Measuring Social Value Orientation

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 771-781

  Murphy, Ryan O ^a   Ackermann, Kurt A ^a   Handgraaf, Michel J J ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Measurement methods; Narrow self interest; Social preferences; Social value orientation (SVO)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855238431     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Au, W. & Kwong, J. (2004). Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In R. Suleiman, D. Budescu, I. Fischer, & D. Messick, (Eds.), Contemporary Psychological Research on Social Dilemmas, pp. 71-98. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Balliet, D., Parks, C. & Joireman, J. (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 533-547.
3. Burkart, J. M., Fehr, E., Efferson, C. & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: Common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19762-19766.
4. Cleveland, W. S. & Devlin, S. J. (1988). Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 596-610.
5. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
6. De Dreu, C. K. W. & Boles, T. L. (1998). Share and share alike or winner take all?: The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 253-276.
7. Ganzach, Y. (2000). Judging risk and return of financial assets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 353-370.
8. Ganzach, Y., Ellis, S., Pazy, A. & Ricci-Siag, T. (2008). On the perception and operationalization of risk perception. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 317-324.
9. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F., Patton, J. & Tracer, D. (2005). Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 795-855.
10. Knight, G. P. & Dubro, A. F. (1984). Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social values an individualized regression and clustering approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 98-105.
11. Kuhlman, D. M. & Marshello, A. F. (1975a). Individual differences in the game motives of own, relative, and joint gain. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 240-251.
12. Kuhlman, D. M. & Marshello, A. F. (1975b). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
13. Liebrand, W. (1984). The effect of social motives, communication and group-size on behavior in an n-person multi-stage mixed-motive game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 239-264.
14. McClintock, C. & Van Avermaet, E. (1982). Social values and rules of fairness: A theoretical perspective. In V. Derlega & J. Grzelak, (Eds.), Cooperation and Helping Behavior, pp. 43-71. New York: Academic Press.
15. Murphy, R. O. & Ackermann, K. A. (2011). A review of measurement methods for social preferences. Working Paper, Chair of Decision Theory and Behavioral Game Theory, ETH Zürich.
16. Radzicki, J. (1976). Technique of conjoint measurement of subjective value of own and other's gains. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 7, 179-186.
17. Roch, S. G., Lane, J. A. S., Samuelson, C. D., Allison, S. T. & Dent, J. L. (2000). Cognitive load and the equality heuristic: A two-stagemodel of resource overconsumption in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 185-212.
18. Roch, S. G. Samuelson, C. D. (1997). Effects of environmental uncertainty and social value orientation in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 221-235.
19. Samuelson, C. D. (1993). A multiattribute evaluation approach to structural change in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 298-324.
20. Stevenson,M. K. (1992). The impact of temporal context and risk on the judged value of future outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 455-491.
21. Van Lange, P. A.M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. & Joireman, J. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.
22. Van Lange, P. A. M.& Visser, K. (1999). Locomotion in social dilemmas: How people adapt to cooperative, tit-for-tat, and noncooperative partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 762-773.
23. Wyer, R. S. (1969). Prediction of behavior in 2-person games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13), 222-238.
24. Zeelenberg, M., Nelissen, R. M. A., Breugelmans, S. M. & Pieters, R. (2008). On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 18-27