How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels

Appetite

Volumn 106, Issue , 2016, Pages 78-91

  Peschel, Anne O ^a   Grebitus, Carola ^b   Steiner, Bodo ^c   Veeman, Michele ^d  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Carbon footprint; Food; Latent class analysis; Objective knowledge; Subjective knowledge; Water footprint

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CONSUMER; GERMANY; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MARKETING; MODEL; POTATO; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FOOD PACKAGING; FOOD PREFERENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CANADA; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD LABELING; FOOD PREFERENCES; GERMANY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84962567828     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.162     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aertsens, J., Mondelaers, K., Verbeke, W., Buysse, J., Van Huylenbroeck, G., The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations and consumption of organic food. British Food Journal 113 (2011), 1353–1378.
2. Aguilar, F.X., Cai, Z., Conjoint effect of environmental labeling, disclosure of forest of origin and price on consumer preferences for wood products in the US and UK. Ecological Economics 70 (2010), 308–316.
3. Alba, J.W., Hutchinson, J.W., Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1987), 411–454.
4. Aschemann-Witzel, J., Zielke, S., Can't buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2015, 10.1111/joca.12092.
5. Boxall, P., Adamowicz, W., Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 23 (2002), 421–446.
6. Brucks, M., The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1985), 1–16.
7. Carlson, J.P., Vincent, L.H., Hardesty, D.M., Bearden, W.O., Objective and subjective knowledge relationships: a quantitative analysis of consumer research findings. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (2009), 864–876.
8. Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Water footprints of nations. Vol. 2. Value of water, Vol. 16, 2004, NESCOIHE, Delft.
9. Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., The water footprint of coffee and tea consumption in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 64 (2007), 109–118.
10. Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Aldaya, M.M., Mekonnen, M.M., The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. 2011, Earthscan, London, UK.
11. Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Savenije, H.H.G., Gautam, R., The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecological Economics 60 (2006), 186–203.
12. Chapagain, A.K., Orr, S., An improved water footprint methodology linking global consumption to local water resources: a case of Spanish tomatoes. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009), 1219–1228.
13. Choice Metrics, Ngene 1.1.2. User manual and reference guide. 2014 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9406880/NgeneManual112.pdf.
14. Choi, S., Ng, A., Environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability and price effects on consumer responses. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2011), 269–282.
15. Darby, M.R., Karni, E., Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16 (1973), 67–88.
16. Destatis, Income, receipts and expenditure of households – size of household. 2015 https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/IncomeConsumptionLivingConditions/IncomeReceiptsExpenditure/Tables/IncomeExpenditure_SizeHousehold.html visited 14/07/2015.
17. Echeverría, R., Moreira, V.H., Sepúlveda, C., Wittwer, C., Willingness to pay for carbon footprint on foods. British Food Journal 116 (2014), 186–196.
18. Economist, Following the footprints, June 2nd 2011. 2011.
19. Ellen, P.S., Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. Journal of Business Research 30 (1994), 43–52.
20. Ellen, P.S., Wiener, J.L., Cobb-Walgren, C., The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 10 (1991), 102–117.
21. Financial Times, Tesco steps back on carbon footprint labeling. 2012 January 31. By Louise Lucas and Pilita Clarke. In.
22. Finkbeiner, M., Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14 (2009), 91–94.
23. Flynn, L.R., Goldsmith, R.E., A short, reliable measure of subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research 46 (1999), 57–66.
24. Galloway, J.N., Burke, M., Bradford, G.E., Naylor, R., Falcon, W., Chapagain, A.K., et al. International trade in meat: the tip of the pork chop. Ambio 36 (2007), 622–629.
25. Gleim, M.R., Smith, J.S., Andrews, D., Cronin, J.J. Jr., Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing 89 (2013), 44–61.
26. Grebitus, C., Jensen, H.H., Roosen, J., Sebranek, J.G., Fresh meat packaging: consumer acceptance of modified atmosphere packaging including carbon monoxide. Journal of Food Protection 76 (2013), 99–107.
27. Grebitus, C., Lusk, J.L., Nayga, R.M. Jr., Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food. Ecological Economics 88 (2013), 67–75.
28. Grebitus, C., Steiner, B., Veeman, M., Personal values and decision making: evidence from environmental footprint labeling in Canada. American Journal of Agricultural Economics – Proceedings 95 (2013), 397–403.
29. Grebitus, C., Steiner, B., Veeman, M., The roles of human values and generalized trust on stated preferences when food is labeled with environmental footprints: insights from Germany. Food Policy 52 (2015), 84–91.
30. Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37 (2003), 681–698.
31. Grunert, K.G., Fernández-Celemín, L., Wills, J., Storcksdieck Genannt Bonsmann, S., Nureeva, L., Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries. Journal of Public Health 18 (2010), 261–277.
32. Grunert, K.G., Hieke, S., Wills, J., Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 44 (2014), 177–189.
33. Grunert, K.G., Scholderer, J., Rogeaux, M., Determinants of consumer understanding of health claims. Appetite 56 (2011), 269–277.
34. Hartikainen, H., Roininen, T., Katajajuuri, J.-M., Pulkkinen, H., Finnish consumer perceptions of carbon footprints and carbon labelling of food products. Journal of Cleaner Production 73 (2014), 285–293.
35. Hempel, C., Hamm, U., How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?. Appetite 96 (2016), 309–318.
36. IPCC, Summary for policymakers. The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Climate change 2007, 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Kallas, Z., Realini, C.E., Gil, J.M., Health information impact on the relative importance of beef attributes including its enrichment with polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 and conjugated linoleic acid). Meat Science 97 (2014), 497–503.
38. Kempton, W., Lay perspectives on global climate change. Global Environmental Change 1 (1991), 183–208.
39. Kimura, A., Wada, Y., Kamada, A., Masuda, T., Okamoto, M., Goto, S.-i., et al. Interactive effects of carbon footprint information and its accessibility on value and subjective qualities of food products. Appetite 55 (2010), 271–278.
40. Krajnc, D., Glavič, P., How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics 55 (2005), 551–563.
41. Lee, J.K., Lee, W.-N., Country-of-origin effects on consumer product evaluation and purchase intention: the role of objective versus subjective knowledge. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 21 (2009), 137–151.
42. Loose, S.M., Remaud, H., Impact of corporate social responsibility claims on consumer food choice: a cross-cultural comparison. British Food Journal 115 (2013), 142–166.
43. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D., Adamowicz, W., Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. 2000, Cambridge University Press.
44. Mesías Díaz, F.J., Martínez-Carrasco Pleite, F., Miguel Martínez Paz, J., Gaspar García, P., Consumer knowledge, consumption, and willingness to pay for organic tomatoes. British Food Journal 114 (2012), 318–334.
45. Minx, J., Methods review to support the PAS process for the calculation of the greenhouse gas emissions embodied in good and services. Report to the UK department for environment, food and rural affairs. 2007, 2007, Stockholm Environment Institute at the University of York and Department for Biobased Products at the University of Minnesota, London.
46. Moorman, C., Diehl, K., Brinberg, D., Kidwell, B., Subjective knowledge, search locations, and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (2004), 673–680.
47. Norwood, F.B., Lusk, J.L., Social desirability bias in real, hypothetical, and inferred valuation experiments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (2011), 528–534.
48. Onozaka, Y., Hu, W., Thilmany, D.D., Can eco-labels reduce carbon emissions? Market-wide analysis of carbon labeling and locally grown fresh apples. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2015, 1–17 FirstView.
49. Park, C.W., Lessig, V.P., Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research 8 (1981), 223–231.
50. Powers, G., Retailers move to put carbon footprint labels on products. 2011 MSN Money www.everydaymoney.ca/2011/06/retailers-move-to-put-carbon-footprint-labels-on-products.html visited 12/4/2011. In.
51. Raju, P.S., Lonial, S.C., Glynn Mangold, W., Differential effects of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, and usage experience on decision making: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 4 (1995), 153–180.
52. Rao, A.R., Monroe, K.B., The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (1988), 253–264.
53. Rao, A.R., Sieben, W.A., The effect of prior knowledge on price acceptability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research 19 (1992), 256–270.
54. Rees, W.E., Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization 4 (1992), 121–130.
55. Rees, W.E., Wackernagel, M., Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable—and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16 (1996), 223–248.
56. Ridoutt, B.G., Pfister, S., A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Global Environmental Change 20 (2010), 113–120.
57. Schumacher, I., Ecolabeling, consumers’ preferences and taxation. Ecological Economics 69 (2010), 2202–2212.
58. Seghezzo, L., The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics 18 (2009), 539–556.
59. Stancich, R., Summary of global carbon labels. 2011 http://www.climatechangecorp.com/content.asp?ContentID=5828 visited 12/4/2011. In.
60. Statistics Canada, Census of population and statistics Canada catalogue no. 98-313-XCB. 2011.
61. Statistics Canada, Education in Canada: Attainment, field of study and location of study. 2015 http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-012-x/99-012-x2011001-eng.cfm#a2 Visited 25/11/2015. In.
62. Statistics Canada, Income in Canada. 2015 Available online: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-202-%20x/2010000/hl-fs-eng.htm Visited 14/07/2015 In.
63. Statistics Canada. Income in Canada. Available online: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-202-x/2010000/hl-fs-eng.htm. Visited 14/07/2015.
64. Statistisches Bundesamt, Averages ages in the Länder 2013. 2014 https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Population/CurrentPopulation/CurrentPopulation.html visited 14/07/2015. In.
65. Teisl, M.F., What we may have is a failure to communicate: labeling environmentally certified forest products. Forest Science 49 (2003), 668–680.
66. Thøgersen, J., Haugaard, P., Olesen, A., Consumer responses to ecolabels. European Journal of Marketing 44 (2010), 1787–1810.
67. Tully, S.M., Winer, R.S., The role of the beneficiary in willingness to pay for socially responsible products: a meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing 90 (2014), 255–274.
68. Upham, P., Dendler, L., Bleda, M., Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions. Journal of Cleaner Production 19 (2011), 348–355.
69. Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R.M. Jr., Verbeke, W., Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy 49 (2014), 137–150 Part 1.
70. Vermunt, J.K., Magidson, J., Technical guide for latent GOLD choice 4.0: Basic and advanced. 2005, Statistical Innovations Inc., Belmont Massachusetts.
71. Wackernagel, M., Rees, W.E., Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics 20 (1997), 3–24.
72. Wedel, M., Kamakura, W.A., Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations. 2nd ed., 2000, Kluwer Academic.
73. Wikoff, R., Rainbolt, G.N., Wakeland, W., Measuring the longitudinal effects of food carbon footprint training on consumers: knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Sustainability 5 (2012), 317–322.