A portal into biology education: An annotated list of commonly encountered terms

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Miller, Sarah ^a   Tanner, Kimberly D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENT; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY; THINKING;

BIOLOGY; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY; THINKING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84978733352     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.15-03-0065     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allen DE, Duch BJ (eds.) (1998). Thinking Towards Solutions: Problem-based Learning Activities for General Biology, Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College.
2. Allen DE, Tanner KD (2002). Questions about questions. Cell Biol Educ 1, 63-67.
3. Allen DE, Tanner KD (2003). Learning in context: problem-based learning. Cell Biol Educ 2, 73-81.
4. Allen DE, Tanner KD (2005). Infusing active learning into the large enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biol Educ 4, 262-268.
5. Allen DE, Tanner KD (2006). Rubrics: tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners. Cell Biol Educ 5, 197-203.
6. Allen DE, Tanner KD (2007). Putting the horse back in front of the cart: using visions and decisions about high-quality learning experiences to drive course design. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 85-89.
7. Ambrose S, Bridges MW, DiPietro M, Lovett MC, Norman MK (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Angelo TA, Cross KP (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Bain K (2004). What the Best College Teachers Do, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bandura A (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman.
11. Bean J (2011). Rubrics. In: Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, chap. 14.
12. Bloom BS, Englehart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR (1956). A Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, New York: McKay.
13. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (eds.) (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14. Brown B (2004). Discursive identity: assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. J Res Sci Teach 41, 810-834.
15. Bybee RW, Taylor JA, Gardner A, Van Scotter P, Powell JC, Westbrook A, Landes N (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications, Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS. http://bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model (accessed 15 May 2015).
16. Chamany K, Allen DE, Tanner KD (2008). Making biology learning relevant to students: integrating people, history, and context into college biology teaching. CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 267-278.
17. Crouch CH, Mazur E (2001). Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys 69, 970-977.
18. Crowe A, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP (2008). Biology in Bloom: implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 368.
19. Dirks C, Wenderoth MP, Withers M (2014). Assessment in the College Science Classroom, New York: Freeman.
20. Filene P (2005). The Joy of Teaching: A Practical Guide for New College Instructors, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
21. Gaffney JDH, Richards E, Kustusch MB, Ding L, Beichner RJ (2008). Scaling up education reform. J Coll Sci Teach 37, 18-23.
22. Gosser D, Cracolice M, Kampmeier J, Roth V, Strozak V, Varma-Nelson P (2001). Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, Bruns P, Chang A, DeHaan R, Gentile J, Lauffer S, Stewart J, Tilghman SM, Wood WB (2004). Scientific teaching. Science 304, 521-522.
24. Handelsman J, Miller S, Pfund C (2006). Scientific Teaching, New York: Freeman.
25. Huba ME, Freed JE (2000). Learner-centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
26. Hurtado S, Carter D (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociol Educ 70, 324-345.
27. Johnson A (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Sci Educ 91, 805-821.
28. Johnson D, Johnson R, Johnson Holubec E (1993). Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom, 4th ed., Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
29. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA (1991). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
30. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: what evidence is there that it works? Change July/ August, 27-35.
31. Knight JK, Wood WB (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol Educ 4, 298-310.
32. Ladson-Billings G (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Pract 34, 159-165.
33. Lyman F (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: the inclusion of all students. In: Mainstreaming Digest, ed. AS Anderson, College Park: University of Maryland.
34. Mazur E (1996). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoli VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 109, 16474-16479.
36. Pintrich P (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Pract 41, 219-226.
37. Roth D (2007). Understanding by design: a framework for effecting curricular development and assessment. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 95-97.
38. Rowe MB (1987). Wait time: slowing down may be a way of speeding up. Am Educator 11, 38-43, 47.
39. Schinske J, Tanner KD (2014). Teaching more by grading less (or differently). CBE Life Sci Educ 13, 159-166.
40. Schmader T, Johns M, Forbes C (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychol Rev 115, 336-356.
41. Seidel SB, Tanner KD (2013). What if students revolt?—Considering student resistance: origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 586-595.
42. Seymour E, Hewitt NM (1997). Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview.
43. Smith MK, Wood WB, Adams WK, Wieman C, Knight JK, Guild N, Su TT (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323, 122-124.
44. Steele C (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues How Stereotypes Affect Us, New York: Norton.
45. Steele CM (1999). Thin ice: stereotype threat and black college students. Atlantic Monthly August, 44-54.
46. Steele CM, Aronson J (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Personality Soc Psychol 69, 797-811.
47. Tanner KD (2007). Cultural competence in the college biology classroom. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 251-258.
48. Tanner KD (2009a). Learning to see equity in science. CBE Life Sci Educ 8, 265-270.
49. Tanner KD (2009b). Talking to learn: why biology students should be talking in classrooms and how to make it happen. CBE Life Sci Educ 8, 89-94.
50. Tanner KD (2010). Order matters: using the 5E model to align teaching with how people learn. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 159-164.
51. Tanner KD (2011). Moving theory into practice: a reflection on teaching a large introductory biology course for majors. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 113-122.
52. Tanner KD (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 113-120.
53. Tanner KD (2013). Structure matters: twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 322-331.
54. Tanner KD, Allen DE (2002). Answers worth waiting for: “one second is hardly enough.” Cell Biol Educ 1, 3-5.
55. Tanner KD, Allen DE (2004a). From assays to assessments. Cell Biol Educ 3, 69-74.
56. Tanner KD, Allen DE (2004b). Learning styles and the problem of instructional selection—engaging all students in science courses. Cell Biol Educ 3, 197-201.
57. Tanner KD, Allen DE (2007). Cultural competence in the college biology classroom. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 251-258.
58. Tanner KD, Chatman LC, Allen DE (2003). Cooperative learning in the science classroom: beyond students working in groups. Cell Biol Educ 2, 1-5.
59. Tobias S (1990). They’re Not Dumb. They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier, Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
60. Tobin K (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Rev Educ Res 57, 69-95.
61. Trujillo G, Tanner KD (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE Life Sci Educ 13, 6-15.
62. Twigg C (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: new models for online learning. EDUCAUSE Rev 38, 28-38.
63. Wiggins GP, McTighe J (1998). Understanding by Design, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
64. Wood WB (2004). Clickers: a teaching gimmick that works. Dev Cell 7, 796-798.