In situ identification of bipotent stem cells in the mammary gland

Nature

Volumn 506, Issue 7488, 2014, Pages 322-327

  Rios, Anne C ^a,b   Fu, Nai Yang ^a,b   Lindeman, Geoffrey J ^a,b,c   Visvader, Jane E ^a,b  

^a WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; CELL LINEAGE; CELL TRACKING; CLONE CELLS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATIN-14; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MICE; MORPHOGENESIS; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PUBERTY; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; SEXUAL MATURATION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84894267586     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12948     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hennighausen, L. & Robinson, G. W. Information networksinthemammary gland. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 715-725 (2005).
2. Hoshino, K. & Gardner, W. U. Transplantability and life span of mammary gland during serial transplantation in mice. Nature 213, 193-194 (1967).
3. Daniel, C. W., De Ome, K. B., Young, J. T., Blair, P. B. & Faulkin, L. J. Jr. The in vivo life span of normal and preneoplastic mouse mammary glands: a serial transplantation study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 61, 53-60 (1968).
4. Smith, G. H. & Medina, D. A morphologically distinct candidate for an epithelial stem cell in mouse mammary gland. J. Cell Sci. 90, 173-183 (1988).
5. Asselin-Labat, M. L. et al. Gata-3 is an essential regulator of mammary-gland morphogenesis andluminal-celldifferentiation. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 201-209 (2007).
6. Eirew, P. et al. A method for quantifying normal human mammary epithelial stem cells with in vivo regenerative ability. Nature Med. 14, 1384-1389 (2008).
7. Lim, E. et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nature Med. 15, 907-913 (2009).
8. Shackleton, M. et al. Generationofafunctionalmammarygland fromasingle stem cell. Nature 439, 84-88 (2006).
9. Shehata, M. et al. Phenotypic and functional characterization of the luminal cell hierarchy of the mammary gland. Breast Cancer Res. 14, R134 (2012).
10. Sleeman, K. E., Kendrick, H., Ashworth, A., Isacke, C. M. & Smalley, M. J. CD24 staining ofmouse mammary gland cells defines luminal epithelial, myoepithelial/basal and non-epithelial cells. Breast Cancer Res. 8, R7 (2006).
11. Sleeman, K. E. et al. Dissociation of estrogen receptor expression and in vivo stem cell activity in the mammary gland. J. Cell Biol. 176, 19-26 (2007).
12. Stingl, J. et al. Purification andunique propertiesofmammary epithelial stem cells. Nature 439, 993-997 (2006).
13. Villadsen, R. et al. Evidence for a stem cell hierarchy in the adult human breast. J. Cell Biol. 177, 87-101 (2007).
14. Asselin-Labat, M. L. et al. Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling. Nature 465, 798-802 (2010).
15. Cicalese, A. et al. The tumor suppressor p53 regulates polarity of self-renewing divisions in mammary stem cells. Cell 138, 1083-1095 (2009).
16. dos Santos, C. O. et al. Molecular hierarchy of mammary differentiation yields refined markers of mammary stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7123-7130 (2013).
17. Smith, G. H. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 132, 681-687 (2005).
18. Joshi, P. A. et al. Progesteroneinducesadultmammarystemcellexpansion. Nature 465, 803-807 (2010).
19. Kretzschmar, K. & Watt, F. M. Lineage tracing. Cell 148, 33-45 (2012).
20. Van Keymeulen, A. et al. Distinct stem cells contribute to mammary gland development and maintenance. Nature 479, 189-193 (2011).
21. van Amerongen, R., Bowman, A. N. & Nusse, R. Developmental stage and time dictate the fate of Wnt/b-catenin-responsive stem cells in the mammary gland. Cell Stem Cell 11, 387-400 (2012).
22. Lim, E. et al. Transcriptome analyses of mouse and human mammary cell subpopulations reveal multiple conserved genesandpathways. Breast Cancer Res. 12, R21 (2010).
23. Oakes, S. R. et al. The Ets transcription factor Elf5 specifies mammary alveolar cell fate. Genes Dev. 22, 581-586 (2008).
24. Grachtchouk, M. et al. Basal cell carcinomas in mice arise from hair follicle stem cells and multiple epithelial progenitor populations. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 1768-1781 (2011).
25. Rinkevich, Y., Lindau, P., Ueno, H., Longaker, M. T. & Weissman, I. L. Germ-layer and lineage-restricted stem/progenitors regenerate the mouse digit tip. Nature 476, 409-413 (2011).
26. Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134-144 (2010).
27. Mascré, G. et al. Distinct contribution of stem and progenitor cells to epidermal maintenance. Nature 489, 257-262 (2012).
28. Rock, J. R. et al. Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12771-12775 (2009).
29. Moumen, M. et al. The proto-oncogene Myc is essential for mammary stem cell function. Stem Cells 30, 1246-1254 (2012).
30. Li, M. et al. Skinabnormalities generatedbytemporallycontrolled RXRa mutations in mouse epidermis. Nature 407, 633-636 (2000).
31. Barker, N. et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449, 1003-1007 (2007).
32. 1 cells to basal and luminal epithelial lineages in the postnatal mammary gland. J. Pathol. 228, 300-309 (2012).
33. Plaks, V. et al. Lgr5-expressing cells are sufficient and necessary for postnatal mammary gland organogenesis. Cell Rep 3, 70-78 (2013).
34. Srinivas, S. et al. Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev. Biol. 1, 4 (2001).
35. Das, A. T. et al. Viral evolution as a tool to improve the tetracycline-regulated gene expression system. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18776-18782 (2004).
36. Raḿirez, A., Bravo, A., Jorcano, J. L. & Vidal, M. Sequences 59 of the bovine keratin 5 gene direct tissue-and cell-type-specific expression of a lacZ gene in the adult and during development. Differentiation 58, 53-64 (1994).
37. Liu, P., Jenkins, N. A. & Copeland, N. G. A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res. 13, 476-484 (2003).