The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization

Nature

Volumn 533, Issue , 2016, Pages 200-205

  Lien, Sigbjørn ^a   Koop, Ben F ^b   Sandve, Simen R ^a   Miller, Jason R ^c   Kent, Matthew P ^a   Nome, Torfinn ^a   Hvidsten, Torgeir R ^a,d   Leong, Jong S ^b   Minkley, David R ^b   Zimin, Aleksey ^e   Grammes, Fabian ^a   Grove, Harald ^a   Gjuvsland, Arne ^a   Walenz, Brian ^c   Hermansen, Russell A ^f,g,h   Von Schalburg, Kris ^b   Rondeau, Eric B ^c   Di Genova, Alex ⁱ   Samy, Jeevan K A ^a   Olav Vik, Jon ^a   Vigeland, Magnus D ^j   Caler, Lis ^c   Grimholt, Unni ^k   Jentoft, Sissel ^l   Inge Våge, Dag ^a   De Jong, Pieter ^m   Moen, Thomas ⁿ   Baranski, Matthew ^o   Palti, Yniv ^p   Smith, Douglas R ^q,r   Yorke, James A ^e   Nederbragt, Alexander J ^l   Tooming Klunderud, Ave ^l   Jakobsen, Kjetill S ^l   Jiang, Xuanting ^s   Fan, Dingding ^s   Hu, Yan ^s   Liberles, David A ^g,h   Vidal, Rodrigo ^t   Iturra, Patricia ^u   Jones, Steven J M ^v,w   Jonassen, Inge ^x   Maass, Alejandro ⁱ   Omholt, Stig W ^y   Davidson, William S ^w   more..

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^c J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^g TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h Temple University   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^j OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^k NORWEGIAN VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^l UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^m CHORI   (United States)

ⁿ Aqua Gen AS   (Norway)

^o NOFIMA   (Norway)

^p NATIONAL CENTER FOR COOL AND COLD WATER AQUACULTURE   (United States)

^q Beckman Coulter Genomics   (United States)

^r University of Santiago ^*  (United States)

^s BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^t UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE   (Chile)

^u UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^v BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^w SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^x UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^y NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; POLYPLOIDY; PROTEIN; SALMONID; TELEOST;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DIPLOIDY; DUPLICATE GENE; FISH GENETICS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALMO SALAR; TRANSPOSON; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTAGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STANDARD;

ATLANTIC OCEAN;

SALMO SALAR; SALMONIDAE; TELEOSTEI; VERTEBRATA;

TRANSPOSON;

ANIMALS; DIPLOIDY; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, DUPLICATE; GENOME; GENOMICS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTAGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SALMO SALAR; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 84969136024     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature17164     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Nelson, J. S. Fishes of the World (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).
2. Smith, J. J. et al. Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nature Genet. 45, 415-421 (2013).
3. Jaillon, O. et al. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431, 946-957 (2004).
4. Kasahara, M. et al. The medaka draft genome and insights into vertebrate genome evolution. Nature 447, 714-719 (2007).
5. Nakatani, Y., Takeda, H., Kohara, Y. & Morishita, S. Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res. 17, 1254-1265 (2007).
6. Allendorf, F. W. & Thorgaard, G. H. in Evolutionary Genetics of Fishes (ed. Turner, B. J.) 1-53 (Plenum Press, 1984).
7. Near, T. J. et al. Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13698-13703 (2012).
8. Macqueen, D. J. & Johnston, I. A. A well-constrained estimate for the timing of the salmonid whole genome duplication reveals major decoupling from species diversification. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132881 (2014).
9. Wright, J. E., Johnson, K., Hollister, A. & May, B. Meiotic models to explain classical linkage, pseudolinkage, and chromosome pairing in tetraploid derivative salmonid genomes. Isozymes Curr. Top. Biol. Med. Res. 10, 239-260 (1983).
10. Lien, S. et al. A dense SNP-based linkage map for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reveals extended chromosome homeologies and striking differences in sex-specific recombination patterns. BMC Genomics 12, 615 (2011).
11. Davidson, W. S. et al. Sequencing the genome of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Genome Biol. 11, 403 (2010).
12. Mayfield-Jones, D. et al. Watching the grin fade: Tracing the effects of polyploidy on different evolutionary time scales. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 320-331 (2013).
13. Berthelot, C. et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat. Commun. 5, 3657 (2014).
14. Glasauer, S. M. K. & Neuhauss, S. C. F. Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences. Mol. Genet. Genomics 289, 1045-1060 (2014).
15. Schnable, J. C., Pedersen, B. S., Subramaniam, S. & Freeling, M. Dose-sensitivity, conserved non-coding sequences, and duplicate gene retention through multiple tetraploidies in the grasses. Front. Plant Sci. 2, 2 (2011).
16. Hardie, D. C. & Hebert, P. D. N. The nucleotypic effects of cellular DNA content in cartilaginous and ray-finned fishes. Genome 46, 683-706 (2003).
17. McCluskey, B. M. & Postlethwait, J. H. Phylogeny of zebrafish, a "model species," within Danio, a "model genus". Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 635-652 (2015).
18. Daron, J. et al. Organization and evolution of transposable elements along the bread wheat chromosome 3B. Genome Biol. 15, 546 (2014).
19. Wendel, J. F. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 225-249 (2000).
20. Gerstein, A. C., Chun, H.-J. E., Grant, A. & Otto, S. P. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2, e145 (2006).
21. Allendorf, F. W. et al. Effects of crossovers between homeologs on inheritance and population genomics in polyploid-derived salmonid fishes. J. Hered. 106, 217-227 (2015).
22. Kodama, M., Brieuc, M. S. O., Devlin, R. H., Hard, J. J. & Naish, K. A. Comparative mapping between Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and three other salmonids suggests a role for chromosomal rearrangements in the retention of duplicated regions following a whole genome duplication event. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics 4, 1717-1730 (2014).
23. Rondeau, E. B. et al. The genome and linkage map of the Northern pike (Esox lucius): Conserved synteny revealed between the salmonid sister group and the neoteleostei. PLoS ONE 9, e102089 (2014).
24. Slotkin, R. K. & Martienssen, R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 272-285 (2007).
25. Guillén, Y. & Ruiz, A. Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution. BMC Genomics 13, 53 (2012).
26. Langham, R. J. et al. Genomic duplication, fractionation and the origin of regulatory novelty. Genetics 166, 935-945 (2004).
27. Cunningham, F. et al. Ensembl 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D662-D669 (2015).
28. Braasch, I. & Postlethwait, J. H. in Polyploidy and Genome Evolution (eds Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E.) Polyploidy in fish and the teleost genome duplication (Springer, 2012).
29. Sato, Y., Hashiguchi, Y. & Nishida, M. Temporal pattern of loss/persistence of duplicate genes involved in signal transduction and metabolic pathways after teleost-specific genome duplication. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 127 (2009).
30. Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531-1545 (1999).
31. Conant, G. C. & Wolfe, K. H. Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 938-950 (2008).
32. Hughes, T., Ekman, D., Ardawatia, H., Elofsson, A. & Liberles, D. A. Evaluating dosage compensation as a cause of duplicate gene retention in Paramecium tetraurelia. Genome Biol. 8, 213 (2007).
33. He, X. & Zhang, J. Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169, 1157-1164 (2005).
34. Rastogi, S. & Liberles, D. A. Subfunctionalization of duplicated genes as a transition state to neofunctionalization. BMC Evol. Biol. 5, 28 (2005).
35. Phillips, R. B. et al. Assignment of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) linkage groups to specific chromosomes: Conservation of large syntenic blocks corresponding to whole chromosome arms in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). BMC Genet. 10, 46 (2009).
36. Mank, J. E. & Avise, J. C. Phylogenetic conservation of chromosome numbers in Actinopterygiian fishes. Genetica 127, 321-327 (2006).
37. Zimin, A. V. et al. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29, 2669-2677 (2013).
38. Green, P., Falls, K. & Crooks, S. Documentation for CRI-MAP version 2.4. (Washington University School of Medicine, 1990).
39. Leong, J. S. et al. Salmo salar and Esox lucius full-length cDNA sequences reveal changes in evolutionary pressures on a post-tetraploidization genome. BMC Genomics 11, 279 (2010).
40. Adzhubei, A. A. et al. Annotated expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from pre-smolt Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in a searchable data resource. BMC Genomics 8, 209 (2007).
41. Koop, B. F. et al. A salmonid EST genomic study: Genes, duplications, phylogeny and microarrays. BMC Genomics 9, 545 (2008).
42. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).
43. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15-21 (2013).
44. Wu, T. D. & Nacu, S. Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads. Bioinformatics 26, 873-881 (2010).
45. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature Protocols 7, 562-578 (2012).
46. Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq: Reference generation and analysis with Trinity. Nature Protocols 8, 1494-1512 (2013).
47. Conesa, A. et al. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674-3676 (2005).
48. Gremme, G., Brendel, V., Sparks, M. E. & Kurtz, S. Engineering a software tool for gene structure prediction in higher organisms. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47, 965-978 (2005).
49. Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462-467 (2005).
50. Matveev, V. & Okada, N. Retroposons of salmonoid fishes (Actinopterygii: Salmonoidei) and their evolution. Gene 434, 16-28 (2009).
51. Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for De novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 18 (2008).
52. Smit, A. F. A. & Hubley, R. RepeatModeler Open-1.0. http://www.repeatmasker. org (2008).
53. Flutre, T., Duprat, E., Feuillet, C. & Quesneville, H. Considering transposable element diversification in De novo annotation approaches. PLoS ONE 6, e16526 (2011).
54. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).
55. Jiang, N. Repeat Library Construction-Advanced http://www.webcitation. org/6YWzgLCzw (2013).
56. Wicker, T. et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 973-982 (2007).
57. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: A hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D204-D212 (2015).
58. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792-1797 (2004).
59. Pace, J. K., Gilbert, C., Clark, M. S. & Feschotte, C. Repeated horizontal transfer of a DNA transposon in mammals and other tetrapods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17023-17028 (2008).
60. Harris, R. S. Improved Pairwise Alignment of Genomic DNA. (ProQuest, 2007).
61. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639-1645 (2009).
62. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772-780 (2013).
63. Schliep, K. P. phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592-593 (2011).
64. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics (2004).
65. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586-1591 (2007).
66. Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969-1973 (2012).
67. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/(R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2009).
68. Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximumlikelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307-321 (2010).
69. Berglund-Sonnhammer, A.-C., Steffansson, P., Betts, M. J. & Liberles, D. A. Optimal gene trees from sequences and species trees using a soft interpretation of parsimony. J. Mol. Evol. 63, 240-250 (2006).
70. Jensen, L. J. et al. STRING 8-a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D412-D416 (2009).
71. Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, 2002).
72. Smit, A. F. A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0. http://www. repeatmasker.org (2013).
73. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
74. Rastas, P., Paulin, L., Hanski, I., Lehtonen, R. & Auvinen, P. Lep-MAP: fast and accurate linkage map construction for large SNP datasets. Bioinformatics 29, 3128-3134 (2013).