Ecolabeling, consumers' preferences and taxation

Ecological Economics

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2202-2212

  Schumacher, Ingmar ^a  

^a L 2983   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Consumer choice; Ecolabeling; Taxation

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DATA SET; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ECOLABELING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX; INCOME; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; PUBLIC GOODS; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; TAX SYSTEM;

EID: 77956172176     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Amacher G.S., Koskela E., Ollikainen M. Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2004, 47(2):284-306.
2. Anderson R., Hansen E. Determining consumer preferences for ecolabeled forest products: an experimental approach. Journal of Forestry 2004, 102(4):28-32.
3. Arnot C., Boxall P., Cash S. Do ethical consumers care about price? A revealed preference analysis of fair trade coffee purchases. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 54(4):555-566.
4. Baksi S., Bose P. Credence goods, efficient labelling policies, and regulatory enforcement. Environmental & Resource Economics 2007, 37(2):411-430.
5. Bjørner T., Hansen L., Russell C. Environmental labeling and consumers' choices: an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2004, 47(3):411-434.
6. Blend J.R., van Ravenswaay E.O. Measuring consumer demand for ecolabeled apples. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1999, 81(5):1072-1077.
7. Brécard D., Hlaimi B., Lucas S., Perraudeau Y., Salladarré F. Determinants of demand for green products: an application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe. Ecological Economics 2009, 69(1):115-125.
8. Cason T., Gangadharan L. Environmental labeling and incomplete consumer information in laboratory markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2002, 43(1):113-134.
9. Darby M.R., Karni E. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. The Journal of Law and Economics 1973, 16(1):67.
10. De S., Nabar P. Economic implications of imperfect quality certification. Economics Letters 1991, 37(4):333-337.
11. Dosi C., Moretto M. Is ecolabelling a reliable environmental policy measure?. Environmental & Resource Economics 2001, 18(1):113-127.
12. Ellis R.J., Thompson F. Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest. American Political Science Review 1997, 885-897.
13. Grankvist G., Biel A. Predictors of purchase of eco-labelled food products: a panel study. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18(4):701-708.
14. Hamilton S.F., Zilberman D. Green markets, eco-certification, and equilibrium fraud. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 52(3):627-644.
15. Harbaugh W.T., Levinson A., Wilson D.M. Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2002, 84(3):541-551.
16. Hirshleifer J., Riley J.G. The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information 1992, Cambridge University Press.
17. Iyer E., Banerjee B. Anatomy of green advertising. Advances in Consumer Research 1993, 20:494-501.
18. Kotchen M.J. Green markets and private provision of public goods. Journal of Political Economy 2006, 114(4):816-834.
19. Kotchen M.J., Moore M.R. Private provision of environmental public goods: household participation in green-electricity programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2007, 53(1):1-16.
20. Lehtonen M. Criteria in environmental labelling: a comparative analysis of environmental criteria in selected labelling schemes. Environment and Trade (UNEP) 1997.
21. Mason C.F. An economic model of eco-labeling. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2006, 11(2):131-143.
22. Noblet C.L., Teisl M.F., Rubin J. Factors affecting consumer assessment of eco-labeled vehicles. Transportation Research. Part D 2006, 11(6):422-431.
23. Nyborg K., Howarth R.B., Brekke K.A. Green consumers and public policy: on socially contingent moral motivation. Resource and Energy Economics 2006, 28(4):351-366.
24. Olli E., Grendstad G., Wollebaek D. Correlates of environmental behaviors: bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior 2001, 33(2):181.
25. The Gallup Organisation European's attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production. Flash Eurobarometer 2009, 258.
26. Roe B., Sheldon I. Credence good labeling: the efficiency and distributional implications of several policy approaches. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2007, 89(4):1020-1033.
27. Scherlofsky A. EU Ecolabel Marketing for Products 2007 2007, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/.
28. Schumacher I. The dynamics of environmentalism and the environment. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(11):2842-2849.
29. Teisl M.F., Roe B., Hicks R.L. Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2002, 43(3):339-359.
30. Torgler B., Garcia-Valinas M.A. The determinants of individuals' attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecological economics 2007, 63(2-3):536-552.
31. Urban D. Was ist Umweltbewußtsein? Exploration eines mehrdimensionalen Einstellungskonstruktes. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 1986, 15(5):363-377.
32. Van Amstel M., Driessen P., Glasbergen P. Eco-labeling and information asymmetry: a comparison of five eco-labels in The Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008, 16(3):263-276.
33. Wessells C.R., Johnston R.J., Donath H. Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: the influence of species, certifier, and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1999, 81(5):1084-1089.