The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980

Research Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 99-119

  Mowery, David C ^a   Nelson, Richard R ^b   Sampat, Bhaven N ^b   Ziedonis, Arvids A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayh Dole; Licenses; Patents; Technology Transfer; University Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346657500     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arrow, K., 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Association of University Technology Managers, 1996. AUTM Licensing Survey: Survey Summary. Association of University Technology Managers, Norwalk, CT.
3. Association of University Technology Managers, 1998. AUTM Licensing Survey: Survey Summary. Association of University Technology Managers Norwalk, CT.
4. Cohen, W., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., Walsh, J., 1998. Industry and the Academy: Uneasy Partners in the Cause of Technological Advance. In: Noll, R. (Ed.), Challenges to the Research University. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
5. Crow, M.M., Gelijns, A.C., Nelson, R.R., Raider, H.J., Sampat, B.N., 1998. Recent Changes in University-Industry Research Interactions: A Preliminary Analysis of Causes and Effects, unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.
6. Eisenberg R. Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review. 82:1996;1663-1727.
7. Gambardella, A., 1995. Science and Innovation: The US Pharmaceutical Industry During the 1980s. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
8. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., 1998. Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-88, Review of Economics and Statistics, 119-127.
9. Katz, M.L., Ordover, J.A., 1990. R&D Competition and Cooperation, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 137-192.
10. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S., 1987. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 783-820.
11. Mowery, D.C., Rosenberg, N., 1998. Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
12. National Research Council, 1997. Intellectual Property Rights and Research Tools in Molecular Biology. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
13. National Science Board, 1998. Science and Engineering Indicators 1998. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
14. National Science Foundation, 1998. National Patterns of R&D Resources: 1998. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
15. Nelson, R.R., 1959. The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research, Journal of Political Economy, 297-306.
16. Research Corporation, 1974. Annual Report. Research Corporation, New York, NY.
17. Rosenberg N. Scientific Instrumentation and University Research. Research Policy. 21:1992;381-390.
18. Rosenberg, N., 1998. Technological Change in Chemicals: The Role of University-Industry Relations. In: Arora, A., Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth. Wiley, New York.
19. Rosenberg N., Nelson R.R. American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry. Research Policy. 23:1994;323-348.
20. Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing, 1982. Thirteenth Annual Report. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
21. Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing, 1990. Twentieth Annual Report. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
22. Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing, 1993. 1991-92 Annual Report: Office of Technology Licensing. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
23. Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing, 1994a. Office of Technology Licensing Guidelines for Software Distribution, 11/17/94; processed.
24. Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing, 1994b. Copyrightable Works and Licensing at Stanford, Spring 1994; processed.
25. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., 1994. University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Inventions, CEPR Working Paper #372, Stanford University.
26. United States Patent and Trademark Office, 1998. University Patent Report; processed.