Regulation of stem cell fate by nanomaterial substrates

Nanomedicine

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 829-847

  Mashinchian, Omid ^a   Turner, Lesley Anne ^b   Dalby, Matthew J ^b   Laurent, Sophie ^c,d   Shokrgozar, Mohammad Ali ^e   Bonakdar, Shahin ^e   Imani, Mohammad ^f   Mahmoudi, Morteza ^g,h  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

^d Center for Microscopy and Molecular Imaging (CMMI)   (Belgium)

^e PASTEUR INSTITUTE OF IRAN   (Iran)

^f IRAN POLYMER AND PETROCHEMICAL INSTITUTE   (Iran)

^g TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^h STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

biomimicking; differentiation; nanotechnology; niche; stem cells; substrates

Indexed keywords

NANOMATERIAL; BIOMATERIAL;

CELL ADHESION; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL FATE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MANIPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; ELECTROSPINNING; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FOCAL ADHESION; HUMAN; MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGION; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MICROENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELL; STEM CELL FATE; STEM CELL NICHE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE GROWTH; TISSUE REPAIR; TOPOGRAPHY; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ENGINEERING; CYTOLOGY; NANOMEDICINE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL PROLIFERATION; HUMANS; NANOMEDICINE; NANOSTRUCTURES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELL NICHE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84961288599     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.225     Document Type: Review

References (205)

1. Shi J, Votruba AR, Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Nanotechnology in drug delivery and tissue engineering: from discovery to applications. Nano Lett. 10(9), 3223-3230 (2010).
2. Petros RA, Desimone JM. Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9(8), 615-627 (2010).
3. Serpooshan V, Zhao M, Metzler SA et al. The effect of bioengineered acellular collagen patch on cardiac remodeling and ventricular function post myocardial infarction. Biomaterials 34(36), 9048-9055 (2013).
4. Badylak SF. Decellularized allogeneic and xenogeneic tissue as a bioscaffold for regenerative medicine: factors that influence the host response. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42 (7), 1517-1527 (2014).
5. Jungebluth P, Alici E, Baiguera S et al. Tracheobronchial transplantation with a stem-cell-seeded bioartificial nanocomposite: A proof-of-concept study. Lancet 378(9808), 1997-2004 (2011).
6. Caiazzo M, Dell'anno MT, Dvoretskova E et al. Direct generation of functional dopaminergic neurons from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nature 476(7359), 224-227 (2011).
7. Hubbell JA, Chilkoti A. Nanomaterials for drug delivery. Science 337(6092), 303-305 (2012).
8. Ranga A, Gjorevski N, Lutolf MP. Drug discovery through stem cell-based organoid models. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 69-70, 19-28 (2014).
9. Khademhosseini A, Vacanti J, Langer R. Progress in tissue engineering. Sci. Am. 300(5), 64-71 (2009).
10. Higuchi A, Ling Q-D, Hsu S-T, Umezawa A. Biomimetic cell culture proteins as extracellular matrices for stem cell differentiation. Chem. Rev. 112(8), 4507-4540 (2012).
11. Goodridge HS. Induced pluripotent stem cell derived myeloid phagocytes: disease modeling and therapeutic applications. Drug Discov. Today 19(6), 774-780 (2014).
12. Trappmann B, Gautrot JE, Connelly JT et al. Extracellularmatrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 11(7), 642-649 (2012).
13. Nakagawa M, Koyanagi M, Tanabe K et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat. Biotechnol. 26(1), 101-106 (2007).
14. Marklein RA, Burdick JA. Controlling stem cell fate with material design. Adv. Mater. 22(2), 175-189 (2010).
15. Mihaylova MM, Sabatini DM, Yilmaz OH. Dietary and metabolic control of stem cell function in physiology and cancer. Cell Stem Cell 14(3), 292-305 (2014).
16. Alberti K, Davey RE, Onishi K et al. Functional immobilization of signaling proteins enables control of stem cell fate. Nat. Methods 5(7), 645-650 (2008).
17. Higuchi A, Ling Q-D, Chang Y, Hsu S-T, Umezawa A. Physical cues of biomaterials guide stem cell differentiation fate. Chem. Rev. 113(5), 3297-3328 (2013).
18. Morrison SJ, Scadden DT. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 505(7483), 327-334 (2014).
19. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4), 677-689 (2006).
20. Chen W, Villa-Diaz LG, Sun Y et al. Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. ACS Nano 6(5), 4094-4103 (2012).
21. Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, Chen CS. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5(1), 17-26 (2009).
22. Mahmoudi M, Bonakdar S, Shokrgozar MA et al. Cell-imprinted substrates direct the fate of stem cells. ACS Nano 7(10), 8379-8384 (2013).
23. Gattazzo F, Urciuolo A, Bonaldo P. Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1840(8), 2506-2519 (2014).
24. Kretlow JD, Mikos AG. From material to tissue: biomaterial development, scaffold fabrication, and tissue engineering. AIChE J. 54(12), 3048-3067 (2008).
25. Fong EL, Watson BM, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Building bridges: leveraging interdisciplinary collaborations in the development of biomaterials to meet clinical needs. Adv. Mater. 24(36), 4995-5013 (2012).
26. Spradling A, Drummond-Barbosa D, Kai T. Stem cells find their niche. Nature 414(6859), 98-104 (2001).
27. Yamashita YM, Fuller MT, Jones DL. Signaling in stem cell niches: lessons from the Drosophila germline. J. Cell Sci. 118(4), 665-672 (2005).
28. Scadden DT. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 441(7097), 1075-1079 (2006).
29. Yamashita YM, Tumbar T. Stem cells and their niche in homeostasis/regeneration and disease. Mol. Biol. Cell 25(6), 736-736 (2014).
30. Moore KA, Lemischka IR. Stem cells and their niches. Science 311(5769), 1880-1885 (2006).
31. Li L, Xie T. Stem cell niche: structure and function. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 605-631 (2005).
32. Ehninger A, Trumpp A. The bone marrow stem cell niche grows up: mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages move in. J. Exp. Med. 208(3), 421-428 (2011).
33. Bianco P. Bone and the hematopoietic niche: A tale of two stem cells. Blood 117(20), 5281-5288 (2011).
34. Adams GB, Chabner KT, Alley IR et al. Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium-sensing receptor. Nature 439(7076), 599-603 (2005).
35. Yanes O, Clark J, Wong DM et al. Metabolic oxidation regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6(6), 411-417 (2010).
36. Mcmurray RJ, Gadegaard N, Tsimbouri PM et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat. Mater. 10(8), 637-644 (2011).
37. Reya T, Duncan AW, Ailles L et al. A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 423(6938), 409-414 (2003).
38. Murdoch B, Chadwick K, Martin M et al. Wnt-5A augments repopulating capacity and primitive hematopoietic development of human blood stem cells in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100(6), 3422-3427 (2003).
39. De Haan G, Weersing E, Dontje B et al. In vitro generation of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells by fibroblast growth factor-1. Dev. Cell 4(2), 241-251 (2003).
40. Lutolf MP, Blau HM. Artificial stem cell niches. Adv. Mater. 21(32-33), 3255-3268 (2009).
41. Rice JJ, Martino MM, De Laporte L, Tortelli F, Briquez PS, Hubbell JA. Engineering the regenerative microenvironment with biomaterials. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2(1), 57-71 (2013).
42. Sniadecki NJ, Desai RA, Ruiz SA, Chen CS. Nanotechnology for cell-substrate interactions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34(1), 59-74 (2006).
43. Seo CH, Furukawa K, Montagne K, Jeong H, Ushida T. The effect of substrate microtopography on focal adhesion maturation and actin organization via the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Biomaterials 32(36), 9568-9575 (2011).
44. Ferreira L, Karp JM, Nobre L, Langer R. New opportunities: the use of nanotechnologies to manipulate and track stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 3(2), 136-146 (2008).
45. Watt FM, Huck WT. Role of the extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14(8), 467-473 (2013).
46. Teo BKK, Wong ST, Lim CK et al. Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cell and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. ACS Nano 7(6), 4785-4798 (2013).
47. Trappmann B, Chen CS. How cells sense extracellular matrix stiffness: A material's perspective. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24(5), 948-953 (2013).
48. Worley K, Certo A, Wan LQ. Geometry-force control of stem cell fate. BioNanoSci 3(1), 43-51 (2013).
49. Conti MA, Even-Ram S, Liu C, Yamada KM, Adelstein RS. Defects in cell adhesion and the visceral endoderm following ablation of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II-A in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 279(40), 41263-41266 (2004).
50. Saha K, Keung AJ, Irwin EF et al. Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys. J. 95(9), 4426-4438 (2008).
51. Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffrezic N et al. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour. Mat. Sci. Eng. 23(4), 551-560 (2003).
52. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B et al. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 49(2), 155-166 (2000).
53. Ahmad M, Gawronski D, Blum J, Goldberg J, Gronowicz G. Differential response of human osteoblast-like cells to commercially pure (cp) titanium grades 1 and 4. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 46(1), 121-131 (1999).
54. Xu C, Inokuma MS, Denham J et al. Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19(10), 971-974 (2001).
55. Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295(5557), 1014-1017 (2002).
56. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110), 920-926 (1993).
57. Harrison R, St-Pierre J-P, Stevens M. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A year in review. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 20(1), 1-16 (2014).
58. Lutolf MP, Gilbert PM, Blau HM. Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate. Nature 462(7272), 433-441 (2009).
59. Fisher OZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R, Peppas NA. Bioinspired materials for controlling stem cell fate. Acc. Chem. Res. 43(3), 419-428 (2010).
60. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24(24), 4337-4351 (2003).
61. Buwalda SJ, Boere KW, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J, Vermonden T, Hennink WE. Hydrogels in a historical perspective: from simple networks to smart materials. J. Control. Release 190, 254-273 (2014).
62. Miyanishi K, Trindade MC, Lindsey DP et al. Effects of hydrostatic pressure and transforming growth factor- 3 on adult human mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis in vitro. Tissue Eng. 12(6), 1419-1428 (2006).
63. Bosnakovski D, Mizuno M, Kim G, Takagi S, Okumura M, Fujinaga T. Chondrogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in different hydrogels: influence of collagen type II extracellular matrix on MSC chondrogenesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 93(6), 1152-1163 (2006).
64. Hasegawa Y, Tang D, Takahashi N, Hayashizaki Y, Forrest AR, Suzuki H. CCL2 enhances pluripotency of human induced pluripotent stem cells by activating hypoxia related genes. Sci. Rep. 4, 5228 (2014).
65. Sun Y, Chen CS, Fu J. Forcing stem cells to behave: A biophysical perspective of the cellular microenvironment. Ann. Rev. Biophys. 41, 519-542 (2012).
66. Perestrelo AR, Grenha A, Rosa Da Costa AM, Belo JA. Locust bean gum as an alternative polymeric coating for embryonic stem cell culture. Mat. Sci. Eng. 40, 336-344 (2014).
67. Higashiyama S, Iwamoto R, Goishi K et al. The membrane protein CD9/DRAP 27 potentiates the juxtacrine growth factor activity of the membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. J. Cell Biol. 128(5), 929-938 (1995).
68. Verfaillie C, Catanzaro P. Direct contact with stroma inhibits proliferation of human long-term culture initiating cells. Leukemia 10(3), 498-504 (1996).
69. Joddar B, Ito Y. Artificial niche substrates for embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cell cultures. J. Biotechnol. 168(2), 218-228 (2013).
70. Klimanskaya I, Chung Y, Meisner L, Johnson J, West MD, Lanza R. Human embryonic stem cells derived without feeder cells. Lancet 365(9471), 1636-1641 (2005).
71. Lyssiotis CA, Lairson LL, Boitano AE, Wurdak H, Zhu S, Schultz PG. Chemical control of stem cell fate and developmental potential. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50(1), 200-242 (2011).
72. Madl CM, Mehta M, Duda GN, Heilshorn SC, Mooney DJ. Presentation of BMP-2 mimicking peptides in 3D hydrogels directs cell fate commitment in osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules 15(2), 445-455 (2014).
73. Kiessling L. Probing and perturbing stem cells with chemical biology. ACS Chem. Biol. 9(1), 1-2 (2014).
74. Cha C, Liechty WB, Khademhosseini A, Peppas NA. Designing biomaterials to direct stem cell fate. ACS Nano 6(11), 9353-9358 (2012).
75. Perloff A, Posner AS. Preparation of pure hydroxyapatite crystals. Science 124(3222), 583 (1956).
76. Moreno EC, Kresak M, Zahradnik RT. Fluoridated hydroxyapatite solubility and caries formation. Nature 247(5435), 64-65 (1974).
77. Montazeri L, Javadpour J, Shokrgozar MA, Bonakdar S, Javadian S. Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite and fluorhydroxyapatite nano-size powders. Biomed. Mater. 5(4), 045004 (2010).
78. Yan J, Sun J-F, Chu PK, Han Y, Zhang Y-M. Bone integration capability of a series of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite coatings formed by micro-arc oxidation. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Part A, 101(9), 2465-2480 (2013).
79. Bertoni E, Bigi A, Cojazzi G, Gandolfi M, Panzavolta S, Roveri N. Nanocrystals of magnesium and fluoride substituted hydroxyapatite. J. Inorgan. Biochem. 72(1-2), 29-35 (1998).
80. Qu H, Wei M. The effect of fluoride contents in fluoridated hydroxyapatite on osteoblast behavior. Acta Biomater. 2(1), 113-119 (2006).
81. Montazeri L, Javadpour J, Shokrgozar MA, Bonakdar S, Khayyat Moghaddam M, Asgary V. The interaction of plasma proteins with nano-size fluoride-substituted apatite powders. Ceramics International 39(6), 6145-6152 (2013).
82. Khetan S, Guvendiren M, Legant WR, Cohen DM, Chen CS, Burdick JA. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked threedimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 12(5), 458-465 (2013).
83. Liu X, Wang S. Three-dimensional nano-biointerface as a new platform for guiding cell fate. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(8), 2385-2340 (2014).
84. Shokrgozar MA, Fattahi M, Bonakdar S et al. Healing potential of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on a collagenbased scaffold for skin regeneration. Iran Biomed. J. 16(2), 68-76 (2012).
85. Reilly GC, Engler AJ. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. J. Biomech. 43(1), 55-62 (2010).
86. Abraham S, Eroshenko N, Rao RR. Role of bioinspired polymers in determination of pluripotent stem cell fate. Regen. Med. 4(4), 561-578 (2009).
87. Lewicka M, Hermanson O, Rising AU. Recombinant spider silk matrices for neural stem cell cultures. Biomaterials 33(31), 7712-717 (2012).
88. Singh N, Rahatekar SS, Koziol KKK et al. Directing chondrogenesis of stem cells with specific blends of cellulose and silk. Biomacromolecules 14(5), 1287-1298 (2013).
89. Kweon H, Yeo J-H, Lee K-G et al. Semi-interpenetrating polymer networks composed of silk fibroin and poly (ethylene glycol) for wound dressing. Biomed. Mater. 3(3), 034115 (2008).
90. Mauney JR, Nguyen T, Gillen K, Kirker-Head C, Gimble JM, Kaplan DL. Engineering adipose-like tissue in vitro and in vivo utilizing human bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 28(35), 5280-5290 (2007).
91. Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD. New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 238(4826), 491-497 (1987).
92. Jiang J, Papoutsakis ET. Stem-cell niche based comparative analysis of chemical and nano-mechanical material properties impacting ex vivo expansion and differentiation of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2(1), 25-42 (2012).
93. Curran JM, Chen R, Hunt JA. Controlling the phenotype and function of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro by adhesion to silane-modified clean glass surfaces. Biomaterials 26(34), 7057-7067 (2005).
94. Curran JM, Chen R, Hunt JA. The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate. Biomaterials 27(27), 4783-4793 (2006).
95. Benoit DS, Schwartz MP, Durney AR, Anseth KS. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Mater. 7(10), 816-823 (2008).
96. Rashidi H, Yang J, Shakesheff KM. Surface engineering of synthetic polymer materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Biomater. Sci. 2(10), 1318-1331 (2014).
97. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(17), 5953-5957 (2005).
98. GarciA AJ, Vega MaD, Boettiger D. Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate-dependent changes in fibronectin conformation. Mol. Biol. Cell 10(3), 785-798 (1999).
99. Brodbeck WG, Patel J, Voskerician G et al. Biomaterial adherent macrophage apoptosis is increased by hydrophilic and anionic substrates in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99(16), 10287-10292 (2002).
100. Ayala R, Zhang C, Yang D et al. Engineering the cell-material interface for controlling stem cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation. Biomaterials 32(15), 3700-3711 (2011).
101. Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat. Mater. 8(6), 457-470 (2009).
102. Han YL, Wang S, Zhang X et al. Engineering physical microenvironment for stem cell based regenerative medicine. Drug Discov. Today 19(6), 763-773 (2014).
103. Coburn JM, Gibson M, Monagle S, Patterson Z, Elisseeff JH. Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109(25), 10012-10017 (2012).
104. Woo KM, Chen VJ, Ma PX. Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 67(2), 531-537 (2003).
105. Chen VJ, Ma PX. Nano-fibrous poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds with interconnected spherical macropores. Biomaterials 25(11), 2065-2073 (2004).
106. Svensson L, Aszodi A, Reinholt FP, Fassler R, Heinegard D, Oldberg A. Fibromodulin-null mice have abnormal collagen fibrils, tissue organization, and altered lumican deposition in tendon. J. Biol. Chem. 274(14), 9636-9647 (1999).
107. Parry DAD, Squire JM. Fibrous Proteins: Coiled-Coils, Collagen and Elastomers. Elsevier, CA, USA (2005).
108. Tseng H, Grande-Allen KJ. Elastic fibers in the aortic valve spongiosa: A fresh perspective on its structure and role in overall tissue function. Acta Biomater. 7(5), 2101-2108 (2011).
109. Abrams GA, Schaus SS, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the corneal epithelial basement membrane and Descemet's membrane of the human. Cornea 19(1), 57-64 (2000).
110. Zeugolis DI, Khew ST, Yew ES et al. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nano-fibres: just an expensive way to make gelatin? Biomaterials 29(15), 2293-2305 (2008).
111. Schnell E, Klinkhammer K, Balzer S et al. Guidance of glial cell migration and axonal growth on electrospun nanofibers of poly-caprolactone and a collagen/poly-caprolactone blend. Biomaterials 28(19), 3012-3025 (2007).
112. Engelmayr GC, Cheng M, Bettinger CJ, Borenstein JT, Langer R, Freed LE. Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac anisotropy. Nat. Mater. 7(12), 1003-1010 (2008).
113. Fletcher DA, Mullins RD. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463(7280), 485-492 (2010).
114. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751), 1139-1143 (2005).
115. Shah N, Morsi Y, Manasseh R. From mechanical stimulation to biological pathways in the regulation of stem cell fate. Cell Biochem. Funct. 32(4), 309-325 (2014).
116. Wang HB, Dembo M, Wang YL. Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 279(5), C1345-C1350 (2000).
117. Vichare S, Sen S, Inamdar MM. Cellular mechanoadaptation to substrate mechanical properties: contributions of substrate stiffness and thickness to cell stiffness measurements using AFM. Soft Matter 10(8), 1174-1181 (2014).
118. Pelham RJ, Wang Y-L. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94(25), 13661-13665 (1997).
119. Stroka KM, Aranda-Espinoza H. Neutrophils display biphasic relationship between migration and substrate stiffness. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 66(6), 328-341 (2009).
120. Even-Ram S, Artym V, Yamada KM. Matrix control of stem cell fate. Cell 126(4), 645-647 (2006).
121. Leclerc E, Corlu A, Griscom L, Baudoin R, Legallais C. Guidance of liver and kidney organotypic cultures inside rectangular silicone microchannels. Biomaterials 27(22), 4109-4119 (2006).
122. Bani-Yaghoub M, Tremblay R, Voicu R et al. Neurogenesis and neuronal communication on micropatterned neurochips. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 92(3), 336-345 (2005).
123. Jeon K, Oh H-J, Lim H et al. Self-renewal of embryonic stem cells through culture on nanopattern polydimethylsiloxane substrate. Biomaterials 33(21), 5206-5220 (2012).
124. Leipzig ND, Shoichet MS. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials 30(36), 6867-6878 (2009).
125. Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KE et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329(5995), 1078-1081 (2010).
126. Blin G, Lablack N, Louis-Tisserand M, Nicolas C, Picart C, Puceat M. Nano-scale control of cellular environment to drive embryonic stem cells selfrenewal and fate. Biomaterials 31(7), 1742-1750 (2010).
127. Spadaccio C, Rainer A, Trombetta M et al. Poly-l-lactic acid/hydroxyapatite electrospun nanocomposites induce chondrogenic differentiation of human MSC. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37(7), 1376-1389 (2009).
128. Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, Von Der Mark K, Schmuki P. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm-an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 5(6), 666-671 (2009).
129. Shi X, Hudson JL, Spicer PP, Tour JM, Krishnamoorti R, Mikos AG. Injectable nanocomposites of single-walled carbon nanotubes and biodegradable polymers for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 7(7), 2237-2242 (2006).
130. Kam NWS, Jan E, Kotov NA. Electrical stimulation of neural stem cells mediated by humanized carbon nanotube composite made with extracellular matrix protein. Nano Lett. 9(1), 273-278 (2008).
131. Pulskamp K, Diabate S, Krug HF. Carbon nanotubes show no sign of acute toxicity but induce intracellular reactive oxygen species in dependence on contaminants. Toxicol. Lett. 168(1), 58-74 (2007).
132. Huczko A, Lange H, Cako E, Grubek-Jaworska H, Droszcz P. Physiological testing of carbon nanotubes: Are they asbestos-like? Fullerene Sci. Technol. 9(2), 251-254 (2001).
133. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R et al. Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to singlewalled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 289(5), L698-L708 (2005).
134. Warheit DB, Laurence B, Reed KL, Roach D, Reynolds G, Webb T. Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 77(1), 117-125 (2004).
135. Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8(3), 241-254 (2005).
136. Alexander NR, Branch KM, Parekh A et al. Extracellular matrix rigidity promotes invadopodia activity. Curr. Biol. 18(17), 1295-1299 (2008).
137. Paszek MJ, Weaver VM. The tension mounts: mechanics meets morphogenesis and malignancy. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 9(4), 325-342 (2004).
138. Lu P, Weaver VM, Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 196(4), 395-406 (2012).
139. Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324(5935), 1673-1677 (2009).
140. Fischer RS, Myers KA, Gardel ML, Waterman CM. Stiffness-controlled three-dimensional extracellular matrices for high-resolution imaging of cell behavior. Nat. Protoc. 7(11), 2056-2066 (2012).
141. Rehfeldt F, Engler AJ, Eckhardt A, Ahmed F, Discher DE. Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment: implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59(13), 1329-1339 (2007).
142. Martino S, D'angelo F, Armentano I, Kenny JM, Orlacchio A. Stem cell-biomaterial interactions for regenerative medicine. Biotechnol. Adv. 30(1), 338-351 (2012).
143. Saldana L, Crespo L, Bensiamar F, Arruebo M, Vilaboa N. Mechanical forces regulate stem cell response to surface topography. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Part A 102(1), 128-140 (2014).
144. Ahn EH, Kim Y, An SS et al. Spatial control of adult stem cell fate using nanotopographic cues. Biomaterials 35(8), 2401-2410 (2014).
145. Rosa A, Kato R, Castro Raucci L et al. Nanotopography drives stem cell fate toward osteoblast differentiation through 11 integrin signaling pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 115(3), 540-548 (2014).
146. Lu D, Luo C, Zhang C, Li Z, Long M. Differential regulation of morphology and stemness of mouse embryonic stem cells by substrate stiffness and topography. Biomaterials 35(13), 3945-3955 (2014).
147. Ajami E, Mahno E, Mendes V, Bell S, Moineddin R, Davies J. Bone healing and the effect of implant surface topography on osteoconduction in hyperglycemia. Acta Biomater. 10(1), 394-405 (2014).
148. Bae D, Moon S-H, Park BG et al. Nanotopographical control for maintaining undifferentiated human embryonic stem cell colonies in feeder free conditions. Biomaterials 35(3), 916-928 (2014).
149. Bettinger CJ, Langer R, Borenstein JT. Engineering substrate topography at the micro-and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48(30), 5406-5415 (2009).
150. Kolind K, Leong KW, Besenbacher F, Foss M. Guidance of stem cell fate on 2D patterned surfaces. Biomaterials 33(28), 6626-6633 (2012).
151. Choi YY, Chung BG, Lee DH, Khademhosseini A, Kim J-H, Lee S-H. Controlled-size embryoid body formation in concave microwell arrays. Biomaterials 31(15), 4296-4303 (2010).
152. Park J, Cho CH, Parashurama N et al. Microfabricationbased modulation of embryonic stem cell differentiation. Lab Chip 7(8), 1018-1028 (2007).
153. Sasaki D, Shimizu T, Masuda S et al. Mass preparation of size-controlled mouse embryonic stem cell aggregates and induction of cardiac differentiation by cell patterning method. Biomaterials 30(26), 4384-4389 (2009).
154. Gentile F, Tirinato L, Battista E et al. Cells preferentially grow on rough substrates. Biomaterials 31(28), 7205-7212 (2010).
155. Vandrovcova M, Hanus J, Drabik M et al. Effect of different surface nanoroughness of titanium dioxide films on the growth of human osteoblast-like MG63 cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100(4), 1016-1032 (2012).
156. Mendonca DB, Miguez PA, Mendonca G, Yamauchi M, Aragao FJ, Cooper LF. Titanium surface topography affects collagen biosynthesis of adherent cells. Bone 49(3), 463-472 (2011).
157. Galli C, Passeri G, Ravanetti F, Elezi E, Pedrazzoni M, Macaluso GM. Rough surface topography enhances the activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesenchymal cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 95(3), 682-690 (2010).
158. Frey MT, Tsai IY, Russell TP, Hanks SK, Wang YL. Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. Biophys. J. 90(10), 3774-3782 (2006).
159. Recknor JB, Recknor JC, Sakaguchi DS, Mallapragada SK. Oriented astroglial cell growth on micropatterned polystyrene substrates. Biomaterials 25(14), 2753-2767 (2004).
160. Yim EK, Darling EM, Kulangara K, Guilak F, Leong KW. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31(6), 1299-1306 (2010).
161. Bucaro MA, Vasquez Y, Hatton BD, Aizenberg J. Finetuning the degree of stem cell polarization and alignment on ordered arrays of high-aspect-ratio nanopillars. ACS Nano 6(7), 6222-6230 (2012).
162. Gerecht S, Bettinger CJ, Zhang Z, Borenstein JT, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Langer R. The effect of actin disrupting agents on contact guidance of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 28(28), 4068-4077 (2007).
163. Park J, Bauer S, Von Der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 7(6), 1686-1691 (2007).
164. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YJ et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106(7), 2130-2135 (2009).
165. Smith LA, Liu X, Hu J, Wang P, Ma PX. Enhancing osteogenic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by nanofibers. Tissue Eng. Part A 15(7), 1855-1864 (2009).
166. Xie J, Willerth SM, Li X et al. The differentiation of embryonic stem cells seeded on electrospun nanofibers into neural lineages. Biomaterials 30(3), 354-362 (2009).
167. Jiang X, Cao HQ, Shi LY, Ng SY, Stanton LW, Chew SY. Nanofiber topography and sustained biochemical signaling enhance human mesenchymal stem cell neural commitment. Acta Biomater. 8(3), 1290-1302 (2012).
168. Elias KL, Price RL, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials 23(15), 3279-3287 (2002).
169. Schindler M, Ahmed I, Kamal J. A synthetic nanofibrillar matrix promotes in vivo-like organization and morphogenesis for cells in culture. Biomaterials 26(28), 5624-5631 (2005).
170. Schernthaner M, Reisinger B, Wolinski H et al. Nanopatterned polymer substrates promote endothelial proliferation by initiation of -catenin transcriptional signaling. Acta Biomater. 8(8), 2953-2962 (2012).
171. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo RO. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater. 13(6), 558-569 (2014).
172. Tsimbouri PM, Mcmurray RJ, Burgess KV et al. Using nanotopography and metabolomics to identify biochemical effectors of multipotency. ACS Nano 6(11), 10239-10249 (2012).
173. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 6(12), 997-1003 (2007).
174. Kingham E, White K, Gadegaard N, Dalby MJ, Oreffo RO. Nanotopographical cues augment mesenchymal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Small 9(12), 2140-2151 (2013).
175. Ji L, Lapointe VL, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Changes in embryonic stem cell colony morphology and early differentiation markers driven by colloidal crystal topographical cues. Eur. Cell Mater. 23, 135-146 (2012).
176. Kong YP, Tu CH, Donovan PJ, Yee AF. Expression of Oct4 in human embryonic stem cells is dependent on nanotopographical configuration. Acta Biomater. 9(5), 6369-6380 (2013).
177. Das RK, Zouani OF, Labrugere C, Oda R, Durrieu M-C. Influence of nanohelical shape and periodicity on stem cell fate. ACS Nano 7(4), 3351-3361 (2013).
178. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: A review. Tissue Eng. 11(1-2), 1-18 (2005).
179. Llopis-Hernandez V, Rico P, Moratal D, Altankov G, Salmeron-Sanchez M. Role of material-driven fibronectin fibrillogenesis in protein remodeling. BioRes. Open Access 2(5), 364-373 (2013).
180. Gonzalez-Garcia C, Moratal D, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ, Salmeron-Sanchez M. Surface mobility regulates skeletal stem cell differentiation. Integr. Biol. 4(5), 531-539 (2012).
181. Ferreira L, Squier T, Park H, Choe H, Kohane DS, Langer R. Human embryoid bodies containing nano and microparticulate delivery vehicles. Adv. Mater. 20(12), 2285-2291 (2008).
182. Kutsuzawa K, Chowdhury E, Nagaoka M, Maruyama K, Akiyama Y, Akaike T. Surface functionalization of inorganic nano-crystals with fibronectin and E-cadherin chimera synergistically accelerates trans-gene delivery into embryonic stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 350(3), 514-520 (2006).
183. Kutsuzawa K, Akaike T, Chowdhury EH. The influence of the cell-adhesive proteins E-cadherin and fibronectin embedded in carbonate-apatite DNA carrier on transgene delivery and expression in a mouse embryonic stem cell line. Biomaterials 29(3), 370-376 (2008).
184. Green JJ, Zhou BY, Mitalipova MM et al. Nanoparticles for gene transfer to human embryonic stem cell colonies. Nano Lett. 8(10), 3126-3130 (2008).
185. Ruan J, Shen J, Wang Z et al. Efficient preparation and labeling of human induced pluripotent stem cells by nanotechnology. Int. J. Nanomed. 6, 425 (2011).
186. Ahmed I, Kamal J, Schindler M, Meiners S. Threedimensional nanofibrillar surfaces promote self renewal in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24(2), 426-433 (2006).
187. Silva GA, Czeisler C, Niece KL et al. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanofibers. Science 303(5662), 1352-1355 (2004).
188. Lord MS, Foss M, Besenbacher F. Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response. Nano Today 5(1), 66-78 (2010).
189. Jonsson U, Ivarsson B, Lundstrom I, Berghem L. Adsorption behavior of fibronectin on well-characterized silica surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 90(1), 148-163 (1982).
190. Macdonald D, Deo N, Markovic B, Stranick M, Somasundaran P. Adsorption and dissolution behavior of human plasma fibronectin on thermally and chemically modified titanium dioxide particles. Biomaterials 23(4), 1269-1279 (2002).
191. Arima Y, Iwata H. Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 28(20), 3074-3082 (2007).
192. Cai K, Bossert JR, Jandt KD. Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 49(2), 136-144 (2006).
193. Hovgaard MB, Rechendorff K, Chevallier J, Foss M, Besenbacher F. Fibronectin adsorption on tantalum: the influence of nanoroughness. J. Phys. Chem. B 112(28), 8241-8249 (2008).
194. Lord M, Cousins B, Doherty P et al. The effect of silica nanoparticulate coatings on serum protein adsorption and cellular response. Biomaterials 27(28), 4856-4862 (2006).
195. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng. 7(3), 291-301 (2001).
196. Vertegel AA, Siegel RW, Dordick JS. Silica nanoparticle size influences the structure and enzymatic activity of adsorbed lysozyme. Langmuir 20(16), 6800-6807 (2004).
197. Tsai W-B, Ting Y-C, Yang J-Y, Lai J-Y, Liu H-L. Fibronectin modulates the morphology of osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on nano-grooved substrates. J. Mater. Sci. 20(6), 1367-1378 (2009).
198. Sutherland DS, Broberg M, Nygren H, Kasemo B. Influence of nanoscale surface topography and chemistry on the functional behaviour of an adsorbed model macromolecule. Macromol. Biosci. 1(6), 270-273 (2001).
199. Huang H-H, Wu C-P, Sun Y-S, Yang W-E, Lin M-C, Lee T-H. Surface nanoporosity of -type Ti-25Nb-25Zr alloy for the enhancement of protein adsorption and cell response. Surf. Coat. Technol. 259(Part B), 206-212( 2014).
200. Low YKA, Zou X, Fang Y et al. -phase poly (vinylidene fluoride) films encouraged more homogeneous cell distribution and more significant deposition of fibronectin towards the cell-material interface compared with -phase poly (vinylidene fluoride) films. Mat. Sci. Eng. 34, 345-353 (2014).
201. Del Campo A, Arzt E. Fabrication approaches for generating complex micro-and nanopatterns on polymeric surfaces. Chem. Rev. 108(3), 911-945 (2008).
202. Turner L-A, Downes S, Hill E, Kinloch I. Investigating the suitability of electrohydrodynamic lithography for the fabrication of cell substrates. J. Mater. Sci. 49(11), 4045-4057 (2014).
203. Bosworth LA, Turner L-A, Cartmell SH. State of the art composites comprising electrospun fibres coupled with hydrogels: A review. Nanomedicine 9(3), 322-335 (2013).
204. Chen G-Y, Pang D-P, Hwang S-M, Tuan H-Y, Hu Y-C. A graphene-based platform for induced pluripotent stem cells culture and differentiation. Biomaterials 33(2), 418-427 (2012).
205. Mashinchian O, Bonakdar S, Taghinejad H et al. Cell-imprinted substrates act as artificial niche for skin regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(15), 13280-13292 (2014).