Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law

Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-322

  Duff, R A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85198558287     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (456)

1. Alexander, L (2000), ‘Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability’, 88 California Law Review 931
2. Alldridge, P (1986), ‘Developing the Defence of Duress’, Criminal Law Review 433
3. Alldridge, P (1990), ‘Rules for Courts and Rules for Citizens’, 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 487
4. Alldridge, P (1996), ‘Dealing with Drug Dealing’, in AP Simester and ATH Smith (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 239
5. Allen, MJ (1994), ‘Consent and Assault’, Journal of Criminal Law 183
6. Altman, A and Wellman, CH (2004), ‘A Defense of International Criminal Law’, 115 Ethics 35
7. American Law Institute (1985), Model Penal Code and Commentaries (Philadelphia, Penn, American Law Institute)
8. Anscombe, GEM (1963), Intention, 2nd edn (Oxford, Blackwell)
9. Archard, D (1999), ‘The Mens Rea of Rape: Reasonableness and Culpable Mistakes’, in K Burgess-Jackson (ed), A Most Detestable Crime (New York, Oxford University Press) 213
10. Archard, D (2005), ‘Political Reasonableness’, 35 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1
11. Ashworth, AJ (1974), ‘Excusable Mistake of Law’, Criminal Law Review 652
12. Ashworth, AJ (1987), ‘Belief, Intent and Criminal Liability’, in J Eekelaar and J Bell (eds), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 3rd Series (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 1
13. Ashworth, AJ (1989), ‘The Scope of Criminal Liability for Omissions’, 105 Law Quarterly Review 386
14. Ashworth, AJ (1998), ‘Should the Police be Allowed to Use Deceptive Practices?', 114 Law Quarterly Review 108
15. Ashworth, AJ (1999), ‘Article 6 and the Fairness of Trials’, Criminal Law Review 261
16. Ashworth, AJ (2002a), ‘Testing Fidelity to Legal Values: Official Involvement and Criminal Justice’, in S Shute and AP Simester (eds), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 299
17. Ashworth, AJ (2002b), ‘Redrawing the Boundaries of Entrapment’, Criminal Law Review 159
18. Ashworth, AJ (2006), Principles of Criminal Law, 5th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
19. Ashworth, AJ and Blake, M (1996), ‘The Presumption of Innocence in English Criminal Law’, Criminal Law Review 306
20. Ashworth, AJ and Redmayne, M (2005), The Criminal Process (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
21. Audi, R (1998), Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (London, Routledge)
22. Austin, JL (1961), ‘A Plea for Excuses’, in JL Austin, Philosophical Papers (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 123
23. Baldwin, J and McConville, M (1977), Negotiated Justice (London, Martin Robertson)
24. Bamforth, N (1994), ‘Sado-Masochism and Consent’, Criminal Law Review 661
25. Baron, MW (2005), ‘Justifications and Excuses’, 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 387
26. Barry, B (1965), Political Argument (London, Routledge)
27. Bayles, MD (1982), ‘Character, Purpose, and Criminal Responsibility’, 1 Law and Philosophy 5
28. Becker, LC (1974), ‘Criminal Attempts and the Theory of the Law of Crimes’, 3 Philosophy and Public Affairs 262
29. Bennett, C (2006), ‘Taking the Sincerity Out of Saying Sorry: Restorative Justice as Ritual’, 23 Journal of Applied Philosophy 127
30. Bennett, J (1966), ‘Whatever the Consequences’, 26 Analysis 83
31. Bennett, J (1995), The Act Itself (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
32. Bentham, J (1776/1977), A Comment on the Commentaries, in JH Burns and HLA Hart (eds), CollectedWorks of Jeremy Bentham (London, Athlone Press) iii.
33. Bergelson, V (2007), ‘The Right to be Hurt: Testing the Boundaries of Consent’, 75 GeorgeWashington Law Review 165
34. Berman, MN (2003), ‘Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality’, 53 Duke Law Journal 1
35. Bhaskar, R (1993), Dialectic:The Pulse of Freedom (London, Verso)
36. Bianchi, H (1994), Justice as Sanctuary: Toward a New System of Crime Control (Bloomington, Ind, Indiana University Press)
37. Blackstone, W (1765-9), Commentaries on the Laws of England (4 vols; Oxford, Clarendon Press, available at www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/blacksto.htm)
38. Braithwaite, J and Pettit, P (1990), Not Just Deserts:A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
39. Brandt, RB (1970), ‘Traits of Character: A Conceptual Analysis’, 7 American Philosophical Quarterly 23
40. Brandt, RB (1985), ‘A Motivational Theory of Excuses in the Criminal Law’, in J Pennock and J Chapman (eds), Criminal Justice (New York, New York University Press) 165
41. Brennan, A and Lo, Y-S (2002), ‘Environmental Ethics’, in EN Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/ethics-environmental)
42. Burgess-Jackson, K (1999), ‘A Theory of Rape’, in K Burgess-Jackson (ed), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape (New York, Oxford University Press)
43. Burns, RP (1999), ATheory of theTrial (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press)
44. Byrd, BS (1987), ‘Wrongdoing and Attribution: Implications Beyond the Justification-Excuse Distinction’, 33 Wayne Law Review 1289
45. Campbell, K (1987), ‘Offence and Defence’, in IH Dennis (ed), Criminal Law and Justice (London, Sweet & Maxwell) 73
46. Cane, P (2000), Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford, Hart)
47. Casey, J (1971), ‘Actions and Consequences’, in J Casey (ed), Morality and Moral Reasoning (London, Methuen) 155
48. Cassese, A (2003), International Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
49. Chalmers, J (2002), ‘The Criminalisation of HIV Transmission’, 28 Journal of Medical Ethics 160
50. Choo, AL-T (1993), Abuse of Process and Judicial Stay of Criminal Proceedings (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
51. Christie, N (1977), ‘Conflicts as Property’, 17 British Journal of Criminology 1
52. Christman, J (2003), ‘Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy’, in EN Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/autonomy-moral)
53. Christopher, RL (1994), ‘Mistake of Fact in the Objective Theory of Justification:Do Two Rights Make Two Wrongs Make Two Rights…?', 85 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 295
54. Christopher, RL (1995), ‘Unknowing Justification and the Logical Necessity of the Dadson Principle in Self-Defense’, 15 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 229
55. Clark, SJ (1999), ‘The Courage of Our Convictions’, 97 Michigan Law Review 2381
56. Clark, SJ (2006), '“Who Do You Think You Are?": the Criminal Trial and Community Character’, in RA Duff, et al (eds), The Trial on Trial II: Judgement and Calling to Account (Oxford, Hart) 83
57. Clarkson, CMV (1993), ‘Theft and Fair Labelling’, 56 Modern Law Review 554
58. Clarkson, CMV (2005), ‘General Endangerment Offences: The Way Forward?', 32 University ofWestern Australia Law Review 1
59. Cleckley, H (1964), The Mask of Sanity, 4th edn (St Louis, Miss, CV Mosby)
60. Coke, Sir Edward (1628), Institutes of the Laws of England (3 vols; London, Society of Stationers)
61. Coleman, J (1998), ‘Incorporationism, Conventionality and the Practical Difference Thesis’, 4 Legal Theory 381
62. Connelly, S (1994), ‘Bad Advice: The Entrapment by Estoppel Doctrine in Criminal Law’, 48 University of Miami Law Review 627
63. Cooke, E (2000), The Modern Law of Estoppel (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
64. Cotterrell, R (1995), Law’s Community (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
65. Crown Prosecution Service (2005), Annual Report 2005-2006 (London, Crown Prosecution Service, available at www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/annualreport06.pdf)
66. Cunningham, S (2002), ‘Dangerous Driving a Decade On’, Criminal Law Review 945
67. Dagger, R (1997), Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism (New York, Oxford University Press)
68. Damaška, M (1973), ‘Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure’, 21 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 506
69. Dan-Cohen, M (1984), ‘Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law’, 97 Harvard Law Review 625
70. Dan-Cohen, M (2002), ‘Defending Dignity’, in M Dan-Cohen, Harmful Thoughts: Essays on Law, Self and Morality (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press) 150
71. Dancy, J (1991), ‘An Ethic of Prima Facie Duties’, in P Singer (ed), A Companion to Ethics (Oxford, Blackwell) 219
72. Dancy, J (1993), Moral Reasons (Oxford, Blackwell)
73. Dancy, J (2000), Practical Reality (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
74. Dancy, J (2004), Ethics Without Principles (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
75. David, M (2005), ‘The Correspondence Theory of Truth’, in EN Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/truth-correspondence)
76. Davidson, D (1980), ‘Agency’, in D Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 43
77. Dennis, IH (2007), The Law of Evidence, 3rd edn (London, Sweet and Maxwell)
78. Devlin, P (1965), The Enforcement of Morals (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
79. Dillof, AM (2002), ‘Unravelling Unknown Justification’, 77 Notre Dame Law Review 1547
80. Dimock, S (1997), ‘Retributivism and Trust’, 16 Law and Philosophy 37
81. Dolinko, D (1991), ‘Some Thoughts about Retributivism’, 101 Ethics 537
82. Dressler, J (1984), ‘New Thoughts about the Concept of Justification in the Criminal Law: A Critique of Fletcher’s Thinking and Rethinking’, 32 UCLA Law Review 61
83. Dressler, J (1988), ‘Reflections on Excusing Wrongdoers: Moral Theory, New Excuses and the Model Penal Code’, 19 Rutgers Law Journal 671
84. Dressler, J (1989), ‘Exegesis of the Law of Duress: Justifying the Excuse and Searching for its Proper Limits’, 62 Southern California Law Review 1331
85. Dressler, J (2000a), ‘Some Thoughts (Mostly Negative) About “Bad Samaritan” Laws’, 40 Santa Clara Law Review 971
86. Dressler, J (2000b), ‘Does One Mens Rea Fit All? Thoughts on Alexander’s Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability’, 88 California Law Review 955
87. Dressler, J (2006), Understanding Criminal Law, 4th edn (New York, Lexis)
88. Dubber, MD (2001), ‘Policing Possession: The War on Crime and the End of Criminal Law’, 91 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 829
89. Dubber, MD (2002a), Criminal Law: Model Penal Code (New York, Foundation Press)
90. Dubber, MD (2002b), Victims in theWar on Crime (New York, New York University Press)
91. Dubber, MD (2005), ‘The Possession Paradigm: The Special Part and the Police Model of the Criminal Process’, in RA Duff and SP Green (eds), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press), 91
92. Dubber, MD and Kelman, MG (2005), American Criminal Law: Cases, Statutes, and Comments (New York, Foundation Press)
93. Duff, P (2004), ‘Changing Conceptions of the Scottish Criminal Trial: The Duty to Agree Uncontroversial Evidence’, in RA Duff et al (eds), TheTrial onTrial I:Truth and Due Process (Oxford, Hart) 29
94. Duff, RA (1977), ‘Psychopathy and Moral Understanding’, 14 American Philosophical Quarterly 189
95. Duff, RA (1986), Trials and Punishments (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
96. Duff, RA (1990a), Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability (Oxford, Blackwell)
97. Duff, RA (1990b), ‘Can I Help You?: Accessorial Liability and the Intention to Assist’, 10 Legal Studies 165
98. Duff, RA (1993), ‘Choice, Character and Criminal Liability’, 12 Law and Philosophy 345
99. Duff, RA (1996), Criminal Attempts (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
100. Duff, RA (1998a), ‘Principle and Contradiction in the Criminal Law: Motives and Criminal Liability’, in RA Duff (ed), Philosophy and the Criminal Law. Principle and Critique (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 156
101. Duff, RA (1998b), ‘Dangerousness and Citizenship’, in AJ Ashworth and M Wasik (eds), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 141
102. Duff, RA (2001), Punishment, Communication, and Community (New York, Oxford University Press)
103. Duff, RA (2002a), ‘Rule-Violations and Wrongdoings’, in S Shute and AP Simester (eds), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 47
104. Duff, RA (2002b), ‘Virtue, Vice and Criminal Liability: Do We Want an Aristotelian Criminal Law?', 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 147
105. Duff, RA (2004a), ‘Action, the Act Requirement and Criminal Liability’, in J Hyman and H Steward (eds), Agency and Action (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) 69
106. Duff, RA (2004b), ‘Rethinking Justifications’, 39 Tulsa Law Review 829
107. Duff, RA (2005), ‘Criminalizing Endangerment’, in RA Duff and SP Green (eds), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 43
108. Duff, RA (2006), ‘The Virtues and Vices of Virtue Jurisprudence’, in TDJ Chappell (ed), Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 90
109. Duff, RA, Farmer, L, Marshall, SE and Tadros, V (eds) (2004), The Trial on Trial I:Truth and Due Process (Oxford, Hart)
110. Duff, RA, Farmer, L, Marshall, SE and Tadros, V (eds) (2006), The Trial on Trial II: Judgement and Calling to Account (Oxford, Hart)
111. Duff, RA, Farmer, L, Marshall, SE and Tadros, V (eds) (2007), The Trial on Trial III:Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial (Oxford, Hart)
112. Duff, RA, and Marshall, SE (2005), ‘How Offensive Can You Get?', in AP Simester and A von Hirsch (eds), Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour (Oxford, Hart) 57.
113. Dummett, M (1978), Truth and Other Enigmas (London, Duckworth)
114. Dworkin, G (1972), ‘Paternalism’, 56 The Monist 64
115. Dworkin, G (1982), ‘Is More Choice Better than Less?', in PA French et al (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy (Minneapolis, Minn, Minnesota University Press), vii, 47
116. Dworkin, RM (1986), Law’s Empire (London, Fontana)
117. Ebert, U (2001), Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 2001 3rd edn (Heidelberg, CF Müller)
118. Epstein, RA (2005), ‘The Not So Minimum Content of Natural Law’, 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 219
119. Eser, A (1976), ‘Justification and Excuse’, 24 American Journal of Comparative Law 621
120. Falk, WD (1968), ‘Morality, Self, and Others’, in JJ Thomson and G Dworkin (eds), Ethics (New York, Harper & Row) 349
121. Feinberg, J (1970a), ‘The Expressive Function of Punishment’, in J Feinberg, Doing and Deserving (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press) 95
122. Feinberg, J (1970b), ‘Action and Responsibility’, in J Feinberg, Doing and Deserving (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press) 119
123. Feinberg, J (1984), Harm to Others (New York, Oxford University Press)
124. Feinberg, J (1985), Offense to Others (New York, Oxford University Press)
125. Feinberg, J (1986), Harm to Self (New York, Oxford University Press)
126. Feinberg, J (1988), Harmless Wrongdoing (New York, Oxford University Press)
127. Ferzan, KK (2001), ‘Opaque Recklessness’, 91 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 597
128. Ferzan, KK (2002), ‘Don’t Abandon the Model Penal Code Yet! Thinking Through Simons’s Rethinking’, 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 185
129. Fingarette, H and Hasse, AF (1979), Mental Disabilities and Criminal Responsibility (Berkeley, Cal, University of California Press)
130. Finkelstein, CO (1996), ‘Self-Defense as a Rational Excuse’, 57 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 621
131. Finkelstein, CO (2000), ‘Positivism and the Notion of an Offense’, 88 California Law Review 335
132. Finkelstein, CO (2002), ‘Excuses and Dispositions in Criminal Law’, 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 317
133. Finkelstein, CO (2003), ‘Is Risk a Harm?', 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 963
134. Finnis, JM (1987a), ‘On “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”', in J Eekelaar and J Bell (eds), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 3rd Series (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 145
135. Finnis, JM (1987b), ‘Legal Enforcement of “Duties to Oneself”: Kant v Neo-Kantians’, 87 Columbia Law Review 433
136. Finnis, JM (1994), ‘Law, Morality, and “Sexual Orientation”', 69 Notre Dame Law Review 1049
137. Fischer, JM and Ravizza, M (1998), Responsibility and Control (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
138. Fletcher, GP (1975), ‘The Right Deed for the Wrong Reason: A Reply to Mr Robinson’, 23 UCLA Law Review 293
139. Fletcher, GP (1978), Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston, Mass, Little, Brown)
140. Fletcher, GP (1979), ‘Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape?', 26 UCLA Law Review 1355
141. Fletcher, GP (1985), ‘The Right and the Reasonable’, 98 Harvard Law Review 949
142. Fletcher, GP (1988), A Crime of Self-Defense (New York, Macmillan)
143. Fletcher, GP (1994), ‘On the Moral Irrelevance of Bodily Movements’, 142 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1443
144. Frankfurt, H (1969), ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’, 66 Journal of Philosophy 829
145. Frankfurt, H (1978), ‘The Problem of Action’, 15 American Philosophical Quarterly 157
146. Fuller, LL (1964), The Morality of Law, rev edn (New Haven, Conn, Yale University Press)
147. Gainer, RL (1988), ‘The Culpability Provisions of the Model Penal Code’, 19 Rutgers Law Journal 575
148. Gaita, R (1991), Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception (London, Macmillan)
149. Gardner, J (1994), ‘Rationality and the Rule of Law in Offences Against the Person’, 53 Cambridge Law Journal 502
150. Gardner, J (1996), ‘Justifications and Reasons’, in AP Simester and ATH Smith (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 103
151. Gardner, J (1998a), ‘On the General Part of the Criminal Law’, in RA Duff (ed), Philosophy and the Criminal Law. Principle and Critique (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 205
152. Gardner, J (1998b), ‘The Gist of Excuses’, 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 575
153. Gardner, J (2001), ‘Obligations and Outcomes in the Law of Torts’, in P Cane and J Gardner (eds), Relating to Responsibility: Essays for Tony Honoré on his 80th Birthday (Oxford, Hart) 111
154. Gardner, J (2003), ‘The Mark of Responsibility’, 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 157
155. Gardner, J (2004), ‘Fletcher on Offences and Defences’, 39 Tulsa Law Review 817
156. Gardner, J (2005), ‘Wrongs and Faults’, in AP Simester (ed), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 51
157. Gardner, J and Jung, H (1991), ‘Making Sense of Mens Rea: Antony Duff’s Account’, 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 559
158. Gardner, J and Macklem, T (2002), ‘Reasons’, in J Coleman and S Shapiro (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 440
159. Gardner, J and Shute, S (2000), ‘The Wrongness of Rape’, in J Horder (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 4th Series (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 193
160. George, RP (1993), Making Men Moral (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
161. George, RP (1999), ‘Marriage and the Liberal Imagination’, in RP George (ed), In Defense of Natural Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
162. Gettier, EL (1963), ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?', 23 Analysis 231
163. Giles, M (1994), ‘R v Brown: Consensual Harm and the Public Interest’, 11 Modern Law Review 121
164. Ginet, C (2000), ‘The Epistemic Requirements for Moral Responsibility’, in Action and Freedom (Nous Supplement vol 14) 267
165. Glannon, W (2002), The Mental Basis of Responsibility (Aldershot, Ashgate)
166. Glazebrook, PR (1978), ‘Situational Liability’ in PR Glazebrook (ed), Reshaping the Criminal Law (London, Stevens) 108
167. Glazebrook, PR (1991), ‘Thief or Swindler: Who Cares?', 50 Cambridge Law Journal 389
168. Glazebrook, PR (2006), Blackstone’s Statutes on Criminal Law, 15th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
169. Goldman, AI (1971), ‘The Individuation of Actions’, 18 Journal of Philosophy 761
170. Gordon, GH (2000), The Criminal Law of Scotland, 3rd edn, by MGA Christie (W Green, Edinburgh) i.
171. Gowans, CW (ed) (1987), Moral Dilemmas (New York, Oxford University Press)
172. Gray, RL (1995), ‘Eliminating the (Absurd) Distinction between Malum in Se and Malum Prohibitum Crimes’, 73 Washington University Law Quarterly 1369
173. Green, SP (1997), ‘Why it’s a Crime to Tear the Tag off a Mattress: Over-Criminalization and the Moral Content of Regulatory Offenses’, 46 Emory Law Journal 1533
174. Green, SP (2001), ‘Lying, Misleading, and Falsely Denying: How Moral Concepts Inform the Law of Perjury, Fraud, and False Statements’, 53 Hastings Law Journal 157
175. Green, SP (2005), ‘Six Sense of Strict Liability: A Plea for Formalism’, in AP Simester (ed), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 1
176. Green, SP (2006), Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
177. Greenawalt, K (1984), ‘The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse’, 84 Columbia Law Review 1897
178. Greenawalt, K (1986), ‘Distinguishing Justifications from Excuses’, 49 Law and Contemporary Problems 89
179. Gross, H (1979), ATheory of Criminal Justice (New York, Oxford University Press)
180. Gustafson, D (1986), Intention and Agency (Dordrecht, Reidel)
181. Hall, J (1963), ‘Negligent Behavior should be Excluded from Penal Liability’, 63 Columbia Law Review 632
182. Hampton, C (1982), Criminal Procedure, 3rd edn (London, Sweet & Maxwell)
183. Hampton, J (1984), ‘The Moral Education Theory of Punishment’, 13 Philosophy & Public Affairs 208
184. Hampton, J (1992), ‘Correcting Harms versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution’, 39 UCLA Law Review 201
185. Harcourt, BE (1999), ‘The Collapse of the Harm Principle’, 90 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 109
186. Hare, RM (1981), Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
187. Harré, R (1983), Personal Being (Oxford, Blackwell)
188. Hart, HLA (1963), Law, Liberty, and Morality (Stanford, Cal, Stanford University Press)
189. Hart, HLA (1968a), Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
190. Hart, HLA (1968b), ‘Negligence, Mens Rea, and Criminal Responsibility’, in HLA Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 136
191. Hart, HLA (1994), The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
192. Hirst, M (2003), Jurisdiction and the Ambit of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
193. Holtug, N (2002), ‘The Harm Principle’, 5 Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 357
194. Honoré, AM (1988), ‘Responsibility and Luck’, 104 Law Quarterly Review 530; reprinted in AM Honoré, Responsibility and Fault (Oxford, Hart, 1999) 14
195. Honoré, AM (1993), ‘The Dependence of Morality on Law’, 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1
196. Horder, J (1993), ‘Criminal Culpability: The Possibility of a General Theory’, 12 Law and Philosophy 193
197. Horder, J (1994a), ‘Rethinking Non-Fatal Offences against the Person’, 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 335
198. Horder, J (1994b), ‘Varieties of Intention, Criminal Attempts and Endangerment’, 14 Legal Studies 335
199. Horder, J (1995), ‘A Critique of the Correspondence Principle in Criminal Law’, Criminal Law Review 759
200. Horder, J (1996a), ‘Crimes of Ulterior Intent’, in AP Simester and ATH Smith (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 153
201. Horder, J (1996b), ‘Criminal Law: Between Determinism, Liberalism, and Criminal Justice’, 49 Current Legal Problems 159
202. Horder, J (1999a), ‘Questioning the Correspondence Principle-A Reply’, Criminal Law Review 206
203. Horder, J (1999b), ‘Between Provocation and Diminished Responsibility’, King’s College Law Journal 143
204. Horder, J (2000), ‘On the Irrelevance of Motive in Criminal Law’, in J Horder (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 4th Series (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 173
205. Horder, J (2001), ‘How Culpability Can, and Cannot, Be Denied in Under-age Sex Crimes’, Criminal Law Review 15
206. Horder, J (2005), ‘The Classification of Crimes and the Special Part of the Criminal Law’, in RA Duff and SP Green (eds), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 21
207. Hörnle, T (2001), ‘Offensive Behaviour and German Penal Law’, 5 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 255
208. Hornsby, J (1993), ‘On What’s Intentionally Done’, in S Shute et al (eds), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 55
209. Hornsby, J (1994), ‘Action and Aberration’, 142 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1719
210. Hornsby, J (1999), ‘The Poverty of Action Theory’, 21 Philosophical Inquiry 1
211. Hruschka, J (2005), ‘Justifications and Excuses: A Systematic Approach’, 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 407
212. Hudson, B (2003), Justice in the Risk Society (London, Sage)
213. Hudson, SD (1986), Human Character and Morality (London, Routledge)
214. Hughes, G (1958), ‘Criminal Omissions’, 67 Yale Law Journal 590
215. Huigens, K (1995), ‘Virtue and Inculpation’, 108 Harvard Law Review 1423
216. Huigens, K (1998), ‘Virtue and Criminal Negligence’, 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 431
217. Huigens, K (2002), ‘Homicide in Aretaic Terms’, 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 9
218. Hurd, HM (1999), ‘Justification and Excuse, Wrongdoing and Culpability’, 74 Notre Dame Law Review 1551
219. Hursthouse, R (2003), ‘Virtue Ethics’, in EN Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/ethics-virtue)
220. Hulsman, L (1986), ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’, 10 Contemporary Crises 63
221. Husak, DN (1987), Philosophy of Criminal Law (Totowa, NJ, Rowman & Littlefield)
222. Husak, DN (1981), ‘Paternalism and Autonomy’, 10 Philosophy & Public Affairs 27
223. Husak, DN (1989a), ‘Motive and Criminal Liability’, 8 Criminal Justice Ethics 3
224. Husak, DN (1989b), ‘Justifications and the Criminal Liability of Accessories’, 80 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 491
225. Husak, DN (1992), Drugs and Rights (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
226. Husak, DN (1995a), ‘The Nature and Justifiability of Nonconsummate Offenses’, 37 Arizona Law Review 151
227. Husak, DN (1995b), ‘Varieties of Strict Liability’, 8 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 189
228. Husak, DN (1998a), ‘Does Criminal Liability Require an Act?', in RA Duff (ed), Philosophy and the Criminal Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 60
229. Husak, DN (1998b), ‘Reasonable Risk Creation and Overinclusive Legislation’, 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 599
230. Husak, DN (1999), ‘Conflicts of Justifications’, 18 Law and Philosophy 41
231. Husak, DN (2004), ‘The Criminal Law as a Last Resort’, 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 207
232. Husak, DN (2005a), ‘Crimes Outside the Core’, 39 Tulsa Law Review 755
233. Husak, DN (2005b), ‘Malum Prohibitum and Retributivism’, in RA Duff and SP Green (eds) (2005), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press), 65
234. Husak, DN (2005c), ‘Applying Ultima Ratio: A Skeptical Assessment’, 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 535
235. Husak, DN (2005d), ‘Strict Liability, Justice, and Proportionality’, in AP Simester (ed), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford, Oxford University Press), 4
236. Husak, DN (2005e), ‘On the Supposed Priority of Justification to Excuse’, 24 Law and Philosophy 557
237. Husak, DN (2007), Overcriminalization (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
238. Husak, DN and von Hirsch, A (1993), ‘Culpability and Mistake of Law’, in S Shute, J Gardner and J Horder (eds), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 157
239. Jareborg, N (2005), ‘Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio)', Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 521
240. Jeffries, JC and Stephan, PB (1979), ‘Defenses, Presumptions, and Burden of Proof in the Criminal Law’, 88 Yale Law Journal 1325
241. Kahan, DM and Nussbaum, M (1996), ‘Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law’, 96 Columbia Law Review 269
242. Katz, L (1987), Bad Acts and Guilty Minds (Chicago, Ill, Chicago University Press)
243. Kell, D (1994), ‘Social Disutility and the Law of Consent’, 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 121
244. Kelman, M (1981), ‘Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law’, 33 Stanford Law Review 591
245. Kelsen, H (1925/1945), Allgemeine Staatslehre (Berlin, Springer; trans by A Wedberg as General Theory of Law and State; Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1945)
246. Kenny, AJ (1978), Freewill and Responsibility (London, Routledge)
247. Kleinig, J (1978), ‘Crime and the Concept of Harm’, 15 American Philosophical Quarterly 32
248. Kristol, I (1971), ‘Pornography, Obscenity, and the Case for Censorship’, New York Times Magazine 28 March 246; reprinted in G Dworkin (ed), Morality, Harm, and the Law (Boulder, Colo, Westview Press) 46
249. Kugler, I (2002), Direct and Oblique Intention in the Criminal Law (Aldershot, Ashgate)
250. Kupperman, J (1991), Character (New York, Oxford University Press)
251. Lacey, N (1988), State Punishment (London, Routledge)
252. Lacey, N (1993), ‘A Clear Concept of Intention: Elusive or Illusory?', 56 Modern Law Review 621
253. Lacey, N (ed) (1994), A Reader on Criminal Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
254. Lacey, N (1998), ‘Contingency, Coherence and Conceptualism: Reflections on the Encounter between “Critique” and “the Philosophy of the Criminal Law”', in RA Duff (ed), Philosophy and the Criminal Law. Principle and Critique (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 9
255. Lacey, N (2000), '“Philosophical Foundations of the Common Law”: Social not Metaphysical’, in J Horder (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 4th Series (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 17
256. Lacey, N (2001a), ‘In Search of the Responsible Subject: History, Philosophy and Criminal Law Theory’, 64 Modern Law Review 350
257. Lacey, N (2001b), ‘Responsibility and Modernity in Criminal Law’, 9 Journal of Political Philosophy 249
258. Lacey, N, Wells, C and Quick, O (2003), Reconstructing Criminal Law, 3rd edn (London, LexisNexis)
259. LaFave, WR (2003), Criminal Law, 4th edn (St Paul, Minn, West Group)
260. LaFave, WR Israel, JH, King, NJ (2004), Criminal Procedure, 4th edn (St Paul, Minn, West Group)
261. Lanham, D (1976), ‘Larsonneur Revisited’, Criminal Law Review 276
262. Lanham, D (1999), ‘Danger Down Under’, Criminal Law Review 960
263. Law and Philosophy (2000), Special Issue:The Moral and Legal Limits of Samaritan Duties, 19 Law and Philosophy 649
264. Law Commission (1989), A Criminal Code for England andWales, 2 vols (No 177, London, HMSO)
265. Law Commission (1989a), ‘Draft Criminal Code Bill’, in Law Commission, A Criminal Code for England andWales (No 177, London, HMSO), i.
266. Law Commission (2004), Partial Defences to Murder (No 290; London, HMSO)
267. Law Commission (2006), Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide (No 304; London, HMSO)
268. Lieberman, D (2002), ‘Mapping Criminal Law: Blackstone and the Categories of English Jurisprudence’, in N Landau (ed), Law, Crime and English Society, 1660-1840 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) 139
269. Luban, D (2004), ‘A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity’, 29 Yale Journal of International Law 124
270. Lucas, JR (1993), Responsibility (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
271. Lynch, ACE (1982), ‘The Mental Element in the Actus Reus’, 98 Law Quarterly Review 109
272. MacCormick, DN (1990), ‘Reconstruction after Deconstruction: A Response to CLS’, 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 539
273. Mack, E (1980), ‘Bad Samaritanism and the Causation of Harm’, 9 Philosophy and Public Affairs 141
274. Maher, G (2005), ‘Age and Criminal Responsibility’, 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 493
275. Markwick, P (2000), ‘Law and Content-Independent Reasons’, 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 579
276. Marshall, SE and Duff, RA (1998), ‘Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs’, 11 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 7
277. May, L (2005), Crimes against Humanity: A Normative Account (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
278. McDowell, J (1978), ‘Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?', 52 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supp vol) 13
279. McDowell, J (1979), ‘Virtue and Reason’, 62 The Monist 331
280. McEwan, J (2004), ‘Ritual, Fairness and Truth: The Adversarial and Inquisitorial Models of Criminal Trial’, in RA Duff et al (eds), TheTrial onTrial I:Truth and Due Process (Oxford, Hart) 51
281. Mckenzie, A (2005), '“This Death Some Strong and Stout Hearted Man Doth Choose”: The Practice of Peine Fort et Dure in Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century England’, 23 Law & History Review 279
282. McMahan, J (1994), ‘Innocence, Self-Defense, and Killing in War’, 2 Journal of Political Philosophy 193
283. Melden, AI (1961), Free Action (London, Routledge)
284. Michaels, A (1999), ‘Constitutional Innocence’, 112 Harvard Law Review 828
285. Michaels, A (2000), '“Rationales” of Criminal Law Then and Now: For a Judgmental Descriptivism’, 100 Columbia Law Review 54
286. Midgley, M (1978), ‘The Objection to Systematic Humbug’, 53 Philosophy 147
287. Mill, JS (1859), On Liberty (London, Parker)
288. Mitchell, B (1999), ‘In Defence of a Principle of Correspondence’, Criminal Law Review 195
289. Moore, MS (1990), ‘Choice, Character, and Excuse’, 7 Social Philosophy and Policy 28
290. Moore, MS (1993), Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and its Implications for the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
291. Moore, MS (1996), ‘Prima Facie Moral Culpability’, 76 Boston University Law Review 319
292. Moore, MS (1997), Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
293. Moran, M (2003), Rethinking the Reasonable Person:An Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective Standard (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
294. Morgan, EM (1937), ‘Presumptions’, 12 Washington Law Review 255
295. Morris, CW (1991), ‘Punishment and Loss of Moral Standing’, 21 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 53
296. Morris, H (1965), ‘Punishment for Thoughts’, 49 The Monist 1
297. Morris, H (1981), ‘A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment’, 18 American Philosophical Quarterly 263
298. Morse, SJ (1998), ‘Excusing and the New Excuse Defenses: A Legal and Conceptual Review’, 23 Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research 329
299. Mulhall, S and Swift, A (1992), Liberals and Communitarians (Oxford, Blackwell)
300. Murphy, JG (1973), ‘Marxism and Retribution’, 2 Philosophy & Public Affairs 217
301. Murphy, JG (1985), ‘Retributivism, Moral Education, and the Liberal State’, 4 Criminal Justice Ethics 3
302. Nagel, T (1970), The Possibility of Altruism (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
303. Nagel, T (1972), ‘War and Massacre’, 1 Philosophy & Public Affairs 123
304. Nagel, T (1980), ‘The Limits of Objectivity’, in S McMurrin (ed), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) i, 75
305. Norman, R (1995), Ethics, Killing and War (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
306. Norrie, AW (2000), Punishment, Responsibility, and Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
307. Norrie, AW (2001), Crime, Reason and History, 2nd ed (London, Butterworths)
308. Nuotio, K (2005), ‘On Becoming a Responsible Person’, 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 513
309. Olsen, F (1983), ‘The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform’, 96 Harvard Law Review 1497
310. Ormerod, D (2005), Smith & Hogan Criminal Law, 11th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
311. Padfield, N (2004), ‘The Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003: the Ultimate Nannystate Act?', Criminal Law Review 712
312. Parry, JT (1997), ‘Culpability, Mistake, and Official Interpretations of Law’, 25 American Journal of Criminal Law 1
313. Pateman, C (1988), The Sexual Contract (Stanford, Cal, Stanford University Press)
314. Pettit, P and Smith, M (1996), ‘Freedom in Belief and Desire’, 93 Journal of Philosophy 429
315. Phillips, DZ (1982), ‘What the Complex Did to Oedipus’, in DZ Phillips, Through a Darkening Glass (Oxford, Blackwell) 82
316. Postema, G (1986), Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
317. Quinn, WS (1989), ‘Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing’, 98 Philosophical Review 287
318. Rachels, J (1975), ‘Active and Passive Euthanasia’, 292 New England Journal of Medicine 78
319. Rawls, J (1985), ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical’, 14 Philosophy and Public Affairs 223
320. Raz, J (1979), The Authority of Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
321. Raz, J (1986), The Morality of Freedom (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
322. Raz, J (1987), ‘Autonomy, Toleration, and the Harm Principle’, in R Gavison (ed), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 313
323. Raz, J (1990), Practical Reason and Norms (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press)
324. Raz, J (1994), Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
325. Rees, T and Ashworth, AJ (2004), ‘Comment on Goldstein’, Criminal Law Review 303
326. Reydams, L (2003), Universal Jurisdiction (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
327. Richards, DAJ (1987), ‘Kantian Ethics and the Harm Principle: A Reply to John Finnis’, 87 Columbia Law Review 461
328. Richards, P (2002), Law of Contract, 5th edn (Harlow, Pearson)
329. Ripstein, A (1999), Equality, Responsibility, and the Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
330. Ripstein, A (2006), ‘Beyond the Harm Principle’, 34 Philosophy and Public Affairs 215
331. Roberts, P (1995), ‘Taking the Burden of Proof Seriously’, Criminal Law Review 783
332. Roberts, P (2001), ‘Philosophy, Feinberg, Codification, and Consent: A Progress Report on English Experiences of Criminal Law Reform’, 5 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 173
333. Roberts, P (2002), ‘The Presumption of Innocence Brought Home? Kebilene Deconstructed’, 118 Law Quarterly Review 41
334. Roberts, P (2005), ‘Strict Liability and the Presumption of Innocence: An Exposé of Functionalist Assumptions’, in AP Simester (ed), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 151
335. Roberts, P and Zuckerman, A (2004), Criminal Evidence (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
336. Robinson, PH (1982), ‘Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis’, 82 Columbia Law Review 199
337. Robinson, PH (1984), Criminal Law Defenses (2 vols; St Paul, Minn, West Group)
338. Robinson, PH (1993), ‘Should the Criminal Law Abandon the Actus Reus/Mens Rea Distinction’, in S Shute, J Gardner and J Horder (eds), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 187
339. Robinson, PH (1995), Fundamentals of Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Boston, Mass, Little, Brown)
340. Robinson, PH (1997), Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
341. Robinson, PH, and Grall, JA (1983), ‘Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability: The Model Penal Code and Beyond’, 35 Stanford Law Review 681
342. Rorty, R (1986), ‘Pragmatism, Davidson and Truth’, in E LePore (ed), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 333
343. Rorty, R (1995), ‘Is Truth a Goal of Enquiry? Davidson vs. Wright’, 45 Philosophical Quarterly 281
344. Ross, WD (1930), The Right and the Good (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
345. Roxin, C (2006), Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil 4th edn (Munich, CH Beck) i
346. Sayre, FB (1933), ‘Public Welfare Offenses’, 33 Columbia Law Review 55
347. Scanlon, T (1988), ‘The Significance of Choice’, in SM McMurrin (ed), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Salt Lake City, Utah, University of Utah Press) viii, 149
348. Schauer, F (1993), Playing by the Rules (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
349. Scheid, D (1997), ‘Constructing a Theory of Punishment, Desert, and the Distribution of Punishments’, 10 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 441
350. Schlag, PJ (1985), ‘Rules and Standards’, 33 UCLA Law Review 379
351. Schonsheck, J (1994), On Criminalization:An Essay in the Philosophy of the Criminal Law (Dordrecht, Kluwer)
352. Schopp, RF (1998), Justification Defenses and Just Convictions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
353. Searle, J (1978), ‘Prima Facie Obligations’, in J Raz (ed), Practical Reasoning (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
354. Shapiro, S (1998a), ‘On Hart’s Way Out’, 4 Legal Theory 469
355. Shapiro, S (1998b), ‘The Difference that Rules Make’, in B Bix (ed), Analyzing Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
356. Sher, G (1997), Beyond Neutrality (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
357. Shiner, R (2003), Freedom of Commercial Expression (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
358. Shute, S and Horder, J (1993), ‘Thieving and Deceiving: What is the Difference?', 56 Modern Law Review 548
359. Simester, AP (1992), ‘Mistakes in Defence’, 12 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 295
360. Simester, AP (1995), ‘Why Omissions Are Special’, 1 Legal Theory 311
361. Simester, AP (1996a), ‘Agency’, 15 Law and Philosophy 159
362. Simester, AP (1996b), ‘Why Distinguish Intention from Foresight?', in AP Simester and and ATH Smith (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 71
363. Simester, AP (1998), ‘On the So-called Requirement for Voluntary Action’, 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 403
364. Simester, AP (2000), ‘Can Negligence be Culpable?', in J Horder (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 4th Series (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 85
365. Simester, AP (2005), ‘Is Strict Liability Always Wrong?', in AP Simester (ed), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 21
366. Simester, AP and Sullivan, GR (2007), Criminal Law:Theory and Doctrine, 3rd ed (Oxford, Hart)
367. Simester, AP and Sullivan, GR (2005), ‘On the Nature and Rationale of Property Offences’, in RA Duff and SP Green (eds), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 168
368. Simester, AP and von Hirsch, A (eds) (2006), Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour (Oxford, Hart)
369. Simons, KW (1992), ‘Rethinking Mental States’, 72 Boston University Law Review 463
370. Simons, KW (1997), ‘When is Strict Criminal Liability Just?', 87 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1075
371. Simons, KW (2002), ‘Does Punishment for “Culpable Indifference” Simply Punish for “Bad Character”?', 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 219
372. Singer, R (1986), ‘On Classism and Dissonance in the Criminal Law: A Reply to Professor Dan-Cohen’, 77 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 69
373. Sistare, CT (1987), ‘Agent Motives and the Criminal Law’, 13 Social Theory & Practice 303
374. Sistare, CT (1989), Responsibility and Criminal Liability (Dordrecht, Kluwer)
375. Sistare, CT (1995), ‘In the Land of Omissions: An Opinionated Guide’, 14 Criminal Justice Ethics 26
376. Smith, ATH (1978), ‘On Actus Reus and Mens Rea’, in PR Glazebrook (ed), Reshaping the Criminal Law (London, Stevens) 95
377. Smith, ATH (1984), ‘Error and Mistake of Law in Anglo-American Criminal Law’, 14 Anglo-American Law Review 3
378. Smith, JC (1989), Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law (London, Stevens)
379. Smith, KJM (1983), ‘Liability for Endangerment: English Ad Hoc Pragmatism and American Innovation’, Criminal Law Review 127
380. Smith, P (1999), ‘Social Revolution and the Persistence of Rape’, in K Burgess-Jackson (ed), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape (New York, Oxford University Press)
381. Smith, P (2003), ‘Omission and Responsibility in Legal Theory’, 9 Legal Theory 221
382. Solomon, R (1993), The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life (Indianapolis, Ind, Hackett)
383. Solum, L (2003), ‘Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centred Theory of Judging’, 34 Metaphilosophy 178
384. Spencer, JR (1989), ‘Public Nuisance-A Critical Examination’, 48 Cambridge Law Journal 55
385. Sprack, J (2006), A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure, 11th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
386. Stanton-Ife, J (2006), ‘The Limits of Law’, in EN Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2006/entries/law-limits)
387. Stephen, JF (1867/1973), Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (ed RJ White; Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
388. Stone, CD (1974), Should Trees Have Standing? (Los Angeles, Cal, Kaufmann)
389. Strawson, G (1986), Freedom and Belief (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
390. Strawson, PF (1962), ‘Freedom and Resentment’, 48 Proceedings of the British Academy 1
391. Sullivan, GR (2005), ‘Strict Liability for Criminal Offences in England and Wales Following Incorporation into English Law of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in AP Simester (ed), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 195
392. Sypnowich, C (2000), ‘The Civility of Law: Between Public and Private’, in M d’Entrèves and U Vogel (eds), Public and Private: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives (London, Routledge)
393. Tadros, V (1999), ‘No Consent: A Historical Critique of the Actus Reus of Rape’, 3 Edinburgh Law Review 317
394. Tadros, V (2002), ‘The System of Criminal Law’, 22 Legal Studies 448
395. Tadros, V (2005a), Criminal Responsibility (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
396. Tadros, V (2005b), ‘The Distinctiveness of Domestic Abuse: A Freedom-Based Account’, in RA Duff and SP Green (eds), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 119
397. Tadros, V (2006a), ‘Rape Without Consent’, 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 515
398. Tadros, V (2006b), ‘The Homicide Ladder’, 69 Modern Law Review 601
399. Tadros, V (2007), ‘Rethinking the Presumption of Innocence’, 1 Criminal Law and Philosophy 193
400. Tadros, V and Tierney, S (2004), ‘The Presumption of Innocence and the Human Rights Act’, 67 Modern Law Review 402
401. Tapper, CF (1999), Cross and Tapper on Evidence, 9th edn (London, Butterworths)
402. Taylor, C (1989), ‘Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate’, in N Rosenblum (ed), Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press) 159
403. Taylor, P (1986), Respect for Nature (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press)
404. Thomson, G (1987), Needs (London, Routledge)
405. Thomson, JJ (1987), ‘Causality and Rights: Some Preliminaries’, 63 Chicago-Kent Law Review 471
406. Turner, JW (1945), ‘The Mental Element in Crimes at Common Law’, in L Radzinowicz and JW Turner (eds), The Modern Approach to Criminal Law (London, Macmillan) 195
407. Ullmann-Margalit, E (1983), ‘On Presumption’, 80 Journal of Philosophy 143
408. Uniacke, SM (1994), Permissible Killing: The Self-defence Justification of Homicide (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
409. University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1994), ‘Symposium, Act and Crime’, 142 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1443
410. Urmson, JO (1988), Aristotle’s Ethics (Oxford, Blackwell)
411. von Hirsch, A (1985), Past or Future Crimes (Manchester, Manchester University Press)
412. Urmson, JO (1996), ‘Extending the Harm Principle: “Remote” Harms and Fair Imputation’, in AP Simester and ATH Smith (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford, Oxford University Press) 259
413. Urmson, JO (2002), ‘Das Rechtsgutbegriff und das “Harm Principle”', 149 Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht 1
414. Urmson, JO Garland, D and Wakefield A (eds) (2000), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention (Oxford, Hart)
415. Urmson, JO and Jareborg, N (1991), ‘Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living-Standard Analysis’, 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1
416. Urmson, JO Roberts, J, Bottoms, AE, Roach, K and Schiff, M (eds) (2003), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (Oxford, Hart)
417. Waldron, J (1999), Law and Disagreement (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
418. Walgrave, L (2001), ‘Restoration and Punishment. On Favourable Similarities and Fortunate Differences’, in G Maxwell and A Morris (eds), Restoring Justice for Juveniles (Oxford, Hart) 17
419. Walker, N (1969), Sentencing in a Rational Society (London, Allen Lane)
420. Walker, N (1980), Punishment, Danger and Stigma (Oxford, Blackwell)
421. Walker, N (1982), ‘Unscientific, Unwise, Unprofitable, or Unjust’, 22 British Journal of Criminology 276
422. Wallace, RJ (1994), Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press)
423. Watson, G (1975), ‘Free Agency’, 72 Journal of Philosophy 205
424. Watson, G (2001), ‘Reasons and Responsibility’, 111 Ethics 374
425. Weale, A (1998), ‘Needs and Interests’, in E Craig (ed), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London, Routledge; available at http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/S040)
426. Weigend, T (1988), ‘The Legal and Practical Problems Posed by the Difference between Criminal Law and Administrative Penal Law’, 59 Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal 67
427. Westen, P and Mangiafico, J (2003), ‘The Criminal Defense of Duress: A Justification, Not an Excuse-and Why it Matters’, 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 833
428. Widerker, D and McKenna, M (eds) (2003), Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities (Aldershot, Ashgate)
429. Williams, B (1973a), ‘Deciding to Believe’, in B Williams, Problems of the Self (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
430. Williams, B (1973b), ‘Morality and the Emotions’, in B. Williams, Problems of the Self (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) 207
431. Williams, B (1973c), ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism’, in JJC Smart and B Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
432. Williams, B (1981a), ‘Moral Luck’, in B Williams, Moral Luck (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) 20
433. Williams, B (1981b), ‘Internal and External Reasons’, in B Williams, Moral Luck (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) 101
434. Williams, B (1985), Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London, Fontana)
435. Williams, B (1993), Shame and Necessity (Berkeley, Cal, University of California Press)
436. Williams, B (1994), ‘The Actus Reus of Dr Caligari’, 142 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1661
437. Williams, G (1955), ‘Police Control of Intending Criminals-I’, Criminal Law Review 66
438. Williams, G (1961), Criminal Law:The General Part, 2nd edn (London, Stevens)
439. Williams, G (1982), ‘Offences and Defences’, 2 Legal Studies 233
440. Williams, G (1983a), Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd edn (London, Stevens)
441. Williams, G (1983b), ‘Convictions and Fair Labelling’, 42 Cambridge Law Journal 85
442. Williams, G (1988), ‘The Logic of “Exceptions”', 47 Cambridge Law Journal 261
443. Wilson, W (2002), Central Issues in Criminal Theory (Oxford, Hart)
444. Wilson, W (2003), Criminal Law: Doctrine and Theory, 2nd edn (London, Longman)
445. Wilson, W (2007), ‘What’s Wrong with Murder?', 1 Criminal Law and Philosophy 157
446. Winch P (1960), ‘Nature and Convention’, 60 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 231
447. Winch P (1972), ‘Moral Integrity’, in P Winch, Ethics and Action (London, Routledge) 171
448. Wohlers, W, von Hirsch, A and Hefendehl, R (eds) (2003), Die Rechtsgutstheorie (Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft)
449. Wolf, S (1987), ‘Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility’, in F Schoeman (ed), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) 46
450. Wolfenden, J (1957), Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (The Wolfenden Report) (Cmnd 247, London, HMSO)
451. Wood, AW (2000), ‘The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy’, in M Timmons (ed), Essays on Kant’s Moral Philosophy (New York, Cambridge University Press)
452. Young, JO (2001), ‘The Coherence Theory of Truth’, in EN Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2001/entries/truth-coherence)
453. Zedner, L (2003), ‘Too Much Security?', 31 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 155
454. Zedner, L (2004), Criminal Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
455. Zedner, L (2005), ‘Securing Liberty in the Face of Terror: Reflections from Criminal Justice’, 32 Journal of Law and Society 507
456. Zimmerman, MJ (1988), An Essay on Moral Responsibility (Totowa, NJ, Rowman & Littlefield)