How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?

Nanoscale

Volumn 8, Issue 19, 2016, Pages 9919-9943

  Marchese Robinson, Richard L ^a   Lynch, Iseult ^b   Peijnenburg, Willie ^c,d   Rumble, John ^e   Klaessig, Fred ^f   Marquardt, Clarissa ^g   Rauscher, Hubert ^h   Puzyn, Tomasz ⁱ   Purian, Ronit ^j   Åberg, Christoffer ^k   Karcher, Sandra ^l   Vriens, Hanne ^m   Hoet, Peter ^m   Hoover, Mark D ⁿ   Hendren, Christine Ogilvie ^o   Harper, Stacey L ^p  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e R and R Data Services   (United States)

^f Pennsylvania Bio Nano Systems   (United States)

^g KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^h EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

^j TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^k UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^l CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m Faculty of Medicine   (Belgium)

ⁿ NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

^o DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p Oregon State University   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOSCIENCE; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; DATA COMPLETENESS; DATA CURATION; ELECTRONIC DATABASE; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MINIMUM INFORMATION; NANOTOXICOLOGY; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84971350914     PISSN: 20403364     EISSN: 20403372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr08944a     Document Type: Review

References (207)

1. G. Lövestam, H. Rauscher, G. Roebben, B. Sokull Klüttgen, N. Gibson, J.-P. Putaud and H. Stamm, Considerations on a Definition of Nanomaterial for Regulatory Purposes, European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2010
2. D. G. Thomas R. V. Pappu N. A. Baker NanoParticle Ontology for cancer nanotechnology research J. Biomed. Inf. 2011 44 59 74
3. A. B. Stefaniak V. A. Hackley G. Roebben K. Ehara S. Hankin M. T. Postek I. Lynch W.-E. Fu T. P. J. Linsinger A. F. Thünemann Nanoscale reference materials for environmental, health and safety measurements: needs, gaps and opportunities Nanotoxicology 2013 7 1325 1337
4. I. Lynch, Compendium of Projects in the European NanoSafety Cluster: 2014 Edition, 2014
5. Y. Xia Editorial: Are We Entering the Nano Era? Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014 53 12268 12271
6. N. Golbamaki B. Rasulev A. Cassano R. L. M. Robinson E. Benfenati J. Leszczynski M. T. D. Cronin Genotoxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials: review of recent data and discussion of possible mechanisms Nanoscale 2015 7 2154 2198
7. European Commission Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial Off. J. Eur. Union 2011 275 38 40
8. H. Rauscher B. Sokull-Klüttgen H. Stamm The European Commission's recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial makes an impact Nanotoxicology 2013 7 1195 1197
9. C. O. Hendren C. M. Powers M. D. Hoover S. L. Harper The Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative: A collaborative approach to assessing, evaluating, and advancing the state of the field Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015 6 1752 1762
10. ISO Technical Committee (ISO/TC) 229-Nanotechnologies, ISO/TS 80004-1:2015-Nanotechnologies-Vocabulary-Part 1: Core terms, International Standards Organisation, 2015
11. ISO Technical Committee (ISO/TC) 229-Nanotechnologies, ISO/TS 80004-2:2015-Nanotechnologies-Vocabulary-Part 2: Nano-objects, International Standards Organisation, 2015
12. C. O. Hendren X. Mesnard J. Dröge M. R. Wiesner Estimating Production Data for Five Engineered Nanomaterials As a Basis for Exposure Assessment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011 45 2562 2569
13. A. Gajewicz B. Rasulev T. C. Dinadayalane P. Urbaszek T. Puzyn D. Leszczynska J. Leszczynski Advancing risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: Application of computational approaches Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2012 64 1663 1693
14. A. D. Maynard Is novelty overrated? Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014 9 409 410
15. R. S. Kookana A. B. A. Boxall P. T. Reeves R. Ashauer S. Beulke Q. Chaudhry G. Cornelis T. F. Fernandes J. Gan M. Kah I. Lynch J. Ranville C. Sinclair D. Spurgeon K. Tiede P. J. Van den Brink Nanopesticides: Guiding Principles for Regulatory Evaluation of Environmental Risks J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014 62 4227 4240
16. G. Oberdörster E. Oberdörster J. Oberdörster Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles Environ. Health Perspect. 2005 113 823 839
17. C. M. Powers K. A. Mills S. A. Morris F. Klaessig S. Gaheen N. Lewinski C. O. Hendren Nanocuration workflows: Establishing best practices for identifying, inputting, and sharing data to inform decisions on nanomaterials Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015 6 1860 1871
18. N. Jeliazkova, P. Doganis, B. Fadeel, R. Grafstrom, J. Hastings, V. Jeliazkov, P. Kohonen, C. R. Munteanu, H. Sarimveis, B. Smeets, G. Tsiliki, D. Vorgrimmler and E. Willighagen, The first eNanoMapper prototype: A substance database to support safe-by-design, in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2014, pp. 1-9
19. A. P. Mustad, B. Smeets, N. Jeliazkova, V. Jeliazkov and E. Willighagen, Summary of the Spring 2014 NSC Database Survey, 2014
20. C. Batini C. Cappiello C. Francalanci A. Maurino Methodologies for Data Quality Assessment and Improvement ACM Comput. Surv. 2009 41 16
21. X. Fu A. Wojak D. Neagu M. Ridley K. Travis Data governance in predictive toxicology: A review J. Cheminf. 2011 3 24
22. H.-J. Klimisch M. Andreae U. Tillmann A Systematic Approach for Evaluating the Quality of Experimental Toxicological and Ecotoxicological Data Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1997 25 1 5
23. A. Auvinen, J. Bridges, K. Dawson, W. De Jong, P. Hartemann, P. Hoet, T. Jung, M.-O. Mattsson, H. Norppa, J.-M. Pagès, A. Proykova, E. Rodríguez-Farré, K. Schulze-Osthoff, J. Schüz, M. Thomsen and T. Vermeire, Memorandum on the use of the scientific literature for human health risk assessment purposes-weighing of evidence and expression of uncertainty, SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), 2012
24. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.4: Evaluation of available information, European Chemicals Agency, 2011
25. ISO/TMBG (Technical Management Board-groups), ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008-Uncertainty of measurement-Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995), International Standards Organisation, 2008
26. R. D. Chirico M. Frenkel J. W. Magee V. Diky C. D. Muzny A. F. Kazakov K. Kroenlein I. Abdulagatov G. R. Hardin W. E. Acree J. F. Brenneke P. L. Brown P. T. Cummings T. W. de Loos D. G. Friend A. R. H. Goodwin L. D. Hansen W. M. Haynes N. Koga A. Mandelis K. N. Marsh P. M. Mathias C. McCabe J. P. O'Connell A. Pádua V. Rives C. Schick J. P. M. Trusler S. Vyazovkin R. D. Weir J. Wu Improvement of Quality in Publication of Experimental Thermophysical Property Data: Challenges, Assessment Tools, Global Implementation, and Online Support J. Chem. Eng. Data 2013 58 2699 2716
27. X. Fu A. Wojak D. Neagu M. Ridley K. Travis Data governance in predictive toxicology: A review J. Cheminf. 2011 3 24
28. C. F. Taylor D. Field S.-A. Sansone J. Aerts R. Apweiler M. Ashburner C. A. Ball P.-A. Binz M. Bogue T. Booth A. Brazma R. R. Brinkman A. Michael Clark E. W. Deutsch O. Fiehn J. Fostel P. Ghazal F. Gibson T. Gray G. Grimes J. M. Hancock N. W. Hardy H. Hermjakob R. K. Julian M. Kane C. Kettner C. Kinsinger E. Kolker M. Kuiper N. L. Novère J. Leebens-Mack S. E. Lewis P. Lord A.-M. Mallon N. Marthandan H. Masuya R. McNally A. Mehrle N. Morrison S. Orchard J. Quackenbush J. M. Reecy D. G. Robertson P. Rocca-Serra H. Rodriguez H. Rosenfelder J. Santoyo-Lopez R. H. Scheuermann D. Schober B. Smith J. Snape C. J. Stoeckert K. Tipton P. Sterk A. Untergasser J. Vandesompele S. Wiemann Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: The MIBBI project Nat. Biotechnol. 2008 26 889 896
29. D. G. Thomas F. Klaessig S. L. Harper M. Fritts M. D. Hoover S. Gaheen T. H. Stokes R. Reznik-Zellen E. T. Freund J. D. Klemm D. S. Paik N. A. Baker Informatics and standards for nanomedicine technology Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2011 3 511 532
30. R. Van Noorden, Sluggish data sharing hampers reproducibility effort (Nature News & Comment) 10.1038/nature.2015.17694 (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
31. Challenges in irreproducible research (Nature News & Comment articles collection) http://www.nature.com/news/reproducibility-1.17552 (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
32. B. N. Taylor and C. E. Kuyatt, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994
33. L. P. van Reeuwijk and V. J. G. Houba, Guidelines for Quality Management in Soil and Plant Laboratories. (FAO Soils Bulletin-74), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998
34. IUPAC. Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the 'Gold Book'). Compiled by A. D. McNaught and A. Wilkinson. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1997). XML on-line corrected version: http://goldbook.iupac.org (2006-) created by M. Nic, J. Jirat, B. Kosata; updates compiled by A. Jenkins. ISBN 0-9678550-9-8. DOI: 10.1351/goldbook
35. J. C. Madden, Chapter 5: Sources of Chemical Information, Toxicity Data and Assessment of Their Quality, in Chemical Toxicity Prediction: Category Formation and Read-Across, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013
36. K. W. Powers S. C. Brown V. B. Krishna S. C. Wasdo B. M. Moudgil S. M. Roberts Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials. Part VI. Characterization of Nanoscale Particles for Toxicological Evaluation Toxicol. Sci. 2006 90 296 303
37. R. C. Murdock L. Braydich-Stolle A. M. Schrand J. J. Schlager S. M. Hussain Characterization of Nanomaterial Dispersion in Solution Prior to In Vitro Exposure Using Dynamic Light Scattering Technique Toxicol. Sci. 2008 101 239 253
38. R. M. Crist J. H. Grossman A. K. Patri S. T. Stern M. A. Dobrovolskaia P. P. Adiseshaiah J. D. Clogston S. E. McNeil Common pitfalls in nanotechnology: lessons learned from NCI's Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Integr. Biol. 2013 5 66 73
39. K. C. Mills D. Murry K. A. Guzan M. L. Ostraat Nanomaterial registry: database that captures the minimal information about nanomaterial physico-chemical characteristics J. Nanopart. Res. 2014 16 2219
40. E. Izak-Nau M. Voetz S. Eiden A. Duschl V. F. Puntes Altered characteristics of silica nanoparticles in bovine and human serum: The importance of nanomaterial characterization prior to its toxicological evaluation Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2013 10 1
41. J. Rumble S. Freiman Describing Nanomaterials: Meeting the Needs of Diverse Data Communities Data Sci. J. 2012 11 ASMD1 ASMD6
42. T. Puzyn B. Rasulev A. Gajewicz X. Hu T. P. Dasari A. Michalkova H.-M. Hwang A. Toropov D. Leszczynska J. Leszczynski Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011 6 175 178
43. R. Liu R. Rallo S. George Z. Ji S. Nair A. E. Nel Y. Cohen Classification NanoSAR Development for Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Small 2011 7 1118 1126
44. I. Lynch C. Weiss E. Valsami-Jones A strategy for grouping of nanomaterials based on key physico-chemical descriptors as a basis for safer-by-design NMs Nano Today 2014 9 266 270
45. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals (ENV/JM/MONO(2014)4), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2nd edn, 2014
46. J. C. Dearden M. T. D. Cronin K. L. E. Kaiser How not to develop a quantitative structure-Activity or structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2009 20 241 266
47. L. Lubinski P. Urbaszek A. Gajewicz M. T. D. Cronin S. J. Enoch J. C. Madden D. Leszczynska J. Leszczynski T. Puzyn Evaluation criteria for the quality of published experimental data on nanomaterials and their usefulness for QSAR modelling SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2013 24 995 1008
48. H.-J. Klimisch M. Andreae U. Tillmann A Systematic Approach for Evaluating the Quality of Experimental Toxicological and Ecotoxicological Data Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1997 25 1 5
49. K. R. Przybylak J. C. Madden M. T. D. Cronin M. Hewitt Assessing toxicological data quality: basic principles, existing schemes and current limitations SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2012 23 435 459
50. R. M. Kaplan D. A. Chambers R. E. Glasgow Big Data and Large Sample Size: A Cautionary Note on the Potential for Bias Clin. Transl. Sci. 2014 7 342 346
51. NSI: Nanotechnology Knowledge Infrastructure (NKI) Data Readiness Levels discussion draft, Nanotechnology Signature Initiative Nanotechnology Knowledge Infrastructure (NSI NKI), 2013
52. ISO/TMBG (Technical Management Board-groups), ISO/IEC Guide 98-1:2009-Uncertainty of measurement-Part 1: Introduction to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, International Standards Organisation, 2009
53. R. D. Chirico M. Frenkel J. W. Magee V. Diky C. D. Muzny A. F. Kazakov K. Kroenlein I. Abdulagatov G. R. Hardin W. E. Acree J. F. Brenneke P. L. Brown P. T. Cummings T. W. de Loos D. G. Friend A. R. H. Goodwin L. D. Hansen W. M. Haynes N. Koga A. Mandelis K. N. Marsh P. M. Mathias C. McCabe J. P. O'Connell A. Pádua V. Rives C. Schick J. P. M. Trusler S. Vyazovkin R. D. Weir J. Wu Improvement of Quality in Publication of Experimental Thermophysical Property Data: Challenges, Assessment Tools, Global Implementation, and Online Support J. Chem. Eng. Data 2013 58 2699 2716
54. ISO Technical Committee (ISO/TC) 146/SC 4-General aspects, ISO 20988:2007-Air quality-Guidelines for estimating measurement uncertainty, International Standards Organisation, 2007
55. ISO Technical Committee (ISO/TC) 69/SC 6-Measurement methods and results, ISO/TR 22971:2005-Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Practical guidance for the use of ISO 5725-2:1994 in designing, implementing and statistically analysing interlaboratory repeatability and reproducibility results, International Standards Organisation, 2005
56. V. Ruusmann U. Maran From data point timelines to a well curated data set, data mining of experimental data and chemical structure data from scientific articles, problems and possible solutions J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2013 27 583 603
57. B. Saha and D. Srivastava, Data quality: The other face of Big Data, in 2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), 2014, pp. 1294-1297
58. XML Tutorial http://www.w3schools.com/xml/default.asp (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
59. XML Schema Tutorial http://www.w3schools.com/xml/schema-intro.asp
60. The Minimum Information for Nanomaterial Characterization (MINChar) Initiative Parameters List https://characterizationmatters.wordpress.com/parameters/ (accessed Mar 28, 2015)
61. M. D. Hoover, A. L. Miller, N. T. Lowe, A. B. Stefaniak, G. A. Day and K. D. Linch, Information Management for Nanotechnology Safety and Health, in Report of Presentations at Plenary and Workshop Sessions and Summary of Conclusions, First International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Palace Hotel, Buxton, Derbyshire, UK, 2004
62. A. L. Miller M. D. Hoover D. M. Mitchell B. P. Stapleton The Nanoparticle Information Library (NIL): A prototype for linking and sharing emerging data J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2007 4 D131 D134
63. Nanoparticle Information Library Homepage http://www.nanoparticlelibrary.net/ (accessed Dec 7, 2015)
64. A. G. Oomen P. M. J. Bos T. F. Fernandes K. Hund-Rinke D. Boraschi H. J. Byrne K. Aschberger S. Gottardo F. von der Kammer D. Kühnel D. Hristozov A. Marcomini L. Migliore J. Scott-Fordsmand P. Wick R. Landsiedel Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment-report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10 Nanotoxicology 2014 8 334 348
65. CODATA-VAMAS Working Group On the Description of nanomaterials, Uniform Description System for Materials on the Nanoscale v1.0, 2015
66. C. Aberg, NanoSafety Cluster Databases Working Group. Overview and recommendation of data quality: Working draft http://www.nanosafetycluster.eu/working-groups/4-database-wg/tasks-2/2013-2.html (accessed Mar 20, 2015)
67. J. H. E. Arts M. Hadi M.-A. Irfan A. M. Keene R. Kreiling D. Lyon M. Maier K. Michel T. Petry U. G. Sauer D. Warheit K. Wiench W. Wohlleben R. Landsiedel A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015 71 S1 S27
68. S. K. D. Nme, M. M. J. M. B. Eaj, S. Dthm and van B. Fa, Grouping nanomaterials: A strategy towards grouping and read-Across, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu RIVM, 2015
69. A. G. Oomen E. A. J. Bleeker P. M. J. Bos F. van Broekhuizen S. Gottardo M. Groenewold D. Hristozov K. Hund-Rinke M.-A. Irfan A. Marcomini W. J. G. M. Peijnenburg K. Rasmussen A. S. Jiménez J. J. Scott-Fordsmand M. van Tongeren K. Wiench W. Wohlleben R. Landsiedel Grouping and Read-Across Approaches for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015 12 13415 13434
70. C. Hirsch M. Roesslein H. F. Krug P. Wick Nanomaterial cell interactions: Are current in vitro tests reliable? Nanomedicine 2011 6 837 847
71. J. A. Kim C. Åberg A. Salvati K. A. Dawson Role of cell cycle on the cellular uptake and dilution of nanoparticles in a cell population Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012 7 62 68
72. M. J. Ware B. Godin N. Singh R. Majithia S. Shamsudeen R. E. Serda K. E. Meissner P. Rees H. D. Summers Analysis of the Influence of Cell Heterogeneity on Nanoparticle Dose Response ACS Nano 2014 8 6693 6700
73. G. Maiorano S. Sabella B. Sorce V. Brunetti M. A. Malvindi R. Cingolani P. P. Pompa Effects of Cell Culture Media on the Dynamic Formation of Protein-Nanoparticle Complexes and Influence on the Cellular Response ACS Nano 2010 4 7481 7491
74. J. A. Kim A. Salvati C. Åberg K. A. Dawson Suppression of nanoparticle cytotoxicity approaching in vivo serum concentrations: limitations of in vitro testing for nanosafety Nanoscale 2014 6 14180 14184
75. DaNa Literature Criteria Checklist http://nanopartikel.info/files/methodik/DaNa-Literature-Criteria-Checklist-PDF-document.pdf (accessed Mar 20, 2015)
76. DaNa Literature Criteria Checklist (revised) http://www.nanopartikel.info/files/methodik/DaNa-criteria-checklist-2015-form.pdf (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
77. A. Huk E. Izak-Nau B. Reidy M. Boyles A. Duschl I. Lynch M. Dušinska Is the toxic potential of nanosilver dependent on its size? Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2014 11 65
78. S. A. Morris S. Gaheen M. Lijowski M. Heiskanen J. Klemm Experiences in supporting the structured collection of cancer nanotechnology data using caNanoLab Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015 6 1580 1593
79. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Publications in the Series on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials-OECD http://www.oecd.org/science/nanosafety/publications-series-on-safety-of-manufactured-nanomaterials.htm (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
80. Guidance Manual for the Testing of Manufactured Nanomaterials: OECD Sponsorship Programme: First Revision (ENV/JM/MONO(2009)20/REV), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2010
81. Guidance on Sample Preparation and Dosimetry for the Safety Testing of Manufactured Nanomaterials (ENV/JM/MONO(2012)40), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2012
82. International Standards Organisation, ISO Standards catalogue-ISO/TC 229-Nanotechnologies http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue-tc/catalogue-tc-browse.htm?commid=381983&published=on&includesc=true (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
83. ISO Technical Committee (ISO/TC) 229-Nanotechnologies, ISO/TS 12805:2011-Nanotechnologies-Materials specifications-Guidance on specifying nano-objects, International Standards Organisation, 2011
84. ISO Technical Committee (ISO/TC) 229-Nanotechnologies, ISO/TR 13014:2012-Nanotechnologies-Guidance on physico-chemical characterization of engineered nanoscale materials for toxicologic assessment, International Standards Organisation, 2012
85. ISO Technical Committee (ISO/TC) 229-Nanotechnologies, ISO/TR 13329:2012-Nanomaterials-Preparation of material safety data sheet (MSDS), International Standards Organisation, 2012
86. M. L. Ostraat K. Mills K. Guzan D. Murry The Nanomaterial Registry: facilitating the sharing and analysis of data in the diverse nanomaterial community Int. J. Nanomed. 2013 8 7
87. NanomaterialRegistry Team, RTI International, Data Compliance in a Minimal Information about Nanomaterials (Oral Presentation) https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/download/attachments/138281847/RegistryCL-nanoWG-2013-09-19-508-compliant.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1383334268000&api=v2 (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
88. B. Fadeel A. Fornara M. S. Toprak K. Bhattacharya Keeping it real: The importance of material characterization in nanotoxicology Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015 468 498 503
89. A. E. Nel W. J. Parak W. C. W. Chan T. Xia M. C. Hersam C. J. Brinker J. I. Zink K. E. Pinkerton D. R. Baer P. S. Weiss Where Are We Heading in Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety and Materials Characterization? ACS Nano 2015 9 5627 5630
90. C. O. Hendren, Y. Tian, S. Karcher, J. VanBriessen, G. V. Lowry and M. R. Wiesner, The CEINT Informatics Knowledge Commons (Poster Presentation) http://www.nseresearch.org/2014/posters/Christine-Hendren-Yuan-Tian-Sandra-Karcher-Jeanne-VanBriessen-Gregory-Lowry-Mark-Wiesner~NSF-Grantees-2014.pdf (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
91. S. Karcher and Y. Tian, Design and Applications of the CEINT Database (Oral Presentation) https://nciphub.org/resources/501 (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
92. CEINT Data Integration Team Homepage http://ceint.vm.duke.edu/ (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
93. D. R. Hristozov S. Gottardo A. Critto A. Marcomini Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: A review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective Nanotoxicology 2012 6 880 898
94. DaNa2.0 Project Homepage http://www.nanopartikel.info/en/ (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
95. D. Kühnel C. Marquardt K. Nau H. F. Krug B. Mathes C. Steinbach Environmental impacts of nanomaterials: providing comprehensive information on exposure, transport and ecotoxicity-The project DaNa2.0 Environ. Sci. Eur. 2014 26 21
96. C. Marquardt D. Kühnel V. Richter H. F. Krug B. Mathes C. Steinbach K. Nau Latest research results on the effects of nanomaterials on humans and the environment: DaNa-Knowledge Base Nanomaterials J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2013 429 012060
97. OECD, OECD Principles on Good Laboratory Practice, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1998
98. J. M. Wörle-Knirsch K. Pulskamp H. F. Krug Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays Nano Lett. 2006 6 1261 1268
99. A. Kroll M. H. Pillukat D. Hahn J. Schnekenburger Current in vitro methods in nanoparticle risk assessment: Limitations and challenges Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009 72 370 377
100. A. Kroll M. H. Pillukat D. Hahn J. Schnekenburger Interference of engineered nanoparticles with in vitro toxicity assays Arch. Toxicol. 2012 86 1123 1136
101. R. D. Handy N. van den Brink M. Chappell M. Mühling R. Behra M. Dušinská P. Simpson J. Ahtiainen A. N. Jha J. Seiter A. Bednar A. Kennedy T. F. Fernandes M. Riediker Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far? Ecotoxicology 2012 21 933 972
102. J. Domey, L. Haslauer, I. Grau, C. Strobel, M. Kettering and I. Hilger, Probing the Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles: Experimental Pitfalls and Artifacts, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2014, pp. 1-14
103. H. F. Krug Nanosafety Research-Are We on the Right Track? Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014 53 12304 12319
104. E. J. Petersen T. B. Henry J. Zhao R. I. MacCuspie T. L. Kirschling M. A. Dobrovolskaia V. Hackley B. Xing J. C. White Identification and Avoidance of Potential Artifacts and Misinterpretations in Nanomaterial Ecotoxicity Measurements Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014 48 4226 4246
105. M. Rösslein J. T. Elliott M. Salit E. J. Petersen C. Hirsch H. F. Krug P. Wick Use of Cause-And-Effect Analysis to Design a High-Quality Nanocytotoxicology Assay Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015 28 21 30
106. R. Guadagnini B. H. Kenzaoui L. Walker G. Pojana Z. Magdolenova D. Bilanicova M. Saunders L. Juillerat-Jeanneret A. Marcomini A. Huk M. Dusinska L. M. Fjellsbø F. Marano S. Boland Toxicity screenings of nanomaterials: challenges due to interference with assay processes and components of classic in vitro tests Nanotoxicology 2015 9 13 24
107. H. L. Karlsson S. Di Bucchianico A. R. Collins M. Dusinska Can the comet assay be used reliably to detect nanoparticle-induced genotoxicity? Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2015 56 82 96
108. M. Simkó S. Tischler M.-O. Mattsson Pooling and Analysis of Published in Vitro Data: A Proof of Concept Study for the Grouping of Nanoparticles Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015 16 26211 26236
109. K. A. Guzan K. C. Mills V. Gupta D. Murry C. N. Scheier D. A. Willis M. L. Ostraat Integration of data: The Nanomaterial Registry project and data curation Comput. Sci. Discovery 2013 6 014007
110. Nanomaterial Registry https://www.nanomaterialregistry.org/ (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
111. MODERN Project Web Applications http://modern-fp7.biocenit.cat/tools.html (accessed Mar 28, 2015)
112. MODERN Project Homepage http://modern-fp7.biocenit.cat/index.html (accessed Mar 28, 2015)
113. D. G. Thomas S. Gaheen S. L. Harper M. Fritts F. Klaessig E. Hahn-Dantona D. Paik S. Pan G. A. Stafford E. T. Freund J. D. Klemm N. A. Baker ISA-TAB-Nano: A Specification for Sharing Nanomaterial Research Data in Spreadsheet-based Format BMC Biotechnol. 2013 13 2
114. ISA-TAB-Nano Wiki https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/ICR/ISA-TAB-Nano (accessed Mar 27, 2015)
115. R. L. Marchese Robinson M. T. D. Cronin A.-N. Richarz R. Rallo An ISA-TAB-Nano based data collection framework to support data-driven modelling of nanotoxicology Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015 6 1978 1999
116. A. Brazma Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME)-Successes, Failures, Challenges Sci. World J. 2009 9 420 423
117. Journals unite for reproducibility, Nature, 2014, 515, 7
118. GigaScience Instructions for Authors http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/authors/instructions/ (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
119. A. Brazma P. Hingamp J. Quackenbush G. Sherlock P. Spellman C. Stoeckert J. Aach W. Ansorge C. A. Ball H. C. Causton T. Gaasterland P. Glenisson F. C. P. Holstege I. F. Kim V. Markowitz J. C. Matese H. Parkinson A. Robinson U. Sarkans S. Schulze-Kremer J. Stewart R. Taylor J. Vilo M. Vingron Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-Toward standards for microarray data Nat. Genet. 2001 29 365 371
120. S. Martínez-Bartolomé, P.-A. Binz and J. Albar, The Minimal Information About a Proteomics Experiment (MIAPE) from the Proteomics Standards Initiative, in Plant Proteomics, ed., J. V. Jorrin-Novo, S. Komatsu, W. Weckwerth, and, S. Wienkoop, Humana Press, 2014, pp. 765-780
121. J. M. Fostel L. Burgoon C. Zwickl P. Lord J. C. Corton P. R. Bushel M. Cunningham L. Fan S. W. Edwards S. Hester J. Stevens W. Tong M. Waters C. Yang R. Tennant Toward a Checklist for Exchange and Interpretation of Data from a Toxicology Study Toxicol. Sci. 2007 99 26 34
122. S. Orchard B. Al-Lazikani S. Bryant D. Clark E. Calder I. Dix O. Engkvist M. Forster A. Gaulton M. Gilson R. Glen M. Grigorov K. Hammond-Kosack L. Harland A. Hopkins C. Larminie N. Lynch R. K. Mann P. Murray-Rust E. Lo Piparo C. Southan C. Steinbeck D. Wishart H. Hermjakob J. Overington J. Thornton Minimum information about a bioactive entity (MIABE) Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2011 10 661 669
123. BioSharing https://biosharing.org/ (accessed Nov 25, 2015)
124. C. Kettner D. Field S.-A. Sansone C. Taylor J. Aerts N. Binns A. Blake C. M. Britten A. de Marco J. Fostel P. Gaudet A. González-Beltrán N. Hardy J. Hellemans H. Hermjakob N. Juty J. Leebens-Mack E. Maguire S. Neumann S. Orchard H. Parkinson W. Piel S. Ranganathan P. Rocca-Serra A. Santarsiero D. Shotton P. Sterk A. Untergasser P. L. Whetzel Meeting Report from the Second 'Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations' (MIBBI) workshop Stand. Genomic Sci. 2010 3 259 266
125. D. Field S. Sansone E. F. DeLong P. Sterk I. Friedberg P. Gaudet S. Lewis R. Kottmann L. Hirschman G. Garrity G. Cochrane J. Wooley F. Meyer S. Hunter O. White B. Bramlett S. Gregurick H. Lapp S. Orchard P. Rocca-Serra A. Ruttenberg N. Shah C. Taylor A. Thessen Meeting Report: BioSharing at ISMB 2010 Stand. Genomic Sci. 2010 3 254 258
126. D. Field S.-A. Sansone A. Collis T. Booth P. Dukes S. K. Gregurick K. Kennedy P. Kolar E. Kolker M. Maxon S. Millard A.-M. Mugabushaka N. Perrin J. E. Remacle K. Remington P. Rocca-Serra C. F. Taylor M. Thorley B. Tiwari J. Wilbanks Omics Data Sharing Science 2009 326 234 236
127. NIST Standard Reference Data Program http://www.nist.gov/srd/ (accessed Nov 30, 2015)
128. D. A. Hobbs M. S. J. Warne S. J. Markich D. A. Hobbs Evaluation of criteria used to assess the quality of aquatic toxicity data Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2005 1 174 180
129. Determining the adequacy of existing data, guideline for the HPV challenge program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1999
130. J. L. Durda D. V. Preziosi Data Quality Evaluation of Toxicological Studies Used to Derive Ecotoxicological Benchmarks Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2000 6 747 765
131. K. Schneider M. Schwarz I. Burkholder A. Kopp-Schneider L. Edler A. Kinsner-Ovaskainen T. Hartung S. Hoffmann 'ToxRTool', a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data Toxicol. Lett. 2009 189 138 144
132. A. Beronius L. Molander C. Rudén A. Hanberg Facilitating the use of non-standard in vivo studies in health risk assessment of chemicals: A proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting J. Appl. Toxicol. 2014 34 607 617
133. M. Ågerstrand M. Breitholtz C. Rudén Comparison of four different methods for reliability evaluation of ecotoxicity data: A case study of non-standard test data used in environmental risk assessments of pharmaceutical substances Environ. Sci. Eur. 2011 23 17
134. N. Jeliazkova C. Chomenidis P. Doganis B. Fadeel R. Grafström B. Hardy J. Hastings M. Hegi V. Jeliazkov N. Kochev P. Kohonen C. R. Munteanu H. Sarimveis B. Smeets P. Sopasakis G. Tsiliki D. Vorgrimmler E. Willighagen The eNanoMapper database for nanomaterial safety information Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015 6 1609 1634
135. ToxRTool-Toxicological data Reliability Assessment Tool-EURL ECVAM https://eurl-ecvam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/about-ecvam/archive-publications/toxrtool (accessed Nov 26, 2015)
136. L. Yang D. Neagu M. T. D. Cronin M. Hewitt S. J. Enoch J. C. Madden K. Przybylak Towards a Fuzzy Expert System on Toxicological Data Quality Assessment Mol. Inf. 2013 32 65 78
137. J. P. Myers F. S. vom Saal B. T. Akingbemi K. Arizono S. Belcher T. Colborn I. Chahoud D. A. Crain F. Farabollini L. J. Guillette T. Hassold S. Ho P. A. Hunt T. Iguchi S. Jobling J. Kanno H. Laufer M. Marcus J. A. McLachlan A. Nadal J. Oehlmann N. Olea P. Palanza S. Parmigiani B. S. Rubin G. Schoenfelder C. Sonnenschein A. M. Soto C. E. Talsness J. A. Taylor L. N. Vandenberg J. G. Vandenbergh S. Vogel C. S. Watson W. V. Welshons R. T. Zoeller Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: The case of bisphenol A Environ. Health Perspect. 2009 117 309 315
138. Clinical and Biospecimen XML Validation-TCGA-National Cancer Institute-Confluence Wiki https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/TCGA/Clinical+and+Biospecimen+XML+Validation (accessed Nov 26, 2015)
139. P. Rocca-Serra M. Brandizi E. Maguire N. Sklyar C. Taylor K. Begley D. Field S. Harris W. Hide O. Hofmann S. Neumann P. Sterk W. Tong S.-A. Sansone ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level Bioinformatics 2010 26 2354 2356
140. ISA-Tools Software http://www.isa-Tools.org/software-suite/ (accessed Jul 21, 2015)
141. M. Watson Quality assessment and control of high-Throughput sequencing data Front. Genet. 2014 5 235
142. R. M. Leggett R. H. Ramirez-Gonzalez B. Clavijo D. Waite R. P. Davey Sequencing quality assessment tools to enable data-driven informatics for high throughput genomics Front. Genet. 2013 4 288
143. K. H. Paszkiewicz A. Farbos P. O'Neill K. Moore Quality control on the frontier Front. Genet. 2014 5 157
144. M. Lohse A. M. Bolger A. Nagel A. R. Fernie J. E. Lunn M. Stitt B. Usadel RobiNA: A user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 40 W622 W627
145. H. Li B. Handsaker A. Wysoker T. Fennell J. Ruan N. Homer G. Marth G. Abecasis R. Durbin 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools Bioinformatics 2009 25 2078 2079
146. (IUCr) IUCr Journals-details of checkCIF/PLATON tests for IUCr Journals http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checkcif.html (accessed Nov 26, 2015)
147. A. L. Spek Structure validation in chemical crystallography Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2009 65 148 155
148. S. R. Hall F. H. Allen I. D. Brown The crystallographic information file (CIF): A new standard archive file for crystallography Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Fundam. Crystallogr. 1991 47 655 685
149. R. Shankar H. Parkinson T. Burdett E. Hastings J. Liu M. Miller R. Srinivasa J. White A. Brazma G. Sherlock C. J. Stoeckert C. A. Ball Annotare-A tool for annotating high-Throughput biomedical investigations and resulting data Bioinformatics 2010 26 2470 2471
150. About TCGA-TCGA-National Cancer Institute-Confluence Wiki https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/TCGA/About+TCGA (accessed Nov 26, 2015)
151. S.-A. Sansone P. Rocca-Serra M. Brandizi A. Brazma D. Field J. Fostel A. G. Garrow J. Gilbert F. Goodsaid N. Hardy P. Jones A. Lister M. Miller N. Morrison T. Rayner N. Sklyar C. Taylor W. Tong G. Warner S. Wiemann The First RSBI (ISA-TAB) Workshop: 'Can a Simple Format Work for Complex Studies?' OMICS: J. Integr. Biol. 2008 12 143 149
152. P. Rocca-Serra, S.-A. Sansone, M. Brandizi, D. Hancock, S. Harris, A. Lister, M. Miller, K. O'Neill, C. Taylor and W. Tong, Specification documentation: release candidate 1, ISA-TAB 1.0 http://isatab.sourceforge.net/docs/ISA-TAB-release-candidate-1-v1.0-24nov08.pdf (accessed Jul 21, 2015)
153. S.-A. Sansone P. Rocca-Serra D. Field E. Maguire C. Taylor O. Hofmann H. Fang S. Neumann W. Tong L. Amaral-Zettler K. Begley T. Booth L. Bougueleret G. Burns B. Chapman T. Clark L.-A. Coleman J. Copeland S. Das A. de Daruvar P. de Matos I. Dix S. Edmunds C. T. Evelo M. J. Forster P. Gaudet J. Gilbert C. Goble J. L. Griffin D. Jacob J. Kleinjans L. Harland K. Haug H. Hermjakob S. J. H. Sui A. Laederach S. Liang S. Marshall A. McGrath E. Merrill D. Reilly M. Roux C. E. Shamu C. A. Shang C. Steinbeck A. Trefethen B. Williams-Jones K. Wolstencroft I. Xenarios W. Hide Toward interoperable bioscience data Nat. Genet. 2012 44 121 126
154. A. Mikolajczyk A. Gajewicz B. Rasulev N. Schaeublin E. Maurer-Gardner S. Hussain J. Leszczynski T. Puzyn Zeta Potential for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Predictive Model Developed by a Nano-Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach Chem. Mater. 2015 27 2400 2407
155. A. Gajewicz N. Schaeublin B. Rasulev S. Hussain D. Leszczynska T. Puzyn J. Leszczynski Towards understanding mechanisms governing cytotoxicity of metal oxides nanoparticles: Hints from nano-QSAR studies Nanotoxicology 2015 9 313 325
156. P. Hole K. Sillence C. Hannell C. M. Maguire M. Roesslein G. Suarez S. Capracotta Z. Magdolenova L. Horev-Azaria A. Dybowska L. Cooke A. Haase S. Contal S. Manø A. Vennemann J.-J. Sauvain K. C. Staunton S. Anguissola A. Luch M. Dusinska R. Korenstein A. C. Gutleb M. Wiemann A. Prina-Mello M. Riediker P. Wick Interlaboratory comparison of size measurements on nanoparticles using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) J. Nanopart. Res. 2013 15 1 12
157. W.-S. Cho R. Duffin F. Thielbeer M. Bradley I. L. Megson W. MacNee C. A. Poland C. L. Tran K. Donaldson Zeta Potential and Solubility to Toxic Ions as Mechanisms of Lung Inflammation Caused by Metal/Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Toxicol. Sci. 2012 126 469 477
158. I. Lynch K. A. Dawson Protein-nanoparticle interactions Nano Today 2008 3 40 47
159. S. Milani F. Baldelli Bombelli A. S. Pitek K. A. Dawson J. Rädler Reversible versus Irreversible Binding of Transferrin to Polystyrene Nanoparticles: Soft and Hard Corona ACS Nano 2012 6 2532 2541
160. M. P. Monopoli C. Åberg A. Salvati K. A. Dawson Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012 7 779 786
161. E. Casals T. Pfaller A. Duschl G. J. Oostingh V. Puntes Time Evolution of the Nanoparticle Protein Corona ACS Nano 2010 4 3623 3632
162. R. F. Domingos C. Franco J. P. Pinheiro The role of charged polymer coatings of nanoparticles on the speciation and fate of metal ions in the environment Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014 22 2900 2906
163. Y. Ma V. Chechik Aging of Gold Nanoparticles: Ligand Exchange with Disulfides Langmuir 2011 27 14432 14437
164. C. E. Nanayakkara J. Pettibone V. H. Grassian Sulfur dioxide adsorption and photooxidation on isotopically-labeled titanium dioxide nanoparticle surfaces: roles of surface hydroxyl groups and adsorbed water in the formation and stability of adsorbed sulfite and sulfate Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012 14 6957 6966
165. D. M. Mitrano S. Motellier S. Clavaguera B. Nowack Review of nanomaterial aging and transformations through the life cycle of nano-enhanced products Environ. Int. 2015 77 132 147
166. E. Izak-Nau A. Huk B. Reidy H. Uggerud M. Vadset S. Eiden M. Voetz M. Himly A. Duschl M. Dusinska I. Lynch Impact of storage conditions and storage time on silver nanoparticles' physicochemical properties and implications for their biological effects RSC Adv. 2015 5 84172 84185
167. K. Donaldson C. A. Poland Nanotoxicity: challenging the myth of nano-specific toxicity Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013 24 724 734
168. J. M. Cohen J. G. Teeguarden P. Demokritou An integrated approach for the in vitro dosimetry of engineered nanomaterials Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2014 11 20
169. E. J. Petersen S. A. Diamond A. J. Kennedy G. G. Goss K. Ho J. Lead S. K. Hanna N. B. Hartmann K. Hund-Rinke B. Mader N. Manier P. Pandard E. R. Salinas P. Sayre Adapting OECD Aquatic Toxicity Tests for Use with Manufactured Nanomaterials: Key Issues and Consensus Recommendations Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015 49 9532 9547
170. E. C. Cho Q. Zhang Y. Xia The effect of sedimentation and diffusion on cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011 6 385 391
171. C. D. Walkey J. B. Olsen F. Song R. Liu H. Guo D. W. H. Olsen Y. Cohen A. Emili W. C. W. Chan Protein Corona Fingerprinting Predicts the Cellular Interaction of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles ACS Nano 2014 8 2439 2455
172. L. M. Gilbertson J. B. Zimmerman D. L. Plata J. E. Hutchison P. T. Anastas Designing nanomaterials to maximize performance and minimize undesirable implications guided by the Principles of Green Chemistry Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015 44 5758 5777
173. Sample Processing and Separation Techniques Ontology (SEP): Definition of Batch Identifier http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SEP?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.obolibrary.org%2Fobo%2Fsep-00015 (accessed Nov 26, 2015)
174. ISA-TAB-Nano Wiki: Material File Documentation https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/ICR/Material (accessed Mar 28, 2015)
175. H. Zhang D. R. Dunphy X. Jiang H. Meng B. Sun D. Tarn M. Xue X. Wang S. Lin Z. Ji R. Li F. L. Garcia J. Yang M. L. Kirk T. Xia J. I. Zink A. Nel C. J. Brinker Processing Pathway Dependence of Amorphous Silica Nanoparticle Toxicity: Colloidal vs Pyrolytic J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012 134 15790 15804
176. S. H. Doak B. Manshian G. J. S. Jenkins N. Singh In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines Mutat. Res., Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2012 745 104 111
177. M. Fenech Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay Nat. Protocols 2007 2 1084 1104
178. V. A. Hackley and C. F. Ferraris, NIST Recommended Practice Guide: The Use of Nomenclature in Dispersion Science and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001
179. Report of the OECD Expert Meeting on the Physical Chemical Properties of Manufactured Nanomaterials and Test Guidelines, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2014
180. Dynamic light scattering-common terms defined (Version 1 Whitepaper), Malvern Instruments Ltd., 2014
181. M. Baalousha J. R. Lead Rationalizing Nanomaterial Sizes Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy, Flow Field-Flow Fractionation, and Dynamic Light Scattering: Sample Preparation, Polydispersity, and Particle Structure Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012 46 6134 6142
182. D. L. Kaiser and R. L. Watters, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Certificate of Analysis for Standard Reference Material® 1898 Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterial, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2012
183. A. Dhawan V. Sharma Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010 398 589 605
184. A. M. Horst R. Vukanti J. H. Priester P. A. Holden An Assessment of Fluorescence-And Absorbance-Based Assays to Study Metal-Oxide Nanoparticle ROS Production and Effects on Bacterial Membranes Small 2013 9 1753 1764
185. K. J. Ong T. J. MacCormack R. J. Clark J. D. Ede V. A. Ortega L. C. Felix M. K. M. Dang G. Ma H. Fenniri J. G. C. Veinot G. G. Goss Widespread Nanoparticle-Assay Interference: Implications for Nanotoxicity Testing PLoS One 2014 9 e90650
186. I. V. Vrček I. Pavičić T. Crnković D. Jurašin M. Babič D. Horák M. Lovrić L. Ferhatović M. Ćurlin S. Gajović Does surface coating of metallic nanoparticles modulate their interference with in vitro assays? RSC Adv. 2015 5 70787 70807
187. OECD, Test No. 203: Fish, Acute Toxicity Test, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing, Paris, 1992
188. Preliminary Review of OECD Test Guidelines for their Applicability to Manufactured Nanomaterials (ENV/JM/MONO(2009)21), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2009
189. D. Kühnel C. Nickel The OECD expert meeting on ecotoxicology and environmental fate-Towards the development of improved OECD guidelines for the testing of nanomaterials Sci. Total Environ. 2014 472 347 353
190. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Fate of Manufactured Nanomaterials: Test Guidelines (ENV/JM/MONO(2014)1), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2014
191. Genotoxicity of Manufactured Nanomaterials: Report of the OECD Expert Meeting, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2014
192. H. Bouwmeester I. Lynch H. J. P. Marvin K. A. Dawson M. Berges D. Braguer H. J. Byrne A. Casey G. Chambers M. J. D. Clift G. Elia T. F. Fernandes L. B. Fjellsbø P. Hatto L. Juillerat C. Klein W. G. Kreyling C. Nickel M. Riediker V. Stone Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices Nanotoxicology 2011 5 1 11
193. D. B. Warheit S. C. Brown E. M. Donner Acute and subchronic oral toxicity studies in rats with nanoscale and pigment grade titanium dioxide particles Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015 84 208 224
194. D. B. Warheit E. M. Donner How meaningful are risk determinations in the absence of a complete dataset? Making the case for publishing standardized test guideline and 'no effect' studies for evaluating the safety of nanoparticulates versus spurious 'high effect' results from single investigative studies Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2015 16 034603
195. I. L. Gunsolus C. L. Haynes Analytical Aspects of Nanotoxicology Anal. Chem. 2016 88 451 479
196. T. Gebel H. Foth G. Damm A. Freyberger P.-J. Kramer W. Lilienblum C. Röhl T. Schupp C. Weiss K.-M. Wollin J. G. Hengstler Manufactured nanomaterials: categorization and approaches to hazard assessment Arch. Toxicol. 2014 88 2191 2211
197. M. J. D. Clift P. Gehr B. Rothen-Rutishauser Nanotoxicology: A perspective and discussion of whether or not in vitro testing is a valid alternative Arch. Toxicol. 2011 85 723 731
198. A. Gallud B. Fadeel Keeping it small: Towards a molecular definition of nanotoxicology Eur. J. Nanomed. 2015 7 143 151
199. I. Lynch I. L. Feitshans M. Kendall Bio-nano interactions: new tools, insights and impacts': summary of the Royal Society discussion meeting Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 2015 370 20140162
200. O. Bondarenko K. Juganson A. Ivask K. Kasemets M. Mortimer A. Kahru Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: A critical review Arch. Toxicol. 2013 87 1181 1200
201. P. A. Holden J. P. Schimel H. A. Godwin Five reasons to use bacteria when assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards and fates Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014 27 73 78
202. F. Laborda E. Bolea J. Jiménez-Lamana Single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the analysis of inorganic engineered nanoparticles in environmental samples Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 2016 9 15 23
203. B. Nowack M. Baalousha N. Bornhöft Q. Chaudhry G. Cornelis J. Cotterill A. Gondikas M. Hassellöv J. Lead D. M. Mitrano F. von der Kammer T. Wontner-Smith Progress towards the validation of modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials by analytical measurements Environ. Sci.: Nano 2015 2 421 428
204. A. R. Badireddy M. R. Wiesner J. Liu Detection, Characterization, and Abundance of Engineered Nanoparticles in Complex Waters by Hyperspectral Imagery with Enhanced Darkfield Microscopy Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012 46 10081 10088
205. S. Lee X. Bi R. B. Reed J. F. Ranville P. Herckes P. Westerhoff Nanoparticle Size Detection Limits by Single Particle ICP-MS for 40 Elements Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014 48 10291 10300
206. H. Bouwmeester P. Brandhoff H. J. P. Marvin S. Weigel R. J. B. Peters State of the safety assessment and current use of nanomaterials in food and food production Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014 40 200 210
207. K. D. Grieger J. Harrington N. Mortensen Prioritizing research needs for analytical techniques suited for engineered nanomaterials in food Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016 50 219 229