Erratum: Autophagic Turnover of Inactive 26S Proteasomes in Yeast Is Directed by the Ubiquitin Receptor Cue5 and the Hsp42 Chaperone (Autophagic Turnover of Inactive 26S Proteasomes in Yeast Is Directed by the Ubiquitin Receptor Cue5 and the Hsp42 Chaperone (2016) 16(6) (1717–1732), (S2211124716309019), (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.015));Autophagic Turnover of Inactive 26S Proteasomes in Yeast Is Directed by the Ubiquitin Receptor Cue5 and the Hsp42 Chaperone

Cell Reports

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1717-1732

  Marshall, Richard S ^a,b   McLoughlin, Fionn ^b   Vierstra, Richard D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

26S proteasome; autophagy; insoluble protein deposit (IPOD); nitrogen starvation; proteaphagy; protein chaperone; ubiquitin; yeast

Indexed keywords

26S PROTEASOME; AUTOPHAGY PROTEIN 8; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 42; PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN RECEPTOR CUE5; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE; CHAPERONE; CUE5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; HSP42 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; AUTOPHAGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENCAPSULATION; ENZYME INACTIVATION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEAPHAGY; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUALITY CONTROL; UBIQUITINATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ARABIDOPSIS; AUTOPHAGY; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84979780136     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110552     Document Type: Erratum

References (67)

1. Bajorek, M., Finley, D., Glickman, M.H., Proteasome disassembly and downregulation is correlated with viability during stationary phase. Curr. Biol. 13 (2003), 1140–1144.
2. Besche, H.C., Sha, Z., Kukushkin, N.V., Peth, A., Hock, E.M., Kim, W., Gygi, S., Gutierrez, J.A., Liao, H., Dick, L., Goldberg, A.L., Autoubiquitination of the 26S proteasome on Rpn13 regulates breakdown of ubiquitin conjugates. EMBO J. 33 (2014), 1159–1176.
3. Bhattacharyya, S., Yu, H., Mim, C., Matouschek, A., Regulated protein turnover: snapshots of the proteasome in action. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 (2014), 122–133.
4. Book, A.J., Gladman, N.P., Lee, S.S., Scalf, M., Smith, L.M., Vierstra, R.D., Affinity purification of the Arabidopsis 26 S proteasome reveals a diverse array of plant proteolytic complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 285 (2010), 25554–25569.
5. Chen, P., Hochstrasser, M., Biogenesis, structure and function of the yeast 20S proteasome. EMBO J. 14 (1995), 2620–2630.
6. Crosas, B., Hanna, J., Kirkpatrick, D.S., Zhang, D.P., Tone, Y., Hathaway, N.A., Buecker, C., Leggett, D.S., Schmidt, M., King, R.W., et al. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 127 (2006), 1401–1413.
7. Cuervo, A.M., Palmer, A., Rivett, A.J., Knecht, E., Degradation of proteasomes by lysosomes in rat liver. Eur. J. Biochem. 227 (1995), 792–800.
8. Dengjel, J., Høyer-Hansen, M., Nielsen, M.O., Eisenberg, T., Harder, L.M., Schandorff, S., Farkas, T., Kirkegaard, T., Becker, A.C., Schroeder, S., et al. Identification of autophagosome-associated proteins and regulators by quantitative proteomic analysis and genetic screens. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 11, 2012, 014035.
9. Dunham, M.J., Gartenberg, M.R., Brown, G.W., Methods in Yeast Genetics and Genomics. 2015, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1–256.
10. Farmer, L.M., Book, A.J., Lee, K.H., Lin, Y.L., Fu, H., Vierstra, R.D., The RAD23 family provides an essential connection between the 26S proteasome and ubiquitylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22 (2010), 124–142.
11. Fatimababy, A.S., Lin, Y.L., Usharani, R., Radjacommare, R., Wang, H.T., Tsai, H.L., Lee, Y., Fu, H., Cross-species divergence of the major recognition pathways of ubiquitylated substrates for ubiquitin/26S proteasome-mediated proteolysis. FEBS J. 277 (2010), 796–816.
12. Finley, D., Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78 (2009), 477–513.
13. Finley, D., Chen, X., Walters, K.J., Gates, channels, and switches: elements of the proteasome machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41 (2016), 77–93.
14. Fujiwara, T., Tanaka, K., Orino, E., Yoshimura, T., Kumatori, A., Tamura, T., Chung, C.H., Nakai, T., Yamaguchi, K., Shin, S., et al. Proteasomes are essential for yeast proliferation. cDNA cloning and gene disruption of two major subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 265 (1990), 16604–16613.
15. Gladman, N.P., Marshall, R.S., Lee, K.H., Vierstra, R.D., The proteasome stress regulon is controlled by a pair of NAC transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28 (2016), 1279–1296.
16. Haslbeck, M., Ignatiou, A., Saibil, H., Helmich, S., Frenzl, E., Stromer, T., Buchner, J., A domain in the N-terminal part of Hsp26 is essential for chaperone function and oligomerization. J. Mol. Biol. 343 (2004), 445–455.
17. Kaganovich, D., Kopito, R., Frydman, J., Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature 454 (2008), 1088–1095.
18. Kang, R.S., Daniels, C.M., Francis, S.A., Shih, S.C., Salerno, W.J., Hicke, L., Radhakrishnan, I., Solution structure of a CUE-ubiquitin complex reveals a conserved mode of ubiquitin binding. Cell 113 (2003), 621–630.
19. Khaminets, A., Behl, C., Dikic, I., Ubiquitin-dependent and independent signals in selective autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 26 (2016), 6–16.
20. Kim, W., Bennett, E.J., Huttlin, E.L., Guo, A., Li, J., Possemato, A., Sowa, M.E., Rad, R., Rush, J., Comb, M.J., et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. Mol. Cell 44 (2011), 325–340.
21. Kim, D.Y., Scalf, M., Smith, L.M., Vierstra, R.D., Advanced proteomic analyses yield a deep catalog of ubiquitylation targets in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25 (2013), 1523–1540.
22. Kleijnen, M.F., Roelofs, J., Park, S., Hathaway, N.A., Glickman, M., King, R.W., Finley, D., Stability of the proteasome can be regulated allosterically through engagement of its proteolytic active sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 (2007), 1180–1188.
23. Klionsky, D.J., Schulman, B.A., Dynamic regulation of macroautophagy by distinctive ubiquitin-like proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21 (2014), 336–345.
24. Klionsky, D.J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M.J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C.M., Adams, P.D., Adeli, K., et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy 12 (2016), 1–222.
25. Lamb, C.A., Yoshimori, T., Tooze, S.A., The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14 (2013), 759–774.
26. Laporte, D., Salin, B., Daignan-Fornier, B., Sagot, I., Reversible cytoplasmic localization of the proteasome in quiescent yeast cells. J. Cell Biol. 181 (2008), 737–745.
27. Lazarou, M., Sliter, D.A., Kane, L.A., Sarraf, S.A., Wang, C., Burman, J.L., Sideris, D.P., Fogel, A.I., Youle, R.J., The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 524 (2015), 309–314.
28. Lee, D.H., Goldberg, A.L., Selective inhibitors of the proteasome-dependent and vacuolar pathways of protein degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 271 (1996), 27280–27284.
29. Leggett, D.S., Hanna, J., Borodovsky, A., Crosas, B., Schmidt, M., Baker, R.T., Walz, T., Ploegh, H., Finley, D., Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 10 (2002), 495–507.
30. Leggett, D.S., Glickman, M.H., Finley, D., Purification of proteasomes, proteasome subcomplexes, and proteasome-associated proteins from budding yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 301 (2005), 57–70.
31. Lehmann, A., Niewienda, A., Jechow, K., Janek, K., Enenkel, C., Ecm29 fulfils quality control functions in proteasome assembly. Mol. Cell 38 (2010), 879–888.
32. Liu, C., Apodaca, J., Davis, L.E., Rao, H., Proteasome inhibition in wild-type yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Biotechniques 42 (2007), 158–162, 160, 162.
33. Livnat-Levanon, N., Kevei, É., Kleifeld, O., Krutauz, D., Segref, A., Rinaldi, T., Erpapazoglou, Z., Cohen, M., Reis, N., Hoppe, T., Glickman, M.H., Reversible 26S proteasome disassembly upon mitochondrial stress. Cell Rep. 7 (2014), 1371–1380.
34. Lu, K., Psakhye, I., Jentsch, S., Autophagic clearance of polyQ proteins mediated by ubiquitin-Atg8 adaptors of the conserved CUET protein family. Cell 158 (2014), 549–563.
35. Lu, Y., Lee, B.H., King, R.W., Finley, D., Kirschner, M.W., Substrate degradation by the proteasome: a single-molecule kinetic analysis. Science, 348, 2015, 1250834.
36. Malinovska, L., Kroschwald, S., Munder, M.C., Richter, D., Alberti, S., Molecular chaperones and stress-inducible protein-sorting factors coordinate the spatiotemporal distribution of protein aggregates. Mol. Biol. Cell 23 (2012), 3041–3056.
37. Marshall, R.S., Vierstra, R.D., Eat or be eaten: The autophagic plight of inactive 26S proteasomes. Autophagy 11 (2015), 1927–1928.
38. Marshall, R.S., Li, F., Gemperline, D.C., Book, A.J., Vierstra, R.D., Autophagic degradation of the 26S proteasome is mediated by the dual ATG8/ubiquitin receptor RPN10 in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 58 (2015), 1053–1066.
39. Miller, S.B., Ho, C.T., Winkler, J., Khokhrina, M., Neuner, A., Mohamed, M.Y., Guilbride, D.L., Richter, K., Lisby, M., Schiebel, E., et al. Compartment-specific aggregases direct distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregate deposition. EMBO J. 34 (2015), 778–797.
40. Mochida, K., Oikawa, Y., Kimura, Y., Kirisako, H., Hirano, H., Ohsumi, Y., Nakatogawa, H., Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Nature 522 (2015), 359–362.
41. Noda, T., Klionsky, D.J., The quantitative Pho8Δ60 assay of nonspecific autophagy. Methods Enzymol. 451 (2008), 33–42.
42. Panasenko, O.O., Collart, M.A., Not4 E3 ligase contributes to proteasome assembly and functional integrity in part through Ecm29. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31 (2011), 1610–1623.
43. Paraskevopoulos, K., Kriegenburg, F., Tatham, M.H., Rösner, H.I., Medina, B., Larsen, I.B., Brandstrup, R., Hardwick, K.G., Hay, R.T., Kragelund, B.B., et al. Dss1 is a 26S proteasome ubiquitin receptor. Mol. Cell 56 (2014), 453–461.
44. Park, S., Kim, W., Tian, G., Gygi, S.P., Finley, D., Structural defects in the regulatory particle-core particle interface of the proteasome induce a novel proteasome stress response. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (2011), 36652–36666.
45. Peters, L.Z., Karmon, O., David-Kadoch, G., Hazan, R., Yu, T., Glickman, M.H., Ben-Aroya, S., The protein quality control machinery regulates its misassembled proteasome subunits. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1005178.
46. Peters, L.Z., Karmon, O., Miodownik, S., Ben-Aroya, S., Proteasome storage granules are transiently associated with the insoluble protein deposit (IPOD). J. Cell Sci. 129 (2016), 1190–1197.
47. Peth, A., Uchiki, T., Goldberg, A.L., ATP-dependent steps in the binding of ubiquitin conjugates to the 26S proteasome that commit to degradation. Mol. Cell 40 (2010), 671–681.
48. Pfaffl, M.W., A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 2001, e45.
49. Radhakrishnan, S.K., Lee, C.S., Young, P., Beskow, A., Chan, J.Y., Deshaies, R.J., Transcription factor Nrf1 mediates the proteasome recovery pathway after proteasome inhibition in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 38 (2010), 17–28.
50. Reggiori, F., Klionsky, D.J., Autophagic processes in yeast: mechanism, machinery and regulation. Genetics 194 (2013), 341–361.
51. Rogov, V., Dötsch, V., Johansen, T., Kirkin, V., Interactions between autophagy receptors and ubiquitin-like proteins form the molecular basis for selective autophagy. Mol. Cell 53 (2014), 167–178.
52. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 (2003), 1572–1574.
53. Saito, A., Watanabe, T.K., Shimada, Y., Fujiwara, T., Slaughter, C.A., DeMartino, G.N., Tanahashi, N., Tanaka, K., cDNA cloning and functional analysis of p44.5 and p55, two regulatory subunits of the 26S proteasome. Gene 203 (1997), 241–250.
54. Schmidt, M., Finley, D., Regulation of proteasome activity in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843 (2014), 13–25.
55. Sha, Z., Goldberg, A.L., Proteasome-mediated processing of Nrf1 is essential for coordinate induction of all proteasome subunits and p97. Curr. Biol. 24 (2014), 1573–1583.
56. Shi, Y., Chen, X., Elsasser, S., Stocks, B.B., Tian, G., Lee, B.H., Shi, Y., Zhang, N., de Poot, S.A., Tuebing, F., et al. Rpn1 provides adjacent receptor sites for substrate binding and deubiquitination by the proteasome. Science, 351, 2016, 831.
57. Shih, S.C., Prag, G., Francis, S.A., Sutanto, M.A., Hurley, J.H., Hicke, L., A ubiquitin-binding motif required for intramolecular monoubiquitylation, the CUE domain. EMBO J. 22 (2003), 1273–1281.
58. Sica, V., Galluzzi, L., Bravo-San Pedro, J.M., Izzo, V., Maiuri, M.C., Kroemer, G., Organelle-specific initiation of autophagy. Mol. Cell 59 (2015), 522–539.
59. Silva, J.C., Gorenstein, M.V., Li, G.Z., Vissers, J.P., Geromanos, S.J., Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5 (2006), 144–156.
60. Specht, S., Miller, S.B., Mogk, A., Bukau, B., Hsp42 is required for sequestration of protein aggregates into deposition sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 195 (2011), 617–629.
61. Tomko, R.J. Jr., Hochstrasser, M., Molecular architecture and assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82 (2013), 415–445.
62. Waite, K.A., De-La Mota-Peynado, A., Vontz, G., Roelofs, J., Starvation induces proteasome autophagy with different pathways for core and regulatory particles. J. Biol. Chem. 291 (2016), 3239–3253.
63. Weberruss, M.H., Savulescu, A.F., Jando, J., Bissinger, T., Harel, A., Glickman, M.H., Enenkel, C., Blm10 facilitates nuclear import of proteasome core particles. EMBO J. 32 (2013), 2697–2707.
64. Wild, P., Farhan, H., McEwan, D.G., Wagner, S., Rogov, V.V., Brady, N.R., Richter, B., Korac, J., Waidmann, O., Choudhary, C., et al. Phosphorylation of the autophagy receptor optineurin restricts Salmonella growth. Science 333 (2011), 228–233.
65. Woolford, C.A., Daniels, L.B., Park, F.J., Jones, E.W., Van Arsdell, J.N., Innis, M.A., The PEP4 gene encodes an aspartyl protease implicated in the posttranslational regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae vacuolar hydrolases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6 (1986), 2500–2510.
66. Xie, Y., Varshavsky, A., Physical association of ubiquitin ligases and the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000), 2497–2502.
67. Xie, Y., Varshavsky, A., RPN4 is a ligand, substrate, and transcriptional regulator of the 26S proteasome: a negative feedback circuit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001), 3056–3061.