Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 87-98

  Nordmann, Alfred ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

anticipation; anticipatory governance; plausibility; real time technology assessment; responsible research and innovation; the future

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975886360     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882064     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baird, Davis. 2004. Thing Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Barben, Daniel, Eric, Fisher, Cynthia, Selin, and David, Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In The New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward, Hackett, Olga, Amsterdamska, Michael, Lynch, and Judy, Wajcman, 979–1000. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Boenink, Marianne, Tsjalling, Swierstra, and Dirk, Stemerding. 2010. “Anticipating the Interaction Between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology.” Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4 (2): 1–38. doi: 10.2202/1941-6008.1098
4. Collins, Harry. 2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Dupuy, Jean-Pierre, and Alexei, Grinbaum. 2004. “Living with Uncertainty: Toward the Ongoing Normative Assessment of Nanotechnology.” Techné 8 (2): 4–25.
6. Felt, Ulrike, rapporteur. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Brussels: European Commission.
7. Fuller, Steve. 2013. “Beyond the Precautionary Principle.” The Guardian Science Blog Network, July 10. Accessed December 17, 2013. www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/jul/10/beyond-precautionary-principle
8. Gammel, Stefan. 2009. “Nanotechnologie, Visionen und Science Fiction.” In Visionen der Nanotechnologie, edited by Arianna, Ferrari and Stefan, Gammel, 79–101. Heidelberg: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
9. Grin, John, Armin, Grunwald, Michael, Decker, Peter, Mambrey, Rob, Reuzel, and Gert Jan, van der Wilt. 2000. “First Outline of a Methodical Repertoire for Technology Assessment as Vision Assessment.” In Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society, edited by John, Grin and Armin, Grunwald, 169–190. Heidelberg: Springer.
10. Groves, Christopher. 2013. “Horizons of Care: From Future Imaginaries to Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse, edited by Kornelia Konrad, Christopher Coenen, Anne Dijkstra, Colin Milburn, and Harro van Lente, 185–202. Berlin: IOS Press.
11. Grunwald, Armin. 2013. “Techno-visionary Sciences: Challenges to Policy Advice.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9 (2): 21–38.
12. Guston, David. 2010. “The Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies.” Journal of the Korean Vacuum Society 19 (6): 432–441. doi: 10.5757/JKVS.2010.19.6.432
13. Guston, David. 2013. “‘Daddy, Can I Have a Puddle Gator?’: Creativity, Anticipation, and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by Richard, Owen, John, Bessant, and Maggy, Heintz, 109–118. London: John Wiley.
14. Guston, David, and Daniel, Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1–2): 93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
15. Hölscher, Lucian. 1999. Die Entdeckung der Zukunft. Frankfurt: Fischer.
16. Karinen, Risto, and David, Guston. 2010. “Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology.” In Governing Future Technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, edited by Mario, Kaiser, Monika, Kurath, Sabine, Maasen, and Christoph, Rehmann-Sutter, 217–232. Dordrecht: Springer.
17. Krohn, Wolfgang, and Johannes, Weyer. 1994. “Society as a Laboratory: The Social Risks of Experimental Research.” Science and Public Policy 21 (3): 173–183.
18. Liebert, Wolfgang, and Jan C., Schmidt. 2010. “Towards a Prospective Technology Assessment: Challenges and Requirements for Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience.” Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1–2): 99–116. doi: 10.1007/s10202-010-0079-1
19. Nordmann, Alfred. 2007. “If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics.” NanoEthics 1 (1): 31–46. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6
20. Nordmann, Alfred. 2010. “A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience.” Poiesis & Praxis 7 (1): 5–15. doi: 10.1007/s10202-010-0081-7
21. Nordmann, Alfred. 2013a. “Metachemistry.” In The Philosophy of Chemistry: Practices, Methodologies, and Concepts, edited by Jean-Pierre, Llored, 725–743. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
22. 2.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 9 (2–4): 125–134.
23. Pitt, Joseph. 2011. Doing Philosophy of Technology: Essays in a Pragmatist Spirit. Dordrecht: Springer.
24. Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25. Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26. Roache, Rebecca. 2008. “Ethics, Speculation, and Values.” NanoEthics 2 (3): 317–327. doi: 10.1007/s11569-008-0050-y
27. Schot, Johann, and Arie, Rip. 1996. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
28. Schwarz, Astrid. Forthcoming. Experiments in Practice. London: Pickering and Chatto.
29. Suvin, Darko. 1979. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Swierstra, Tsjalling. 2013. “Nanotechnology and Technomoral Change.” Ethics and Politics 15 (1): 200–219.
31. Swierstra, Tsjalling, and Arie, Rip. 2007. “Nano-ethics as NEST-Ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation about New and Emerging Science and Technology.” NanoEthics 1 (1): 3–20. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8
32. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. London: Penguin.
33. Van de Poel, Ibo. 2009. “The Introduction of Nanotechnology as a Societal Experiment.” In Technoscience in Progress–Managing the Uncertainty of Nanotechnology, edited by Simone, Arnaldi, Andrea, Lorenzet, and Federica, Russo, 129–142. Amsterdam: IOS Press.