Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study

Small Business Economics

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 361-391

  Fini, Riccardo ^a   Fu, Kun ^b   Mathisen, Marius Tuft ^c   Rasmussen, Einar ^d   Wright, Mike ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^d NORD UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Commercialization of research; Institutional framework; Technology transfer offices; University spin offs; Venure capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979573689     PISSN: 0921898X     EISSN: 15730913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.
2. Aldridge, T., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). Does policy influence the commercialization route? Evidence from National Institutes of Health funded scientists. Research Policy, 39(5), 583–588. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.005.
3. Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424–1447.
4. Arshed, N., Carter, S., & Mason, C. (2014). The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: Is policy formulation to blame? Small Business Economics, 43(3), 639–659. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9554-8.
5. Baldini, N., Fini, R., & Grimaldi, R. (2014a). The transition towards entrepreneurial universities: An assessment of academic entrepreneurship in Italy. In A. Link, D. Siegel, & M. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of university technology transfer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
6. Baldini, N., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2014b). Organisational change and the institutionalisation of university patenting activity in Italy. Minerva, 52(1), 27–53.
7. Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35(4), 518–532.
8. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.
9. Bliese, P. D., Chan, D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2007). Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 10(4), 551–563.
10. Bolzani, D., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2014a). Fifteen years of academic entrepreneurship in Italy: Evidence from the TASTE Project. Technical Report, University of Bologna.
11. Bolzani, D., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2014b). University Spin-Offs and Their Impact: Longitudinal Evidence from Italy. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 41, 181–205.
12. Borlaug, S. B., Grünfeld, L., Gulbrandsen, M., Rasmussen, E., Rønning, L., Spilling, O. R., et al. (2009). Between entrepreneurship and technology transfer: Evaluation of the FORNY programme. In Report 19 (pp. 160). Oslo: NIFU STEP.
13. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 6520.2010.00390.x.
14. Carpenter, R. E., & Petersen, B. C. (2002). Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. The Economic Journal, 112(477), F54–F72.
15. Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369–384. doi:10.1016/J.Respol.2005.01.007.
16. Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084–1093. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010.
17. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Mustar, P., & Knockaert, M. (2007). Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 609–640. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm019.
18. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004.
19. Complete University Guide (2014). http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings. Accessed 20/8 2014.
20. CWTS (2014). Leiden Ranking. http://www.leidenranking.com/. Accessed 8/7 2014.
21. Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2009). Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy, 38(1), 26–34. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.001.
22. Damsgaard, E. F., & Thursby, M. C. (2013). University entrepreneurship and professor privilege. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 183–218. doi:10.1093/icc/dts047.
23. Database for Statistics on Higher Education (2014). dbh.nsd.uib.no. Accessed 8/7 2014.
24. Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
25. European Commission (2010). Feasibility study for creating a European university data collection. http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/docs/en/eumida-final-report.pdf. Accessed 15/5 2014.
26. Eurostat (2014). Eurostat Statistics Database. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed 20/08/2014 and 24/01/2016.
27. FAME (2014). https://fame.bvdinfo.com/. Accessed 20/8 2014.
28. Fini, R., & Grimaldi, R. (2016). Process approach to academic entrepreneurship: evidence from the globe. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
29. Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.013.
30. Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39(8), 1060–1069. doi:10.1016/j.respo1.2010.05.014.
31. Garnsey, E., & Heffernan, P. (2005). High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction: The Cambridge case. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1127–1144. doi:10.1080/00343400500328289.
32. Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva, 47(1), 93–114. doi:10.1007/S11024-009-9118-2.
33. Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy, 40(8), 1068–1076. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008.
34. Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2002). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658.
35. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005.
36. Gulbrandsen, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2012). The use and development of indicators for the commercialisation of university research in a national support programme. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(5), 481–495.
37. Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. (2010). Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1241–1262.
38. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127. doi:10.1162/003465398557221.
39. Heritage Foundation. (2014). Index of Economic Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/index/download Accessed 20/8 2014.
40. Higher Education Information Database for Institutions (HEIDI). (2014). https://heidi.hesa.ac.uk/Home.aspx. Accessed 20/8 2014.
41. Huyghe, A., & Knockaert, M. (2015). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 138–160. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9333-3.
42. Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., & Piva, E. (2014). Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 289–307.
43. Italian Companies House Database. (2013). Infocamere Telemaco. https://telemaco.infocamere.it/. Accessed 17/11 2013.
44. Kenney, M., & Goe, W. R. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professional entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33(5), 679–844.
45. Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2011). Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison. Research Policy, 40(8), 1100–1112. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.012.
46. Kochenkova, A., Grimaldi, R., & Munari, F. (2016). Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: a review of academic literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 407–429.
47. Lawton Smith, H., & Ho, K. (2006). Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories’ spin-off companies. Research Policy, 35(10), 1554–1568.
48. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392–1419. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x.
49. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006.
50. Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Wild, A. (2015). The institutionalization of third stream activities in UK higher education: The role of discourse and metrics. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 78–92. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12069.
51. Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.
52. Mason, C. (2012). Handbook of research on venture capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
53. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9369-9.
54. Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2016). University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 345–362. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9721-1.
55. MIUR. (2013). Italian Ministry of instruction, university and research. http://nuclei.miur.it/sommario/ Accessed 17/11 2013.
56. Mowery, D. C. (2011). Learning from one another? International policy “emulation” and university-industry technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1827–1853. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr063.
57. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99–119. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6.
58. Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., Toschi, L., & Villani, E. (2015). Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: A cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–29. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9448-1.
59. Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15–23. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00159-X.
60. Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Ramaciotti, L. (2016). The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy. Research Policy, 45(7), 1386–1396.
61. Nightingale, P., & Coad, A. (2014). Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 113–143. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt057.
62. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (the political economy of institutions and decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
64. O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011.
65. O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R & D Management, 37(1), 1–16.
66. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13–24.
67. Perkmann, M., Fini, R., Ross, J. M., Salter, A., Silvestri, C., & Tartari, V. (2015). Accounting for universities’ impact: Using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientists. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 380-391.
68. Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311.
69. Rasmussen, E. (2008). Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada. Technovation, 28(August), 506–517.
70. Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612.
71. Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2011). The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1314–1345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x.
72. Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43(1), 92–106. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007.
73. Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2015). The transformation of network ties to develop entrepreneurial competencies for university spin-offs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(7–8), 430–457.
74. Repubblica. (2013). Grande Guida dell’Università. http://temi.repubblica.it/guide-universita-2013-2014/. Accessed 17/11 2013.
75. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Müller, V. (2013). Does acquiring venture capital pay off for the funded firms? A meta-analysis on the relationship between venture capital investment and funded firm financial performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 335–353. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.04.002.
76. Salvador, E. (2009). Evolution of Italian universities' rules for spin-offs: The usefulness of formal regulations. Industry and Higher Education, 23(6), 445-462.
77. Sampat, B. N., Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371–1390. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00087-0.
78. Savva, N., & Taneri, N. (2015). The role of equity, royalty, and fixed fees in technology licensing to university spin-offs. Management Science, 61(6), 1323–1343. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2000.
79. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. London: Sage Publications.
80. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
81. Shane, S. (Ed.). (2004). Academic entrepreneurship -University spinoffs and wealth creation (New horizons in entrepreneurship). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
82. Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5.
83. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280.
84. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 115–142. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006.
85. Spinouts UK Survey. (2014). http://www.spinoutsuk.co.uk/. Accessed 20/8 2014.
86. Stevens, A. J. (2004). The enactment of Bayh-Dole. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 93–99.
87. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.
88. Tartari, V., Perkmann, M., & Salter, A. (2014). In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Research Policy, 43(7), 1189-1203.
89. The Research Council of Norway. (2013). Det Norske Forsknings-og Innovasjonssystemet—Statistikk og Indikatorer. Oslo: Norges Forskningsråd.
90. Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of University Licensing: A survey of major U.S. Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 59–72.
91. Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109–124. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8.
92. Tolbert, P. S., David, R. J., & Sine, W. D. (2011). Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organization Science, 22(5), 1332–1344. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0601.
93. UNICO, & NUBS. (2002). Annual UNICO-NUBS-AURIL survey on university commercialization activities. Nottingham: Nottingham University Business School.
94. Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2014). Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: An international study. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 703–716. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9523-7.
95. Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553–564. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.001.
96. van Praag, M., & van Stel, A. (2013). The more business owners, the merrier? The role of tertiary education. Small Business Economics, 41(2), 335–357. doi:10.1007/s11187-012-9436-x.
97. Vincett, P. S. (2010). The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, 39(6), 736–747. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.001.
98. Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0.
99. Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x.
100. World Bank. (2014a). Doing business project of the world bank. http://www.doingbusiness.org/. Accessed 20/8 2014.
101. World Bank. (2014b). World Bank database. http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 20/8 2014.
102. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205–1223. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021.
103. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (Eds.). (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
104. Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005.
105. Zephyr. (2014). https://zephyr.bvdinfo.com/. Accessed 20/8 2014.
106. Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.