Reasons for cooperating in repeated interactions: Social value orientations, fuzzy traces, reciprocity, and activity bias

Decision

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 102-122

  Pulford, Briony D ^a   Colman, Andrew M ^a   Lawrence, Catherine L ^a,b   Krockow, Eva M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centipede game; Fuzzy trace theory; Reciprocity; Social value orientation; Team reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031812056     PISSN: 23259965     EISSN: 23259973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/dec0000057     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Au, W. T., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2004). Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In R. Suleiman, D. V. Budescu, I. Fischer, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 71-98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
2. Aumann, R. J. (1995). Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality. Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 6-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80015-6
3. Aumann, R. J. (1998). On the Centipede game. Games and Economic Behavior, 23, 97-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.1997.0605
4. Bacharach, M. (1999). Interactive team reasoning: A contribution to the theory of co-operation. Research in Economics, 53, 117-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/reec.1999.0188
5. Bacharach, M. (2006). Beyond individual choice: Teams and frames in game theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
6. Balliet, D., Parks, C., & Joireman, J. (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 533-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430209105040
7. Bardsley, N., Mehta, J., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2010). Explaining focal points: Cognitive hierarchy theory versus team reasoning. The Economic Journal, 120, 40-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02304.x
8. Bem, D. J., & Lord, C. G. (1979). Template matching: A proposal for probing the ecological validity of experimental settings in social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 833-846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.833
9. Bence, J. R. (1995). Analysis of short time series: Correcting for autocorrelation. Ecology, 76, 628-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941218
10. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B. (Methodological), 57, 289-300
11. Bisgaard, S., & Kulahci, M. (2011). Time series analysis and forecasting by example. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118056943
12. Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerck, C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466607X244970
13. Bornstein, G., Kugler, T., & Ziegelmeyer, A. (2004). Individual and group decisions in the Centipede game: Are groups more "rational" players? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 599-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.003
14. Busemeyer, J. R. (2015). Cognitive science contributions to decision science. Cognition, 135, 43-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.010
15. Busemeyer, J. R., & Pleskac, T. J. (2009). Theoretical tools for understanding and aiding dynamic decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 126-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.12.007
16. Butler, D. J. (2012). A choice for "me" or for "us"? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games. Theory and Decision, 73, 53-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9270-7
17. Carroll, L. (1871). Through the looking-glass. London, UK: Macmillan
18. Chater, N. (2015). Can cognitive science create a cognitive economics? Cognition, 135, 52-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.015
19. th ed.). New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC
20. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662168300700301
21. Colman, A. M., Körner, T. W., Musy, O., & Tazdaït, T. (2011). Mutual support in games: Some properties of Berge equilibria. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 166-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2011.02.001
22. Colman, A. M., Pulford, B. D., & Lawrence, C. L. (2014). Explaining strategic coordination: Cognitive hierarchy theory, strong Stackelberg reasoning, and team reasoning. Decision, 1, 35-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dec0000001
23. Colman, A. M., Pulford, B. D., & Rose, J. (2008). Collective rationality in interactive decisions: Evidence for team reasoning. Acta Psychologica, 128, 387-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.003
24. Cooper, R., & Madden, G. (2010). Estimating components of ICT expenditure: A model-based approach with applicability to short time-series. Applied Economics, 42, 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840701564442
25. Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1998). On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics, 1, 115-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026435508449
26. El-Gamal, M. A., McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1993). A Bayesian sequential experimental study of learning in games. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 428-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476292
27. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
28. Fey, M., McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1996). An experimental study of constant-sum Centipede games. International Journal of Game Theory, 25, 269-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02425258
29. Gleicher, F., Kost, K. A., Baker, S. M., Strathman, A. J., Richman, S. A., & Sherman, S. J. (1990). The role of counterfactual thinking in judgments of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 284-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167290162009
30. Imhof, L. A., & Nowak, M. A. (2010). Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 277, 463-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1171
31. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Shafir, E. (1993). The interaction between reasoning and decision making: An introduction. Cognition, 49, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90033-R
32. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
33. Kawagoe, T., & Takizawa, H. (2012). Level-k analysis of experimental Centipede games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82, 548-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.010
34. Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167287134009
35. Lee, J. (2008). The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 19-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-007-9028-3
36. McClintock, C. G. (1972). Social motivation: A set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17, 438-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830170505
37. McClintock, C. G., & Allison, S. T. (1989). Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 353-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00060.x
38. McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1992). An experimental study of the Centipede game. Econometrica, 60, 803-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2951567
39. McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1998). Quantal response equilibria for extensive form games. Experimental Economics, 1, 9-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009905800005
40. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68) 90046-2
41. Milgrom, P. (1981). An axiomatic characterization of common knowledge. Econometrica, 49, 219-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1911137
42. Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A. (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 13-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501745
43. Nagel, R., & Tang, F. F. (1998). Experimental results on the Centipede game in normal form: An investigation on learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 356-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1998.1225
44. Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA of the United States of America, 36, 48-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
45. Nash, J. F. (1951). Non-cooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1969529
46. Norušis, M. J. (2005). SPSS Trends 14.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS
47. Norušis, M. J. (2011). IBM SPSS Forecasting 20. Armonk, NY: IBM
48. Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560-1563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755
49. Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0043424
50. Parco, J. E., Rapoport, A., & Stein, W. E. (2002). Effects of financial incentives on the breakdown of mutual trust. Psychological Science, 13, 292-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00454
51. Rapoport, A. (2003). Games: Centipede. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 196-203). London, UK: Nature Publishing Group
52. Rapoport, A., Stein, W. E., Parco, J. E., & Nicholas, T. E. (2003). Equilibrium play and adaptive learning in a three-person Centipede game. Games and Economic Behavior, 43, 239-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00009-5
53. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1991). Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extrac tion, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 249-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960040403
54. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4
55. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
56. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2011). Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model. Developmental Review, 31, 180-206
57. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960030404
58. Rosenthal, R. W. (1981). Games of perfect information, predatory pricing and chain-store paradox. Journal of Economic Theory, 25, 92-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(81)90018-1
59. Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059
60. Selten, R. (1978). The chain store paradox. Theory and Decision, 9, 127-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00131770
61. Shumway, R., & Stoffer, D. (2006). Time series analysis and its applications: With R examples (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer
62. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0042769
63. Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
64. Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1991). Does the randomlottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. The American Economic Review, 81, 971-978
65. Sugden, R. (1993). Thinking as a team: Towards an explanation of nonselfish behavior. Social Philosophy & Policy, 10, 69-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004027
66. Sugden, R. (2005). The logic of team reasoning. In N. Gold (Ed.), Teamwork: Multi-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 181-199). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
67. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/406755
68. Trivers, R. (2005). Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later. In C. P. van Schaik & P. M. Kappeler (Eds.), Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution (pp. 67-83). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag
69. van den Bos, K., Van Lange, P. A. M., Lind, E. A., Venhoeven, L. A., Beudeker, D. A., Cramwinckel, F. M., van der Laan, J. (2011). On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: Because of the prosocial nature of people, behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 791-811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023556
70. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337
71. Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 297-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000068
72. Van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers, R., Schuyt, T. N. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 375-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973530701665223
73. Van Lange, P. A. M., De Bruin, E. M. N., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733
74. nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
75. Wang, X., Wu, M., Li, Z., & Chan, C. (2008). Short time-series microarray analysis: Methods and challenges. BMC Systems Biology, 2, 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-2-58
76. Wilson, T. D., Reinhard, D. A., Westgate, E. C., Gilbert, D. T., Ellerbeck, N., Hahn, C., Shaked, A. (2014). Social psychology. Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind. Science, 345, 75-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1250830
77. Yaffee, R. A., & McGee, M. (2000). Introduction to time series analysis and forecasting with applications: With applications of SAS and SPSS. New York, NY: Academic Press
78. Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y., Shinada, M., Hashimoto, H., Horita, Y., Simunovic, D. (2013). Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of prosociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 260-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.002
79. Yanovitzky, I., & VanLear, A. (2008). Time series analysis: Traditional and contemporary ap-proaches. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communications research (pp. 89-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452272054.n4
80. Zauner, K. G. (1999). A payoffuncertainty explanation of results in experimental Centipede games. Games and Economic Behavior, 26, 157-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.1998.0649