Effect of different surface nanoroughness of titanium dioxide films on the growth of human osteoblast-like MG63 cells

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 100 A, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1016-1032

  Vandrovcova, Marta ^a   Hanus, Jan ^b   Drabik, Martin ^b   Kylian, Ondrej ^b   Biederman, Hynek ^b   Lisa, Vera ^a   Bacakova, Lucie ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

cell adhesion; cell differentiation; cell proliferation; material surface chemistry; nanoscale surface roughness; titanium dioxide

Indexed keywords

ADHERING CELLS; CELL BEHAVIORS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUMBER; CELL SPREADING; CELL-POPULATION DENSITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; COATED SURFACE; GLASS SUBSTRATES; HUMAN OSTEOBLAST LIKES; MATERIAL CHEMISTRY; MATERIAL SURFACE; MATERIAL SURFACE CHEMISTRY; MG63 CELLS; NANO-SCALE SURFACE ROUGHNESS; NANOROUGHNESS; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; POLYSTYRENE DISHES; TIO; TITANIUM DIOXIDE FILMS;

ADHESION; BIOMATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; OXIDES; POLYSTYRENES; POPULATION STATISTICS; PROTEINS; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TOPOGRAPHY;

CELLS;

BETA ACTIN; BETA1 INTEGRIN; NANOCOATING; NANOFILM; OSTEOCALCIN; POLYSTYRENE; TALIN; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; VINCULIN;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL DENSITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MATURATION; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MG63 CELL; OSTEOBLAST; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINE; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84857372779     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34047     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK,. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants-A review. Prog Mater Sci 2009; 54: 397-425.
2. Long M, Rack HJ,. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-A materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1621-1639.
3. Steinemann SG,. Titanium-The material of choice? Periodontology 2000 1998; 17: 7-21.
4. 2 deposited by MOCVD and of collagen deposited from a gel. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 2075-2083.
5. Carballo-Vila M, Moreno-Burriel B, Chinarro E, Jurado JR, Casañ-Pastor N, Collazos-Castro JE,. Titanium oxide as substrate for neural cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 94-105.
6. 2/perlite composite and its surface modification with fibronectin. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2813-2826.
7. 2 coating for reducing hospital-acquired infection. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 85: 220-224.
8. He J, Zhou W, Zhou X, Zhong X, Zhang X, Wan P, Zhu B, Chen W,. The anatase phase of nanotopography titania plays an important role on osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 3465-3472.
9. Sawase T, Jimbo R, Baba K, Shibata Y, Ikeda T, Atsuta M,. Photo-induced hydrophilicity enhances initial cell behavior and early bone apposition. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 491-496.
10. Bacakova L, Filova E, Rypacek F, Svorcik V, Stary V,. Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering. Physiol Res 2004; 53 (Suppl. 1): S35-S45.
11. Bacakova L, Svorcik V,. Cell colonization control by physical and chemical modification of materials. In:, Kimura D, editor. Cell Growth Processes: New Research. 2008 Nova Science Publisher, Inc. Hauppauge, N.Y. p 5-56. ISBN: 978-1-60456-123-6.
12. Clark P,. Cell behaviour on micropatterned surfaces. Biosens Bioelectron 1994; 9: 657-661.
13. Ito Y,. Surface micropatterning to regulate cell functions. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 2333-2342.
14. Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Schwartz Z,. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2219-2232.
15. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD,. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2821-2829.
16. Khang D, Lu J, Yao Ch, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ,. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 970-983.
17. Liu H, Yazici H, Ergun C, Webster TJ, Bermek H,. An in vitro evaluation of the Ca/P ratio for the cytocompatibility of nano-to-micron particulate calcium phosphates for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 1472-1479.
18. Mendonça G, Mendonça DBS, Aragão FJL, Cooper LF,. Advancing dental implant surface technology-From micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3822-3835.
19. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus CRH, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res A 2000; 51: 475-483.
20. Christenson EM, Anseth KS, van den Beucken JJP, Chan CK, Ercan B, Jansen JA, Laurencin CT, Li W-J, Murugan R, Nair LS, Ramakrishna S, Tuan RS, Webster TJ, Mikos AG,. Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics. J Orthop Res 2007; 25: 11-22.
21. Schwartz Z, Bell BF, Wang L, Zhao G, Olivares-Navarrete R, Boyan BD,. Beta-1 integrins mediate substrate dependent effects of 1alpha,25(OH)2D3 on osteoblasts. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007; 103: 606-609.
22. Olivares-Navarrete R, Raz P, Zhao G, Chen J, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Chaudhri RA, Ornoy A, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z,. Integrin alpha2beta1 plays a critical role in osteoblast response to micron-scale surface structure and surface energy of titanium substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 15767-15772.
23. Cutler SM, García AJ,. Engineering cell adhesive surfaces that direct integrin alpha5beta1 binding using a recombinant fragment of fibronectin. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1759-1770.
24. Yamada M, Miyauchi T, Yamamoto A, Iwasa F, Takeuchi M, Anpo M, Sakurai K, Baba K, Ogawa T,. Enhancement of adhesion strength and cellular stiffness of osteoblasts on mirror-polished titanium surface by UV-photofunctionalization. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 4578-4588.
25. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ,. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265-275.
26. Filova E, Brynda E, Riedel T, Bacakova L, Chlupac J, Lisa V, Houska M, Dyr JE,. Vascular endothelial cells on two- and three-dimensional fibrin assemblies for biomaterial coatings. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 55-69.
27. Grausova L, Bacakova L, Kromka A, Vanecek M, Lisa V,. Molecular markers of adhesion, maturation and immune activation of human osteoblast-like MG 63 cells on nanocrystalline diamond films. Diamond Relat Mater 2009; 18: 258-263.
28. 4 hydrolysis. Appl Catal B Environ 2000; 26: 207-215.
29. 2/HCl solution and heat treatment. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 473-480.
30. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1803-1810.
31. Bacakova L, Stary V, Kofronova O, Lisa V,. Polishing and coating carbon fiber-reinforced carbon composites with a carbon-titanium layer enhances adhesion and growth of osteoblast-like MG63 cells and vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54: 567-578.
32. Anselme K, Bigerelle M,. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater 2005; 1: 211-222.
33. Rosa AL, Beloti MM,. Effect of cpTi surface roughness on human bone marrow cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Braz Dent J 2003; 14: 16-21.
34. Lipski AM, Pino CJ, Haselton FR, Chen IW, Shastri VP,. The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3836-3846.
35. Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, Habersetzer P, Wieland M, Jeanfils J, Hardouin P, Landolt D,. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2695-2711.
36. de Oliveira PT, Nanci A,. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 403-413.
37. de Oliveira PT, Zalzal SF, Beloti MM, Rosa AL, Nanci A,. Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 80: 554-564.
38. Kalbacova M, Rezek B, Baresova V, Wolf-Brandstetter C, Kromka A,. Nanoscale topography of nanocrystalline diamonds promotes differentiation of osteoblasts. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 3076-3085.
39. Kalbacova M, Kalbac M, Dunsch L, Kromka A, Vanecek M, Rezek B, Hempel U, Kmoch S,. The effect of SWCNT and nano-diamond films on human osteoblast cells. Phys Stat Sol B 2007; 244: 4356-4359.
40. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1221-1227.
41. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheiderler L, Altebaeumer T, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kern D,. Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron- and submicron scale porous structures of titanium surfaces. Cells Tissues Organs 2004; 178: 13-22.
42. Kunzler TP, Huwiler Ch, Drobek T, Vörös J, Spencer ND,. Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradient. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 5000-5006.
43. Rice JM, Hunt JA, Gallagher JA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, Gold J,. Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblast and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4799-4818.