Approaches to biology teaching and learning: Learning styles and the problem of instructional selection - Engaging all students in science courses

Cell Biology Education

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 197-201

  Tanner, Kimberly ^a   Allen, Deborah ^b  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; REVIEW; STUDENT; TEACHER; TEACHING; TECHNIQUE;

BIOLOGY; CAREER CHOICE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING; SCIENCE; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TEACHING MATERIALS;

EID: 15744398084     PISSN: 15367509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.04-07-0050     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Allen, D.E., and Tanner, K.D. (2003). Learning in context: problem-based learning. Cell Biol. Educ. 2, 73-81.
2. Entwhistle, N. (1981). Styles of Learning and Teaching; an integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
3. Felder, R.M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: learning and teaching styles in college science education. J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 23(5), 286-290.
4. Felder, R.M., and Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engr. Educ., 78(7), 674-681.
5. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books. (Tenth Anniversary Edition with new introduction, New York: Basic Books, 1993.)
6. Gardner, H. (1999). Disciplined Minds: What All Students Should Understand. New York: Simon and Schuster.
7. Grasha, A.F. (1996). Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. Pittsburg, PA: Alliance Publishers.
8. Honey, P., and Mumford, A. (1982). Manual of Learning Styles. London: P. Honey.
9. James, W.B., and Gardner, D.L. (1995). Learning styles: Implications for distance learning. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ., 67, 19-32.
10. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Kolb, D.A. (1994). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In: Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom, ed. K. Feldman and M. Paulson. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
12. Myers, I.B., and McCaulley, M.H. (1986). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13. Myers-Briggs, I. (1980). Gifts Differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
14. Powell, K. (2003). Spare me the lecture. Nature, 425, 234-236.
15. Sarasin, L.C. (1998). Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
16. Schmeck, R.R. (1998). Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum Press.
17. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, E. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates Among Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors. Boulder, CO: Bureau of Sociological Research.
18. Tanner, K.D., Chatman, E.S., and Allen, D.E. (2003). Cooperative learning in the science classroom: beyond students working in groups. Cell Biol. Educ., 2, 1-5.
19. Tobias, S. (1990). They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.