Chaudhry, Q., Thomas, M., Boxall, A., Aitken, R.J., Hull, M. (2005) The Manufacture and Use of Nanomaterials in the UK. DEFRA Report CB01070, London.
9. Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2006) A Scoping Study to Identify Gaps in Environmental Regulation for the Products and Applications of Nanotechnologies, Defra, London.
10. Doubleday, R. (2007) Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology Health Risk and Society, 9(2), 211-227.
11. European Commission (2005) Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005-2009 (Brussels: COM(2005) 243 final)
12. European Commission (2008) Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research (2008) 424 Final.
13. European Commission (2009) Regulation No. 1223/2009 on Cosmetic Products.
14. European Commission (2011) Regulation No. 1169/2011 on the provision of Food Information to Consumers.
15. European Community (1997) Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 Concerning Novel Foods and Novel Food Ingredients.
16. European Community (2001) General Product Safety (GPS) Directive (2001/95/EC).
17. European Community (2002) General Food Law, Regulation (178/2002/EC).
18. European Community (2004) Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on Environmental Liability With Regard to the Prevention and Remedying of Environmental Damage.
19. Faure, M. (2000) Product liability and product safety in Europe: harmonization or differentiation? Kyklos, 53(4), 467-508.
20. Fisher, E. (2002) Precaution, precaution everywhere: developing a 'common understanding' of the precautionary principle in the European community. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 9, 7-28.
21. FSA (Food Standards Agency) (2008) A Review of Potential Implications of Nanotechnologies for Regulations and Risk Assessment in Relation to Food, FSA, London. Note that although the Report has a 2008 publication date, a draft version was presented to the FSA Board and available in 2006.
22. Frater L., Stokes, E. Lee, R.et al., (2006) An Overview of the Framework of Current Regulation Affecting the Development and Marketing of Nanomaterials - A Report for the DTI, OSI, London.
23. Goodin, R. and Dryzek, J. (2006) Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and Society, 34(2), 219-243.
24. Groves, C. (2006) Technological futures and non-reciprocal responsibility. The International Journal of the Humanities, 4(2), 57-61.
25. Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. (1998) Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Guston, D.H. (2008) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature, 545, 940-941.
27. Guston, D.H. and Sarewitz, D. (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24, 93-109.
28. Haines, F. (2009) Regulatory failures and regulatory solutions: a characteristic analysis of the aftermath of disaster. Law & Social Inquiry, 34(1), 31-60.
29. Harrimoes, P. (ed.) (2001) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle, 1896-2000. Environmental Issue Report 22, European Environment Agency, Brussels.
30. Harrington, J. (2002) Red in tooth and claw: the idea of progress in medicine and the common law. Social and Legal Studies, 11, 211-232.
31. HM Government (2005) Response to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering Report: 'Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties', Department of Trade and Industry, London.
32. HSE (Health and Safety Executive) (2006) Review of the Adequacy of Current Regulatory Regimes to Secure Effective Regulation of Nanoparticles Created by Nanotechnology, HSE, London.
33. Insight Investment et al. (2008) Information on the Responsible Nano Code Initiative (Responsible NanoCode), http://www.nanoandme.org/downloads/The%20Responsible%20Nano%20Code.pdf (accessed 20 December 2012).
34. IRGC (International Risk Governance Council) (2009) Risk Governance Deficits: An Analysis and Illustration of the Most Common Deficits in Risk Governance, IRGC, Geneva.
35. Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers, Harvard University Press., Cambridge.
36. Jones, R. (2008) When it pays to ask the public. Nature Nanotechnology, 3, 578-579.
37. Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. (1987) The Economic Structure of Tort Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Lee, R. and Jose, P.D. (2008) Self-interest, self-restraint and corporate responsibility for nanotechnologies: emerging dilemmas for modern managers. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(1), 113-125.
39. Lee, R. and Vaughan, S. (2010) Reaching down: nanomaterials and chemical safety in the European Union. Law Innovation and Technology, 2(2), 193-217.
40. Macilwain, C. (2010) Without effective public engagement there will be no synthetic biology in Europe. Nature, 465, 867.
41. Macnaghten, P. (2010) Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: narrative structures, public responses and emerging nanotechnologies. Environment and Planning A, 41, 23-27.
42. Macnaghten, P.M. and Owen, R. (2011) Good governance for geoengineering. Nature, 479, 293.
43. Miller, C.J. and Goldberg, R.S. (2004) Product Liability, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
44. Owen, R. and Goldberg, N. (2010) Responsible innovation: a pilot study with the U.K. engineering and physical sciences research council. Risk Analysis, 30, 1699-1707.
45. Pellizzoni, L. (2004) Responsibility and environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 541-565.
46. Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., Rowe, G. et al. (2005) Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision-making: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation public debate. Risk Analysis, 25(2), 467-480.
47. Pidgeon, N.F. and Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or 'upstream engagement? Health, Risk and Society, 9, 191-210.
48. RA/REng (Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering) (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, Royal Society, London.
49. RCEP (Royal Commission on Environmental Protection) (2008) Novel Materials in the Environment: The Case of Nanotechnology. 27th Report, The Stationery Office, London, www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm74/7468/7468.pdf (accessed 26 July 2012).
50. Renn, O., Webler, T., and Wiedemann, P. (eds) (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA.
51. Reynolds, G.H. (2003) Nanotechnology and regulatory policy: three futures. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 17(1), 180-210.
52. Robalino, D. and Lempert, R. (2000) Carrots and sticks for new technology: Abating greenhouse gas emissions in a heterogeneous and uncertain world. Integrated Assessment, 1(1), 1-19.
53. Roco, M.C. (2008) Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 11-29.
54. Rowe, W.D. (1994) Understanding uncertainty. Risk Analysis, 14(5), 743-750.
55. de Sadeleer, N. (2010) The precautionary principle in EU law. Aansprakelijkheid, Verzekering & Schade, 173-184.
56. Sinclair, D. (1997) Self-regulation versus command and control? Beyond false dichotomies. Law and Policy, 19(4), 529-559.
57. Stapleton, J. (2006) Evaluating goldberg and Zipursky's civil recourse theory. Fordham Law Review, 75(3), 1529.
58. Steinzor, R.I. (1998) Reinventing environmental regulation: the dangerous journey from command to self-control. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22, 103.
59. Stern, P.C. and Fineberg, H. (eds) (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
60. Stilgoe, J. (2007) Nanodialogues: Experiments in Public Engagement with Science, Demos, London.
61. Stilgoe, J. (2010) A question of intent. Nature Climate Change, 1(7), 11.
62. Stilgoe, J. and Wilsdon, J. (2007) The Nanodialogues: Four Experiments in Public Engagement in All Talk? Nanotechnologies and Public Engagement, Institute of Physics, London.
63. Stirling, A. (2008) Science, precaution and the politics of technological risk: converging implications in evolutionary and social science perspectives. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1128, 95-110.
64. Stirling, A. (2009) The precautionary principle, in Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Technology (eds J.-K. Olsen, S.A. Pedersoen, and V.F. Hendricks), Blackwell, Oxford.
65. Stokes, E. (2011) You are what you eat: market citizens and the right to know about nano foods. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 2(2), 178-200.
66. US Environment Protection Agency (2009) Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program: Interim Report, EPA, Washington DC.
67. Van Asselt, M.B.A. and Renn, O. (2011) Risk governance. Journal of Risk Research, 1(4), 431-449.
68. Von Schomberg, R. (ed.) (2011) Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. European Commission, Brussels.
69. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., and Renn, O. (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review., 15(5), 443-464.
70. Weinberg, A.M. (1972) Science and trans-science. Minerva, 10, 209-22.
71. Wynne, B. (1987) Risk management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility, Springer, Berlin.
72. Wynne, B. (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2(2), 111-127.