Responsible Innovation - Opening Up Dialogue and Debate

Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 85-107

  Sykes, Kathy ^a   Macnaghten, Phil ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Anti genetic modification (GM) foods; Public dialogue; Public engagement; Responsible innovation; UK

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886332763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118551424.ch5     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Bodmer, W. (1985) The Public Understanding of Science. London: The Royal Society.
2. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2010) On Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technological Democracy. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
3. Carson, R. (1962) Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Chilvers, J. (2010) Sustainable Participation? Mapping Out and Reflecting on the Field of Public Dialogue on Science and Technology. Summary Report. London: Sciencewise-ERC and the University of East Anglia, London.
5. Chilvers, J. and Macnaghten, P. (2011) The Future of Science Governance: A Review of Public Concerns, Governance and Institutional Response. London: Sciencewise-ERC. All the Sciencewise dialogues are at: http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk (accessed 1 June 2012).
6. Council for Science and Technology (2005) Policy Through Dialogue: Informing Policies Based on Science and Technology. London: Council for Science and Technology.
7. Doubleday, R. and Wynne, B. (2011) Despotism and democracy in the UK: experiments in reframing relations between the state, science and citizens (ed. S. Jasanoff) in Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Durrant, J. (1994) Final Report, UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology. London: Science Museum.
9. Van Eijndhoven, J. (1997) Technology assessment: product of process? Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 54: 269-286.
10. van Est, R. (2011) The broad challenge of public engagement in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17: 639-648.
11. See also Fiorino, D. (1989) Environmental risk and democratic process: a critical review, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14: 501-547.
12. Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Mayer, S., and Wynne, B. (1997) Uncertain World: GMOs, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain. Lancaster: CSEC and Unilever.
13. HM Treasury/DTI/DfES (2004) Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014, HM Treasury, London, July 2004.
14. House of Lords (2000) Science and Society - Third Report of the Science and Technology Committee, Session 1999-2000. London: House of Lords, February 23, 2000.
15. Hynes P. (1989) The Recurring Silent Spring. New York: Pergamon Press.
16. Irwin, A. (2006) The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2): 299-330.
17. Jones, R. (2008) When it pays to ask the public. Nature Nanotechnology, 3: 578-579.
18. Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P. and Wilsdon, J. (2006) Governing at the Nanoscale: People, Policies and Emerging Technologies. London: Demos, available at http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/governingatthenanoscale, (accessed 1 June 2012).
19. Lutts, R. (1985) Chemical fallout: Rachel Carson's silent spring, radioactive fallout and the environmental movement, Environmental Review, 9: 210-225.
20. Macnaghten, P. and Jacobs, M. (1997) Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation, Global Environmental Change, 7: 1-20.
21. Macnaghten, P. (2010) Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: narrative structures, public responses and emerging nanotechnologies, Environment and Planning A, 41: 23-37.
22. Macnaghten, P. and Guivant, J. (2011) Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the Political Imaginary of Public Engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom, Public Understanding of Science, 20: 207-220.
23. Macnaghten, P. and Chilvers, J. (2012) Governing risky technology, in S. Lane, F. Klauser and M. Kearnes (eds.). Critical Risk Research: Practices, Politics and Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
24. Pielke, R. (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Pielke, R. (2010) The Climate Fix. Basic Books: New York.
26. Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London: Royal Society.
27. Small Talk (2005) Small Talk - Discussing Nanotechnologies. available at http://www.smalltalk.org.uk/page1g.html (accessed 1 June 2012).
28. Stirling, A. (2005) Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology, in M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne (eds.) Science, Citizenship and Globalisation. London: Zed.
29. Stirling, A. (2007) Deliberate futures: precaution and progress in social choice of sustainable technology, Sustainable Development, 15 (5): 286-295.
30. Thorpe, C. and Gregory, J. (2010) Producing the post-Fordist public: the political economy of public engagement with science, Science as Culture, 19(3): 273-301.
31. TNS-BMRB (2011) Science, Governance and Public Engagement. London: Sciencewise-ERC, available at http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Science-Governance-and-Public-Engagement-Nov11.pdf (accessed 1 June 2012).
32. Warner, M. (2002) Counter publics. Public Culture, 14: 49-90.
33. Wiulsdon, J. and Willis, R. (2004). See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos, available at http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/paddlingupstream (accessed 1 June 2012).
34. Wynne, B. (1995). The public understanding of science, in S., Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J. C. Peterson (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 380-392.
35. Wynne, B. (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics, 9: 211-220.