Social value induction and cooperation in the centipede game

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Pulford, Briony D ^a   Krockow, Eva M ^a   Colman, Andrew M ^a   Lawrence, Catherine L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTIPEDE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; THEORETICAL MODEL; GAME; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

GAME THEORY; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 84962110207     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152352     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Rosenthal RW (1981) Games of perfect information, predatory pricing and chain store paradox. J Econ Theory 25:92-100. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531 (81) 90018-1
2. Binmore K (1987) Modeling rational players: Part 1. Econ Philos 3:179-214.
3. Arnsperger C, Varoufakis Y (2003) Toward a theory of solidarity (Other-regarding acts and beliefs). Erkenntnis 59:157-188. doi: 10.1023/A:1024630228818
4. Bernhard H, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2006) Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442:912-915. doi: 10.1038/nature04981 PMID: 16929297
5. Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev 90:166-193. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.1.166
6. Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817-868. doi: 10.1162/003355399556151
7. Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am Econ Rev 83:1281-1302.
8. Aumann RJ (1995) Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality. Games and Econ Beh 8:6-19. doi: 10.1016/S0899-8256 (05) 80015-6
9. Aumann RJ (1998) On the Centipede game. Game Econ Behav 23:97-105. doi: 10.1006/game.1997. 0605
10. El-Gamal MA, McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (1993) A Bayesian sequential experimental study of learning in games. J Am Stat Assoc 88:428-435. doi: 10.2307/2290321
11. Fey M, McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (1996) An experimental study of constant-sum centipede games. International J Game Theory 25:269-287. doi: 10.1007/BF02425258
12. McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (1992) An experimental study of the Centipede game. Econometrica 60:803-836. doi: 10.2307/2951567
13. Nagel R, Tang F (1998) Experimental results on the Centipede game in normal form: An investigation on learning. J Math Psychol 42:356-384. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1225 PMID: 9710555
14. Krockow EM, Pulford BD, Colman AM (2015) Competitive Centipede games: Zero-end payoffs and payoff inequality deter reciprocal cooperation. Games 6(3):262-272. doi: 10.3390/g6030262
15. Levitt SD, List JA, Sadoff SE (2011) Checkmate: Exploring backward induction among chess players. Am Econ Rev 101:975-990. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.2.975
16. Busemeyer JR, Pleskac TJ (2009) Theoretical tools for understanding and aiding dynamic decision making. J Math Psychol 53:126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp. 2008.12.007
17. Colman AM, Körner TW, Musy O, Tazdaït T (2011) Mutual support in games: Some properties of Berge equilibria. J Math Psychol 55:166-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp. 2011.02.001
18. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Messick DM, McClintock CG (1968) Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. J Exper Soc Psychol 4:1-25.
20. McClintock CG (1972) Social motivation: A set of propositions. Behav Sci: 17, 438-454. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830170505
21. Balliet D, Parks C, Joireman J (2009) Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes Interg 12:533-547. doi: 10.1177/1368430209105040
22. Bogaert S, Boone C, Declerck C (2008) Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. Brit J Soc Psychol 47:453-480. doi: 10.1348/014466607X244970
23. Murphy RO, Ackermann KA (2014) Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 18:13-41. doi: 10.1177/1088868313501745 PMID: 24065346
24. Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM (2003) Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Ann Rev Psychol 54:351-375. doi: 10.1146/annurev. psych.54.101601.145059
25. Van Lange PAM (2000) Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 11:297-330. doi: 10.1080/14792772043000068
26. Van Lange PAM (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:337-349. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.2.337
27. Yamagishi T, Mifune N, Li Y, Shinada M, Hashimoto H, Horita Y, Miura A, et al. (2013) Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 120:260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp. 2012.06.002
28. Bem DJ, Lord CG (1979) Template matching: A proposal for probing the ecological validity of experimental settings in social psychology. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:833-846. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6. 833
29. McClintock CG, Allison ST (1989) Social value orientation and helping behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 19:353-362. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00060.x
30. Van Lange PAM, Bekkers R, Schuyt TNM, Van Vugt M (2007) From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 29:375-384. doi: 10.1080/01973530701665223
31. Au WT, Kwong JYY (2004) Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In Suleiman R, Budescu D, Fischer I, Messick D (Eds.), Contemporary Psychological Research on Social Dilemmas (pp. 71-98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Spielberger CD (1966). The effects of anxiety on complex learning and academic achievement. In Spielberger CD (Ed.), Anxiety and Behavior (pp. 361-398). New York: Academic Press.
33. Spielberger CD (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
34. Ackermann KA, Fleiß J, Murphy RO (2014). Reciprocity as an individual difference. J Confl Resolut 23:1-28. doi: 10.1177/0022002714541854
35. Beersma B, De Dreu CKW (1999) Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups. Int J Confl Manage 10:385-402. doi: 10.1108/eb022831
36. Griesinger DW, Livingston JW (1973) Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behav Sci 18:173-188. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830180305
37. Iedema J, Poppe M (1994) The effect of self-presentation on social value orientation. J Soc Psychol 134:771-782. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9923012 PMID: 7869705
38. Malhotra D (2010) The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 111:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp. 2009.11.005
39. Weingart LR, Bennett RI, Brett JM (1993) The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. J Appl Psychol 78:504-517. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.504
40. Van Lange PAM, Otten W, De Bruin E, Joireman JA (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:733-746. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733 PMID: 9325591
41. Murphy RO, Ackermann KA, Handgraaf MJJ (2011) Measuring social value orientation. Judgm Decis Mak 6:771-781. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 1804189
42. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, et al. (2005) "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behav Brain Sci 28:795-855. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000142 PMID: 16372952
43. Burnham T, McCabe K, Smith VL (2000) Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. J Econ Behav Organ 43:57-73. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681 (00) 00108-6
44. Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Mollerstrom J, Munkhammar S (2012) Social framing effects: Preferences or beliefs? Game Econ Behav 76:117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2012.05.007
45. Bardsley N, Cubitt RP, Loomes G, Moffat P, Starmer C, Sugden R (2010) Experimental economics: Rethinking the rules. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Cubitt RP, Starmer C, Sugden R (1998) On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Exper Econ 1:115-131. doi: 10.1007/BF01669298
47. Lee J (2008) The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model. J Risk Uncertainty 36:19-41. doi: 10.1007/s11166-007-9028-3
48. Starmer C, Sugden R (1991) Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. Am Econ Rev 81:971-978.
49. Bisgaard S, Kulahci M (2011) Time series analysis and forecasting by example. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
50. Chatfield C (2003) The analysis of time series: An introduction (6th ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
51. Shumway R, Stoffer D (2006) Time series analysis and its applications: With R examples (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
52. Yanovitzky I, Van Lear A (2008) Time series analysis: Traditional and contemporary approaches. In: Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communications research (pp. 89-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Cohen J (1983) The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psych Meas 7:249-253. doi: 10.1177/014662168300700301
54. Ames DR (2008) Assertiveness expectancies: How hard people push depends on the consequences they predict. J Pers Soc Psychol. 95:1541-1557. doi: 10.1037/a0013334 PMID: 19025301
55. Feinberg M, Willer R, Keltner D (2012) Flustered and faithful: Embarrassment as a signal of prosociality. J Pers Soc Psychol 102:81-97. doi: 10.1037/a0025403 PMID: 21928915
56. Hilbig BE, Zettler I, Moshagen M, Heydasch T (2013) Tracing the path from personality-via cooperativeness- to conservation. Eur J Pers 27:319-327. doi: 10.1002/per.1856
57. Niemi L, Young L (2013) Caring across boundaries versus keeping boundaries intact: links between moral values and interpersonal orientations. PLOS ONE 8:12, e81605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0081605
58. Piff PK, Kraus MW, Coˆté S, Cheng H (2010) Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 99:771-784. doi: 10.1037/a0020092 PMID: 20649364
59. White AE, Kenrick DT, Neel R, Neuberg SL (2013) From the bedroom to the budget deficit: Mate competition changes men's attitudes toward economic redistribution. J Pers Soc Psychol 105:924-940. doi: 10.1037/a0033808 PMID: 23895267
60. Droste E, Kosfeld M, Voorneveld M (2003) Best-reply matching in games. Math Soc Sci 46:291-309.
61. Pulford BD, Colman AM, Lawrence CL, Krockow EM (2016) Reasons for cooperating in repeated interactions: Social value orientations, fuzzy traces, reciprocity, and activity bias. Decision. In press. doi: 10. 1037/dec0000057