The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame?

Small Business Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 639-659

  Arshed, Norin ^a   Carter, Sara ^b   Mason, Colin ^c  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Enterprise policy; Formulation; Institutional entrepreneur; Institutional theory; Legitimacy; Power; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894271420     PISSN: 0921898X     EISSN: 15730913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-014-9554-8     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Acs, Z. J., Morck, R., Shaver, J. M., & Yeung, B. (1997). The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: A policy perspective. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 2–7.
2. Aldrich, H. E. (2011). Heroes, villains, and fools: Institutional entrepreneurship, not institutional entrepreneurs. Entre-preneurship Research Journal, 1(2), 1–6.
3. Aldrich, E. H., & Fiol, M. C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.
4. Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: Public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry & Innovation, 11(3), 167–191.
5. Audretsch, D. B., & Beckmann, I. A. M. (2007). From small business to entrepreneurship policy. In D. B. Audretsch, I. Grilo, & A. R. Thurik (Eds.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy (pp. 36–53). Great Britain: Edward Elgar.
6. Bannock, G. (2005). The economics and management of small business. New York: Routledge.
7. Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface Institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institution-alism (pp. 490–515). London: Sage.
8. Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676.
9. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.
10. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
11. Bayard de Volo, L., & Schatz, E. (2004). From the inside out: Ethnographic methods in political research. Political Science and Politics, 37, 267–271.
12. Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.
13. Bennett, R. (2008). SME support policy in Britain since the 1990s: What have we learnt? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17(5), 375–397.
14. BERR. (2008). Enterprise: Unlocking the UK’s talent. London: Report for HM Treasury.
15. Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2003). Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge.
16. Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. The Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
17. Blackburn, R., & Smallbone, D. (2008). Researching small firms and entrepreneurship in the UK: Developments and dis-tinctiveness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(2), 267–288.
18. Blackburn, R., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Policy support for SMEs. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(4), 571–576.
19. Bolton, J.E. (1971). Report of the committee of enquiry on small firms. Bolton Report Cmnd. 4811. London: HMSO.
20. Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
21. Bridge, S. (2010). Rethinking enterprise policy: Can failure trigger new understanding?. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Han-Lin, L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.
23. Bullock, H., Mountford, J. & Stanley, R. (2001). Better policy-making. Report, Centre for Mangement and Policy Studies.
24. Burch, P. (2007). Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: Crafting a wider lens. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 84–95.
25. Burton, P. (2006). Modernising the policy process: Making policy research more significant? Policy Studies, 27(3), 173–195.
26. Cabinet Office. (1999). Modernising government. Report no. Cm 4310. London: The Stationery Office.
27. Campbell, N. D. (2012). Entrepreneurial action and the rules of the game. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 1(1), 4–11.
28. Centre for Cities. (2013). Support for growing businesses: A policy briefing. Accessed May 12 2013. http://www. centreforcities.org/research/2013/04/23/support-for-grow ing-businesses/.
29. Cornett, A. P. (2009). Aims and strategies in regional innovation and growth policy: A Danish perspective. Entrepreneur-ship & Regional Development, 21(4), 399–420.
30. Cowie, P. (2012). SME policy evaluation: Current issues and future challenges. In R. A. Blackburn & M. T. Schaper (Eds.), Government, SMES and entrepreneurship development: Policy, practice and challenges (pp. 243–257). Surrey: Gower Publishing.
31. Curran, J., & Storey, D. J. (2002). Small business policy in the United Kingdom: The inheritance of the Small Business Service and implications for its future effectiveness. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20(2), 163–177.
32. Dacin, T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 45–57.
33. David, R. J., Sine, W. D. & Haveman, H. A. (2012). New organizational forms in emerging fields. Organization Science, Papers in Advance, pp. 1–22.
34. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.
35. Delbridge, R., & Edwards, T. (2007). Reflections on developments in institutional theory: Toward a relational approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(2), 191–205.
36. Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385–410.
37. Dennis Jr, W. J. (2011). Entrepreneurship, small business and policy levers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 92–106.
38. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2012). Understanding the Enterprise Finance Guarantee. Accessed January 10 2013. https://www.gov.uk/understanding-the-enterprise-finance-guarantee.
40. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
41. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920–1940. In W. P. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutional-ism in organizational analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
43. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
44. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
45. Ekanem, I., & Smallbone, D. (2007). Learning in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 25(2), 107–129.
46. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing participant observation fieldnotes. Chicago: University Press of Chicago.
47. Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step by step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Fine, G. A., Morrill, C. & Surianarain, S. (2010). Ethnography in organizational settings. In D. Buchanan & A. E. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 602–670). London: Sage.
49. Fischer, F., Miller, G., & Sidney, M. (2006). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods. England: CRC.
50. Fisher, S. (2012). Policy storylines in Indian climate politics: Opening new political spaces? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(1), 109–127.
51. Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. The American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405.
52. Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.
53. Garud, R., Hardy, C. & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.
54. Gibb, A. A. (2000). SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance, mythical concepts, myths, assumptions, rituals and confusions. International Small Business Journal, 18(3), 13–35.
55. Gilbert, B., Audretsch, D. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2004). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy. Small Business Economics, 22(3/4), 313–323.
56. Greene, F. J. (2009). Assessing the impact of policy interventions: The influence of evaluation methodology. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(2), 216–229.
57. Greene, F. J., Mole, K. F., & Storey, D. J. (2008). Three decades of enterprise culture: Entrepreneurship, economic regen-ration and public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
58. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
59. Grimm, H. (2006). Entrepreneurship policy and regional economic growth: Exploring the link and theoretical implications. In B. Rihoux & H. Grimm (Eds.), Innovative comparative. Methods for policy analysis beyond the quantitative-qualitative divide. USA: Springer.
60. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: principles in practice. London: Routledge.
63. Hewitt-Dundas, N., & Roper, S. (2011). Creating advantage in peripheral regions: The role of publicly funded R&D centres. Research Policy, 40(6), 832–841.
64. Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of ‘‘old’’ and ‘‘new’’ insti-tutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 406–418.
65. Huggins, R., & Williams N. (2009). Enterprise and public policy: A review of Labour government intervention in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), 19–41.
66. Hu¨lsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2007). Entrepreneurship policy in Bavaria: Between laptop and lederhosen. In D. B. Audretsch, I. Grilo, & A. R. Thurik (Eds.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy (pp. 200–212). Great Britain: Edward Elgar.
67. Jennings, P. D., Greenwood, R., Lounsbury, M. D., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Institutions, entrepreneurs, and communities: A special issue on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 1–9.
68. Johnstone, B. A. (2007). Ethnographic methods in entrepre-neurship research. In H. Neergaard & J. P. Ulhoi (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepre-neurship (pp. 97–121). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
69. Jones, P., Beynon, M., Pickernell, D., & Packham, G. (2013). Evaluating the impact of different training methods on SME business performance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(1), 56–81.
70. Karlsson, C., & Andersson, M. (2009). Entrepreneurship policies: Principles, problems and opportunities. In J. Leitao & R. Baptista (Eds.), Public policies for fostering entrepre-neurship (pp. 111–131). Dordrecht: Springer.
71. King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage.
72. Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policy. Boston: Little Brown.
73. Lambrecht, J., & Pirnay, F. (2005). An evaluation of public support for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Walloon Region of Belgium. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(2), 89–108.
74. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
75. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.
76. Leca, B., Battilana, J. & Boxenbaum, E. (2008). Agency and institutions: A review of institutional entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge (working paper number: 08-096).
77. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
78. Lenihan, H. (2011). Enterprise policy evaluation: Is there a ‘new’ way of doing it? Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 323–332.
79. Levi, M. (2005). Achieving good government—and, maybe, legitimacy. In Paper presented at the New Frontiers of Social Policy. Arusha, Tanzania.
80. Levy, D., & Scully, M. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as a modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organizational Studies, 28(7), 1–21.
81. Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990). An institutional approach to the theory of policy-making: The role of guidance mechanisms in policy formulation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(1), 59–83.
82. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993–1012.
83. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
84. Lundstrom, A., & Stevenson, L. (2005). Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practices. New York: Springer.
85. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 567–679.
86. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organisational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(2), 734–749.
87. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88. Mason, C. (2009). Policy as a focus for small business research. Envronement and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(2), 191–194.
89. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225.
90. Mason, C., & Rogers, A. (1997). The Business Angel’s investment decision: An exploratory analysis. In D. Deakins, P. Jennings & C. Mason. (Eds.), Small firms entrepreneurship in the nineties (pp. 29–46). London: Paul Chapman, Publishing.
91. McGaughey, S. (2012). Institutional entrepreneurship in North American lighting protection standards: Rhetorical history and unintended consequences of failure. Business History, 55(1), 73–97.
92. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
93. Mole, K. (2002). Business advisers’ impact on SMEs: An agency theory approach. International Small Business Journal, 20(2), 139–162.
94. Mole, K., Hart, M., Roper, S., & Saal, D. (2011). Broader or deeper? Exploring the most effective intervention profile for public small business support. Environment and Planning A, 43(1), 87–105.
95. Mutch, A. (2007). Reflexivity and the institutional entrepreneur: A historical exploration. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1123–1140.
96. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97. North, D., & Smallbone, D. (2006). Developing entrepreneur-ship and enterprise in Europe’s peripheral rural areas: Some issues facing policy-makers. European Planning Studies, 14(1), 41–60.
98. North, D., Smallbone, D., & Vickers, I. (2001). Public sector support for innovating SMEs. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 303–317.
99. Oborn, E., Barrett, M., & Dawson, S. (2013). Distributed leadership in policy formulation: A social material perspective. Organization Studies, 34(2), 253–276.
100. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
101. Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974–1010.
102. Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
103. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
104. Peters, B. G. (2000). Institutional theory: Problems and prospects. Report, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.
105. Polsby, N. W. (2001). Legitimacy in British policy-making: Functional alternatives to the civil service. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(1), 5–35.
106. Pratt, M. G. (2009). For the lack of boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–865.
107. Ram, M., & Trehan, K. (2010). Critical action learning, policy learning and small firms: An inquiry. Management Learning, 41(4), 415–428.
108. Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 239–282.
109. Richard, D., Connell, D., Ibbetson, P., Kestenbaum, J., & Richards, A. (2007). Richard review on small business and government: Interim report. Conservative Party, March.
110. Sapru, R. K. (2010). Public policy: Art and craft of policy analysis. London: Prentice-Hall Publishing.
111. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
112. Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
113. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
114. Shane, S. A. (2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors and policy makers live by. New Haven: Yale University Press.
115. Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.
116. Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2010). Entrepreneurship and government policy in former Soviet republics: Belarus and Estonia compared. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(2), 195–210.
117. Sobel, R. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepenreuship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641–655.
118. Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepre-neurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112.
119. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.
120. Stevenson, L., & Lundstrom, A. (2007). Dressing the emperor: The fabric of entrepreneurship policy. In D. B. Audretsch, I. Grilo, & A. R. Thurik (Eds.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy (pp. 94–129). Great Britain: Edward Elgar.
121. Storey, D. J. (2000a). Understanding the small business sector. UK: Thomson.
122. Storey, D. J. (2000b). Six steps to heaven: Evaluating the impact of public policies to support small business in developed economies. In L. Sexton & H. Landstrom (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 176–194). Great Britain: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
123. Storey, D. J. (2002). Methods evaluating the impact of public policies to support small businesses: The six steps to heaven. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), 181–202.
124. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
125. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
126. Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14–20.
127. Thompson, J., Scott, J., & Downing, R. (2012). Enterprise policy, delivery, practice and research: Largely rhetoric or under-valued achievement? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25(5), 332–345.
128. Treasury, H. M. (2005). The Green Book-appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: The Stationery Office.
129. Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2013). Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: An international study. Small Business Economics,. doi:10.1007/s11187-013.9523-7.
130. Van Cauwenberge, P., Vander Bauwhede, H., Schoonjans, B., et al. (2013). An evaluation of public spending: The effectiveness of a government-supported networking program in Flanders. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(1), 24–38.
131. Van Praag, C. M., & Versloot, P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351–382.
132. Van Stel, A., Storey, D. J., & Thurik, A. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 171–186.
133. Vega, A., Chiasson, M., & Brown, D. (2013). Understanding the causes of informal and formal discretion in the delivery of enterprise policies: A multiple case study. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(1), 102–118.
134. Vishanth, W., Yogesh, K. D., & Zahir, I. (2009). The diffusion and use of institutional theory: A cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey. Journal of Information Technology, 24, 354–368.
135. Wagner, J., & Sternberg, R. (2004). Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data. The Annals of Regional Science, 38(2), 219–240.
136. Wahid, F., & Sein, M. K. (2013). Institutional entrepreneurs: The driving force in institutionalization of public systems in developing countries. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(1), 76–92.
137. Waller, P., Morris, R. M. & Simpson, D. (2008). Understanding the formulation and development of government policy in the context of FOI. Report, The Constitution Unit.
138. Weik, E. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 466–481.
139. Welter, F. (2011). Book review: Rethinking enterprise policy: Can failure trigger a new understanding? International Small Business Journal, 29(6), 733–744.
140. Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in changing environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125.
141. Williams N. (2013). Entrepreneurship and the role of policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy., 31(1), 1–4.
142. Wren, C., & Storey, D. J. (2002). Evaluating the effect of soft business support upon small firm performance. Oxford Economics Papers, 54(2), 334–365.
143. Xheneti, M., & Kitching, J. (2011). From discourse to implementation: Enterprise policy development in postcommu-nist Albania. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(6), 1018–1103.
144. Young L. (2013). Growing your business: A report on growing micro businesses. Report, URN BIS/13/729.