University entrepreneurship and professor privilege

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 183-218

  Färnstrand Damsgaard, Erika ^a,c   Thursby, Marie C ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS IFN   (Sweden)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIALIZATION; ENTREPRENEUR; FIRM OWNERSHIP; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

SWEDEN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84873267182     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dts047     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson M. and S. Klepper (2013) 'Characteristics and Performance of New Firms and Spinoffs in Sweden,' Industrial and Corporate Change 22(1) 245-280.
2. Conti A. (2009) 'Managing Innovations Resulting from University-Industry Collaborations,' CEMI-Working Paper 002 Mimeo.2009
3. Braunerhjelm P. (2007) 'Academic entrepreneurship: social norms university culture and policies,' Science and Public Policy 34 619-631.
4. Braunerhjelm P. and R. Svensson (2010) 'The inventor role: was Schumpeter right?' Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 314-344.
5. Dechenaux E. M. Thursby and J. Thursby (2011) 'Inventor moral hazard in licensing: the role of contracts,' Research Policy 40 94-104.
6. Di Gregorio D. and S. Shane (2003) 'Why Do some universities generate more start-ups than others?' Research Policy 32 209-227.
7. Edwards M. F. Murray and R. Yu (2003) 'Value creation and sharing among universities biotechnology and pharma,' Nature Biotechnology 21 618-624.
8. Geuna A. and L. J. J. Nesta (2006) 'University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence,' Research Policy 35 790-807.
9. Greenburg D. (2007) Science for Sale: The Perils Rewards and Delusions of Campus Capitalism. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
10. Goldfarb B. and M. Henrekson (2003) 'Bottom-up versus top-down Policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property,' Research Policy 32 639-658.
11. Hellmann T. (2007) 'The role of patents for bridging the science to market gap,' Journal of Economic Behavior &Organization 63 577-598.
12. Henrekson M. and N. Rosenberg (2001) 'Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: lesson from the US and Sweden,' Journal of Technology Transfer 26 207-231.
13. Higgins M. J. Thursby and M. Thursby (2010) 'The nexus of NIH funding for university science and biopharmaceutical applications,' in Why Invest in Biomedical Research Office of Science Policy Analysis. National Institutes of Health: Bethesda MD.
14. Hoppe H. and E. Ozdenoren (2005) 'Intermediation in innovation,' International Journal of Industrial Organization 23 483-503.
15. Jensen R. and D. Showalter (2011) 'Commercializing University Inventions with Startups,' Mimeo.
16. Jensen R. and M. Thursby (2001) 'Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions,' American Economic Review 91 240-259.
17. Kenney M. and D. Patton (2009) 'Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university ownership model,' Research Policy 38 1407-1422.
18. Laffont J. J. (1989) 'The economics of uncertainty and information,' The MIT press: Cambridge MA.
19. Lissoni F. P. Lotz J. Schovsbo and A. Treccani (2009) 'academic patent and the professor's privilege: evidence on Denmark from the KEINS database,' Science and Public Policy 36 595-607.
20. Litan R. L. Mitchell and E.J. Reedy (2008) 'Commercializing university inventions: alternative approaches,' In J. Lerner and S Stern (eds) Innovation Policy and the Economy. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
21. Lowe R. and A. Ziedonis (2006) 'Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms,' Management Science 52 173-186.
22. Macho-Stadler I. D. Perez-Castrillo and R. Veugelers (2008) 'Designing contracts for university spin-offs,' Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 17 185-218.
23. Merrill S. and A. Mazza (2010) 'Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest,' Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience Research and Dialogue National Research Council. The National Academies Press.
24. Mowery D. R. R. Nelson B. Sampat and A. Ziedonis (2004) 'Ivory tower and industrial innovation: U.S. university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act,' Stanford University: Stanford Press.
25. Mowery D. and B. Sampat (2005) 'The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for other OECD Governments?' The Journal of Technology Transfer 30 115-127.
26. Murray F. and S. Stern (2007) 'Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis,' Journal of Economic Behavior &Organization 63 648-687.
27. National Research Council Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest. The National Academy Press: Washington DC.2010
28. Parr R. (2007) Royalty Rates for Licensing Intellectual Property. John Wiley and Sons: New York.
29. Rai A. (1999) 'Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science,' Northwestern University Law Review 94 77-152.
30. Rothaermel F. S. Agung and L. Jiang (2007) 'University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature,' Industrial and Corporate Change 16 691-791.
31. Shane S. (2000) 'Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities,' Organization Science 11 448-469.
32. Stephen T.K. (2010) 'Asian initiatives on Bayh-Dole with special reference to India: how do we make it more "Asian"?' Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property 10 44-64.
33. Thursby J. A. Fuller and M. Thursby (2009) 'US faculty patenting: Inside and outside the university,' Research Policy 38 14-25.
34. Thursby J. and M. Thursby (2008) 'Knowledge creation and diffusion of public science with intellectual property rights,' Maskus (ed.) Intellectual Property Rights and Technical Change Frontiers in Economics. Elsevier: New York.
35. Thursby J. and M. Thursby (2010) 'University licensing: harnessing or tarnishing research?,' In J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds) Innovation Policy and the Economy. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
36. Thursby J. and M. Thursby (2000) 'Industry perspectives on licensing university technologies: sources and problems,' Association of University Industry Managers Journal (2000 with Jerry Thursby) 9-22. Reprinted in Industry and Higher Education (August 2001).
37. Thursby J. and M. Thursby (2003) 'University licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act,' Science 301 1052.
38. Thursby J. R. Jensen and M. Thursby (2001) 'Objectives characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities,' Journal of Technology Transfer 26 59-72.
39. Valentin F. and R. L. Jensen (2007) 'Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights,' Journal of Technology Transfer 32 251-276.
40. Verspagen B. (2006) 'University research intellectual property rights and European innovation systems,' Journal of Economic Surveys 20 607-632.
41. Washburn J. (2008) University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education. Basic Books: New York.