Tissue-specific designs of stem cell hierarchies

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 349-355

  Visvader, Jane E ^a,b   Clevers, Hans ^c,d  

^a WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT STEM CELL; BREAST EPITHELIUM; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL RENEWAL; FACULTATIVE STEM CELL; HUMAN; INTESTINE; INTESTINE CRYPT; INTESTINE VILLUS; MAMMARY GLAND; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TISSUE INJURY; TISSUE REPAIR; TISSUES; UNIPOTENT STEM CELL; ADULT; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; METABOLISM; STEM CELL; STEM CELL NICHE;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; BIOMARKERS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINES; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; STEM CELL NICHE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84961392561     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3332     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Chao, M. P., Seita, J., & Weissman, I. L. Establishment of a normal hematopoietic and leukemia stem cell hierarchy. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 73, 439-449 (2008
2. Eaves, C. J. Hematopoietic stem cells: concepts, defi-nitions, and the new reality. Blood 125, 2605-2613 (2015
3. Choi, N., Zhang, B., Zhang, L., Ittmann, M., & Xin, L. Adult murine prostate basal and luminal cells are self-sustained lineages that can both serve as targets for pros-tate cancer initiation. Cancer Cell 21, 253-265 (2012
4. Van Keymeulen, A., et al. Distinct stem cells contrib-ute to mammary gland development and maintenance. Nature 479, 189-193 (2011
5. Wang, Z. A., et al. Lineage analysis of basal epithelial cells reveals their unexpected plasticity and supports a cell-of-origin model for prostate cancer heterogeneity. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 274-283 (2013
6. Barbera, M., et al. The human squamous oesophagus has widespread capacity for clonal expansion from cells at diverse stages of differentiation. Gut 64, 11-19 (2015
7. DeWard, A. D., Cramer, J., & Lagasse, E. Cellular het-erogeneity in the mouse esophagus implicates the pres-ence of a nonquiescent epithelial stem cell population. Cell Rep. 9, 701-711 (2014
8. Hsu, Y. C., Li, L., & Fuchs, E. Emerging interactions between skin stem cells and their niches. Nat. Med. 20, 847-856 (2014
9. Tetteh, P. W., Farin, H. F., & Clevers, H. Plasticity within stem cell hierarchies in mammalian epithelia. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 100-108 (2015
10. Cheng, H., & Leblond, C. P. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine: unitarian theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am. J. Anat. 141, 537-561 (1974
11. Bjerknes, M., & Cheng, H. The stem-cell zone of the small intestinal epithelium. I. Evidence from Paneth cells in the adult mouse. Am. J. Anat. 160, 51-63 (1981
12. Barker, N., et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449, 1003-1007 (2007
13. Griffiths, D. F., Davies, S. J., Williams, D., Williams, G. T., & Williams, E. D. Demonstration of somatic muta-tion and colonic crypt clonality by X-linked enzyme his-tochemistry. Nature 333, 461-463 (1988
14. Winton, D. J., & Ponder, B. A. Stem-cell organization in mouse small intestine. Proc. Biol. Sci. 241, 13-18 (1990
15. Lopez-Garcia, C., Klein, A. M., Simons, B. D., & Winton, D. J. Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 330, 822-825 (2010
16. Ritsma, L., et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis revealed at single-stem-cell level by in vivo live imaging. Nature 507, 362-365 (2014
17. Sato, T., et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262-265 (2009
18. Snippert, H. J., et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetri-cally dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134-144 (2010
19. Marshman, E., Booth, C., & Potten, C. S. The intestinal epithelial stem cell. Bioessays 24, 91-98 (2002
20. Montgomery, R. K., et al. Mouse telomerase reverse transcriptase (mTert) expression marks slowly cycling intestinal stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 179-184 (2011
21. Powell, A. E., et al. The pan-ErbB negative regulator Lrig1 is an intestinal stem cell marker that functions as a tumor suppressor. Cell 149, 146-158 (2012
22. Sangiorgi, E., & Capecchi, M. R. Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells. Nat. Genet. 40, 915-920 (2008
23. Takeda, N., et al. Interconversion between intestinal stem cell populations in distinct niches. Science 334, 1420-1424 (2011
24. Tian, H., et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature 478, 255-259 (2011
25. Yan, K. S., et al. The intestinal stem cell markers Bmi1 and Lgr5 identify two functionally distinct populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 466-471 (2012
26. Grun, D., et al. Single-cell messenger RNA sequencing reveals rare intestinal cell types. Nature 525, 251-255 (2015
27. Munoz, J., et al. The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent +4 cell mark-ers. EMBO J. 31, 3079-3091 (2012
28. Roche, K. C., et al. SOX9 maintains reserve stem cells and preserves radioresistance in mouse small intestine. Gastroenterology 149, 1553-1563 (2015
29. Wong, V. W., et al. Lrig1 controls intestinal stem-cell homeostasis by negative regulation of ErbB signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 401-408 (2012
30. Metcalfe, C., Kljavin, N. M., Ybarra, R., & de Sauvage, F. J. Lgr5+ stem cells are indispensable for radiation-induced intestinal regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 14, 149-159 (2014
31. Pellegrinet, L., et al. Dll1- and Dll4-mediated notch signalling are required for homeostasis of intesti-nal stem cells. Gastroenterology 140, 1230-1240 (2011
32. Stamataki, D., et al. Delta1 expression, cell cycle exit, and commitment to a specific secretory fate coincide within a few hours in the mouse intestinal stem cell system. PLoS One 6, e24484 (2011
33. van Es, J. H., et al. Dll1+ secretory progenitor cells revert to stem cells upon crypt damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1099-1104 (2012
34. Basak, O., et al. Mapping early fate determination in Lgr5+ crypt stem cells using a novel Ki67-RFP allele. EMBO J. 33, 2057-2068 (2014
35. Wang, F., et al. Isolation and characterization of intes-tinal stem cells based on surface marker combinations and colony-formation assay. Gastroenterology 145, 383-395 (2013
36. Buczacki, S. J., et al. Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5. Nature 495, 65-69 (2013
37. Roth, S., et al. Paneth cells in intestinal homeostasis and tissue injury. PLoS One 7, e38965 (2012
38. Daniel, C. W., De Ome, K. B., Young, J. T., Blair, P. B., & Faulkin, L. J., Jr. The in vivo life span of normal and preneoplastic mouse mammary glands: a serial trans-plantation study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 61, 53-60 (1968
39. Hoshino, K. Morphogenesis and growth potentiality of mammary glands in mice: transplantability and growth potentiality of mammary tissue of virgin mice. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 29, 835-851 (1962
40. Smith, G. H., & Medina, D. A morphologically distinct candidate for an epithelial stem cell in mouse mam-mary gland. J. Cell Sci. 90, 173-183 (1988
41. Shackleton, M., et al. Generation of a functional mam-mary gland from a single stem cell. Nature 439, 84-88 (2006
42. Stingl, J., et al. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature 439, 993-997 (2006
43. Dos Santos, C. O., et al. Molecular hierarchy of mam-mary differentiation yields refined markers of mammary stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7123-7130 (2013
44. Boras-Granic, K., Dann, P., & Wysolmerski, J. J. Embryonic cells contribute directly to the quiescent stem cell population in the adult mouse mammary gland. Breast Cancer Res. 16, 487 (2014
45. Cicalese, A., et al. The tumor suppressor p53 regulates polarity of self-renewing divisions in mammary stem cells. Cell 138, 1083-1095 (2009
46. Asselin-Labat, M. L., et al. Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling. Nature 465, 798-802 (2010
47. Stingl, J., Eaves, C. J., Zandieh, I., & Emerman, J. T. Characterization of bipotent mammary epithelial pro-genitor cells in normal adult human breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 67, 93-109 (2001
48. Visvader, J. E., & Stingl, J. Mammary stem cells and the differentiation hierarchy: current status and perspec-tives. Genes Dev. 28, 1143-1158 (2014
49. van Amerongen, R., Bowman, A. N., & Nusse, R. Developmental stage and time dictate the fate of Wnt/?- catenin-responsive stem cells in the mammary gland. Cell Stem Cell 11, 387-400 (2012
50. Rios, A. C., Fu, N. Y., Lindeman, G. J., & Visvader, J. E. In situ identification of bipotent stem cells in the mam-mary gland. Nature 506, 322-327 (2014
51. Tao, L., van Bragt, M. P., Laudadio, E., & Li, Z. Lineage tracing of mammary epithelial cells using cell-type-specific cre-expressing adenoviruses. Stem Cell Rep. 2, 770-779 (2014
52. Prater, M. D., et al. Mammary stem cells have myoepithe-lial cell properties. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 942-950 (2014
53. Wang, D., et al. Identification of multipotent mammary stem cells by protein C receptor expression. Nature 517, 81-84 (2015
54. Nguyen, L. V., et al. Clonal analysis via barcoding reveals diverse growth and differentiation of transplanted mouse and human mammary stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 14, 253-263 (2014
55. Lafkas, D., et al. Notch3 marks clonogenic mammary luminal progenitor cells in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 203, 47-56 (2013
56. Rodilla, V., et al. Luminal progenitors restrict their lin-eage potential during mammary gland development. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002069 (2015
57. De Visser, K. E., et al. Developmental stage-specific con-tribution of LGR5+ cells to basal and luminal epithelial lineages in the postnatal mammary gland. J. Pathol. 228, 300-309 (2012
58. Collins, C. A., et al. Stem cell function, self-renewal, and behavioral heterogeneity of cells from the adult muscle satellite cell niche. Cell 122, 289-301 (2005
59. Rocheteau, P., Gayraud-Morel, B., Siegl-Cachedenier, I., Blasco, M. A., & Tajbakhsh, S. A subpopulation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells retains all template DNA strands after cell division. Cell 148, 112-125 (2012
60. Sacco, A., Doyonnas, R., Kraft, P., Vitorovic, S., & Blau, H. M. Self-renewal and expansion of single trans-planted muscle stem cells. Nature 456, 502-506 (2008
61. Brack, A. S., & Rando, T. A. Tissue-specific stem cells: lessons from the skeletal muscle satellite cell. Cell Stem Cell 10, 504-514 (2012
62. Dumont, N. A., Bentzinger, C. F., Sincennes, M. C., & Rudnicki, M. A. Satellite cells and skeletal mus-cle regeneration. Compr. Physiol. 5, 1027-1059 (2015
63. Sanchez-Gurmaches, J., et al. PTEN loss in the Myf5 lineage redistributes body fat and reveals subsets of white adipocytes that arise from Myf5 precursors. Cell Metab. 16, 348-362 (2012
64. Schulz, T. J., et al. Brown-fat paucity due to impaired BMP signalling induces compensatory browning of white fat. Nature 495, 379-383 (2013
65. Seale, P., et al. PRDM16 controls a brown fat/skeletal muscle switch. Nature 454, 961-967 (2008
66. White, R. B., Bierinx, A. S., Gnocchi, V. F., & Zammit, P. S. Dynamics of muscle fibre growth during postnatal mouse development. BMC Dev. Biol. 10, 21 (2010
67. Lepper, C., Conway, S. J., & Fan, C. M. Adult satellite cells and embryonic muscle progenitors have dis-tinct genetic requirements. Nature 460, 627-631 (2009
68. Murphy, M. M., Lawson, J. A., Mathew, S. J., Hucheson, D. A., & Kardon, G. Satellite cells, con-nective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3625-3637 (2011
69. Sambasivan, R., et al. Pax7-expressing satellite cells are indispensable for adult skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3647-3656 (2011
70. McCarthy, J. J., et al. Effective fiber hypertrophy in satel-lite cell-depleted skeletal muscle. Development 138, 3657-3666 (2011
71. Lepper, C., Partridge, T. A., & Fan, C. M. An abso-lute requirement for Pax7-positive satellite cells in acute injury-induced skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3639-3646 (2011
72. Kuang, S., Kuroda, K., Le Grand, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129, 999-1010 (2007
73. Rodgers, J. T., et al. mTORC1 controls the adaptive tran-sition of quiescent stem cells from G0 to GAlert. Nature 510, 393-396 (2014
74. Bischoff, R. Proliferation of muscle satellite cells on intact myofibers in culture. Dev. Biol. 115, 129-139 (1986
75. Zammit, P. S., et al. Muscle satellite cells adopt diver-gent fates: a mechanism for self-renewal?. J. Cell Biol. 166, 347-357 (2004
76. Brohl, D., et al. Colonization of the satellite cell niche by skeletal muscle progenitor cells depends on Notch signals. Dev. Cell 23, 469-481 (2012
77. Cheung, T. H., & Rando, T. A. Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 329-340 (2013
78. Orford, K. W., & Scadden, D. T. Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 115-128 (2008
79. Walter, D., et al. Exit from dormancy provokes DNA-damage-induced attrition in haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 520, 549-552 (2015