Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe

Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Wright, Mike ^a,b   Clarysse, Bart ^a,c   Mustar, Philippe ^d   Lockett, Andy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d CENTRE DE SOCIOLOGIE DE L INNOVATION   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548286073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (204)

1. Agarwal, R. and Bayus, B.L. (2002), 'The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations', Management Science, 48 (8), 1024-41.
2. Amason, A.C. and Sapienza H.J. (1997), 'The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict', Journal of Management, 23 (4), 495-516.
3. Ambassade de France à Berlin (2006), La politique des biotechnologies en Allemagne, Service pour la science et la technologie, Berlin, September
4. Ambassade de France en République Fédérale d'Allemagne (2000), Les programmes fédéraux de soutien à l'innovation technologique en Allemagne. Note du Service pour la Science et la Technologie, September.
5. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. (1993), 'Strategic assets and organizational rent', Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33-46.
6. Argyes,N. and Liebeskind, J. (1998), 'Privatizing the intellectual commons: universities and the organization of biotechnology', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35, 427-54.
7. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (2004), AUTM US Licensing Survey: FY 2003, Northbrook, IL: AUTM
8. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (2005), AUTM US Licensing Survey: FY 2004, Northbrook, IL: AUTM
9. Audretsch, D. and Beckman, I. (2005), 'Entrepreneurship policies in Germany', presentation at the Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, 9 December.
10. Autio, E. and Lumme, A. (1998), 'Does the innovator role affect the perceived potential for growth? Analysis of four types of new, technology-based firms', Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 41-54.
11. Autio, E. and Yli-Renko, H. (1998), 'New technology based firms in small open economies - an analysis based on the Finnish experience', Research Policy, 26, 973-87.
12. Baker, J. (1999), 'Creating knowledge creating wealth: realising the economic potential of public sector research establishments', a report by John Baker to the Minister for Science and the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, London: HMSO.
13. Bank of England (1996), The Financing of Technology-based Firms, October, London: Bank of England
14. Bank of England (2003), Finance for Small Firms - a Ninth Report, April, London: Bank of England
15. Barney, J.B. (1991), 'Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage', Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
16. Barney, J., Wright, M. and Ketchen, D. (2001), 'The resource based view: ten years after 1991', Journal of Management, 27 (6), 625-42.
17. Becker, R.M. and Hellmann, T.F. (2003), 'The genesis of venture capital: lessons from the German experience', March, CESifo, Working Paper Series No. 883.
18. Bhide, A. (1992), Bootstrap finance: the art of start-ups, Harvard Business Review, November-December, 109-17.
19. Black, B. and Gilson, S. (1998), 'Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: banks versus stock markets', Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 243-77.
20. Bmb+f (2000), EXIST, University-based Start-ups, Networks for Innovative Company Start-ups, Bonn: Federal Ministry for Education and Research
21. Boeker, W. (1989), 'Strategic change: the effect of founding and history', Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3), 489-515.
22. Borch, O.J., Huse,M. and Senneseth, K. (1999), 'Resource configurations, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical examination of small firms', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, 49-70.
23. Bower, D. (2003), 'Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm', R&D Management, 33 (2), 97-105.
24. Branscomb, L.M. and Auerswald, P.E. (2001), Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Executives, and Investors Manage High-Tech Risks, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. British Venture Capital Association (BVCA) (2004), Report on Investment Activity 2003, London: BVCA
26. Bruneel, J., Clarysse, B. and Yli-Renko, H. (2006), 'How key partners shape the extent of internationalisation of young, technology-based firms', University of Ghent Working Paper.
27. Brush, C.G., Greene, P.G and Hart, M.M. (2001), 'From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base', Academy of Management Executive, 15 (1), 64-81.
28. Brush, C.G., Greene, P.G., Hart, M.M. and Edelman, L.F. (1997), 'Resource configurations over the life cycle of ventures', in P.D. Reynolds, W.D. Bygrave, N.M. Carter, P. Davidson, W.B. Gartner, C. Mason and P.P. McDougall (eds), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Proceedings of the Babson Conference 1997, Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
29. Burgelman, R.A. (1983), 'A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm', Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223-44.
30. Callan, B. (2001), 'Generating spin-offs: Evidence from across the OECD', STI Review, special issue on 'Fostering high-tech spin-offs: a public strategy for innovation', 26, 13-55, Paris: OECD.
31. Caracostas, P. and Muldur, U. (1998), Society, the Endless frontier. A European Vision of Research and Innovation Policies for the 21st Century, EN 17655, Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
32. Carayannis, E.G., Rogers, E.M., Kurihara, K. and Allbritton, M.M. (1998), 'High technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research institutes', Technovation, 18 (1), 1-10.
33. Chandler, G., Honig, B. and Wiklund, J. (2005), 'Antecedents, moderators, and performance consequences of membership change in new venture teams', Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (5), 705-25.
34. Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom, R.S. (2002), 'The role of business model in capturing value from innovation', Industrial and Corporate Change, 11 (3), 529-44.
35. Chiesa, V. and Piccaluga, A. (2000), 'Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the general framework and the case of academic spin-off companies', R&D Management, 30, 329-40.
36. Christensen, C.M. (1997), The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
37. Clarysse, B. (2004), Eendagsvlieg of Pionier: welke ondernemer redt onze economie?, Antwerp: Garank.
38. Clarysse, B. and Bruneel, J. (forthcoming), 'Nurturing and growing innovative start-ups: the roles of policy as an integrator', R&D Management.
39. Clarysse, B. and Moray,N. (2004), 'A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of research-based spin-offs', Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 55-79.
40. Clarysse, B., Heirman, A. and Degroof, J. (2000), 'Influence of the environment on the starting configuration of research based spin-offs in Europe', STI Review, 83-108, Paris: OECD.
41. Clarysse, B., Moray, N., Wright, M., Lockett, A. and Mustar, P. (2005b), 'Direct indicators for the commercialisation of research and technology: policy implications', University of Ghent Working Paper.
42. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., van de Velde, E. and Vohora, A. (2005b), 'Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions', Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (2), 183-216.
43. Clarysse, B., Wright, M. and Lockett, A. (2006a), 'Academic spin-offs,formal technology transfer and capital raising', Working Paper, Nottingham University Business School.
44. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Knockaert, M. and Lockett, A. (2006b), 'Academic spin-offs', formal technology transfer and capital raising, CMBOR/UNIEI, Working Paper.
45. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990), 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-52.
46. Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R., Rosenberg, N. and Sampat, B.N. (2002), 'How do university inventions get into practice', Management Science, 48 (1), 61-72.
47. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004), SME Observatory, Paris: CEC
48. Confederation of British Industry (1997), Tech Stars: Breaking the Growth Barriers for Technology-based SMEs, London: CBI
49. Cooper, A.C. and Bruno, A.V. (1977), 'Success among high-technology firms', Business Horizons, 20, 16-22.
50. Cressy, R. (1996), 'Are business start-ups debt rationed?', Economic Journal, 1061, 1253-70.
51. Dacin, T. (1997), 'Isomorphism in context: the power and prescriptions of institutional norms', Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1), 46-81.
52. Debackere, K. (2000), 'Academic R&D as a business: context, structure and processes', R&D Management, 30 (4), 323-9.
53. Degroof, J. (2002), 'The phenomenon spin-off', unpublished PhD dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
54. Delmar, F. and Sölvell, I. (2005), 'The development of growth-oriented high-tech firms in Sweden', research in progress, Stockholm School of Economics, Center for Entrepreneurship and Business Creation, May. Corresponding author address: ingela.solvell@hhs.se.
55. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (1998), Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Economy, London: Stationery Office
56. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2000), Science and Innovation: Excellence and Opportunity, London: Stationery Office
57. Di Gregorio, D. and Shane, S. (2003), 'Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?', Research Policy, 32, 209-27.
58. Direction de la technologie (2005), Innovation et recherche technologique, État de la situation et bilan au 31 décembre 2004, Paris: Ministère délégué à l'Enseignement supérieur et à la Recherche
59. Direction de la technologie (2006), Innovation et recherche technologique, État de la situation et bilan au 31 décembre 2005, Paris: Ministère délégué à l'Enseignement supérieur et à la Recherche
60. Druilhe, C. and Garnsey, E. (2004), 'Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter?', Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (3-4), 269-85.
61. Edwards, C. (1999), Entrepreneurial Dynamism and the Success of US Hightech, Joint Economic Committee Staff Report, Office of the Chairman, US Senator Connie Mack, Washington, DC: US Senate.
62. Ehrlich, S., DeNoble, A., Moore, T. and Weaver, R. (1994), 'After the cash arrives: a comparative study of venture capital and private investor involvement in entrepreneurial firms', Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 67-82.
63. Eisenhardt, K., Kahwajy, J. and Bourgeois, L. (1997), 'How management teams can have a good fight', Harvard Business Review, 75 (4), July-August, 77-85.
64. Elfring, T. and Hulsink,W. (2003), 'Networks in entrepreneurship: the case of high-technology firms', Small Business Economics, 21, 409-22.
65. Ensley, M.D. and Pearce, C.L. (2001), 'Shared cognition in top management teams: implications for new venture performance', Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 145-60.
66. Ensley, M.D., Carland, J.C. and Carland, J.W. (1998), 'The effects of entrepreneurial team skill heterogeneity and functional diversity on new venture performance', Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 10 (1), 1-11.
67. Ensley, M.D., Pearson, A.W. and Amanson A.C. (2002), 'Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance', Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 365-86.
68. Etzkowitz, H. (1983), 'Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science', Minerva, 21 (2-3), 198-233.
69. European Commission (EC) (2000a), Progress Report on the Risk Capital Action Plan, Brussels and Luxembourg: European Commission
70. European Commission (EC) (2000b), Innovation in a Knowledge Driven Economy, Brussels and Luxembourg: European Commission
71. European Commission (EC) (2004), Observatory of European SMEs 2003, No 8, Luxembourg: European Commission
72. European Report on Science and Technology Indicators (1994), EUR 15897 EN, Luxembourg: European Commission Publications
73. European Report on Science and Technology Indicators (1997), EUR 17639 EN, Luxembourg: European Commission Publications
74. European Venture Capital Association (EVCA), 2004, Annual Report on Investment, Zaventem: European Venture Capital Association
75. European Venture Capital Association (EVCA)/Thompson Venture Economics (2004), 'Pan-European survey of performance', available at http://www.evca.com, accessed 24 September 2006.
76. Fiet, J. (1995), 'Reliance upon informants in the venture capital industry', Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 195-223.
77. Fontes, M. (2001), 'Biotechnology entrepreneurs and technology transfer in an intermediate economy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 62 (1), 59-74.
78. Fontes, M. (2005), 'The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs', Technovation, 25, 339-47.
79. Forbes, D., Borchert, P., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. and Sapienza, H. (2006), 'Entrepreneurial team formation: an exploration of new member addition', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 225-48.
80. Francis, D.H. and Sandberg, W.R. (2000), 'Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance', Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25, 5-25.
81. Franklin, A.,Wright, M. and Lockett, A. (2001), 'Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-outs', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 127-41.
82. Gartner,W.B., Shaver, K.G., Gatewood, E. and Katz, J.A. (1994), 'Finding the entrepreneur in entrepreneurship', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18 (3), 5-10.
83. Georghiou, L. (2001), 'The United Kingdom national system of research, technology and innovation', in P. Larédo and P. Mustar (eds),Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 252-96.
84. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) (2001), 2000 UK Executive Report, London: London Business School, available at http://www.gemconsortium.org/download/1159180845578/GEM2000UK.pdf.
85. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) (2004), Financing Report, by Bygrave,W.D. and Hunt, S.A., London and Babson Park, MA: London Business School and Babson College, available at http://www.gemconsortium.org/document.asp?id=365.
86. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) (2005), Excutive Report, by Minniti, M. with Bygrave, W.D. and Autio, E., London and Babson Park, MA: London Business School and Babson College, available at http://www.gemconsortium.org/document.asp?id=448.
87. Golder, P.N. and Tellis, G.J. (1996), 'First to market, first to fail? Real causes of enduring market leadership', Sloan Management Review, Winter, 65-75.
88. Goldfarb, B. and Henrekson, M. (2003), 'Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property', Research Policy, 32, 639-58.
89. Hambrick,D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984), 'Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers', Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 193-207.
90. Heirman, A. and Clarysse, B. (2004), 'How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective', Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 247-68.
91. Heirman, A. and Clarysse, B. (2006), 'Do intangible assets and pre-founding R&D matter for innovation speed in start-ups?', Journal of Product Innovation Management, forthcoming.
92. Hindle, K. and Yencken, J. (2004), 'Public research commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: an integrated model', Technovation, 24, 793-803.
93. HM Treasury (2004), Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014, London: HMTreasury/DTI/Department for Education and Skills
94. HM Treasury and Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (1998), Innovating for the Future: Investing in R&D, London: Stationery Office
95. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M. and Hellsmark, H. (2003), 'Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology', Research Policy, 32 (9), 1555-68.
96. Jensen, R. and Thursby, M. (2001), 'Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions', American Economic Review, 91 (1), 240-59.
97. Jones-Evans, D. (1995), 'A typology of technology-based entrepreneurs: a model based on previous occupational background', International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 1, 26-47.
98. Kamm, J.B., Schuman, J.C., Seeger, J.A. and Nurick, A.J. (1990), 'Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: a research agenda', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14 (4), 7-17.
99. Karnebeek, A. (2001), Spin-offs and the University of Twente - Sixteen Years of Experience in Incubating Start-ups, Enschede: University of Twente Press.
100. Keasey, K. and Watson, R. (1992), Investment and Financing Decisions and the Performance of Small Firms. London: National Westminster Bank.
101. La Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998), 'Law and finance', Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6), 1113-55.
102. Lambert, R. (2003), Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, London: HMSO.
103. Landstrom, H. (1993), 'Informal risk capital in Sweden and some international comparisons', Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 525-40.
104. Lee, C., Lee, K. and Pennings, J.M. (2001), 'Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study of technology-based ventures', Strategic Management Journal, 22, 615-40.
105. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), 'Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development', Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-25.
106. Lichtenstein, B. and Brush, C. (2001), 'How do "resource bundles" develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 37-58.
107. Lockett, A. and Wright, M. (2005), 'Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies', Research Policy, 34, 1043-57.
108. Lockett, A., Murray, G. and Wright, M. (2002), 'Do UK venture capitalists still have a bias against investment in new technology firms?', Research Policy, 31, 1009-30.
109. Lockett, A., Vohora, A. and Wright, M. (2003a), 'Incubators without walls', International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, November, 245-56.
110. Lockett A.,Wright, M. and Franklin, S. (2003b), 'Technology transfer and universities' spin-out strategies', Small Business Economics, 20 (2), 185-203.
111. Lundqvist, J.M. and Hellsmark, M. (2003), 'Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology', Research Policy, 32, 1555-68.
112. MacMillan, I.C., Zemann, L. and Subbanarasimha, P.N. (1987), 'Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process', Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 123-37.
113. Mangematin, V., Lemarié, S., Boissin, J.P., Catherine, D., Corolleur, F., Coronini, D. and Trommette, M. (2002), 'Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: the case of biotechnology in France', Research Policy, 32, 621-38.
114. Mason, C. and Harrison, R. (2004), 'Does investing in technology-based firms involve higher risk? An exploratory study of the performance of technology and non-technology investments by business angels', Venture Capital, 6 (4), 313-32.
115. McNally, K. (1997), Corporate Venture Capital: Bridging the Equity Gap in the Small Business Sector, London: Routledge.
116. Meyer, M. (2003), 'Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms, R&D Management, 33 (2), 107-15.
117. Ministère délégué à l'enseignement supérieur et à la recherche
118. Ministry of Research website (2000), Action incubators, February, available at http://www.recherche.gouv.fr.
119. Minshall, T.H.W. and Wicksteed, W. (2005), 'University spin-out companies: starting to fill the evidence gap', a report for the Gatsby Charitable Foundation.
120. Moore, B. (1994), 'Financial constraints to the growth and development of small, high-technology firms', in A. Hughes and D.J. Storey (eds), Finance for Smaller Firms, London: Routledge.
121. Moore, G.A. (1991), Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers: Crossing the Chasm, NewYork: Harper Business.
122. Moray, N. and Clarysse, B. (2003), 'How do institutional logics shape the spin off process? An in depth analysis of a research institute', University of Ghent Working Paper.
123. Moray, N. and Clarysse, B. (2005), 'Institutional changes and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms', Research Policy, 34 (7), 1010-27.
124. Morgan, R.P., Kruytbosch, C. and Kannankutty,N. (2001), 'Patenting and invention activity of U.S. scientists and engineers in the academic sector: comparisons with industry', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (1-2), 173-83.
125. Mosey, S., Lockett, A. and Westhead, P. (2006), 'The importance of bridging networks for university technology transfer: a case study of the Medici Fellowship Scheme', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18 (1), 71-91.
126. Mowery, D.C. (2001), 'The United States national innovation system after the cold war', in P. Larédo and P. Mustar (eds), Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy. An International Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 15-46.
127. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N. and Ziedonis, A.A. (2001), 'The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980', Research Policy, 30, 99-119.
128. Murray, G. and Lott, J. (1995), 'Have venture capitalists a bias against investment in new technology firms?', Research Policy, 24, 283-99.
129. Mustar, P. (1988), Science & Innovation, Paris: CPE International, Economica.
130. Mustar, P. (1994), Science & Innovation 1995, Paris: Economica.
131. Mustar, P. (1997), 'Spin-off enterprises: how French academies create hitech companies: the condition for success or failure', Science and Public Policy, 24 (1), 37-43.
132. Mustar, P. (2002), 'Public support for the spin-off companies from higher education and research institutions', conference, STRATA, Brussels, 22-23 April.
133. Mustar, P. and Larédo, P. (2002), 'Innovation and research policy in France (1980-2000) on the disappearance of the Colbertist state', Research Policy, 31, 55-72.
134. Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A.,Wright, M., Clarysse, B. and Moray,N. (2006), 'Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi-dimensional taxonomy', Research Policy, 35 (2), 289-308.
135. Muzyka, D., Birley, S. and Leleux, B. (1996), 'Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists', Journal of Business Venturing, 11 (4), 273-88.
136. Nerkar, A. and Shane, S. (2003), 'When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive?', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1391-410.
137. Nicolaou, N. and Birley, S. (2003a), 'Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts', Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (3), 333-59.
138. Nicolaou, N. and Birley, S. (2003b), 'Social networks in organizational emergence: the university spin-out phenomenon', Management Science, 49 (12), 1702-25.
139. Office for Science and Technology (OST) (2003), Les chiffres clés de la science et de la technologie, Paris: Economica
140. Office for Science and Technology (OST) (2004), Les chiffres clés de la science et de la technologie, Paris: Economica
141. Office for Science and Technology (OST) (2006), Les chiffres clés de la science et de la technologie, Paris: Economica
142. O'shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A. and Roche, F. (2005), 'Entrepreneurial, orientation, technology transfer and spin-off performance of US universities', Research Policy, 34 (7), 994-1009.
143. Owen-Smith, J. and Powell,W.W. (2001), 'To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 99-114.
144. Penrose, E.T., (1959), The Theory of Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Blackwell.
145. Phan, P., Siegel, D. and Wright, M. (2005), 'Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research', Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (2), 165-82.
146. Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B. and Nlemvo, F. (2003), 'Towards a typoloy of university spin-offs', Small Business Economics, 21, 355-69.
147. Price Waterhouse/Coopers/British Venture Capital Association, (PWC/ BVCA) (2004), Performance of Venture Capital Investments, London: BVCA
148. Proton (2005), Proton Europe Annual Survey: Financial Year 2004, European Commission, available at http://www.protoneurope.org/news/2006/art2006/artjanmar06/zasty2004/attachment_download/file.
149. Quinn, R.E. (1988), Beyond Rational Management, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
150. Radosevich, R. (1995), 'A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources', International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 879-93.
151. Renault, C.S. (2006), 'Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship', Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (2), 227-39.
152. Reynolds, P.D., Bygrave, W.D. and Autio, E. (2003), GEM 2003 Global Report, Kansas, MO: Kauffman Foundation.
153. Roberts, E.B. (1991), High Tech Entrepreneurs: Lessons from MIT and Beyond, New York: Oxford University Press.
154. Roberts, E.B. and Malone, D.E. (1996), 'Policies and structures for spinning out new companies from research and development organizations', R&D Management, 26 (1), 17-48.
155. Ruhnka, J., Feldman, H. and Dean, T. (1992), 'The living dead phenomenon in venture capital investment', Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 137-55.
156. Saxenian, A. (1994a), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
157. Saxenian, A. (1994b), 'The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley', Research Policy, 20 (5), 423-38.
158. Scherr, F.C., Sugrue, T.F. and Ward, J.B. (1993), 'Financing the small firm start-up: determinants of debt use', Journal of Small Business Finance, 3 (1), 17-36.
159. Scholten, V., Omta, O. and Elfring, T. (2001), 'The significance of parenthood: the social capital of the parent organization and the entrepreneurial outcome', Rent XV Conference, 22-23 November, Finland.
160. Segal, Quince and Wicksteed Limited (SQW) (2005), Interim Evaluation of Knowledge Transfer Programmes Funded by the Office of Science and Technology through the Science Budget, Cambridge: SQW
161. Shane, S. (2001), 'Selling university technology: patterns from MIT', Management Science, 48 (1), 122-38.
162. Shane, S. and Stuart, T. (2002), 'Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups', Management Science, 48 (1), 154-70.
163. Shane, S.A. (2004), Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
164. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. and Link, A. (2003a), 'Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study', Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
165. Siegel, D.S.,Waldman, D., Atwater, L. and Link, A. (2003c), 'Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration', Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 111-33.
166. Siegel, D., Westhead, P. and Wright, M. (2003b), 'Assessing the impact of science parks on the research productivity of firms: exploratory evidence from the UK', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (9), 1357-69.
167. Smilor, R., Gibson, D. and Dietrich, G. (1990), 'University spin-off firms: technology start-ups from UT-Austin', Journal of Business Venturing, 5 (1), 63-76.
168. Stankiewicz, R. (1994), 'University firms: spin-off companies from universities', Science and Public Policy, 21 (2), 99-107.
169. Steffensen, M., Rogers E.M. and Speakman K. (2000), 'Spin-offs from research centers at a research university', Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 93-111.
170. Suchman, M.C. (1994), 'On advice of counsel: law firms and venture capital funds as information intermediaries in the structuration of Silicon Valley', unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.
171. Teece, D.J. (1987), 'Capturing value from technological innovation: integration, strategic partnering and licensing decisions', in B. Guile and H. Brooks (eds), Technology and Global Industry, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 65-95.
172. Tellis, G.J., Stremersch, S. and Yin, E. (2003), 'The international takeoff of new products: the role of economics, culture and country innovativeness', Marketing Science. 22 (2), 188-208.
173. Thornburn, L. (2001), 'Institutional structures and arrangements at Australian public sector laboratories', STI Review, OECD, July, 121-41.
174. Thursby, J. and Thursby, M. (2002), 'Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing', Management Science, 48, 90-104.
175. Tiler, C., Metcalfe, S. and Connell, D. (1993), 'Business expansion through entrepreneurship: the influence of internal and external barriers to growth', International Journal of Technology Management, special publication on small firms and innovation, 15-52.
176. Ucbasaran, D., Lockett, A., Wright, M. and Westhead, P. (2003a), 'Entrepreneurial founder teams: factors associated with members' entry and exit', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28 (2), 107-28.
177. Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., Westhead, P. and Busenitz, L. (2001), Entrepreneurial learning and opportunity recognition: habitual versus novice entrepreneurs', Working Paper, Nottingham University Business School.
178. Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., Westhead, P. and Busenitz, L. (2003b), 'The impact of entrepreneurial experience on opportunity identification and exploitation: habitual and novice entrepreneurs', in J. Katz, and D. Shepherd, (eds), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Volume 6: Cognition and Decision-Making in the Entrepreneurial Context, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 231-63.
179. Universities' Companies Association (UNICO) (2005), 'Survey of UK university commercialisation shows a doubling of licensing activity in 2004', press release, 22 November
180. Upstill,G. and Symington,D. (2002), 'Technology transfer and the creation of companies: the CSIRO experience', R&D Management, 32 (3), 233-9.
181. Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K. and Zimmerman, E. (2004), 'Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compound and reciprocal Matthew-effect?', Research Policy, 33, 425-41.
182. Van Muijen, J.J., Koopman, P., De Witte, K., De Cock, G., Susanj, Z., Lemoine, C., Bourantas,D., Papalexandris,N., Branyicski, I., Spaltro, E., Jesuino, J., Gonzalves Das Neves, J., Pitariu, H., Konrad, E., Pieró, J., González-Romá, V. and Turnipseed, D. (1999), 'Organizational culture: the focus questionnaire', European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8 (4), 551-68.
183. Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B.,Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N. and S'Jegers, R. (2006), 'Entrepreneurial team development in academic spin-outs: an examination of team heterogeneity', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 249-72.
184. Vohora, A., Wright, M. and Lockett, A. (2004), 'Critical junctures in the growth in university high-tech spinout companies', Research Policy, 33, 147-75.
185. Von Burg, U. and Kenney,M. (2000), 'Venture capital and the birth of the local area network industry', Research Policy, 29, 1135-55.
186. Watson, R. and Wilson, N. (2002), 'Small and medium size enterprise financing: a note on some of the empirical implications of a pecking order', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29 (3 and 4), 557-78.
187. Westhead, P. and Storey, D. (1997), 'Financial constraints on the growth of high technology small firms in the UK', Applied Financial Economics, 7, 197-201.
188. Williams, E. (2005), 'Too few university spin-out companies', Warwick Ventures, Warwick University.
189. Wilson, H. (1979), Committee to review the functioning of financial institutions: Evidence on the Financing of Industry and Trade, London: HMSO.
190. Worms, G. (2005), 'Recommandations pour favoriser le développement des entreprises innovantes', Rapport du groupe de travail de l'opération FutuRIS, Paris: ANRT.
191. Wright, M. and Robbie, K. (1999), Venture Capital into the Next Millennium, London: British Venture Capital Association.
192. Wright, M., Birley, S. and Mosey, S. (2004a), 'Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer', Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (3/4), 235-46.
193. Wright, M., Pruthi, S. and Lockett, A. (2005), 'International venture capital research: from cross-country comparisons to crossing borders', International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 135-66.
194. Wright, M., Sapienza, H. and Busenitz, L. (2003), Venture Capital Vol. I, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
195. Wright, M., Vohora, A. and Lockett, A. (2004b), 'The formation of high tech university spinout companies: the role of joint ventures and venture capital investors', Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (3/4), 287-310.
196. Wright, M., Binks, M., Vohora, A. and Lockett, A. (2003), UK University Commercialisation Survey Financial Year 2002, Nottingham: NUBS.
197. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A. and Binks, M. (2006b), 'University spin-out companies and venture capital', Research Policy, 35 (4), 481-501.
198. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A. and Knockaert, M. (2006a), 'University-industry linkages: evidence from mid-range universities in Europe', paper presented at Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, 14 August.
199. Wright, M., Lockett, A., Mosey, S. and Piva, E. (2006c), 'Academic entrepreneurship and the challenges for business schools', CMBOR Occasional Paper.
200. Wtterwulghe, R. (1998), La P.M.E. Une entreprise humaine, Brussels: De Boeck Universite.
201. Zahra, S. and George, G. (2002), 'Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension', Academy of Management Review, 27, 185-203.
202. Zahra, S. and Wicklund, J. (2000), 'Top management team characteristics and resource recombinations among new ventures', paper presented at the Stategic Management Society Annual Meeting, Vancouver, 15-18 October.
203. Zeitlyn, M. and Horne, J. (2002), Business Interface Training Provision Review (BITS Review), report produced for the DTI, UK.
204. Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2005), 'Business model', in M. Hitt and D. Ireland (eds), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Management: Vol III Entrepreneurship, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 20-24.