Grouping and read-across approaches for risk assessment of nanomaterials

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 13415-13434

  Oomen, Agnes G ^a   Bleeker, Eric A J ^a   Bos, Peter M J ^a   van Broekhuizen, Fleur ^a   Gottardo, Stefania ^b   Groenewold, Monique ^a   Hristozov, Danail ^c   Hund Rinke, Kerstin ^d   Irfan, Muhammad Adeel ^e   Marcomini, Antonio ^c   Peijnenburg, Willie J G M ^a,f   Rasmussen, Kirsten ^b   Sánchez Jiménez, Araceli ^g   Scott Fordsmand, Janeck J ^h   van Tongeren, Martie ^g   Wiench, Karin ^e   Wohlleben, Wendel ^e   Landsiedel, Robert ^e  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^c CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^d FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED ECOLOGY IME   (Germany)

^e BASF SE   (Germany)

^f LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^h AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Grouping; MARINA risk assessment strategy; Nanomaterials; Read across

Indexed keywords

NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

NANOMATERIAL;

ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

EID: 84945390850     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121013415     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sellers, K.; Deleebeeck, N.M.E.; Messiean, M.; Jackson, M.; Bleeker, E.A.J.; Sijm, D.T.H.M.; van Broekhuizen, F.A. Grouping nanomaterials: A strategy towards grouping and read-across. In RIVM Report 2015-0061; National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM): Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2015.
2. Arts, J.H.; Hadi, M.; Irfan, M.A.; Keene, A.M.; Kreiling, R.; Lyon, D.; Maier, M.; Michel, K.; Petry, T.; Sauer, U.G.; et al. A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2015, 71, S1-S27.
3. Arts, J.H.; Hadi, M.; Keene, A.M.; Kreiling, R.; Lyon, D.; Maier, M.; Michel, K.; Petry, T.; Sauer, U.G.; Warheit, D.; et al. A critical appraisal of existing concepts for the grouping of nanomaterials. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2014, 70, 492-506.
4. Oomen, A.G.; Bos, P.M.; Fernandes, T.F.; Hund-Rinke, K.; Boraschi, D.; Byrne, H.J.; Aschberger, K.; Gottardo, S.; von der Kammer, F.; Kuhnel, D.; et al. Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment—Report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8, 334-348.
5. Stone, V.; Pozzi-Mucelli, S.; Tran, L.; Aschberger, K.; Sabella, S.; Vogel, U.; Poland, C.; Balharry, D.; Fernandes, T.; Gottardo, S.; et al. ITS-NANO-prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2014, 11, doi:10.1186/1743-8977-11-9.
6. Landsiedel, R.; Fabian, E.; Ma-Hock, L.; van Ravenzwaay, B.; Wohlleben, W.; Wiench, K.; Oesch, F. Toxico-/biokinetics of nanomaterials. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 1021-1060.
7. Chen, G.; Vijver, M.G.; Xiao, Y.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M. Recent advances towards the development of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships for nanomaterials: A critical review. In Modelling the Toxicity of Nano Particles, Lang, T., Miguel, B., Robert, R., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, in press.
8. Bos, P.M.J.; Gottardo, S.; Scott-Fordsmand, J.J.; van Tongeren, M.; Semenzin, E.; Fernandes, T.; Hristozov, D.; Hund-Rinke, K.; Hunt, N.; Irfan, M.-A.; et al. MARINA risk assessment strategy: Flexible strategy for efficient information collection and risk assessment of nanomaterials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, Submitted.
9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals, second edition; OECD: Paris, France, 2014; No. 194.
10. European Chemicals Agency. Grouping of Substances and Read-Across Approach Part 1: Introductory Note; ECHA: Helsinki, Finland, 2013.
11. European Chemicals Agency. Assessing Human Health and Environmental Hazards of Nanomaterials-Best Practice for Reach Registrants. In Proceedings of Second GAARN Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, 21-22 January 2013.
12. European Chemicals Agency. Appendix R7-1 recommendations for nanomaterials applicable to chapter R7a endpoint specific guidance. In Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment; ECHA: Helsinki, Finland, 2012.
13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidance Manual for the Testing of Manufactured Nanomaterials: OECD’s Sponsorship Programme, First Revision; OECD: Paris, France, 2010.
14. Regulatory Cooperation Council. Final Report. Work Element 2, Priority Setting: Development of a Joint Nanomaterials Classification Scheme. Available online: http://www.oekopol.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Work-Element-2.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2015).
15. Nel, A.; Xia, T.; Meng, H.; Wang, X.; Lin, S.; Ji, Z.; Zhang, H. Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: Use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. Accounts Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 607-621.
16. Donaldson, K.; Poland, C.A. Nanotoxicity: Challenging the myth of nano-specific toxicity. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2013, 24, 724-734.
17. Gebel, T.; Foth, H.; Damm, G.; Freyberger, A.; Kramer, P.J.; Lilienblum, W.; Rohl, C.; Schupp, T.; Weiss, C.; Wollin, K.M.; et al. Manufactured nanomaterials: Categorization and approaches to hazard assessment. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 2191-2211.
18. BAuA. Announcement Regarding Hazardous Substances. Manufactured Nanomaterials; German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Dortmund, Germany, 2013; No. 25, pp. 498-511.
19. Kuempel, E.D.; Castranova, V.; Geraci, C.L.; Schulte, P.A. Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1029-8.
20. Godwin, H.; Nameth, C.; Avery, D.; Bergeson, L.L.; Bernard, D.; Beryt, E.; Boyes, W.; Brown, S.; Clippinger, A.J.; Cohen, Y.; et al. Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3409-3417.
21. Sánchez Jiménez, A.; Rashid, S.; Ritchie, P.; van Tongeren, M. Development of an exposure scenario library for nanomaterials. In preparation.
22. EFSA. Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J. 2011, 9, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2140.
23. Wang, J.; Wang, W.X. Significance of physicochemical and uptake kinetics in controlling the toxicity of metallic nanomaterials to aquatic organisms. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 2014, 15, 573-592.
24. Utembe, W.; Potgieter, K.; Stefaniak, A.B.; Gulumian, M. Dissolution and biodurability: Important parameters needed for risk assessment of nanomaterials. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2015, 12, doi:10.1186/s12989-015-0088-2.
25. Mitrano, D.M.; Motellier, S.; Clavaguera, S.; Nowack, B. Review of nanomaterial aging and transformations through the life cycle of nano-enhanced products. Environ. Int. 2015, 77, 132-147.
26. Bruinink, A.; Wang, J.; Wick, P. Effect of particle agglomeration in nanotoxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 659-675.
27. Nyström, A.M.; Fadeel, B. Safety assessment of nanomaterials: Implications for nanomedicine. J. Control. Release 2012, 161, 403-408.
28. OECD. Preliminary Review of Oecd Test Guidelines for Their Applicability to Manufactured Nanomaterials; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2009.
29. OECD. Guidance on Sample Preparation and Dosimetry for the Safety Testing of Manufactured Nanomaterials; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2012; No. 36.
30. OECD. Recommendation of the Council on the Safety Testing and Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2013; No. 107.
31. Walser, T.; Studer, C. Sameness: The regulatory crux with nanomaterial identity and grouping schemes for hazard assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2015, 72, 569-571.
32. ECHA. Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF); European Chemicals Agency: Helsinki, Finland, 2015.
33. Gajewicz, A.; Cronin, M.T.D.; Rasulev, B.; Leszczynski, J.; Puzyn, T. Novel approach for efficient predictions properties of large pool of nanomaterials based on limited set of species: Nano-read-across. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, doi:10.1088/0957-4484/26/1/015701.