Responsible innovation: From concept to practice

Responsible Innovation: From Concept to Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-168

  Pavie, Xavier ^a   Scholten, Victor ^b   Carthy, Daphné ^a  

^a ESSEC BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013041871     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/8903     Document Type: Book

References (105)

1. Acquier, A, Gond, J-P and Igalens, J (2011). La religion dans les affaires: la RSE (Responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise). Fondapol (May 2011).
2. Alleman, JE and Brooke, TM (1997). Asbestos Revisited. Scientific American, July, 70-75.
3. Balaudé, JF (2010). Le savoir-vivre philosophique. Empédocle, Socrate et Platon. Paris: Grasset.
4. Barnard, CI (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bensaude-Vincent, B (2009). Colloque innovation-responsable. Coll`ege de France, April.
6. Bentham, J and Bozovic, M (1995). The Panopticon Writings, pp. 29-95. London: Verso.
7. Black, E (2001). IBM and Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s Most Powerful Corporation. London: Little Brown.
8. Botterhuis, L, van der Duin, P, de Ruijter, P and van Wijck, P (2010). Monitoring the future. Building an early warning system for the Dutch Ministry of Justice. Futures, 42, 454-465.
9. Brundtland, GH (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
10. Butner, K (2011). Driving performance through sustainability: Strategy, synergy and significance. Executive report, IBM Global Business Services. (Online). Available at ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03414usen/GBE03414USEN.PDF. Accessed on March 13, 2013.
11. Caroll, AB (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
12. Caroll, AB (1994). Social issues in management research: Expert’s views, analysis and commentary. Business & Society, 33, 5-29.
13. Caroll, AB (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
14. Carson, R (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
15. Chesbrough, HW (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 34-41.
16. Christensen, CM (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
17. Churchman, CW (1967). Guest editorial. Management Science, 14(4).
18. Clark, JM (1939). Social Control of Business, 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. CNW Marketing Research Inc. (2007). Dust to Dust: The Energy Cost of New Vehicles From Concept to Disposal.
20. Cohen, WM and Levinthal, DA (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
21. Collingridge, D (1980). The Social Control of Technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press; London: Pinter.
22. Dahlander, L and Frederiksen, L (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23(4), 988-1007.
23. De Sadeleer, N (2011). Le Principe de précaution dans le monde. Paris: Fondapol.
24. Dickson, PR and Giglierano, JJ (1986). Missing the boat and sinking the boat: A conceptual model of entrepreneurial risk. Journal of Marketing, 50, 58-70.
25. Donaldson, T and Preston, LE (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
26. Dubigeon, O (2009). Piloter un développement responsable. Quels processus pour l’entreprise? 3e Edition. Paris: Pearson Education.
27. Eccles, RG and Serafeim, G (2013). The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50-60.
28. Elkington, J (1997). Cannibals with Forks, the Triple Bottom Lines of the 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
29. Engel, L (1997). Réguler les comportements. In Ferenczi, T (Ed.), De quoi sommes-nous responsables?, pp. 11-36; 80-89. Editions Le Monde.
30. Ernult, J and Ashta, A (2007). Développement durable, responsabilité société de l’entreprise, théroei des parties prenantes: Evolution et perspectives. Cahiers du CEREN, 21, 4-31.
31. Etzkowitz, H (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. London: Routledge.
32. Ewald, F (1996). Histoire de l’Etat-Providence, p. 86. Paris: LGF.
33. Falk, R (2007). Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities. Survey evidence from Austria. Research Policy, 36(5), 665-679.
34. Foucault, M (2001). Usage des plaisirs et techniques de soi. Reprinted in Dits et Ecrits II, p. 1358. Paris: Gallimard.
35. Fransman, M (1990). The Market and Beyond: Cooperation and Competition in Information Technology Development in the Japanese System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Freelancers Union (2013). Homepage. (Online). Available at www.freelancersunion.org. (accessed on March 13, 2013).
37. Freeman, RE (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, p. 48. Boston: Piman-Ballinger.
38. Friedmann, G (1970). La puissance et la sagesse, p. 55. Paris: Gallimard.
39. Gagnepain, L (2006). La climatisation automobile - Impacts consommation et pollution. In Rep`eres. Agency for Environment and Energy Management, Department of Transport Technology.
40. Gargiulo, M and Benassi, M (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organizational Science, 11, 183-196.
41. Georghiou, L et al. (2003). Raising EU R&D intensity: Improving the effectiveness of public support mechanisms for private sector research and development. Direct Measures 2003, EUR 20716.
42. Gleick, PH (2007). Hummer versus Prius. "Dust to Dust" report Misleads the Media and Public with Bad Science. CNW Marketing.
43. Gorgoni, G (2006). La responsabilité comme projet. In Eberhard, C (Ed.), Traduire nos responsabilités planétaires. Recomposer nos paysages juridiques, pp. 131-146. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
44. Greenwood, M (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315-327.
45. Hadot, P (2001). La philosophie comme mani`ere de vivre, p. 149. Paris: Albin Michel.
46. Henderson, R and Clark, K (1990). Architectural innovation. The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 81-112.
47. Igalens, J and Benraiss, L (2005). Aux fondements de l’audit social: Howard R. Bowen et les églises protestantes. Actes de la 23e Université d’été de l’Audit social, 1 et 2 septembre 2005, IAE de Lille. (In French.)
48. Jonas, H (1979). Das Prinzip Verantwortung - Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (In German.)
49. Jonas, H (1979). Le Principe responsabilité. Une éthique pour la civilisation technologique. Trad. Greisch, J (1998). Paris: Flammarion (PR).
50. Jonas, H (1984). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Kant, I (1965). Logique (Vrin), p. 25.
52. Kant, I (2006). Fondation de la métaphysique des moeurs. In Métaphysique des moeurs, trad. Alain Renaut, Paris: Flammarion, 97-108.
53. Kramer, M, Pfitzer, M and Lee, P (2005). Competitive social responsibility: Uncovering the economic rationale for corporate social responsibility among Danish small and medium-sized enterprises. Foundation Strategy Group & Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. (Online.) Available at http://www.eogs.dk/sw26505.asp. Accessed on August 20, 2009.
54. Kreps, T (1940). Measurement of the social performance of business. An Investigation of Concentration of Economic Power for the Temporary National Economic Committee (Monograph No. 7). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
55. Laugier, S and Paperman, P (2008). La voix différente et les éthiques du care. In Giligan, C (Ed.), Une voix différente, pp. III-XXIV. Paris: Flammarion.
56. Lenglet, R (1996). L’Affaire de l’amiante. Paris: La Découverte Enqûetes.
57. Le service public de l’acc`es au droit (2004). Charte de l’environnement de 2004. (Online.) Available at http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Droitfrancais/Constitution/Charte-de-l-environnement-de-2004. Accessed on March 16, 2013.
58. Lopez-Perez, V, Perez-Lopez, C and Rodriguez-Ariza, L (2007). The opinion of European companies on corporate social responsibility and its relation to innovation. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 1(2), 276-295.
59. MacGregor, SP and Fontrodona, J (2008). Exploring the fit between CSR and innovation. Working Paper, IESE CBS, Barcelona.
60. McWilliams, A, Siegel, DS andWright, PM (2006). Guest editor’s introduction. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
61. Milne, AA (1926). Winnie-the-Pooh. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
62. Moore, GA (1999). Crossing the Chasm. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
63. Moore, GE (2008). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Mullins, JW and Forlani, D (2005). Missing the boat or sinking the boat: A study of new venture decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 47-69.
65. Myers, S and Marquis, DG (1969). Successful industrial innovation: A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. National Science Foundation, NSF 69-17. In Trott, P (2005), Innovation Management and New Product Development, 3rd Edition, p. 15. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
66. Nidumolu, R, Prahalad, CK and Rangaswami, MR (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 57-64.
67. Owen, R, Macnaghten, P and Stilgoe, J (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760.
68. Pavie, X (2009). L’apprentissage de soi. Paris: Eyrolles.
69. Pavie, X (2010). La méditation philosophique. Paris: Eyrolles.
70. Pavie, X (2011a). The importance of responsible-innovation and the necessity of innovation-care. Working Paper ESSEC 1203.
71. Pavie, X (2011b). De quoi l’innovation-responsable est-elle le nom? Cahier Innovation & Society, November.
72. Pavie, X (2011c). Innovation responsable: Oxymore ou réalité. Cahier Innovation & Society, June.
73. Pavie, X (2012). Innovation-responsable: Stratégie et levier de croissance pour les organisations. Paris: Eyrolles.
74. Pavie, X and Carthy, D (2012). A strategy and process for integrating responsible-innovation into organisations. Presented at the 2nd Conference on Responsible-Innovation (Maatschappelijk Verantwoord Innoveren), December 13-14, 2012.
75. Pavie, X and Carthy, D (2013). Responsible-innovation in practice: How to implement responsibility across an organization. Cahier Innovation & Society, No. 33.
76. Pedersen, ER (2010). Modelling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities on business toward society. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 155-166.
77. Pommier, E (2012). Hans Jonas et le Principe Responsabilité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
78. Porter, M (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
79. Porter, M (2003). CSR - A religion with too many priests? European Business Forum. Interview with Mette Morsig. (Online.) 15 (Autumn). Available at http://www.fsg.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/PDF/CSR Religion with Too Many Priests.pdf?cpgn=WP%20DL %20-%20CSR%20 -%20A%20 Religion%20With%20 too%20Many %20Priests. (accessed on March 13, 2013).
80. Quéré, Y (2006). La sagesse du physicien. Paris: L’oeil neuf editions.
81. Raymond, J (2003). La Ford Pinto: le contre-exemple américain. Le Polyscope Le journal de l’Ecole polytechnique de Montréal, 36.
82. Rittel, HWJ and Webber, MM (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
83. Pedersen, ER (2010). Modelling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities on business toward society. Journal of Business Ethics, 155-166.
84. Simon, HA (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley & Sons.
85. Schilling, MA (2005). A "Small-World" network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2-3), 131-154.
86. Schot, J and Rip, A (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 54, 251-268.
87. Schumpeter, J (1912). Economic Doctrine and Method: An Historical Sketch. New York: Oxford University Press. Translated from German (1912) in 1954.
88. Schumpeter, J (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Boston: Harvard University Press.
89. Schumpeter, J (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, p. 105. New York: McGraw-Hill.
90. Schwartz, MS (2005). Universal moral values for corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 27-44.
91. Shaw, WH and Barry, V (1995). Moral Issues in Business, 6th Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
92. Shane, S (2002). Executive forum: University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 537-552.
93. Stevenson, HH and Gumpert, D (1985). The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 85, 85-94.
94. The HealthStore Foundation (2013). Homepage. (Online.) Available at www.cfwshops.org. Accessed on March 13, 2013.
95. Tortoriello, M and Krackhardt, D (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academic Management Journal, 53(1), 167-181.
96. Trott, P (2012). Innovation Management and New Product Development, 5th Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
97. Ubois, J (2009). Conversations on innovation, power, and responsibility, p. 52. Available at http://beyondradiation.blogs.com/mblog/2010/02/index.html. Accessed on February 12, 2010.
98. Van den Hoven, MJ, Lokhorst, G and Van de Poel, I (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 143-155.
99. Van Maanen, J and Barley, S (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. In Staw, BM and Cummings, LL (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, pp. 287-365. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
100. Von Schomberg, R (2010). What is responsible research and innovation. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/european-group-ethics/docs/activities/schomberg.pdf.
101. Von Schomberg, R (2011). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In Dusseldorp, M and Beecroft, R (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, pp. 39-61. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
102. Von Schomberg, R (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In Owen, R, Heintz, M and Bessant, J (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. London: John Wiley forthcoming.
103. Wallich, HC and McGowan, JJ (1970). Stockholder interest and the corporation’s role in social policy. In Baumol, WJ, Rensis, L, McGowan, JJ and Wallich, HC (Eds.), A New Rationale for Corporate Social Policy.New York: Committee for Economic Development.
104. Weber, M (1967). L’Ethique protestante et l’Esprit du capitalism. Paris: Librairie Plon.
105. Wellman, B, Salaff, J, Dimitrova, D, Garton, L, Gulia, M and Haythornthwaite, C (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.