Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 183-216

  Clarysse, Bart ^a   Wright, Mike ^b   Lockett, Andy ^b   Van de Velde, Els ^a   Vohora, Ajay ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Incubator model; Low Selective model; Spinning out companies; Supportive model

Indexed keywords

EID: 8144227578     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Acs Z. Audretsch D. Feldman M. Real effects of academic research: a comment American Economic Review 82 1992 262-367
2. Agrawal A. Cockburn I. University research, industrial R&D, and the anchor tenant hypothesis International Journal of Industrial Organization 2003 (in press)
3. Autio E. Yli-Renko H. New, technology-based firms in small open economics - An analysis based on the Finnish experience Research Policy 26 1998 973 987
4. Barney J. Wright M. Ketchen D. The resource based view: Ten years after 1991 Journal of Management 27 6 2001 625-642
5. Branscomb L.M. Auerswald P.E. Taking Technical Risks. How Innovators, Executives, and Investors Manage High-tech Risks 2001 The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Brown S.L. Eisenhardt K.M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations Administrative Science Quarterly 42 1 1997 1-34
7. Brush C.G. Greene P.G. Hart M.M. From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base Academy of Management Executive 15 1 2001 64-78
8. Callon B. Generating spin-offs: Evidence from the OECD Science Technology Industry Review Special issue on fostering high tech spin-offs: A public strategy for innovation 26 2001 13-56
9. Clarysse B. Moray N. A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off Journal of Business Venturing 19 1 2004 55
10. Clarysse, B., Heirman, A., Degroof, J. (2001). Analysis of the typical growth path of technology-based companies in life sciences and information technology, and the role of different sources of innovation financing. An EIMS study as part of the innovation program commissioned by the European Commission.
11. Colyvas J. Crow M. Geligns A. Mazzoleni A. Nelson R. Rosenberg N. Sampat B. How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science 48 1 2002 154-170
12. Debackere K. Managing academic R&D as a business at K.U. Leuven: Context, structure and process R & D Management 30 2000 323-328
13. Debackere K. De Bondt R. (Eds.) Leuven Research & Development 2002 64-65 Universitaire Pers Leuven
14. Degroof, J. (2002). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
15. Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research Academy of Management Review 14 4 1989 532-550
16. European Commission (1998). Evaluation of SMEs in the Fourth Framework Programme. Evaluation document of the SME coordination unit, DG XII.
17. European Report on Science and Technology Indicators (1994). EUR 15897 EN. Published by the European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science, Research and Development, ISBN 92-828-0271-X.
18. European Report on Science and Technology Indicators (1997). EUR EN. Published by the European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science, Research and Development, ISBN 92-828-0271-X.
19. Heirman, A., Clarysse, B., & Vandenhaute, V. (2004). Resources of Research-Based Start-Ups and the Influence of Technology, Institutional Link and Industry, forthcoming.
20. Jacob M. Lundqvist M. Hellsmark H. Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology Research Policy 2003 (in press)
21. Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (1998). Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Tale of University Licensing. NBER Working Paper No. 6698, Cambridge, MA.
22. Karnebeck A. Spin-offs and the University of Twente 2001 University of Twente Press
23. Lockett A. Vohora A. Wright M. Incubators without walls International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2003 245-256 (November)
24. Miller D. Friesen P.H. Organizations: A Quantum View 1984 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
25. Moray, N., & Clarysse, B. (2003). How do institutional logics shape the spin off process? An in depth analysis of a research institute. Working paper University of Ghent.
26. Mustar P. The creation of enterprises by researchers: Conditions for growth and the role of public authorities High Level Workshop on SME's: Employment, Innovation and Growth 1995 OECD, Washington, 16-17 June
27. Mustar P. Spin off enterprises. How French academics create hi tech companies: The conditions for success and failure Science and Public Policy 24 1997 37-43
28. Penrose E.T. The Theory of Growth of the Firm 1959 Oxford, Blackwell
29. Roberts E.B. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond 1991 46-99 Oxford Universirty Press, Chapter 3
30. Roberts E.B. Malone D. Policies and Structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations R & D Management 26 1996 17-48
31. Segal, Quince, Wicksteed The Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited 2000 SQW Ltd, Cambridge
32. Siegel D.S. Waldman D. Link A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study Research Policy 32 2003 27-48
33. Saxenian A. Regional advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 1994 Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 226 pp.
34. Shane S. Technology regimes and new firm formation Management Science vol. 47 9 2001 1173
35. Shane S. Stuart T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups Management Science 48 1 2002 154-170
36. Smiler R.W. Gibson D. Dietrich G. University spin-out companies: technology start-ups from UT-Austin Journal of Business Venturing 5 1990 63-76
37. Steffenson M. Rogers E. Speakman K. Spin-offs from research centers at a research university Journal of Business Venturing 15 1999 93-111
38. Suchman, M.C. (1994). On advice of counsel: Law firms and venture capital funds as information intermediaries in the structuration of Silicon Valley. Stanford University, Department of Sociology, Unpublished PhD Dissertation.
39. Thursby J. Jensen R. Thursby M. Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities Journal of Technology Transfer vol. 26 1-2 2001 59
40. Yin, R.K., 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Applied social research methods series, Sage Publications.