Gender inequality in deliberative participation

American Political Science Review

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 533-547

  Karpowitz, Christopher F ^a   Mendelberg, Tali ^b   Shaker, Lee ^c  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865483652     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055412000329     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Aries, Elizabeth. 1976. "Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups." Small Group Behavior 7: 7-18.
2. Aries, Elizabeth. 1998. "Gender Differences in Interaction: A Reexamination." In SexDifferences and Similarities in Communication: Critical Essays and Empirical Investigations of Sex and Gender in Interaction, eds. Daniel J. Canary and Kathryn Dindia. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 21-36.
3. Baron, Reuben M., and David A. Kenny. 1986. "Moderator- Mediator Variables Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173-82.
4. Bouas,Kelly S., and S. S.Komorita. 1996. "Group Discussion and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 1144-50.
5. Bowers, William J., Benjamin D. Steiner, and Marla Sandys. 2001. "Death Sentencing in Black and White: An Empirical Analysis of Jurors' Race and Jury Racial Composition." University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 3: 171-275.
6. Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Bryan, Frank M. 2004. Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How it Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Carlock, C. Jesse, and Patricia Y. Martin. 1977. "Sex Composition and the Intensive Group Experience." Social Work 22: 27-32.
9. Carroll, Susan J., ed. 2001. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10. Chambers, Simone. 1996. Reasonable Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11. Chatman, Jennifer A., and Charles A. O'Reilly. 2004. "Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity among Men and Women." Academy of Management Journal 47: 193-208. (Pubitemid 38845936)
12. Choi, Seung-Whan. 2009. "The Effect of Outliers on Regression Analysis:Regime Type and Foreign Direct Investment." Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4: 153-65.
13. Cohen, Joshua. 1989. "Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy." In The Good Polity, eds. Alan P. Hamlin and Phillip Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell, 17-34
14. Craig, Jane M., and Carolyn W. Sherif. 1986. "The Effectiveness of Men and Women in Problem-solving Groups as a Function of Gender Composition." Sex Roles 14 (7/8): 453-66.
15. Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2007. Talking about Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Croson, Rachel, and Uri Gneezy. 2009. "Gender Differences in Preferences." Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448-74.
17. Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2007. "Gender Differences in Policy Preferences and Priorities." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/ p196573-index.html (accessed May 19, 2011).
18. Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2010. "Local Parties, Local Candidates, and Women's Representation: How County Parties Affect Who Runs for andWins Political Office." Ph.D. diss. Princeton University.
19. Devine, Dennis J., Laura Clayton, Benjamin B. Dunford, Rasmy Seying, and Jennifer Price. 2001. "Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups." Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 73 (3): 622-727. (Pubitemid 33656952)
20. Dindia, Kathryn, and Mike Allen. 1992. "Sex Differences in Selfdisclosure: A Meta-analysis." Psychological Bulletin 112: 106-24.
21. Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Ellis, Donald G. 1982. "Relational Stability and Change inWomen's Consciousness-raising Groups." Women's Studies in Communication 5: 77-87.
23. Esterling, Kevin M., Archon Fung, and TaekuLee. 2009."HowMuch Disagreement is Good for Democratic Deliberation? The California Speaks Health Care Reform Experiment." Presented at the Annual West Coast Experimental Political Science Conference, Del Mar, CA.
24. Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Fishkin, James S., Baogang He, Robert C. Luskin, and Alice Siu. 2010. "DeliberativeDemocracy in an Unlikely Place:Deliberative Polling in China." British Journal of Political Science 40: 435-48.
26. Fiske, Susan T. 2010. "Venus and Mars, or Down to Earth: Stereotypes and Realities of Gender Differences." Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (6): 688-92
27. Fraser, Nancy. 1992. "Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy." In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109-42.
28. Frohlich, Norman, and Joe Oppenheimer. 1990. "Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production." American Political Science Review 84 (2): 461-77.
29. Frohlich,Norman, and Joe Oppenheimer. 1992. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory.Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Frohlich, Norman, Joe Oppenheimer, and Cheryl Eavy, 1987. "Laboratory Results on Rawls's Distributive Justice." British Journal of Political Science 17: 1-21.
31. Fung, Archon. 2003. "Deliberation Where You Least Expect It: Citizen Participation in Government." Connections (Fall): 30-33.
32. Fung, Archon. 2007. "Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement." American Political Science Review 101: 443-58.
33. Gastil, John, E. Pierre Deess, Phil Weiser, and Jordan Meade. 2008. "Jury Service and Electoral Participation: A Test of the Participation Hypothesis." Journal of Politics 70: 1-16.
34. Giles, Howard, Anthony Mulac, James J. Bradac, and Patricia Johnson. 1987. "Speech Accommodation Theory: The First Decade and Beyond." Communication Yearbook 10: 13-48.
35. Grunenfelder, Rita, and Andre Baechtiger. 2007. "Gendered Deliberation? How Men and Women Deliberate in Legislatures." Presented at the European Consortium for PoliticalResearch Joint Sessions, Helsinki.
36. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of The Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. T. Burger with the assistance of F. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Hannagan, Rebecca J., and Christopher Larimer. 2011. "Out-group Threat and Gender Balance in Policymaking Groups." Presented at the 2nd European Conference on Politics andGender, Budapest.
41. Hansen, Susan B. 1997. "Talking about Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing." Journal of Politics 59: 73-103.
42. Hastie, Reid, Steven D. Penrod, and Nancy Pennington. 1983. Inside the Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Hickerson, Andrea, and John Gastil. 2008. "Assessing the Difference Critique of Deliberation: Gender, Emotion, and the Jury Experience." Communication Theory 18: 281-303.
44. Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Humphreys, Macartan, William A. Masters, and Martin E. Sandbu. 2006. "Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in Sao Tome and Pr?ncipe." World Politics 58: 583-622.
46. Imai, Kosuke, Luke Keele, and Dustin Tingley. 2010. "A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis." Psychological Methods 15 (4): 309-34.
47. Jacobs, Lawrence R., Fay L. Cook, and Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Johnson, Cathryn. 1994. "Gender, Legitimate Authority, and Leader-Subordinate Conversations." American Sociological Review 59: 122-35.
49. Johnson, Richard A., and Gary I. Schulman. 1989. "Gender-role Composition and Role Entrapment in Decision-making Groups." Gender and Society 3: 355-72.
50. Kameda, Tatsuya 1991. "Procedural Influence in Small-group Decision Making: Deliberation Style and Assigned Decision Rule." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 245-56.
51. Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic.
52. Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977b. Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Policy Agenda. Frontiers of Social Science Series. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
53. Kaplan, Martin F., and Charles E. Miller. 1987. "Group Decisionmaking and Normative versus Informational Influence: Effects of Type of Issue and Assigned Decision Rule." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 306-13.
54. Karpowitz, Christopher F., Chad Raphael, and Allen S. Hammond IV. 2009. "Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered." Politics and Society 37: 576-615.
55. Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. "Power and Influence in State Legislatures: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates." American Political Science Review 88: 560-76.
56. Krook, Mona L. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Macedo, Stephen, Yvette Alex-Assensoh, Jeffrey M. Berry, Michael Brintnall, David E. Campbell, Luis Ricardo Fraga, Archon Fung, et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do about It. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
58. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent 'Yes.'" Journal of Politics 61: 628-57.
60. Mansbridge, Jane J., Janette Hartz-Karp, Matthew Amengual, and John Gastil. 2006. "Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study." Journal of Public Deliberation 2 (1): 72-93.
61. Massie, Tajuana, SusanW. Johnson, and SaraM. Gubala. 2002. "The Influence of Gender and Race on Judicial Decisions in the United States Courts of Appeals." Presented at theMidwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago.
62. Mathis, Jerome. 2011. "Deliberation with Evidence." American Political Science Review 105: 516-29.
63. Maltz, Daniel, and Ruth Borker. 1982. "A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication." In Language and Social Identity, ed. John Gumperz. New York: Cambridge University Press, 281-312.
64. McCarrick, Anne K., Ronald W. Manderscheid, and Sam Silbergeld. 1981. "Gender Differences in Competition and Dominance during Married-couples Group Therapy." Social Psychology Quarterly 44: 164-77.
65. McDermott, Rose. 2011. "Internal and External Validity." In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski, and Arthur Lupia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27-40.
66. Mendelberg, Tali. 2002. "The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence." In Political Decision-making, Deliberation, and Participation, ed. Michael X. Delli Carpini. San Diego: Elsevier Science, 151-93.
67. Mendelberg, Tali, and Christopher F.Karpowitz. 2007. "Deliberating about Justice." In Deliberation, Participation, and Democracy:Can the People Govern?, ed. Shawn Rosenberg. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 101-29.
68. Merelman, RichardM., Greg Streich, and Paul Martin. 1998. "Unity and Diversity in American Political Culture: An Exploratory Study of the National Conversation on American Pluralism and Identity." Political Psychology 19: 781-807. (Pubitemid 128335480)
69. Miller, Judi B. 1985. "Patterns of Control in Same-sex Conversations: Differences betweenWomen and Men."Women's Studies in Communication 8: 62-99.
70. Morton, Rebecca M., and Kenneth C. Williams. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Moscovici, Serge. 1980. "Toward a Theory of Conversion Behavior." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 13: 209-39.
72. Moscovici, Serge. 1985. "Innovation and Minority Influence." In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, eds. G. Lindzey and E. Aronson. New York: Random House, 347-412.
73. Neblo, Michael A., Kevin M. Esterling, Ryan P. Kennedy, David M.J. Lazer, and Anand E. Sokhey. 2010. "Who Wants to Deliberate-and Why?" American Political Science Review 104: 566-83.
74. Nemeth, Charlan J. 1977. "Interactions between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs. Unanimity Decision Rules." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7: 38-56.
75. Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Piliavin, Jane A., and Rachel R. Martin. 1978. "The Effects of the Sex Composition of Groups on Style of Social Interaction." Sex Roles 4: 281-96. (Pubitemid 8392773)
77. Rapoport, Ronald B. 1981. "The Sex Gap in Political Persuading: Where the 'Structured Principle' Works." American Journal of Political Science 25 (1): 32-48.
78. Reskin, Barbara F., Debra B. McBrier, and Julie A. Kmec. 1999. "The Determinants and Consequences ofWorkplace Sex and Race Composition." Annual Review of Sociology 25: 335-61.
79. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1982. "Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation." American Sociological Review 47: 76-88.
80. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1999. "The Gender System and Interaction." Annual Review of Sociology 25: 191-216.
81. Rosenberg, Shawn. 2007. "Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation." Polity 39: 335-60.
82. Ryfe, David M. 2005. "Does Deliberative Democracy Work?" Annual Review of Political Science 8: 49-71. (Pubitemid 40977447)
83. Sanders, Lynn. 1997. "AgainstDeliberation." Political Theory 25 (3): 347-76.
84. Sapiro, Virginia. 2003. "Theorizing Gender in Political Psychology Research." In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis. New York: Oxford University Press, 601-36.
85. Shapiro, Robert Y., and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. "Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s." Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 42-46.
86. Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
87. Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Charles Brody. 1989. "Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition." American Sociological Review 54: 424-35.
88. Strodtbeck, Fred L., Rita M. James, and Charles Hawkins. 1957. "Social Status in Jury Deliberations." American Sociological Review 22: 713-19.
89. Sunstein, Cass. 2002. Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. London: Oxford University Press.
90. Tannen, Deborah. 1990.You JustDon'tUnderstand:Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
91. Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. "Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science." Annual Review of Political Science 11:497-520.
92. van Knippenberg, Daan, and Michaela C. Schippers. 2007. "Work Group Diversity." Annual Review of Psychology 58: 515-41.
93. Williams, Melissa S. 2000. "The Uneasy Alliance of Group Representation in Deliberative Democracy." In Citizenship in Diverse Societies, eds.WillKymlicka andWayneNorman. London: Oxford University Press, 124-54.
94. Young, Iris M. 1996. "Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy." In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of The Political, ed. Seyla Benhabib. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 120-36
95. Young, Iris M. 2001. "Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy." Political Theory 29: 670-90.