Do women advance equity? The effect of gender leadership composition on LGBT-friendly policies in American firms

Human Relations

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1431-1456

  Cook, Alison ^a   Glass, Christy ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

gender; LGBT; organizational demography; sexual orientation; workplace policies

Indexed keywords

BISEXUALITY; CLINICAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DRAWING; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HOMOSEXUAL FEMALE; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MALE; SEX RATIO; TRANSGENDER; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84976576181     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: 1741282X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018726715611734     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. J.Acker (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organizations. Gender and Society20(4): 441–464.
2. R.B.AdamsP.Funk (2009) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?Management Science58(2): 219–235.
3. P.Allison (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4. M.M.ArthurA.Cook (2009) Shareholder returns for a Catalyst Award. Group & Organization Management34(4): 432–448.
5. P.M.Ayoub (2014) Contested norms in new-adopter states: International determinants of LGBT rights legislation. European Journal of International Relations21(2): 293–322.
6. M.V.L.BadgettL.DursoA.KastanisC.Mallory (2013) The business impact of LGBT-supportive workplace policies. Working paper, The Williams Institute, UCLA. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vt6t9zx. Retrieved February 2015.
7. S.BearN.RahamanC.Post (2010) The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics97(2): 207–221.
8. E.BellS.Nkomo (2001) Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Professional Identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9. S.Bem (1981) Gender scheme theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review88(4): 354–364.
10. D.BilimoriaJ.Wheeler (2000) Women corporate directors: Current research and future directions. In: (eds) Women in Management: Current Research Issues. London: Paul Chapman Publishers, 138–163.
11. J.BlazovichK.CookJ.HustonW.Strawser (2013) Do gay-friendly corporate policies enhance firm performance? SSRN working paper.
12. P.BradshawD.Wicks (2000) Experiences of white women on corporate boards in Canada: Compliance and non-compliance to hegemonic masculinity. In: (eds) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. The Netherlands: Kluwer, 197–212.
13. F.BriscoeS.Safford (2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly53(3): 460–491.
14. D.CarterB.SimkinsW.G.Simpson (2003) Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. Financial Review38(1): 33–53.
15. E.ChamblissC.Uggen (2000) Men and women of elite law firms: Reevaluating Kanter’s legacy. Law and Social Inquiry25(1): 41–68.
16. R.ChenM.DyballS.Wright (2009) The link between board composition and corporate diversification in Australian corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review17(2): 208–223.
17. N.Chodorow (1974) Family structure and feminist perspective. In: (eds) Women in Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 41–48.
18. Y.ChuangR.ChurchR.Ophir (2011) Taking sides: The interactive influences of institutional mechanisms on the adoption of same-sex partner health benefits by Fortune 500 corporations. Organization Science22(1): 190–209.
19. E.CiszekT.D.Gallicano (2013) Changing cultural stigma: A pilot study of sexual orientation and mental illness organizations. Public Relations Review39(1): 82–84.
20. F.ColganC.CreeganA.McKearneyT.Wright (2007) Equality and diversity policies and practices at work: Lesbian, gay and bisexual workers. Equal Opportunities International26(6): 590–609.
21. S.Coltrane (2006) Engendering children. In: (ed.) Childhood Socialization. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine, 279–310.
22. A.CookC.Glass (2011) Does diversity damage corporate value? Measuring stock price reactions to diversity awards. Ethnic and Racial Studies34(12): 2173–2191.
23. A.CookC.Glass (2014) The power of one or power in numbers? Analyzing the effect of minority leaders on organizational policy and practice. Work & Occupations42(2): 183–215.
24. G.B.CunninghamM.L.SartoreB.P.McCullough (2010) The influence of applicant sexual orientation, applicant gender and rater gender on ascribed attributes and hiring recommendations of personal trainers. Journal of Sport Management24(4): 400–415.
25. E.DavisonJ.Rouse (2004) Exploring domestic partnership benefits policies in corporate America. Journal of Homosexuality48(2): 21–44.
26. N.DayP.Greene (2008) A case for sexual orientation diversity management in small and large organizations. Human Resource Management47(3): 637–654.
27. N.E.DayP.Schoenrade (1997) Staying in the closet vs. coming out: Relationships between communication about sexual orientation and work attitudes. Personnel Psychology50(1): 147–163.
28. C.DezsőD.G.Ross (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal33(9): 1072–1089.
29. N.Drydakis (2015) Sexual orientation discrimination in the United Kingdom’s labor market: A field experiment. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print 8April. DOI: 10.1177/0018726715569855.
30. M.M.DuguidD.L.LoydP.S.Tolbert (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat aproach. Organization Science23(2): 386–401.
31. A.H.EaglyL.L.Carli (2007) Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32. A.H.EaglyM.C.Johannesen-SchmidtM.L.Van Engen (2003) Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin129(4): 569–591.
33. A.H.EaglyB.T.Johnson (1990) Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin108(2): 233–256.
34. A.H.EaglyS.J.Karau (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109(3): 573–598.
35. A.H.EaglyW.WoodA.B.Diekman (2000) Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In: (eds) The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 123–174.
36. R.Ely (1995) Power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal38(3): 589–634.
37. B.EverlyJ.Schwartz (2015) Predictors of the adoption of LGBT-friendly HR policies. Human Resource Management54(2): 367–382.
38. B.EverlyM.J.ShihG.C.Ho (2012) Don’t ask, don’t tell? Does disclosure of gay identity affect partner performance?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology48(1): 407–410.
39. S.FinkelsteinR.A.D’Aveni (1994) CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal37(5): 1079–1108.
40. N.FondasS.Sassalos (2000) A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus12: 13–22.
41. C.Gilligan (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. R.Githens (2009) Capitalism, identity politics, and queerness coverage: LGBT employee resource groups. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development23(3): 18–31.
43. B.R.GoldenE.J.Zajac (2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination X power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal22(12): 1087–1111.
44. K.H.GriffithM.R.Hebl (2002) The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: ‘Coming out’ at work. Journal of Applied Psychology87(6): 1191–1199.
45. N.A.GuittarH.Pals (2014) Intersecting gender with race and religiosity: Do unique social categories explain attitudes toward homosexuality?Current Sociology62(1): 41–62.
46. th issue. Available at: http://www.bergenpflag.com/gay_rights/061130_Corporate_gay_rights.pdf. Retrieved April2015.
47. P.R.Haunschild (1993) Inter-organizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly38(4): 564–592.
48. M.A.HeilmanW.D.FuchsM.Tamkins (2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 416–427.
49. L.HelferE.Voeten (2014) International courts as agents of legal change: Evidence from LGBT rights in Europe. International Organization68(1): 77–110.
50. M.J.Hill (2013) Is the Black community more homophobic? Reflections on the intersectionality of race, class, gender, culture and religiosity of the perception of homophobia in the Black community. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health17(2): 208–214.
51. A.J.HillmanC.ShropshireA.A.Canella (2007) Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal50(4): 941–952.
52. M.HoggD.van KnippenbergD.Rast (2012) Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review37(2): 232–255.
53. Human Rights Campaign (2014) Available at: http://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/lgbt-equality-at-the-fortune-500. Retrieved April2015.
54. Human Rights Campaign (2015) Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Available at: http://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/employment-non-discrimination-act. Retrieved August2015.
55. A.H.HuffmanK.M.Watrous-RodriguezE.B.King (2008) Supporting a diverse workforce: What type of support is most meaningful for lesbian and gay employees?Human Resource Management47(2): 237–253.
56. D.JohnstonM.A.Malina (2008) Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group Organizational Management33(5): 602–625.
57. R.M.Kanter (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
58. C.KarpowitzT.MendelbergL.Shaker (2012) Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review106(3): 533–547.
59. A.M.KonradK.CanningsC.Goldberg (2010) Asymmetrical demography effects on psychological climate for gender diversity: Differential effects of leader gender and work unity among Swedish doctors. Human Relations63(11): 1661–1685.
60. A.KonradP.PrasadJ.Pringle (eds) (2006) Handbook of Workplace Diversity. London: SAGE.
61. D.L.LoydJ.B.WhiteM.Kern (2007) Duo status: Disentangling the complex interactions within a minority of two. In: (eds) Research on Managing Groups. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 75–92.
62. D.A.MatsaA.R.Miller (2011) Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. American Economic Review101(3): 635–639.
63. D.A.MatsaA.R.Miller (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal5(3): 136–169.
64. A.C.McCabeR.IngramM.C.Dato-on (2006) The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics64(2): 101–116.
65. G.McGuire (1999) Do race and sex affect employees’ access to help from mentors? Insights from the study of a large corporation. In: (eds) Mentoring Dilemmas: Developmental Relationships within Multicultural Organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 105–120.
66. T.MillerM.D.C.Triana (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies46(5): 755–786.
67. M.S.Mizruchi (1996) What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology22: 271–298.
68. P.Nesbitt (1997) Gender, tokenism and the construction of elite clergy careers. Review of Religious Research38(3): 193–210.
69. W.Newburry (2012) Organizational actions in face of institutional contestation: Diffusion of LGBT-friendly policies. Academy of Management Proceedings, January. Available at: http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2012/1/1.131.short. Retrieved February2015.
70. B.Opall (2012) What motivates Minnesota’s Fortune 500 to create equitable work environments for GLBT People? Unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Available at: http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/129990/1/Opall_umn_0130E_12748.pdf. Retrieved February2015.
71. M.B.Ozturk (2011) Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in Turkey. Human Relations64(8): 1099–1118.
72. N.C.Raeburn (2004) Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights: Changing Corporate American from Inside Out. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
73. B.R.RaginsJ.M.Cornwell (2001) Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology86(6): 1244–1261.
74. C.L.Ridgeway (2001) Gender, status and leadership. Journal of Social Issues57(4): 637–655.
75. J.Rosener (1995) America’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76. L.A.RudmanP.Glick (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues57(4): 743–762.
77. N.RumensD.Kerfoot (2009) Gay men at work: (Re)constructing the self as professional. Human Relations62(5): 763–786.
78. B.SearsC.MalloryN.Hunter (2011) Economic motives for adopting LGBT-related workplace policies. Working paper, The Williams Institute, UCLA.
79. S.SeidmanC.MeeksF.Traschen (1999) Beyond the closet? The changing social meaning of homosexuality in the United States. Sexualities2(1): 9–34.
80. C.Shropshire (2010) The role of interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review35(2): 246–264.
81. J.I.SiegelA.N.LichtS.H.Schwartz (2011) Egalitarianism and international investment. Journal of Financial Economics102(3): 621–642.
82. S.Skaggs (2008) Producing change or bagging opportunity? The effects of discrimination litigation on women in supermarket management. American Journal of Sociology113(4): 1148–1183.
83. S.SkaggsK.StainbackP.Duncan (2012) Shaking things up or business as usual? The influence of female corporate executives and board of directors on women’s managerial representation. Social Science Research41(4): 936–948.
84. K.StainbackD.Tomaskovic-Devey (2009) Intersections of power and privilege: Long-term trends in managerial representation. American Sociological Review74(5): 800–820.
85. S.TerjesenV.Singh (2008) Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics83(1): 55–63.
86. M.ThompsonD.Sekaquaptewa (2002) When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy2(1): 183–203.
87. J.Todd (2005) Diversity pays financially as well as in other ways. HR Focus82(12): 9.
88. M.TorchiaA.CalabroM.Huse (2011) Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics102(2): 299–317.
89. B.Van WanrooyH.BewleyA.BrysonJ.ForthS.FreethL.StokesS.Wood (2013) Employment Relations in the Shadow of Recession: Findings from the 2011Workplace Employment Relations Study. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
90. S.A.WaddockS.B.Graves (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal18(4): 303–319.
91. K.WaldJ.ButtonB.Rienzo (1996) The politics of gay rights in American communities: Explaining antidiscrimination ordinances and policies. American Journal of Political Science40(4): 1152–1178.
92. P.WangJ.Schwartz (2010) Stock price reactions to GLBT nondiscrimination policies. Human Resource Management49(2): 195–216.
93. J.D.Westphal (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal42(1): 7–24.
94. J.D.WestphalL.P.Milton (2000) How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly45(2): 366–398.
95. K.WilliamsC.O’Reilly (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In: (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 77–140.
96. P.Willis (2012) Witnesses on the periphery: Young lesbian, gay, bisexual and queer employees witnessing homophobic exchanges in Australian workplaces. Human Relations65(12): 1589–1610.
97. J.Yoder (1994) Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly57(2): 150–159.
98. E.ZajacJ.Westphal (1996) Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal39(1): 64–90.
99. Y.ZhangL.Hou (2012) The romance of working together: Benefits of gender diversity on group performance in China. Human Relations65(11): 1487–1508.