Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 61, Issue SUPPL. 7, 2005, Pages 225-236

  Kryshtafovych, Andriy ^a   Venclovas, Česlovas ^b   Fidelis, Krzysztof ^a   Moult, John ^c  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Community wide experiment; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

CASP6 SYSTEM; COMPARATIVE MODELING; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FOLD RECOGNITION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 30344475200     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20740     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. CASP6 comparative modeling assessment.
2. CASP6 FR assessment.
3. CASP6 NF assessment.
4. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Comparison of performance in successive CASP experiments. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:163-170.
5. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Assessment of progress over the CASP experiments. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:585-595.
6. CASP6 introduction paper.
7. Zemla A. LGA-a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
8. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Some measures of comparative performance in the three CASPs. Proteins 1999; Suppl 3:231-237.
9. Lackner P, Koppensteiner WA, Domingues FS, Sippl MJ. Automated large scale evaluation of protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:7-14.
10. Lackner P, Koppensteiner WA, Sippl MJ, Domingues FS. ProSup: a refined tool for protein structure alignment. Protein Eng 2000;13: 745-752.
11. Moult J, Melamud E. From fold to function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:384-389.
12. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:22-29.
13. Zhang H, Huang K, Li Z, Banerjei L, Fisher KE, Grishin NV, Eisenstein E, Herzberg O. Crystal structure of YbaK protein from Haemophilus influenzae (HI1434) at 1.8 Å resolution: functional implications. Proteins 2000;40:86-97.
14. Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Tsai J, Baker D. Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2002;11:1937-1944.
15. Liao DI, Herzberg O. Refined structures of the active Ser83→Cys and impaired Ser46→Asp histidine-containing phosphocarrier proteins. Structure 1994;2:1203-1216.
16. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3389-3402.
17. Karplus K, Hu B. Evaluation of protein multiple alignments by SAM-T99 using the BAliBASE multiple alignment test set. Bioinformatics 2001;17:713-720.
18. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998;14:846-856.
19. Kahsay RY, Wang G, Gao G, Liao L, Dunbrack R. Quasi-consensus based comparison of profile hidden Markov models for protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2287-2293.
20. Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Sali A. Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles. Protein Sci 2004;13:1071-1087.
21. Bates PA, Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ. Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. Proteins 2001; Suppl 5:39-46.
22. Wrabl JO, Grishin NV. Gaps in structurally similar proteins: towards improvement of multiple sequence alignment. Proteins 2004;54:71-87.
23. McGuffin LJ, Jones DT. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 2003;19:874-881.
24. Przybylski D, Rost B. Improving fold recognition without folds. J Mol Biol 2004;341:255-269.
25. Karplus K, Karchin R, Draper J, Casper J, Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Diekhans M, Hughey R. Combining local-structure, fold-recognition, and new fold methods for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:491-496.
26. von Grotthuss M, Pas J, Wyrwicz L, Ginalski K, Rychlewski L. Application of 3D-Jury, GRDB, and Verify3D in fold recognition. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:418-423.
27. Sippl MJ. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:355-362.
28. Venclovas C. Comparative modeling in CASP5: progress is evident, but alignment errors remain a significant hindrance. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:380-388.
29. CASP6 domain assessment.
30. Chung SY, Subbiah S. The use of side-chain packing methods in modeling bacteriophage represser and cro proteins. Protein Sci 1995;4:2300-2309.
31. Samudrala R, Moult J. Handling context-sensitivity in protein structures using graph theory: bona fide prediction. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:43-49.