University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 291-311

  Powers, Joshua B ^a   McDougall, Patricia P ^b  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurship; Industry; Start up formation; University

Indexed keywords

EID: 11344277515     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Association of University Technology Managers AUTM Licensing Survey FY 2000 2000 Author Norwalk, CT
2. Bania N. Eberts R.W. Fogarty M.S. Universities and the start-up of new companies: Can we generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? Rev. Econ. Stat. 75 1993 761-766
3. Barboza D. Loving a stock, not wisely but too well: The price of obsession with a promising start-up N.Y. Times 1998
4. Barney J.B. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision making J. Bus. Venturing 12 1997 9-30
5. Bell C. McNamara J. High-tech Ventures: The Guide for Entrepreneurial Success 1991 Addison-Wesley Publ. Reading, MA
6. Bozeman B. Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory Res. Policy 29 2000 627-655
7. Bray M.J. Lee J.N. University revenues from technology transfer: licensing fees vs. equity positions J. Bus. Venturing 15 2000 385-392
8. Brett A. Gibson D. Smilor R. University Spin-Off Companies: Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer 1991 Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Savage, MD
9. Cameron A.C. Trivedi P.K. Regression Analysis of Count Data 1998 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge, UK
10. Cawood M.C. Venture capital and the university In: Brett A.M. Gibson D.W. & Smilor R.W. (Eds.) University Spin-Off Companies: Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer 1991 33-52 Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Savage, MD
11. Chrisman J.J. Hynes T. Fraser S. Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary J. Bus. Venturing 10 1995 267-281
12. Cohen W.M. Florida R. Randazzese L. Walsh J. Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance In: Noll R. (Ed.) Challenge to the Research University 1998 163-191 Brookings Institution Washington, DC
13. Colyvas J. Crow M. Gelihns A. Mazzoleni R. Nelson R.R. Rosenberg N. Sampat B.N. How do university inventions get into practice? Manage. Sci. 48 2002 61-72
14. Connor K.R. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? J. Manage. 17 1991 121-154
15. Deeds D.L. Decarolis D. Coombs J.E. The impact of firm-specific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry J. Bus. Venturing 12 1997 31-46
16. Deeds D.L. DeCarolis D. Coombs J.E. Firm-specific resources and wealth creation in high-technology ventures: Evidence from newly public biotechnology firms Entrep. Theory Pract. 22 3 1998 55-73
17. Deeds D.L. Decarolis D. Coombs J.E. The impact of firm-specific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry Strateg. Manage. J. 20 1999 953-968
18. Di Gregorio, D., Shane, S., 2001. Why do Some Universities Generate More Start-Ups than Others? Unpubl manuscript.
19. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages Res. Policy 27 1998 823-833
20. Etzkowitz H. The Second Academic Revolution: MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science 2000 Gordon - Breach London
21. Etzkowitz H. Webster A. Healey P. Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia 1998 State Univ. of New York Albany
22. Feldman M. Feller I. Bercovitz J. Burton R. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities Manage. Sci. 48 2002 105-121
23. Finkle T.A. The relationship between boards of directors and initial public offerings in the biotechnology industry Entrep. Theory Pract. 22 3 1998 5-29
24. Flynn D.W. A critical exploration of sponsorship, infrastructure, and new organizations Small Bus. Econ. 5 1993 129-156
25. Fried V.H. Bruton G.D. Hisrich R.D. Strategy and the board of directors in venture capital-backed firms J. Bus. Venturing 13 1998 493-503
26. Hall B.H. Jaffe A.B. Trajtenberg M. The NBER citations data file: lessons, insights, and methodological tools 2001 National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA
27. Harmon B. Ardishvili A. Cardozo R. Elder T. Leuthold J. Parshall J. Raghian M. Smith D. Mapping the university technology transfer process J. Bus. Venturing 12 1997 423-434
28. Henderson R. Jaffee A.B. Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology Rev. Econ. Stat. 80 1998 119-127
29. Kennedy D. Another century's end, another revolution for higher education Change 27 3 1995 8-15
30. Lee Y.S. 'Technology transfer' and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration Res. Policy 25 1996 843-863
31. Lerner J. Venture capitalists and the decision to go public J. Financ. Econ. 35 1994 293-316
32. Mansfield E. Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing Rev. Econ. Stat. 77 1995 55-65
33. Mansfield E. Lee J. The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial & D support Res. Policy 25 1996 1047-1058
34. Matkin G.W. Technology Transfer and the University 1990 Am. Council on Ed. New York
35. McDonough P.M. Antionio A.L. Walpole M. Perez L.X. College rankings: democratized college knowledge for whom? Res. High. Educ. 39 1998 513-537
36. McMillan I.C. Zemann L. Subbanarasimha P.N. Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process J. Bus. Venturing 2 1987 123-137
37. McMillan G.S. Narin F. Deeds D.L. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology Res. Policy 29 2000 1-8
38. Mowery D.C. Sampat B.N. Ziedonis A.A. Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of U.S. university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 Manage. Sci. 48 2002 73-89
39. Narin F. Hamilton K.S. Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science Res. Policy 26 1997 317-330
40. National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators 1998 Author Washington, DC
41. National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators 2000 Author Washington, DC
42. Powell W.W. Koput K.W. Bowie J.I. Smith-Doerr L. The spatial clustering of science and capital: Accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships Reg. Stud. 36 2002 291-305
43. Powers, J.B., 2000. Academic Entrepreneurship in Higher Education: Institutional Effects on Performance of University Technology Transfer. Unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Indiana University-Bloomington.
44. Pratt S.E. The organized venture capital community In: Weissberg T. (Ed.) Venture Capital Yearbook 1995 89-94 Venture Economics New York
45. Riley R.J. Technology Transfer Cash Cow Patents 1998 Alliance for American Innovation Washington, DC
46. Roberts E.B. Malone D.E. Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations R & D Manag. 26 1996 17-48
47. Roessner J.D. Ailes C.P. Feller I. How industry benefits from NSF's engineering research centers Res. Technol. Manag. 41 1998 40-44
48. Rosenberg N. Scientific instrumentation and university research Res. Policy 21 1992 381-391
49. Rosenberg N. Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advances in industry Res. Policy 23 1994 323-348
50. Sapienza, H.J., 1989. Variations in Venture Capitalist-Entrepreneur Relations: Antecedents and Consequences. University of Maryland, Unpubl. doctoral dissertation.
51. Shane S. Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation Manage. Sci. 42 2001 205-220
52. Shane S. Stuart T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups Manage. Sci. 48 2002 154-170
53. Steffensen M. Rogers E.M. Speakman K. Spin-offs from research centers at a research university J. Bus. Venturing 15 1999 93-111
54. Thursby J.G. Thursby M. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing Manage. Sci. 48 2002 90-104
55. Von Eye A. Schuster C. Regression Analysis for the Social Sciences 1998 Academic Press San Diego
56. Zahra S.A. Bogner W.C. Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment J. Bus. Venturing 15 1999 135-173
57. Zemsky R. Shaman S. Iannozzi M. In search of strategic perspective: a tool for mapping the market in postsecondary education Change 29 6 1997 23-38
58. Zucker L.G. Darby M.R. Armstrong J. Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Econ. Inq. 36 1998 65-86
59. Zucker L.G. Darby M.R. Armstrong J. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology Manage. Sci. 48 2002 138-153