Learning from one another? International policy "emulation" and university-industry technology transfer

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1827-1853

  Mowery, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSS-BORDER RELATIONS; ECONOMIC POLICY; HIGHER EDUCATION; INCENTIVE; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; INTERNATIONAL LAW; LEARNING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 82955176922     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtr063     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (1994), The AUTM Licensing Survey: Executive Summary and Selected Data, Fiscal Years 1993, 1992, and 1991. AUTM: Norwalk, CT.
2. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (1996), AUTM Licensing Survey 1996, Survey Summary. AUTM: Norwalk, CT.
3. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (1998), AUTM Licensing Survey 1998, Survey Summary. AUTM: Norwalk, CT.
4. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (2000), The AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 1999. AUTM: Norwalk, CT.
5. Blumenthal, D. and S. Epstein (1986), 'Commercializing university research: lessons from the history of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation,' New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1621-1626.
6. Blumenthal, D., E. Campbell, M. Anderson, N. Causino and K. Louis (1997), 'Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty,' Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1224-1229.
7. Breschi, S., F. Lissoni and F. Montobbio (2004), 'Open Science and University Patenting: A Bibliometric Analysis of The Italian Case'. Mimeo.
8. Bresnahan, T. and A. Gambardella (2004), Building High-Tech Clusters. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY.
9. Campbell, E. G., B. R. Clarridge, M. Gokhale, L. Birenbaum, S. Hilgartner, M. Holtzman, A. Neil and D. Blumenthal (2002), 'Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey,' Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 473-480.
10. Casper, S. (2007), Creating Silicon Valley in Europe. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY.
11. Casper, S. and F. Murray (2004), 'Examining the marketplace for ideas: how local are Europe's biotechnology clusters?,' in M. McKelvey, A. Rickne and J. Laage-Hellman (eds), The Economic Dynamics of Modern Biotechnology. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.
12. Christie, A. F., S. D'Aloisio, K. L. Gaita, M. J. Howlett and E. M. Webster (2003), Analysis of the legal framework for patent ownership in publicly funded research institutions. Commonwealth of Australia, Division of Education, Science, and Training: Canberra, Australia.
13. Cohen, W., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. Walsh (1998), 'Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance,' in R. Noll (ed.), Challenges to the Research University. Brookings Institution: Washington, DC.
14. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson and J.P. Walsh (2002), 'Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D,' Management Science, 48, 1-23.
15. Colyvas, J., M. Crow, A. Gelijns, R. Mazzoleni, R. R. Nelson, N. Rosenberg and B. N. Sampat (2002), 'How do university inventions get into practice?' Management Science, 48, 61-72.
16. Crespi, G.A., A. Geuna and L.J.J. Nesta (2006), 'Labour mobility of academic inventors: career decision and knowledge transfer,' European University Institute Working Paper.
17. Ding, W. and E. Choi (2008), 'Divergent paths or stepping stones: a comparison of scientists' advising and founding activities,' Working Paper, Haas School of Business. University of California: Berkeley.
18. Economist (2002), 'Innovation's golden goose', The Economist, 365, T3
19. Eisenberg, R. (2001), 'Bargaining over the transfer of proprietary research tools: is this market emerging or failing?,' in D. L. Zimmerman, R. C. Dreyfuss and H. First (eds), Expanding the Bounds of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford University Press: New York.
20. Eisenberg, R. (1996), 'Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research,' Virginia Law Review, 82, 1663-1727.
21. Etzkowitz, H. (199), 'Knowledge as property: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the debate of academic patent policy,' Minerva, 32, 383-421.
22. Geiger, R (1986), To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940. Oxford University Press: New York.
23. Geiger, R. (1993), Research And Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II. Oxford University Press: New York.
24. Geuna, A. and L. J. J. Nesta (2006), 'University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence,' Research Policy, 35, 790-807.
25. Goldfarb, B. and M. Henrekson (2003), 'Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property,' Research Policy, 32, 639-658.
26. Government University Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR) (1991), Industrial Perspectives on Innovation and Interactions with Universities. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
27. Graham, H. D. and N. Diamond (1997), The Rise of American Research Universities. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.
28. Hall, B. H. and R. H. Zideonis (2001), 'The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995,' RAND Journal of Economics, 32, 101-128.
29. Hasselmo, N. (1999), Priorities for Federal Innovation Reform. Association of American Universities: Washington, DC.
30. Heller, M. A. and R. S. Eisenberg (1998), 'Can patents deter innovation?: The anticommons in biomedical research,' Science, 280, 298.
31. Henderson, R., A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1994), 'Numbers up, quality down?: Trends in university patenting, 1965-1992', Presented at the CEPR Conference on University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms, and the 'Industrial Transferability' of Research, Stanford University,'.
32. Henderson, R., A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998), 'Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988,' Review of Economics & Statistics, 80, 119-127.
33. Henderson, R., A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1995), 'Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988,' National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper W5068.
34. Henderson, R, A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998), 'University patenting amid Changing incentives for commercialization,' in G. Barba Navaretti, P. Dasgupta, K. G. Mäler and D. Siniscalco (eds), Creation and Transfer of Knowledge. Springer: New York.
35. Jensen, R. and M. Thursby (2001), 'Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions,' American Economic Review, 91, 240-258.
36. Katz, M.L. and J.A. Ordover (1990), 'R&D competition and cooperation,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 1990, 137-192.
37. Kilger, C. and K. Bartenbach (2002), 'New rules for German professors,' Science, 298, 1173-1175.
38. Lerner, J. (1999), 'Venture capital and the commercialization of academic technology: Symbiosis and paradox,' in L. Branscomb, R. Florida and F. Kodama (eds), Industrializing Knowledge. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
39. Lerner, J. (2005), 'The university and the start-Up: Lessons from the past two decades,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 49-56.
40. Levin, R. C., A. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson and S. Winter (1987), 'Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783-820.
41. Levine, D. O. (1986), The American College and the Culture of Aspiration, 1915-1940. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.
42. Liebeskind, J. (2001), 'Risky business: universities and intellectual property,' Academe, 87. Available from World Wide Web: 5http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/01SO/so01lie.htm4.
43. Lowe, R. A. (2001), 'The role and experience of start-ups in commercializing university inventions: start-up licensees at the University of California,' in G. Libecap (ed.), Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes. JAI Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
44. Lowe, R. A. (2006), 'Who develops a university invention?: The impact of tacit knowledge and licensing policies,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 415-429.
45. Mansfield, E. (1991), 'Academic research and industrial innovations,' Research Policy, 20, 1-12.
46. Mazzoleni, R. and R. Nelson (1998), 'The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate,' Research Policy, 27, 274-284.
47. Merges, R. and R. Nelson (1994), 'On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: the effect of patent scope decisions,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 1-24.
48. Mowery, D. C. (2002), 'The changing role of universities in the 21st century U.S. R&D system,' in A. H. Teich, S. D. Nelson and S. J. Lita (eds), AAAS Science and Technology Policy Handbook. American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC.
49. Mowery, D. C. and B. N. Sampat (2001a), 'Patenting and licensing university inventions: lessons from the history of the research corporation,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 317-355.
50. Mowery, D. C. and B. N. Sampat (2001b), 'University patents, patent policies, and patent policy debates, 1925-1980,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 781-814.
51. Mowery, D. C., R. R. Nelson, B. N Sampat and A. A. Ziedonis (2001), 'The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980,' Research Policy, 30, 99-119.
52. Mowery, D. C., R. R. Nelson, B. N Sampat and A. A. Ziedonis (2004), 'Ivory Tower' and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
53. Mowery, D. C., B. N. Sampat and A. A. Ziedonis (2002), 'Learning to patent: institutional experience and the quality of university patents,' Management Science, 48, 73-89.
54. Mowery, D. C. and B. N. Sampat (2004), 'Universities in national innovation systems,' in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds), Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
55. National Research Council (1997), Intellectual Property Rights and Research Tools in Molecular Biology. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
56. National Science Board (2002), Science and Engineering Indicators: 2002. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
57. OECD (2000), A New Economy? OECD: Paris
58. OECD (2002), Benchmarking Science-Industry Relationships. OECD: Paris.
59. OECD (2003), Turning Science into Business. OECD: Paris.
60. Office of Technology Transfer (1997), Annual Report: University of California Technology Transfer Program. University of California Office of the President: Oakland, CA.
61. Rai, A. and R. Eisenberg (2003), 'Bayh-Dole reform and the progress of biomedicine,' American Scientist, 91, 52-59.
62. Rai, A. T. and R. S. Eisenberg (2001), 'The public and the private in biopharmaceutical research', Presented at the Conference on the Public Domain, Duke University.
63. Reimers, N. (1998), 'Stanford's Office of Technology Licensing and the Cohen/Boyer Cloning Patents', Oral History compiled in 1997 by Sally Smith Hughes, Ph.D., Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley, CA.
64. Rosenberg, N. and R. R. Nelson (1994), 'American universities and technical advance in industry,' Research Policy, 23, 323-348.
65. Rosenberg, N. (1992), 'Scientific instrumentation and university research,' Research Policy, 21, 381-390.
66. Roush, W., E. Marshall and G. Vogel (1997), 'Publishing sensitive data: who's calling the shots?' Science, 276, 523-526.
67. Sampat, B., D. Mowery and A. Ziedonis (2003), 'Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: a re-examination,' International Journal of Industrial Organization.
68. Sampat, B. N. and R. R. Nelson (2002), 'The emergence and standardization of university technology transfer offices: a case study of institutional change,' Advances in Strategic Management, 19, 135-164.
69. Sampat, B. N. and A. A. Ziedonis (2003), 'Cite-seeing: patent citations and economic value', presented at the Conference on Empirical Economics of Innovation and Patenting, Centre for European Economic Research. Mannheim Germany, March.
70. Slaughter, S. and L. Leslie (1997), Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
71. Stokes, D. E. (1997), Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution: Washington, DC.
72. Swann, J. (1988), Academic Scientists and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Cooperative Research in Twentieth-Century America. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.
73. Thursby, J., R. Jensen and M. Thursby (2001), 'Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59-72.
74. Thursby, J. and M. Thursby (2002), 'Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing,' Management Science, 48, 90-104.
75. Trajtenberg, M., R. Henderson and A. B. Jaffe (1997), 'University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of inventions,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19-50.
76. Trow, M. (1991), 'American higher education: 'Exceptional' or just different,' in B. E. Shafer (ed.), Is America Different? A New Look at American Exceptionalism. Oxford University Press: New York.
77. Trow, M. (1979), 'Aspects of diversity in American higher education,' in H. Gans (ed.), On the Making of Americans. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.
78. U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee (1999), Entrepreneurial Dynamism and the Success of U.S. High-Tech: Joint Economic Committee Staff Report. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
79. United States Patent and Trademark Office (1998), US Colleges and Universities- Utility Patent Grantspp. 1969-1998.
80. Walsh, J.P., A. Arora and W.M. Cohen (2003), 'Research tool patenting and licensing and biomedical innovation,' in W.M. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds), The Patent System in the Knowledge-Based Economy. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.
81. Zucker, L., D. Michael and J. Armstrong (1994), 'Inter-institutional spillover effects in the commercialization of bioscienc,' ISSR Working Papers in Social Science, 6.3. University of California: Los Angeles.