"What if students revolt?"-Considering student resistance: Origins, options, and opportunities for investigation

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 586-595

  Seidel, Shannon B ^a   Tanner, Kimberly D ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; STUDENT;

BIOLOGY; HUMANS; STUDENTS;

EID: 84889032079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe-13-09-0190     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aggarwal P, O'Brien CL (2008). Social loafing on group projects: structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. J Market Educ 30, 255-264.
2. Allen D, Tanner KD (2006). Rubrics: tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners. Cell Biol Educ 5, 197-203.
3. Brooks CM, Ammons JL (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessment. J Educ Business 78, 268-272.
4. Brownell SE, Tanner KD (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and... tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 339-346.
5. Burroughs NF (2007). A reinvestigation of the relationship of teacher nonverbal immediacy and student compliance-resistance with learning. Commun Educ 56, 453-475.
6. Burroughs NF, Kearney P, Plax TG (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Commun Educ 38, 214-229.
7. Center for Teaching Development (2013). Ask Students about Lecture (KQS). Center for Teaching Development at the University of California, San Diego. http://ctd.ucsd.edu/2011/08/ask-students-about-lecture-kqs/ (accessed 26 August 2013).
8. Chory-Assad RM (2002). Classroom justice: perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Commun Q 50, 58-77.
9. Chory-Assad RM, Paulsel ML (2004). Classroom justice: student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Commun Educ 53, 253-273.
10. Crouch CH, Mazur E (2001). Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys 69, 970-977.
11. Felder RM (2007). Sermons for grumpy campers. Chem Eng Educ 41, 183-184.
12. Felder RM (2011). Hang in there! Dealing with student resistance to learner-centered teaching. Chem Eng Educ 43, 131-132.
13. Goodboy AK (2011). Instructional dissent in the college classroom. Commun Educ 60, 296-313.
14. Gorham J, Millette DM (1997). A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Commun Educ 46, 245-261.
15. Hurtado S, Eagan K, Pruor JH, Whang H, Tran S (2012). Undergraduate Teaching Faculty: The 2010-2011 HERI Faculty Survey, Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.
16. Kearney P, Plax TG, Sorensen G, Smith VR (1988). Experienced and prospective teachers' selections of compliance-gaining messages for "common" student misbehaviors. Commun Educ 37, 150-164.
17. Kearney P, Plax TG, Burroughs NF (1991a). An attributional analysis of college students' resistance decisions. Commun Educ 40, 325-342.
18. Kearney P, Plax TG, Hays ER, Ivey MJ (1991b). College teacher misbehaviors: what students don't like about what teachers say and do. Commun Q 39, 309-324.
19. Kelley DH, Gorham J (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Commun Educ 37, 198-207.
20. Mehrabian A (1971). Silent Messages, Oxford, England: Wadsworth.
21. Pfaff E, Huddleston P (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? what impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. J Market Educ 25, 37-45.
22. Prince M, Felder R (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. J Coll Sci Teach 36, 14-20.
23. Richmond VP, McCroskey JC (1992). Power in the Classroom: Communication, Control, and Concern, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Science Education Initiative (2013). Framing the Interactive Engagement Classroom, Boulder: Science Education Initiative at the University of Colorado, Boulder. www.colorado.edu/sei/fac-resources/framing.html (accessed 26 August 2013).
25. Science Education Research Center (2013). Immediacy in the Classroom: Research and Practical Implications, On the Cutting Edge at Carleton College. http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/affective/immediacy.html (accessed 26 August 2013).
26. Silverthorn DU (2006). Teaching and learning in the interactive classroom. Adv Physiol Educ 30, 135-140.
27. Smith GA (2008). First-day questions for the learner-centered classroom. Natl Teach Learn Forum 17(5), 1-4.
28. Tanner KD (2013). Structure matters: twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 322-331.
29. Titsworth BS (2001). The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organizational lecture cues, and students' notetaking on cognitive learning. Commun Educ 50, 283-297.
30. Tyler TR, Caine A (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. J Pers Soc Psychol 41, 642.
31. Witt PL, Wheeless LR (2001). An experimental study of teachers' verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students' affective and cognitive learning. Commun Educ 50, 327-342.